Kennedy Center guts social impact team; more layoffs expected
The team's focus was reaching new and diverse audiences beyond those who regularly attend symphony and opera performances, and 'to advance justice and equity' through art, according to its website.
These programs take many forms, such as an effort to commission new works by Black composers and librettists from across the nation, along with other projects.
Recent performances include 'Traumedy,' a stand-up show in which comedians discuss their personal struggles, followed by a question-and-answer session with the comedians and mental health therapists. 'Poetry & Art as Liberation: Stories of Hope and Resilience in the Prison System' featured poetry and visual art from formerly incarcerated artists. 'The Cartography Project' seeks to 'encourage meaningful dialogue about the future of anti-racism' through classical music.
Kennedy Center staffers were told that this is part of an overall reduction in workforce and that more layoffs are forthcoming, though they received no further details.
The reason for the terminations is unclear. Roma Daravi, the center's head of public relations, did not respond to The Washington Post's request for comment.
It is the center's first major reduction in workforce since President Donald Trump last month ousted Kennedy Center President Deborah F. Rutter and Chairman David M. Rubenstein, along with all Biden-appointed members of the board of trustees, which he then replaced with his own, who voted him in as chair.
The new leadership promptly fired three other staff members, including its previous head of public relations, general counsel and a vice president who worked in development. Since then, at least 10 staffers have resigned.
New leadership also directed the programming team to 'shut down all social impact programming,' according to a staffer with knowledge of the conversation. The directive left the staff confounded, because the social impact team touched on much of the center's programming, including the free shows on Millennium Stage.
One Kennedy Center staffer felt flabbergasted and suggested the new leadership doesn't understand how the organization works, since shutting down social impact programming would affect a broad swath of events.
The social impact team produces its own programming and consults throughout the center on programming. It also runs the Millennium Stage, which hosts free performances four nights a week and free weekly movie screenings.
The members that remain all work directly with the Millennium Stage.
The social impact team grew out of the Millennium Stage, which offered comedy, jazz, hip-hop and other performances, making it the Kennedy Center's primary lever for lowering barriers of entry and reaching beyond its traditional audiences.
However, despite the diverse programming and gratis entry, getting to the Kennedy Center for a 6 p.m. performance was still a challenge. In 2019, after the Kennedy Center opened the Reach — the $250 million campus expansion recently disparaged by Trump — the cultural center expanded its Millennium Stage division and gave it a broader mission.
The idea was to use the new architecture to develop a 'culture of invitation,' according to one social impact staffer who was fired on Tuesday, who spoke on the condition of anonymity so as not to violate a non-disparagement agreement with the center.
'There have been hyperlocal impacts and also really broad impacts,' said the former staffer. 'Our trajectory was extraordinarily positive.'
It is unclear whether the social impact team is being fully dissolved.
The Trump administration has had impacts on other arts organizations in Washington, including the National Gallery of Art and the Smithsonian Institution, which shuttered their diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) offices following an executive order signed by Trump that clamped down on DEI programs across the federal government.
Last year, the Kennedy Center program received permanent funding: an $8 million endowment from Shelley and Allan Holt.
'This was a program that was paying for itself, expanding audience, creating new levels of belonging and confidence and communities, across the cultural landscape of D.C. and beyond,' said the former social impact staffer, who had direct knowledge of the unit's funding and resources.
The dismissals come two days after the center's first major event under new leadership, the Mark Twain Prize, which was given to comedian Conan O'Brien.
During his speech, O'Brien gave 'a special thanks to all the beautiful people who have worked here at the Kennedy Center for years and who are worried about what the future might bring. My eternal thanks for their selfless devotion to the arts.'
