Motorola Moto G Stylus (2025) Review: A Top-Performing Budget Phone
The Motorola Moto G Stylus (2025) packs a lot into its low price, with an integrated stylus for note-taking, a brilliant 6.7-inch AMOLED display, loud stereo speakers, and a stylish design.
Its primary 50MP camera performs well for most shots, but struggles with zoom due to the lack of a telephoto lens.
The stylus offers a smooth note-taking experience but lacks advanced features such as palm rejection or smart gestures.
For note-taking enthusiasts, the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2025) is one of the cheapest stylus phones you can buy. Beyond its note-taking capabilities, though, it is a solid smartphone that, frankly, steals the show in the under $500 category.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus (2025) is available now at retailers like Amazon, Best Buy, Motorola, and some major U.S. carriers. (As of publication, the smartphone was available on AT&T, Spectrum, and Xfinity.) The phone costs $399.99 and comes in two colors: PANTONE Gibraltar Sea (dark blue) and PANTONE Surf the Web (lighter blue).
The design of the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2025) may not be for everyone. I say that because it has a very specific look and feel, and I've seen some complaints about its faux leather body collecting unwanted dirt. I, however, used the Moto G Stylus for over a month, and encountered no issues with dirt and grime. If I saw a minor crumb or mark, I easily remedied it with a phone-safe wipe. My model was the Gibraltar Sea color, which was a nice navy blue.
Faux leather, you say? Why, yes. The striking thing about the Moto G Stylus is that faux leather feel, which is an interesting choice for a phone and one I expected to hate—but I didn't! It looked quite sleek. It was also a surprisingly durable material, so I don't believe it would discolor or degrade with a couple of years of use. The faux leather doesn't extend past the back body of the phone—the sides are a pleasing, matte metallic that matches nicely. The phone also has an IP68 rating (great news for anyone who has experienced dropping past cell phones in bathtubs, toilets, or pools).
Aside from material choices, the Moto G Stylus (2025) looks much the same as other smartphones.
The back houses the camera lenses and flash/flashlight, and these are somewhat protruding, so I'd recommend sticking some lens protectors on there and/or investing in a protective case. The middle of the back has a pearlescent Motorola logo.
Starting on the left side, you'll find the SIM card holder. The bottom edge features all the goodies you'll need, from a hard-to-find 3.5mm audio jack (this is elusive on phones these days, and I appreciate the inclusion) to a USB-C port, as well as the stylus and its housing. Also on the bottom is the speaker grill and the primary microphone. The right side is where you'll find the volume and power buttons. Finally, the top edge houses the secondary microphone.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus (2025) features a 6.7-inch Super HD (2,712 x 1,220p) display with Corning Gorilla Glass 3 protection. This AMOLED display offers refresh rates up to 120Hz, an HDR peak brightness of 3,000nits, and a nearly 94% screen-to-body ratio. And nicely nestled in the usual spot in the top-middle of the display is the selfie camera.
At first, I thought that the Moto G Stylus was relatively lightweight (and worried about its durability). However, it weighs 6.73 ounces, which is only slightly less than a comparably sized 6.7-inch phone, such as the 6.90-ounce Samsung S24+. A couple of butter-finger moments later, I can attest that the Moto G Stylus (2025) scores high on durability in my book, but you should, as always, protect it with a case. And I wouldn't recommend placing any sharp objects next to that vegan leather, because then you might have a problem.
The Moto G Stylus (2025) had a stand-out 6.7-inch AMOLED display. As previously mentioned, it has a 120Hz refresh rate and a peak brightness of 3,000nits. Whether I was streaming videos on YouTube, scrolling through my photos, or playing games, I was pleased with the screen's clarity, vivid color gamut, and lightning-fast frame rates. It also handled blacks and grays quite well, even capturing the blue hue from the sun on a cat's black fur.
These frame rates also stood out while gaming, as I regularly played games like Blue Prince and other casual romps. The phone's display kept up beautifully, with only the occasional stutter.
