
SC quashes lifetime ban imposed on former Ranji Trophy cricketer by KCA
A bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta set aside the 2021 order of the Kerala High Court, which had dismissed Karunakaran's plea and struck down the decision of the KCA in blacklisting him.
"After going through the impugned order dated June 21, 2021, and the order of blacklisting dated August 22, 2021, we are of the opinion that the High Court has taken a very harsh view in rejecting the writ petition and the writ appeal preferred by the appellant on the purported ground of concealment of material facts concluding that the appellant had approached the writ court with unclean hands," the bench said.
The apex court said that Karunakaran had made out a plausible case to suggest that the proceedings before the ombudsman were non-transparent and that the copies of the relevant records/orders were not provided to him.
"The documents and communications placed on record also suggest that many a time, it became difficult for the appellant and his counsel to address the ombudsman during the proceedings of the original application because the virtual hearing gateway was frequently interrupted without any justification," the bench said.
Karunakaran, also a member of the Thiruvananthapuram District Cricket Association, had approached the ombudsman-cum-ethics officer in 2019 to frame a model byelaw to be implemented in all the districts of the state in terms of the model Byelaw recommended by the Lodha Committee and adopted by the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI).
The ombudsman dismissed his plea in October 2020, citing his failure to include the District Cricket Associations as parties in the case despite repeated directions.
Karunakaran assailed the ombudsman's decision in the Kerala High Court, arguing that the ombudsman's proceedings lacked transparency and he was never informed about those specific directions.
The Kerala High Court, both single judge and division bench, dismissed his petitions, noting that he approached the court with "unclean hands" and concealed material facts.
Pursuant to the rejection of the appeal, the Kerala Cricket Association issued a show cause notice to the cricketer under Section 15(4)(s) of the byelaws of the KCA and imposed a lifetime ban in August 2021, blacklisting Karunakaran from all activities.
The top court said that the earlier order passed by the ombudsman, observing that the impleadment of the DCAs may entail unnecessary delay, definitely gave rise to a reasonable belief in the cricketer that he was not under any obligation to implead the DCAs in the original application filed before the ombudsman.
"Otherwise, also, the only prayer of the appellant in the original application was to frame uniform byelaws in sync with the recommendations of the Justice R.M. Lodha Committee. Thus, the application filed by the appellant was not in the form of any adversarial litigation requiring the mandatory opportunity of hearing to the DCAs," the bench said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
5 hours ago
- The Hindu
Disrespect to Mahatma's statue: HC quashes criminal proceedings against law student
The Kerala High Court on Tuesday quashed the criminal proceedings initiated against a law student who had been charged with disrespecting a statue of Mahatma Gandhi on his college campus in Aluva in 2023. He had allegedly placed a pair of sunglasses and a Christmas wreath on the statue and added that 'Gandhi is long dead'. A video recording of this was also posted in WhatsApp groups of students, following which a complaint was lodged with the Principal. Subsequently, a criminal case was registered, and he was suspended from college for five days and directed to remit ₹5,000 as fine. Allowing the student's petition to quash the case, a Bench of Justice V.G. Arun said that the alleged act was undoubtedly immoral. But it cannot be termed as illegal in the absence of any law that prohibited such conduct or prescribed punishment for such conduct. The court said that every Indian citizen had the moral duty to respect freedom fighters who played a crucial role in liberating the country from colonial rule. It hastened to add that 'Our transition from 'native Indian subjects' to 'proud Indian citizens' wouldn't have been possible, but for the untiring and selfless crusade led by Mahatma Gandhi and other national leaders. To borrow the words of Will Durant, an American historian, not since Buddha has India so revered any man. Not since St. Francis of Assissi has any life known to history been so marked by gentleness, disinterestedness, simplicity of soul, and forgiveness of enemies. The preface became essential as this case is about a youngster, then a law student, who is facing prosecution on the allegation of having denigrated the image of Mahatma Gandhi,' the court said.


India Today
7 hours ago
- India Today
Sourav Ganguly to enter race for Cricket Association of Bengal presidential election
Former Indian captain and ex-BCCI President Sourav Ganguly is likely to contest for the President's post of the Cricket Association of Bengal (CAB). Ganguly confirmed to India Today that he will be submitting his nomination ahead of the Annual General Meeting (AGM).If Ganguly enters the race, he is expected to be elected unopposed. His potential return to CAB leadership follows the ineligibility of his elder brother and current CAB president, Snehasish Ganguly, due to the Lodha Committee's tenure CAB has finalised the dates for its AGM and elections. An emergent apex council meeting was held on Tuesday to prepare for the upcoming polls. The final apex council meeting is scheduled for August 14, 2025, and the AGM will take place on September 20, 2025. Ganguly previously served as CAB Secretary in 2015 before becoming President later that year, succeeding Jagmohan Dalmiya. He held the position until 2019, after which he served as BCCI President from 2019 to Ganguly's journey with BCCI, CAB Ganguly has played a transformative role in Indian cricket through his leadership as President of the CAB and later as President of the his tenure as CAB President from 2015 to 2019, Ganguly focused on revitalising Bengal cricket by modernising infrastructure and improving player development programs. He emphasised professional coaching and upgraded facilities, which contributed to Bengal's improved performances in domestic competitions like the Ranji Trophy. After being named as the BCCI president, Ganguly's tenure was marked by several significant initiatives aimed at strengthening Indian cricket's foundations and expanding its global influence. One of his notable achievements was spearheading the development of a state-of-the-art National Cricket Academy (NCA) in Bengaluru, designed to provide world-class training facilities to upcoming also played an instrumental role in promoting women's cricket by launching the Women's T20 Challenge, which created a vital platform for female players to showcase their talent on a larger his leadership, the BCCI secured record-breaking media rights deals for the Indian Premier League (IPL), generating revenues exceeding Rs 48,000 crore for the 2023-2027 in 2022, 1983 World Cup-winner Roger Binny succeeded Sourav Ganguly as the BCCI president. - EndsMust Watch


The Hindu
8 hours ago
- The Hindu
Non-lowering of national flag after sunset in itself is not an offence, says Kerala HC
The mere act of not lowering the national flag after the sunset in itself is not an offence, unless there is a deliberate action with the intention of insulting the national honour or showing disrespect to the flag, the Kerala High Court has stated. It went on to quash criminal proceedings initiated against the Secretary of the Angamaly municipality by the police and the trial court for allegedly not lowering the flag at the municipal office for almost two days after the Independence Day celebration in 2015. He had been charged under the Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971 and the Flag Code of India, 2002 after the Angamaly police initiated suo motu action. A Bench of Justice Kauser Edappagath said that a mere lapse or inaction by a person in not lowering the national flag after sunset cannot be said to be an act of gross affront or indignity, or insult to the flag. The provisions of the Act of 1971 cannot be attracted unless there is a deliberate action with an intention to insult the national honour or show disrespect to the flag. The Municipal Secretary contended that the allegations against him, even if taken at their face value and accepted in their entirety, do not prima facie constitute any offence or make out a case against him.