The audience gave them a standing ovation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump readies new hands-off AI 'action plan' that offers a split with Biden
President Trump is expected to release an AI "action plan" on Wednesday that reportedly outlines how the US can win in the global race to develop artificial intelligence by fostering a hands-off regulatory approach to the technology. Media reports suggest the document will likely mark a split from Biden administration policies, which favored restrictions against exports of AI chips and steps to ensure AI was not used to spread misinformation. The White House, according to a Reuters report that cited a summary of the draft action plan, will likely discuss how to make it easier to export AI technology abroad and reduce barriers to its development in the US. That may include everything from faster permitting for building AI data centers to more use of AI at the Pentagon to identifying which federal regulations slow down AI and even withholding federal funding from states with tough AI laws already in place. Trump is expected to discuss the topic during a speech at a Wednesday event titled "Winning the AI Race," organized by White House AI and crypto czar David Sacks and his co-hosts on the "All-In" podcast. The strategy announcement from the White House is the outcome of an order Trump signed in his first week that asked for an AI action plan to "sustain and enhance America's global AI dominance in order to promote human flourishing, economic competitiveness, and national security." Some executive orders are also expected this week, according to Axios and the Wall Street Journal, that would promote the exports of chips and AI technology to countries considered friendly to the US. There may be an order that targets "woke AI," according to The Wall Street Journal. It would target AI developers that the administration believes create liberally biased algorithms and block them from serving as federal contractors. The White House didn't respond to a request for comment. Two constitutional law scholars who talked with Yahoo Finance said it is doubtful the "woke AI" measure will withstand legal scrutiny. "If you sanction software that is liberal, but not software that is conservative, the challenge will be that the executive order is content-based discrimination," said UC San Francisco School of Law professor Rory Little. "I don't even know how you tell if software is liberal or conservative," Little said, adding that the First Amendment protects intellectual property as forms of speech that the government may not single out for punishment. But the order's constitutional viability may not matter in the short term for companies like Amazon (AMZN), Anthropic ( Google (GOOG), OpenAI ( Microsoft (MSFT), and Perplexity ( all of which are vying to supply AI systems to the government. Even if the order is met with legal challenges, AI developers might not have time to wait out a court solution. "A lot of people are trying to make deals with the Trump administration, so they view these executive orders not as law, but as the opening bid in a negotiation," Little said. "If you're an AI company, like Google, you're probably going to do your best to negotiate something that permits whatever you want to do to go forward," he added. "And you could care less what atmospheric politics might look like, so long as you're making money on your software." OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said Tuesday at a Federal Reserve banking conference in Washington, D.C., that his company now has lots of government work. "We are increasingly working with the government to roll out our services to lots of government employees," Altman said. If such an AI order is issued and then challenged, a court fight is likely to resemble those in multiple ongoing lawsuits against two other DEI-focused executive orders issued by Trump during his first days back in office. Those earlier orders directed all federal contractors to certify that they do not operate DEI programs in violation of anti-discrimination laws. They also shuttered government offices and employment positions focused on DEI. David Coale, a partner with the law firm Lynn Pinker Hurst & Schwegmann, said the executive orders get into an area called the "unconstitutional conditions" doctrine, which prohibits the government from conditioning a grant on the exercise of constitutional rights. "This [type of] proposal goes too far," Coale said, explaining that tying the eligibility to an AI's liberal bias presents "serious First Amendment issues." Alexis Keenan is a legal reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow Alexis on X @alexiskweed. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
ACA insurers propose biggest premium hikes since 2018 as Trump policies take hold
Affordable Care Act insurers are proposing their steepest premium increases since 2018, driven in part by the looming expiration of Biden-era enhanced premium subsidies and by the Trump administration's tariffs, a new KFF analysis has found. Insurers are asking for a typical rate increase of 15% with more than a quarter proposing hikes of 20% or more. KFF, a nonpartisan health policy research group, looked at 105 Obamacare insurers in 19 states and the District of Columbia that have filed rates so far. Steep rate increases in 2018 were also fueled by Trump administration policies, which were focused on weakening the ACA during the president's first term after Republicans in Congress failed to repeal it in 2017. While rising health care costs account for about half of the coming year's proposed increases, two other forces under the control of President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans are also driving up rates, KFF found. The expiration of the enhanced ACA premium subsidies at the end of this year is prompting many insurers to hike rates by an additional 4%, on average. Insurers are concerned that the disappearance of this beefed-up assistance will prompt many, largely healthier consumers to drop their coverage — leaving sicker, costlier policyholders on the exchanges. Initially created by the Democrats' American Rescue Plan Act in 2021, the enhanced premium subsidies enable lower-income enrollees to sign up for