One thing of note is that the Moto G Stylus's display supports the DCI-P3 color gamut, but Motorola didn't disclose the full percentages. I quite enjoyed the color contrast and saturation, but when comparing the display to my Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, I noticed that the saturation was much higher on the Moto G Stylus. The Galaxy S24 Ultra provided a more accurate, true-to-life color and contrast in my photos, while the Moto G Stylus (2025) bumped the saturation levels up a notch or three.
If high-level saturation doesn't bother you, it isn't a big deal. I wouldn't have noticed had I not started comparing photos side by side on the display. At a price below $500, you shouldn't expect perfection.
The Moto G Stylus (2025) comes loaded with Android 15 and a Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (which Snapdragon released back in August 2024). Out of the box, it felt familiar, clean, and user-friendly. It shouldn't feel like anything new if you've used an Android phone within the last few months.
I found little issue with the OS or the processor, as the phone only froze once in over a month of heavy, everyday use, and in most cases felt really snappy.
The Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 and 8GB of RAM were more than sufficient for me to go about my day, doing whatever I pleased on the phone. I never experienced a frame rate stutter or issue in apps, word processing tasks, or note-taking. While you might want a phone with a higher amount of RAM for heavier AI tasks, I found 8GB more than enough for what I usually do on my smartphone (and most people would likely agree).
My one complaint concerning software was the number of AI features crammed into the phone (Moto AI, Gemini, and Copilot). Some of it felt helpful, and some of it felt underdeveloped and forced. Notably, Moto AI could use some more work. Its only function, to my knowledge, was to only slightly enhance the user experience with the stylus via the handwriting calculator (which almost always converted my numbers and symbols incorrectly), write to text (again, often typo-ridden), and sketch-to-image (which was an entertaining diversion). It also includes Live Message (for drawing or sharing animated illustrations via messaging apps), a Lasso tool for photo editing, and Google's Circle to Search (which was probably the most handy). If I missed much of anything else packed into Moto AI, it eluded me.
I should also note that, unfortunately, the Moto G Stylus (2025) only comes with two years of OS updates and three years of security patches. If you plan to keep your phone for more than two years, this might be a reason to skip this and consider a comparable option, such as the Google Pixel 9a (which, by the way, comes with seven years of OS updates). Frankly, I don't understand why Motorola doesn't at least raise this to five years.
I quite enjoyed the overall performance of the Moto G Stylus (2025), particularly the note-taking capabilities. The note-taking feature was excellent, and it felt lightning quick, despite the lower price point. The stylus was smooth and responsive, effortlessly gliding across the display for a fluid writing experience. I used the note-taking feature to jot down to-do lists, ideas, receipts, doodles, and keep track of bill payments.
I even enjoyed the Moto Note app (compatible with Motorola stylus phones), despite my comments about the AI handwriting calculator and write-to-text being relatively unusable for my sloppier handwriting. The app came preloaded and featured easy-to-navigate note, canvas, and checklist sections. One other petty qualm, though—I learned the hard way that I needed to hit the back button to save a note. Swiping the app away would leave the note unsaved, and more than once, I opened Moto Note to find my recent checklist or note blank or missing entirely.
Unfortunately, the stylus is basic. It lacks pressure sensitivity, the touch display lacks palm rejection when the stylus is in use (many rogue markings occurred due to this), and there's no included air commands or gesture support. If you're simply looking to doodle and take notes, this shouldn't be a big deal. However, if you want to create more professional images or utilize stylus-specific shortcuts, you may want to consider a more premium device that offers these features. This, however, likely means significantly raising your budget.
If you want a decent camera that works well enough to provide up to 50MP photos, the cameras on the Moto G Stylus (2025) aren't bad.
The main camera offers 50MP (13MP ultrawide) resolution and features a Sony Lytia 700C sensor, which is an improvement over the previous Moto G phone sensors. Moto AI also comes into play to enhance contrast, exposure, and colors. Most images came out nicely detailed, but the colors and exposure occasionally looked off.
