Consultation On ECE Licensing Criteria Open
Associate Education Minister David Seymour says that the Ministry of Education are now consulting on changing, merging, or removing approximately three-quarters of the Early Childhood Education (ECE) licensing criteria.
'Earlier this year the ECE Sector Review instigated 15 changes to modernise and simplify regulations,' Mr Seymour says.
'The changes to the ECE regulations show the power of a sector review. The Ministry for Regulation went in and listened to the people who actually run, work at, and use early childhood education. They found people encircled by multiple regulators enforcing out of date rules, and proposed solutions.
'The biggest complaint arises from the calcified, high stakes licencing criteria - 98 of them - that can each have a centre shut down with little to no notice. We are consulting on changing, merging, or removing approximately three-quarters of them.
'Some of the proposals being consulted on include more digital information distribution, more clarity, and Removing duplication of regulations that are covered by other authorities.
New licensing criteria will be gazetted by the end of September. Consultation on changes to these is open until 24 July. You can have your say here: Have your say - Ministry of Education.
'By the end of next year ECE providers will be governed by a regulatory system which ensures regulations are focused on what matters – providing safe, high-quality care and education as the changes are rolled out over the coming year,' Mr Seymour says.
'ECE providers will no longer be burdened with 98 separate licensing criteria, many of which were arbitrary or outdated.
'By mid next year, graduated enforcement tools will be used to respond to breaches of the remaining licensing criteria. The only enforcement tools previously available were too blunt a tool for managing minor breaches and allowing early intervention. There will no longer be high-stakes open-or-shut rules that create anxiety and strained relationships for regulators and centre operators alike.'
Graduated enforcement will give the regulator a range of enforcement measures. They will be able to respond proportionately to breaches, changing the sector's culture from a punitive approach to promoting quality.
'The changes to the licensing criteria represents a major shakeup of the sector's outdated system. Consultation will make the new licensing criteria great for children, parents and ECE service providers,' Mr Seymour says.
'There is huge demand for ECEs from families across New Zealand, however numbers show supply isn't keeping up. That is why we are committed to making changes which will allow the industry to expand and provide more high-quality services for families and their children.
'In the meantime, recent amendments to the pay parity opt-in scheme aim to provide some relief to ECE services.
'In a high-cost economy, regulation isn't neutral. It's a tax on growth. Every completed review makes it easier to do business, access services, and innovate in New Zealand. The ECE review is the first of many examples of what smarter regulation looks like in action.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
16 hours ago
- Scoop
73 Per Cent Positive Feedback On School Lunches
Associate Minister of Education Associate Education Minister David Seymour is pleased to see the Healthy School Lunch Programme Term 3 menu has received positive feedback from three quarters of students, and complaints have fallen by 92 per cent, while at the same time taxpayers are saving over $130 million. 'The menu for Term 3 is being tested with students across the lower North Island. The result is 73 per cent positive feedback. Any parent knows getting children to like something is no easy task. I'd say if you're winning 73 per cent of the time, that's a great result', Mr Seymour says. Taste testing took place at schools across Taranaki, Palmerston North, Wairarapa, Wellington, Hawke's Bay, and the Bay of Plenty. In total more than 120 students provided feedback during these sessions, forming the basis for the 73 per cent positive rating. 'Since the beginning of Term 1 2025, the Programme has delivered over 13.8 million nutritious meals, to 242,000 students, in 1011 schools,' says Mr Seymour. 'This marks the first time a single national supplier has provided meals at such scale, let alone meals which children enjoy, are nutritious, and are delivered on time. We are providing a high-quality service which is affordable for taxpayers. 'The Programme has taken on feedback and responded to issues as they arise. For example, in Term 1, students were unhappy with menu variation and meal quality. The variation and quality improved in Term 2, and students say they've been enjoying their lunches. 'The Programme must also be financially responsible. That's why we are committed to reducing surplus meals. We are working towards this by ensuring students enjoy the meals and adjusting order volumes to better align with student attendance. 'Previously there were issues with meals not arriving on time. The Programme got more trucks, streamlined delivery routes, and heard from principals and schools how they could address concerns. Now they deliver on-time, more than 98 per cent of the time, every day. 'Many of the previous issues arose from the use of 'stop gap' frozen meals, exacerbated by Libelle's liquidation. This has been fixed. Equipment was upgraded, and staff numbers increased, to increase meal production and control quality better. Production is now exceeding daily targets, and two million meals are expected to be ready for distribution by the start of Term 3. 'Since March, complaints to the Ministry have reduced by 92 per cent. The transparent feedback system has allowed the programme to be responsive and effective at improving processes. 'The programme has also already realised taxpayer savings of over $130 million. $8 million of those savings will go to ensuring 10,000 children in early learning services receive a taxpayer funded lunch every day. 'When the Government manages its accounts like families and businesses have to, money goes a lot further.'
RNZ News
21 hours ago
- RNZ News
How good have school lunches been in term two?