coverage with very low or no monthly premiums. Also, middle-income Americans can qualify for assistance for the first time. The Biden administration repeatedly said the more generous subsidies allow the majority of enrollees to select plans that cost less than $10 a month. The enhanced subsidies helped drive Obamacare signups to a record 24 million people for 2025. Most enrollees qualify for subsidies, which greatly lower their monthly premium payments. But once the beefed-up assistance lapses, those payments are expected to spike by 75%, on average, KFF said. Trump and GOP lawmakers did not include an extension of the subsidies in their 'big, beautiful bill' and it remains to be seen whether they push for it in subsequent legislation. However, the clock is ticking since insurers are currently finalizing their rates, and the Obamacare federal and state exchanges need time to prepare for open enrollment, which starts on November 1. Several states are highlighting the looming loss of the enhanced subsidies as driving up insurers' proposed rates on their exchanges. In Maryland, for instance, carriers have requested an overall average premium change of 17.1%, the highest since 2019. If Congress extends the enhanced subsidies, the rate increases would be 7.9%, on average, according to the Maryland Insurance Administration, which is looking into creating a state-sponsored subsidy to offset some of the premium increases. Also, some insurers are pointing to the tariffs that the Trump administration has promised to impose on pharmaceutical imports, KFF said. Those that cite tariffs say the levies will add 3% to their premium proposals. The rate filings, however, do not mention specific impacts of the 'big, beautiful bill' because insurers generally had to submit their proposals prior to the bill being signed into law on July 4. Those that mention it point to the uncertainty it is causing, said Cynthia Cox, director of KFF's Program on the ACA. 'We're going to be watching over the next few weeks whether insurers come back and say, 'the big, beautiful bill passed, and here's how we think that might affect our premiums,'' she said. The filings also don't take into account the provisions in a rule that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services finalized in late June that will make several changes to Obamacare, including shortening the open enrollment period, increasing verification requirements and limiting the ability of low-income Americans to sign up for coverage year-round. The measures are a 'mixed bag' for insurers in terms of how it might affect premiums, Cox said. One major insurer has already announced its departure from the Affordable Care Act in 2026. Aetna said in May that it would stop selling plans on the individual market because 'it became clear we would not be able to provide the same level of value we've offered in prior years,' the company said on its website. The insurer also left the Obamacare exchanges in 2018 but later returned. Insurers' 2026 rates are preliminary and are subject to change, particularly in states that run their own exchanges, where state regulators have more of a say in setting the final rates. The final rates should be published later this summer, and consumers will be able to view plan premiums shortly before open enrollment starts.
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump is transforming the GOP's energy policies — and not all conservatives are happy
Republicans spent four years railing against former President Joe Biden's use of Washington's money and regulatory heft to promote wind farms, solar panels and electric cars. Now President Donald Trump is wielding the same mighty federal arsenal on behalf of oil, natural gas, coal and nuclear power — and his party is cheering along. The result is that the GOP is embracing the same style of big government intervention in the energy markets for which they slammed Biden's Inflation Reduction Act — mirroring the ways that Trump has reshaped Republican long-standing orthodoxies on matters such as trade and international alliances. Trump's aims are worlds apart from Biden's, of course: The administration is offering billions in financial support for energy sources long favored by Republicans while rolling back environmental rules that raised costs for the fossil fuel industry. That's a huge contrast from Biden's effort to steer hundreds of billions of dollars to clean-energy manufacturing in an effort to counter climate change. But it's also a departure from longtime Republican arguments that free-market forces should steer the future of the U.S. energy supply, and that the federal government's job is to get out of the way. 'They're picking winners and losers. No doubt of that,' said Shuting Pomerleau, director of energy and environmental policy at center-right think tank American Action Forum. 'There has been a convergence of both Democrats and Republicans into the industrial policies propping up the industries or technologies they love with the resources and the legal authorities they have.' One fresh example is a July 7 executive order from Trump that Interior Secretary Doug Burgum cited to impose tight restrictions on wind and solar projects, to the dismay of moderate Senate Republicans. Trump had promised House conservatives that he would crack down on any federal support for clean energy, despite language in the GOP's recently passed megabill easing the phaseout of tax credits. The Trump administration's actions threaten a massive chill on private investments in wind, solar and battery companies, and run counter to the global markets' growing embrace of clean energy technologies. But the White House says the changes serve major Trump priorities, such as meeting the growing energy demands of artificial intelligence data centers. 'Under President Trump's leadership, America is dedicated to leading every industry, particularly as the global leader in Artificial Intelligence,' White House spokesperson Harrison Fields said in a statement. 