The front-facing selfie camera is 32MP, and takes nice enough selfies to please the average user. Its clarity is striking enough to show nearly every line, pore, and blemish, whether that's for better or for worse. And, of course, there are some of the typical editing features packed into the camera.
In most lighting scenarios, the camera typically took photos with clarity and nice detail, even if the colors were occasionally a bit oversaturated. In dimmer lighting, some images appeared murkier, but I usually achieved good results from nighttime captures and videos.
The weakest link in the camera system is its lack of a telephoto lens, which results in relatively poor shots when zooming in. The rear camera only provides up to two times zoom. Most of the time, when I tried to zoom in on a subject, the image was slightly fuzzy. A lack of a telephoto lens meant the Moto G Stylus had to crop the image digitally rather than truly zoom in, which didn't always result in the best photos.
Overall, though, the camera on the Moto G Stylus (2025) performed well for the price point, and I still enjoyed taking photos with it.
The stereo speakers were also impressively loud, and I could jam out to music or listen to YouTube videos without feeling the need for Bluetooth headphones. As someone who often doesn't have earbuds handy when I'm out and about, I found the speaker volume and quality on the Moto G Stylus (2025) another plus. For reference, the speaker system was at least as loud as the speakers on my Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra. And they offered a nicely balanced sound for most media until they passed the 70% volume threshold, where some sibilance and distortion made listening at higher levels less pleasant.
Motorola claims that the Moto G Stylus (2025) can hit up to 40 hours of battery life. I'm inclined to believe this is reasonably accurate, as I was usually able to get over a day of charge out of the phone, unless I was using it very heavily. One day, I used my phone very little at a social gathering. I mostly took photos, a few videos, and answered a few text messages. The phone had started at 100%, and by the time I woke up the next morning (nearly 24 hours from that 100% charge), the Moto G Stylus still had 70%. Granted, my screen time was maybe two hours or so that day.
Most days, the phone didn't hit below 40%. When I did, it was typically because I was gaming with a mobile gaming controller for hours. This did raise the phone's temperature levels considerably, but not to anything unusual.
As for charging, when I used the phone's 68W TurboCharge setting, I typically noticed about a 30 to 40% increase in 20 to 25 minutes, but sometimes I saw less. It provided an impressive charging boost when the battery was running low, and often, a quick few minutes on the charger saved me from losing game progress or missing important texts and emails.
If I were in the market for a budget-friendly phone right now, I might grab the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2025). It's a compelling choice, thanks to its built-in stylus for note-taking, vibrant display, and outstanding battery life. It also doesn't slack despite its $400 price. The software is speedy, the camera is decent (minus the disappointing zoom), and it looks cool to boot.
Of course, there are plenty of worthy competitors in the best budget phones category. And you won't want to grab this device if you're looking for a more evolved stylus with gestures and other integrations, a camera system with a telephoto lens, or more long-term software support.
