California, coalition of states sue Trump over move to revoke EV mandate
'We made a promise that if the president attempted to illegally interfere with our clean air standards, we'd hold him accountable in court,' California Attorney General Rob Bonta said at a press conference announcing the lawsuit.
'Today, we are making good on that promise,' he added.
Bonta submitted the complaint in the Northern District of California together with his colleagues in Colorado, Delaware, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington.
He said he filed the lawsuit moments after Trump signed three congressional resolutions, which California regulations that had aimed to phase out gas-powered cars by 2035 — and then prompted 11 other states to follow suit.
Rather than directly overturning the rules, the resolutions revoked the Biden administration's authorization of the Golden State's policy. This action occurred via the Congressional Review Act (CRA), which enables the repeal of recently approved regulations with a simple majority.
'We refuse to let this unprecedented and illegal use of the CRA undermine the Clean Air Act waivers that give California the authority to enforce our own mission standards,' Bonta said.
The attorney general was referring to California's unique ability to set stronger-than-federal standards through a 1970 Clean Air Act clause, written amid historic smog conditions in the Los Angeles area. To do so, however, the Golden State must first apply to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for a waiver for each proposed rule — and only following that approval can other states adopt similar such thresholds.
The waiver targeted by Congress and the Trump administration through the CRA received the EPA's approval in December under then-President Biden and enabled the implementation of several key California regulations.
Among the rules repealed as a result of the resolutions is California's Advanced Clean Cars II rule, which required that 35 percent of cars sold in the state in 2026 to be zero-emissions, 68 percent in 2030 and 100 percent in 2035.
A second rule was the Golden State's 'Omnibus regulation,' which sought to cut heavy-duty nitrogen oxide emissions by 90 percent, revamp engine testing procedures and further extend engine warranties.
A third was the Advanced Clean Trucks rule — a regulation that has focused on accelerating the state's transition to less-polluting trucks and would have required 7.5 percent of these vehicles to be emissions-free by 2035.
'Trump's all-out assault on California continues – and this time he's destroying our clean air and America's global competitiveness in the process,' Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) said in a statement on Thursday. 'We are suing to stop this latest illegal action by a President who is a wholly-owned subsidiary of big polluters.'
Bonta, meanwhile, emphasized that no federal administration, Democrat or Republican, has ever voiced disapproval of California's emissions waivers.
'The federal government's actions are not only unlawful, they're irrational and wildly partisan,' he said. 'They come at the direct expense of the health and the well-being of our people, of Californians.'
Accusing Trump of adhering to a 'divisive, partisan agenda' that is endangering the economy, the environment and American lives, Bonta emphasized California's commitment to ensuring that 'future generations inherit a livable planet with breathable air.'
'We don't expect the president's barrage of unlawful, chaotic and disruptive executive orders and actions to slow down, which means neither will our work ahead,' he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Implies Epstein Poached Virginia Giuffre From Mar-A-Lago Spa: 'He Stole Her'
President Donald Trump suggested he fell off with Jeffrey Epstein because the disgraced financier 'stole' Virginia Giuffre as an employee from his Mar-a-Lago spa. The president was speaking to reporters Tuesday when he was asked for further details on his split with onetime pal Epstein. On Monday, Trump admitted that the fracture in their relationship was because Epstein hired some of his workers from his Florida resort, contradicting previous White House explanations that it was because the convicted sex offender was a 'creep.' A day later, the president was asked whether Giuffre, one of Epstein's most prominent accusers, was one of the people 'stolen.' 'I don't know,' Trump said. 'I think she worked at the spa. I think so. I think that was one of the people. He stole her. And by the way that she had no complaints about us, as you know. None whatsoever.' Giuffre, who died by suicide in April, met Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell while she was working at Trump's Mar-a-Lago club as a teenager in 2000. Maxwell offered Giuffre a job as Epstein's masseuse, which led to years of sex trafficking and abuse. Giuffre, who died aged 41, became an advocate for sex trafficking survivors. She sued Epstein and Maxwell, then took her accusations public, and also accused Prince Andrew of abusing her. A photo of Giuffre as a 17-year-old posing with the British royal and Maxwell ― which was taken by Epstein ― became infamous. Andrew denied her allegations and settled a lawsuit out of court. In 2019, Epstein was arrested on federal sex trafficking charges and later died in custody. Maxwell, a British socialite, was sentenced in 2022 to 20 years in prison for her role in helping Epstein recruit underage girls for sexual abuse. The Epstein scandal continues to engulf the Trump presidency weeks after the Department of Justice failed to release more documents on the tycoon. A two-page DOJ memo published July 7 stated there was no evidence of a 'client list' of powerful figures Epstein could potentially blackmail. A Wall Street Journal story published on July 17, which detailed a lewd birthday letter sent by Trump to Epstein, kept the controversy in the headlines. Trump dismissed the letter as a fake, and sued reporters behind the story and the paper's owner. On Tuesday, Trump provided more details on his rift with Epstein, explaining that 'people were taken out of the spa' at Mar-a-Lago. Trump said: 'I heard about it, I told him. I said, 'Listen, we don't want you taking our people, whether it was spa or not spa.' I don't want him taking people. And he was 'fine.' And then not too long after that, he did it again. And I said, 'Out of here.'' Related... Trump Gives Totally Different Answer Than White House For Epstein Split Trump Wants Murdoch Swiftly Deposed Over Epstein Story Because Of Age And Health 'Yikes': Critics Claim Trump Let Out Epic 'Freudian Slip' About Jeffrey Epstein
Chicago Tribune
11 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Column: Japan trade deal is more than meets the eye