'Advancing A.I. requires substantial energy resources, modern infrastructure, and top-tier technological expertise — America is well-prepared to meet these demands and drive progress forward.' Trump's willingness to use the levers of government to reward his energy allies began on the first day of his second term. His Inauguration Day executive order declaring an energy emergency called for weakening environmental rules and focusing federal resources to expedite energy production. But its definition of energy sources notably excluded solar and wind. 'We're in by far the most politicized environment for energy I've ever seen or I'm aware of in history, absolutely. Very sad,' said Robert McNally, who is president of the consulting firm Rapidan Energy Group and served in former President George W. Bush's White House. 'But why should energy be different? What isn't highly political these days?' Trump went further on wind with an executive order that threw up new onerous new hurdles to federal projects, such as by blocking new offshore wind lease sales and halting wind permitting. He doubled down on that with an executive order this month attempting to limit solar and wind developers from accessing federal tax credits, and with the Interior directive requiring Burgum's personal review of wind and solar projects. Other Trump administration actions have overtly benefited fossil fuel sources. Energy Secretary Chris Wright used authorities under the century-old Federal Power Act to keep an aging coal power plant in Michigan running just eight days before it had been slated to go offline. Michigan ratepayers are now paying to keep it afloat — although Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel filed a motion against DOE's move, saying retiring the plant was part of a plan to save Michigan ratepayers $150 million in capital expenditures. Wright later used that same authority to force an oil- and gas-fired power plant outside Philadelphia to continue operating. 'We're expecting more than that. That's the tip of the iceberg,' Devin Hartman, director of energy and environment policy with the conservative think tank R Street Institute. 'The case to subsidize those power plants is really flimsy.' To the Trump administration and its defenders, its actions are a much-needed course correction. They have pointed to warnings from the North American Electric Reliability Corp., a nonprofit that monitors the power grid for potential blackouts, that regional grid operators face higher risk of supply shortages due to coal and natural gas power plant retirements. Addressing grid reliability is crucial for a Trump economic agenda that places a huge priority on growing artificial intelligence, which forecasters have said will require vast amounts of electricity. Trump administration officials contend that ending renewable power subsidies and reversing Biden's environmental rules will attract more AI investment by preventing retirement of coal and natural gas power plants. 'The need for power is scaling so fast that if President Trump hadn't been elected president, I think we would already be in trouble,' said Carla Sands, vice chair of the center for energy and environment at the Trump-aligned think tank America First Policy Institute. 'The American regulatory environment had become anti-production, anti-energy, anti-business, and this is changing under President Trump's brilliant leadership.' An energy and AI summit that Sen. David McCormick (R-Pa.) convened last week in Pittsburgh — which included an appearance by Trump — crystallized the emergence of the president's brand of industrial policy. The administration touted $90 billion in announcements for new AI investments from U.S. tech companies, investment houses and the 'hyperscalers' that build the data centers such as Google, CoreWeave, Blackstone and Brookfield Asset Management. 'The AI revolution will change the way the world works, and we cannot lose. The Trump administration will not let us lose,' Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said during the event. 'We need to do clean, beautiful coal. We need to do natural gas. We need to embrace nuclear. We need to embrace it all because we have the power to do it — and if we don't do it, we're fools." But wind, solar and battery storage projects have been the United States' leading source of new power in recent years, while backlogs for new natural gas turbines, yearslong timelines to build nuclear power plants and the remote chances of greenlighting new coal-fired power plants have stunted growth of those sources. Solar, wind and batteries accounted for 93 percent of all new power added to the grid last year, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. People who identify themselves as traditional small government conservatives expressed wariness of some of Trump's moves. They say the party is using the same heavy-handed tactics to reward favorites for which they criticized Democrats. Republicans have even dialed it up a notch, they said. Republicans have cast aside the all-of-the-above mindset of the pre-Trump era, said Drew Bond, CEO of conservative climate organization C3 Solutions and an Energy Department adviser in the George W. Bush administration. Now, they preach a 'best of the above' mentality that invites subjective choice over the ebbs and flows of a free market, he said. 'You're sort of seeing a bit of an intellectual compromise, if you will, in order to secure more of an agenda focused on abundance and reliability and affordability,' he said. Trump and his team have not been shy about that, said Tom Pyle, president of the conservative Institute for Energy Research. Pyle said he doesn't necessarily agree with GOP efforts to tip the scales for specific energy sources, and he opposed a lucrative tax subsidy worth tens of millions of dollars that the Republican megabill contained for coal used in steelmaking. With tariffs, a flurry of executive actions and other steps, Pyle said, Trump has gone far beyond even Biden's use of executive authority to forge his industrial policy. But, on balance, Pyle said Trump's approach to cutting regulations aligns with Republican orthodoxy — and that means he can stomach the rest for that. 'This is a Republican president who has moved the Republican base and changed what it means to be a Republican,' Pyle said. 'Everyone keeps saying, 'Oh, well, when Trump leaves the scene, things will get back to normal. We'll just be like good old Republicans again.' Well, no. If that's the case, say goodbye to the Electoral College map.'