Still, for the price, this is a solid pick.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tom's Guide
22 minutes ago
- Tom's Guide
Why I keep my streaming separate from my amplifier — and the device which makes it possible
There are plenty of ways to get music from your phone to a pair of speakers. You might use an aux cable, plugged into the RCA ports on the back. Perhaps your device has Bluetooth built-in Bluetooth connection. Maybe you've got something like the Wiim Amp Pro, with built-in streaming capabilities. But if you're looking for a way to get the best possible sounding music to your speakers, there's only really one way. A streaming separate, like this one — the Bluesound Node Icon ($1199 @ Amazon). It's a streaming device that's filled with all kinds of dedicated circuitry and what I can only assume is some form of black magic. Here's why it (and other devices like it) are the only way I'll play digital tracks over my HiFi system. There are cheaper options out there, but the Node Icon is one of the best ways to stream high-quality tracks to some powered speakers or a HiFi stereo system. It's filled with high-tech audio gadgetry and has a large screen on the front to show you what you're listening to. Wide compatibility with a number of different streaming systems is the icing on a delicious cake. There are two goals with a HiFi separates system. The first is to get as close to the sound of the artists intent as possible (AKA: I like this sound more than all the others). The second is to make your components do as much work as possible, each with it's own dedicated job. That means nothing should be pulling double duty, ideally. It's why you'll find the really expensive setups have separate power amps for each speaker, then a pre-amplifier that sends the signal to them, followed by a separate device for each feature. A CD player that plays CDs, a tape deck that plays tapes, and a turntable that plays records. You can get super granular with it, and many do. A streaming separate is part of this ethos. It's sole job is to send a streamed audio signal to your amplifier or powered speakers, without having to do anything else. That means it can dedicate all of the power it consumes to that one job. So what's in the Bluesound Node Icon? Beyond power circuits, there are buckets of excellent audio gear inside to make sure your streamed tracks sound as good as possible. That means a top-quality DAC to send an analogue signal to your amp, a WiFi connection to receive the music, and loads of extras to make sure it's doing the best job possible. Could you pack all those bits and bobs inside an amplifier or even a pair of speakers? Yes, you could — but then you'd be compromising based on space and power. If you want a similar streaming section in an amp, you'll find it in the NAD M10 V3 — but then you've got the space and power restrictions. So we've established why you might want one and how it all works. But why did I choose this option? While the sound quality is priority number one for a HiFi system, it still needs to look cool. I like a mish-mash of devices from different manufacturers, although they all need to look cool in their own right. That's why there's a large, metal smothered amplifier at the core, an aluminum finish turntable, and now this — an enscreened streaming device. That screen makes the whole thing feel thoroughly modern. It's 5-inches across, so it's smaller than a smart phone, but you can still see the readout from across the room. Bright lights have a tendency to wash it out slightly, but it's still a nice option. The glowing touch controls look nice, but my goodness do I still wish they where physical — glass touch surfaces look awful when covered with finger prints. But that's all superficial. There's a whole lot more to the story. I want my speakers and amplifier to dictate the sound of my music for the most part, so the streaming device needs to give them a solid sonic base to work with. If you're not going to spend a thousand dollars to get that sonic base then the likes of the Wiim Ultra are excellent ways to get extremely close — but ultimately, the more proficient Node Icon has won it out for me. It allows my speakers and amp to extract more detail from the hi-res tracks from Qobuz, and its DAC seems to do a slightly better job at resolving music. To most the difference is going to be negligible, but pair it with capable gear and the differences become more noticeable. Then there's the ease of use. It connects to the BluOS whole home streaming solution, which lets you control the device alongside other Bluesound and BluOS devices. It's good — it connects to your best streaming services of choice, and plays music in different controllable zones. Personally, I use Roon. The Node Icon is Roon ready, which means I just need to add it to my system and I can control it alongside the rest of my WiFi connected audio system. All of the track data appears on the device, and I've had few problems making everything work as a cohesive whole. For most people, some form of the best Bluetooth speaker is going to suffice. You don't have to worry about streaming standards, amplifiers, or any other kind of extraneous nonsense that get audiophiles like me foaming at the mouth. But for those of us that are excited by the likes of hi-res streaming, Dirac Live room correction and making a big stack of audio devices so that we can hear an iota more detail in the cymbals when listening to The Wall, then the Bluesound Node Icon is a piece of audio gold. It's certainly found a home in my listening setup. If you're interested in adding streaming to your HiFi but you don't want to spend buckets and buckets of cash, then you should also check out any of Wiim's streaming devices or Bluesounds cheaper options. Even those will sound better than something built in.