David Seymour says the programme is now a success, but he hasn't convinced some principals who see their pupils lose interest in eating them. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone The school lunch programme has been a "success by any measure" in term two, says the minister in charge, citing numbers that show complaints are down and on-time deliveries are up. But the opposition says the programme has not been fixed, and a school principal is pointing out that the issue of quality has not been resolved. Chris Patel, principal of Kopuarahi school near Thames, told RNZ it was "really sad" children no longer anticipated meal time like they did during the previous lunch programme. She said complaints might be down because schools were resigned to the current programme. Associate Education Minister David Seymour launched a cut-price version of the scheme this year , but it was plagued by reports of late, inedible, repetitive and nutritionally questionable lunches. One meal contained melted plastic, another left a student with burns. The Auditor-General's office had announced plans for an inquiry into the programme after concerns were raised both in the media and directly with them. In May, the Auditor-General's office announced plans for an inquiry into the school lunch programme that has drawn criticism since a revamp. Photo: RNZ / Marika Khabazi Seymour told RNZ he marked himself 8/10 for Term 2, compared to a 4/10 for Term 1 "at best". "Yes, there were problems. We owned them. We never denied them, and we fixed them. I think that there's a very good story in that," said Seymour. He pointed to the stats from the last term showing more than 98 percent of lunches were delivered on time each day, and complaints were down by 92 percent since March. He also said student satisfaction was at 67 percent, up from 46 percent the previous term, and pondered the lack of media coverage "now the programme is a success". He explained the programme got more trucks and streamlined delivery routes to help deliver lunches on time. Equipment was also upgraded, and staff numbers increased "to increase meal production and control quality better". "Production is now exceeding daily targets, and two million meals are expected to be ready for distribution by the start of Term 3." He called the programme a "real triumph", pointing to the amount of money saved by the taxpayer. "We took on one of the most ambitious challenges and programs that New Zealand has ever seen in the food industry in order to save the taxpayer $170 million a year. "The way that people view it, I believe, says more about people's disposition towards ambition and problem solving than the scheme itself." He said if the previous Labour government had "done it our way", there would be $800 million less debt on the government's books, "debt that unfortunately will be inherited by the very children at school today". He said since the beginning of Term 1 this year, more than 13.8 million nutritious meals had been delivered to 242,000 students in 1011 schools. "This marks the first time a single national supplier has provided meals at such scale, let alone meals which children enjoy, are nutritious, and are delivered on time." But Labour's education spokesperson Willow-Jean Prime did not accept the programme was fixed. Labour Party education spokesperson Willow-Jean Prime. Photo: VNP / Phil Smith "David Seymour said that everything would be sorted by term two for the debacle that has been the school lunch programme, and he's boasting delivery times as one of the key metrics." She also pointed out there had been such a high level of complaints to start with, a "92 percent drop still means there's a significant amount of complaints that are being made", She criticised these metrics as a measure for considering the success of the programme, and said there was a seeming lack of transparency from the minister around the issue of wastage. "We have been trying to get the information from the minister about the level of waste, and he refuses to tell us what is going into pig buckets and only what is being returned unopened and uneaten." Information gathered by Labour pointed to about 200,000 lunches returned in one half of term two. The party said at $3 per lunch, that amounted to nearly $600,000 wasted. "We have seen children not eating their lunches, not having full tummies and therefore reaching their learning potential," Prime said. "This minister is looking at this particular initiative as an economic initiative, as opposed to an education initiative. "He is simply looking at how much savings can be made from this programme and giving our children the scraps." Prime gave both term one and term two a "thumbs down". Chris Patel, principal of Kopuarahi school near Thames, acknowledged the numbers looked better this term, but said less complaints might just mean schools were resigned to the programme. She sent daily messages to those in charge in term one, and said some of her colleagues were surprised she'd kept up that process. "I think there's a meal fatigue. "You know that no amount of giving feedback is going to make a difference, so... what's the point." Patel wanted the programme to succeed but only gave term two a mark of 3.5/10. That's up only slightly from 2/10 in term one. "As much as it's sad that we've got the ambulance at the bottom of the cliff, I really do want it to succeed." Part of her frustration, she said, was going from a system that had been working for the children at her school to one that was not really working now. For Patel, and her students, it came down to an issue of quality and palatability. "Despite I think the best intentions the School Lunch Collective may have, there's been very little movement on the quality of and palatability of the meals." Her students would often only have "one, two, three, four mouthfuls" she said, despite sometimes having no food of their own. "These are children who are hungry. "Most of them come to school with some food from home or little or in a couple of cases, no food from home for one reason or another." Patel said it was about how the country valued children. "It says a lot about how we really don't value our kids, how we really don't value what we're doing to them. "We're spending a lot of money and there's a - a lot of food is wasted. It's not filling their tummies, it's not doing - it's not hitting the spot. It's not doing what it was designed to do." She said thought the problem was creating meals in bulk. "You can tell that they're made in bulk, they're not made with love. "So it's all very well for minister Seymour and the prime minister to say, we're providing a meal, but if 60-80 percent of that meal goes back in the container it was delivered in... I question that. How sustainable is that? "This is not about fussy kids." Patel questioned what sort of "benchmark" on-time deliveries was. "Yes, timeliness of delivery really is crucial. But actually the purpose of the lunches, is to build attendance, engagement and student achievement. "Help take barriers away from kids learning." Seymour said taste testing was underway for term three and so far there'd been 73 percent positive feedback. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
NZ Herald
21 hours ago
- NZ Herald
David Seymour and James Baldwin: The fire this time
Act leader David Seymour had to deal with massive opposition to his Treaty Principles Bill. Photo / Mark Mitchell THE FACTS Act Party leader David Seymour was guest of honour at a party held by his party recently, to celebrate his becoming Deputy Prime Minister. In his speech, Seymour quoted the American founding father and Boston Tea Party revolutionary Samuel Adams: 'It does not take a majority to prevail