The Trump administration has reached an important economic agreement with Japan. International trade and finance today are complicated, and therefore, agreements can be difficult to sum up briefly. In this case, there is also significant background, somewhat different from our history with Europe, that bears in important ways on the specifics of the accord. Japan has committed to provide $550 billion in new funding to the United States in the form of investment, loans and loan guarantees. President Donald Trump is justified in declaring that the agreement represents a major victory for his approach of negotiating concessions from other nations, especially major partners in Asia and Europe. However, the agreement is also precisely in line with the long-term strategy of Japan to sidestep U.S. restrictions on direct imports by emphasizing investment in our country. This dates from the Reagan administration, years when trade and other frictions between Tokyo and Washington were at a peak. Reagan officials pressed their counterparts in Japan to accept what were termed 'voluntary export agreements,' meaning in fact a ceiling on exports to the U.S. Automobiles were a high priority, reflecting the fact that the traditional Big Three U.S. auto manufacturers — American Motors (and successor Chrysler), Ford and GM — were suffering from growing, increasingly successful competition from Japan and also Europe. Nissan, Toyota, Fiat, Volkswagen and other foreign firms were making great inroads in North America. Japanese car manufacturers responded to the new, significant challenge represented by the U.S. voluntary export agreements in two ways. First, their export profiles were changed. Emphasis on compact cars was shifted to a new emphasis on larger, more luxurious models. Toyota's transformation is especially striking in this regard. Second, tremendous new emphasis was given to building manufacturing facilities within the United States. The second dimension effectively embedded foreign manufacturers in the U.S, establishing a strategic position that would greatly benefit foreign vehicle manufacturers over the long term. President Trump has a strong personal interest in, indeed fascination with, traditional economic tariffs. However, beginning with the Bretton Woods institutions, initially defined by the Allied powers at a New Hampshire conference in 1944, such trade tariffs have become generally regulated and stabilized at relatively low levels. Significant tariff wars, along with competitive currency devaluations, were rightly viewed as major contributing factors to interwar economic dislocations, capped by the Great Depression. This, in turn spawned totalitarian dictatorships and led to World War II. The creation of the United Nations in 1945 institutionalized efforts to maintain greater international stability. The UN has been an umbrella for the Bretton Woods institutions – the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), now the World Trade Organization (WTO), along with the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. The end of the Cold War permitted the UN family of institutions to become truly global. The rise of China, and serious competition with the United States that encompasses ideological and military as well as economic dimensions, places a premium on close, positive cooperation with other Asia powers. Japan along with India and South Korea, and the special case of Taiwan, are all lynchpin components important to the containment effort. Farsighted U.S. foreign policies since World War II created durable ties with economically and militarily significant nations in East and South Asia. The nations cited are also today functioning democracies. Japan's shrewd, flexible adjustment to changing U.S. political winds over the long term is also fundamentally important.
The Hill
11 minutes ago
- The Hill
India overtakes China as top smartphone exporter to US amid Apple shift
India has overtaken China as the leading exporter of smartphones to the U.S., as Apple continues to shift production in the face of the Trump administration's tariffs, according to new research released Monday. Canalys, a global tech market analyst firm, found that 44 percent of U.S. smartphones were manufactured in India in the second quarter of 2025, while just 25 percent were manufactured in China during the same three-month period. This represents a massive 240 percent jump for India, which produced only 13 percent of American smartphones between April and June of last year, when China commanded 61 percent of the market. 'India became the leading manufacturing hub for smartphones sold in the US for the very first time in Q2 2025, largely driven by Apple's accelerated supply chain shift to India amid an uncertain trade landscape between the US and China,' Sanyam Chaurasia, a principal analyst at Canalys, said in a press release. Apple produces the vast majority of its products in China but has increasingly sought to diversity its supply chains by moving some manufacturing to India and Vietnam. Vietnam also saw its share of U.S. smartphone production grow in the second quarter, overtaking China with 30 percent of the market. At the same time last year, Vietnam was responsible for 24 percent of U.S. smartphone production. Apple's shift toward India and Vietnam has been a double-edged sword. In the face of sky-high tariffs on Chinese goods earlier this year, the iPhone maker said the majority of its U.S. products would come from the two countries. The Trump administration raised tariffs on Chinese imports to 145 percent earlier this year, in response to which Beijing raised its import tax on American goods to 125 percent. The two sides ultimately agreed to lower these rates to 30 percent and 10 percent in May, a truce they agreed to extend for another 90 days on Tuesday. However, President Trump has also gone after Apple for its overseas manufacturing, threatening the company with a 25 percent tariff in May unless it moved more manufacturing to the U.S. Experts have warned this is largely infeasible given it would require massive investments and an extended period of time to move smartphone manufacturing to the U.S., while also resulting in higher smartphone prices. Trump never followed through on his threat to tariff Apple, but the iPhone maker is bracing for the administration's next move, as the president's 'reciprocal' tariffs are set to take effect Friday after a 90-day delay. Trump announced in early July that he had reached a trade deal with Vietnam, in which U.S. goods would enter the country duty-free while Vietnamese imports would face a 20 percent tariff. Goods shipped through Vietnam will face a higher 40 percent rate. The deal had not been finalized as of mid-July, although Trump said it was 'pretty well set,' according to Reuters. The administration has not yet reached an agreement with India.