Fast Company
25 minutes ago
- Fast Company
The rise of AI in CEO communications—and the credibility threat it poses
CEOs have become more than just corporate leaders—they're among the most valuable assets on the balance sheet. Great leadership can drive billions in market cap by shaping narratives and galvanizing stakeholders. But what happens when the communication tools they use to build credibility start to erode it? We're entering a new era in CEO communications, one where human messages increasingly filter through the lens of AI. Analysts and investors have long leaned on AI-powered language models and sentiment analysis to dissect earnings calls, parsing executive tone, word choice, and delivery for signals on strategy, risk, or future performance. Now, CEOs and their teams are flipping the script—crafting messages with the help of generative AI to appeal to the very same systems analyzing them. It's a feedback loop of machines talking to machines. And while the tech arms race might make earnings calls look polished and sentiment scores spike, it also risks creating a sentiment gap. In the end, credibility is still the most valuable currency in leadership—and AI can't replace that. The CEO Premium Meets the AI Arms Race Corporate valuation has always been about more than just numbers. Investors have baked intangibles like brand equity, leadership narratives, and cultural impact into their models. As NYU finance professor Aswath Damodaran puts it, valuation is as much about a company's story as it is about spreadsheets. The CEO's job is to integrate those stories with their strategies. Jensen Huang didn't make Nvidia a trillion-dollar company because of flawless financial execution—he did it by selling a vision of AI as the engine of the future, powering everything from healthcare to climate solutions. That's the CEO premium in action: the ability to turn a strategic story into market-moving value. But here's what no one's saying out loud: when that story is over-engineered with AI, something critical is lost. Consider this: Bank of America's S&P 500 corporate sentiment tracker, based on an analysis of thousands of earnings transcripts, hit an all-time high earlier this year, even as analysts lowered growth expectations for 2025. The disconnect is stark. While executives are optimizing their tone and language to look and sound bullish, it's masking underlying realities. We're looking at a sentiment bubble, where polished communications are designed to impress algorithms but are creating distance from actual performance. The result? A risk to long-term stakeholder confidence and broader market integrity. The Credibility Gap is Real–and Risky AI-powered communications is an incredible asset. It can help executives sharpen their messages, anticipate audience reactions, and streamline delivery. But when it starts to obscure reality—or worse, is used as a veil—it risks blowing up the most important thing any CEO has: credibility. Markets thrive on credibility. Investors place a premium on CEOs who communicate clearly and consistently, and are transparent about their strengths and challenges. When communication becomes engineered for algorithms rather than stakeholders, it creates a hollow effect—polished on the surface, but leaving questions below. This is more than theoretical. A recent study published in Harvard Business Review found that employees rated CEO messages as less helpful if they thought the message was AI-generated—even when it wasn't. Perception alone was enough to damage trust. That finding underscores the growing credibility risk CEOs face when misusing or leaning too heavily on AI. What CEOs Need to Do Now So where does this leave us? The CEOs who win in this new reality won't be the ones with the most AI-polished messaging—they'll be the ones who balance technology with authenticity. Here's how: Speak to Stakeholders, Not Just Algorithms: Say what you mean. Own the hard truths. AI should enhance a message, not sanitize it. AI-generated communications might score well with language models, but stakeholders—investors, employees, customers—aren't grading on polish. They're looking for clarity. Anchor Narratives in Performance: Narratives drive valuation, but they're meaningless without numbers. If the results are strong, show your math. If they're weak, explain why. Don't let AI overinflate optimism. Instead, use it to sharpen transparency. Ensure AI Augments, Not Replaces: AI is great for refining delivery and identifying blind spots, but it can't replace human judgment or instinct. Companies that over-rely on AI-driven clones or sentiment engineering risk losing the real connection that drives stakeholder engagement. Anticipate the Credibility Pivot: As sentiment inflation continues, markets will inevitably adjust. Investors will begin looking for the next differentiator, pivoting from polished delivery to deeper signals of authenticity. CEOs who lean into direct, unvarnished communication will stand out. Get Ahead of What's Coming: The tools analyzing your every word are only getting more advanced. The only sustainable strategy? Consistency. Authenticity. Messages that hold up under scrutiny—algorithmic or human. If your leadership story can't survive deep analysis, it was never leadership to begin with. The Way Forward: Still a Human Game AI is reshaping the rules of executive communications, but the most successful leaders will recognize that technology is a supporting act—not the star of the show. At the end of the day, the algorithms don't close deals, inspire employees, or build relationships with customers—CEOs do. In this next chapter of leadership, The CEOs who win won't be the ones scoring highest on sentiment trackers. They'll be the ones who use AI responsibly, stay grounded in performance, and lead with clarity and authenticity. Because when machines talk past each other, the whole system breaks down.
Associated Press
25 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Order.co Names Larry Robinett to Lead Partnerships and Drive Adoption of Its Workday Built Procurement Integration
NEW YORK, June 30, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- the world's leading B2B Ecommerce Platform, welcomes Larry Robinett as Head of Workday Accounts & Alliances. Robinett joins the company to expand strategic partnerships and scale adoption of exclusive Workday Built integration. Robinett brings more than two decades of experience in enterprise software and strategic alliances, with a long-standing focus on the Workday ecosystem. Most notably, he served as Vice President of Sales and Partner Alliances at Ascend Software. Here, he successfully spearheaded the company's strategic partnership with Workday to help customers streamline accounts payable operations. As a result of the partnership, customers experienced significant efficiency gains and cost savings through AP automation, allowing them to scale operations without adding headcount – all while maximizing their investment in Workday Financial Management. Now, as the Head of Workday Accounts & Alliances at Robinett will lead efforts to expand enterprise adoption of the company's innovative Workday integration. With the integration at customers' fingertips, they can unlock greater control, efficiency, and savings with a modern procurement experience from requisition to reconciliation. 'I'm thrilled to join at such an exciting stage of growth,' Robinett said. 'As someone who has worked extensively in the Workday ecosystem, I'm especially proud to join a company with a Workday Built integration, an achievement that reflects close collaboration with Workday's product teams to deliver meaningful value to joint customers. I look forward to building strong partnerships and helping Workday Financial Management customers simplify and modernize their procurement experience in Workday.' As a Workday Select Partner, worked closely with Workday to co-develop an embedded B2B Ecommerce experience directly within the Workday platform. Using exclusive 'Integrated Search', customers can purchase all the items they need from the best-fit suppliers without leaving the Workday portal. Teams can search for any item and browse pre-approved products within their custom catalog, complete with contracted pricing or cost-effective alternatives. Submitting an order automatically generates a pre-populated requisition, eliminating the need for manual, error-prone data entry. Once approved, handles vendor fulfillment, and pre-coded invoices load seamlessly into Workday. Some of the benefits of leveraging Integrated Search include: customers have raved about the integration, with Kyle Ingerman, Finance Transformations Senior Manager at WeWork, saying, 'I cannot tell you how much time, effort, and money [the integration] has saved us.' To learn more about Workday-built integration, visit About simplifies business buying by combining the ease of online shopping with the sophistication of world-class purchase order and AP automation. The result? Businesses cut costs and complexity with every order. Hundreds of companies, like WeWork and Hugo Boss, leverage to centralize purchase-to-pay workflows, scale operations, and gain total control over spending – saving an average of 5% on products. Founded in 2016 and headquartered in New York City, has raised $70M in funding from industry-leading investors like MIT, Stage 2 Capital, Rally Ventures, 645 Ventures, and more. To learn more, visit About Workday Workday is the AI platform for managing people, money, and agents. The Workday platform is built with AI at the core to help customers elevate people, supercharge work, and move their business forever forward. Workday is used by more than 11,000 organizations around the world and across industries – from medium-sized businesses to more than 60% of the Fortune 500. For more information about Workday, visit Media Contact Allison Reich Senior Manager of Brand, Content & Enablement [email protected]
