The phantom threat of Corbyn 2.0
Photo byA More in Common poll shared with my colleague George Eaton in his Morning Call newsletter considers how a hypothetical Jeremy Corbyn-led party would perform at the polls. It suggests the 'JC Party' would receive 10 per cent of the vote in an election held today, cutting into Labour by three points, and the Greens by four.
Labour is four points behind Reform right now, but with the new JC Party on the scene Labour would end up seven points behind.
In 2018 to 2019 I commissioned a lot of hypothetical surveys about Brexit. I drafted scenarios and put them to the public. How would you vote if Brexit was delayed? How would you feel if Theresa May was still prime minister and delayed Brexit? How would you vote if hard Brexit were on the ballot? It was unreliable stuff because it all depended on hypothetical prompts, taking the respondents too far from material reality.
The biggest flaw with More in Common's survey is simple: the Jeremy Corbyn Party isn't real; it hasn't accrued baggage; we don't know who its hypothetical candidates would be or how badly organised it might be. Respondents wouldn't approach the survey in the same manner as they would at the time when it came to cast the ballot.
Prompting it as Corbyn-led too can be both a blessing and a curse. It's asking voters whether they'd vote for Corbyn were he on the ballot. It's making a genuine left alternative a personality contest. That tells you something about how popular Corbyn is. But it doesn't tell you what you want it to tell you: the real appetite for a left alternative.
Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe
I am struggling to think of any moment in recent history where hypothetical polling bore out in reality. In 2019 the poorly named, poorly branded, poorly organised Independent Group got off the ground to pretty favourable opinion polls: even before they announced they announced the would contest elections, it was sitting at 10-15 per cent. It ended up winning 3 per cent in the Euro elections a month later.
It was a dud. When the stakes were real and the party had time to reveal its colours it just wasn't so popular anymore.
This 10 per cent for Corbyn tells us there's an appetite for something with a high profile name attached. But like with the Independent Group – later Change UK – its raison d'etre may be eaten up by parties already in situ. Like the Lib Dems did with Brexit in 2019, the Greens may do as The Left Flank in 2025. It's notable that most of the hypothetical damage a Corbyn party does is not to Labour, but the Greens.
Which brings us to my final point. The appeal of the Greens is not the same as the appeal of a left alternative. Green success in a not insubstantial number of locales comes off not being a hyper-left force, but a hyper-localist, hyper-environmental force. There's a good argument that deprioritising that in favour of leftism will net it new support in the immediacy. But not without possible losses. It becomes muddy.
[See also: These disability benefit cuts are about to bury Labour]
Related
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Western Telegraph
33 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Streeting confident about welfare vote amid criticism of ‘two-tier' Pip plans
Wes Streeting said the changes 'have put us in a much better position' and give 'peace of mind' to those currently in receipt of personal independence payments. The Government's original welfare package had restricted eligibility for Pip, but in a climbdown to stave off a backbench rebellion, the changes will now only apply to new applicants. Mr Streeting said this was not unusual for such a transition. 'When things change and evolve as you bring in new systems, it does change sometimes from group to group, student finance being an example,' he told the BBC's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg programme. He said 'we've got to listen' when asked if further concessions could be made on Pip. Unite general secretary Sharon Graham has called for the Government to start from scratch on the Bill and said the latest plans were 'divisive and sinister'. 'Creating a two-tier system where younger disabled people and those who become disabled in the future will be disadvantaged and denied access to work and education, is morally wrong,' she said. Disabled Labour MP Olivia Blake said the proposed changes had been 'plucked from the air'. 'This could form an unethical two-tier system that treats two people with the exact same injury or illness differently,' she told The Guardian. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has said the 'broken' welfare system must be fixed 'in a Labour way' (Paul Currie/PA) The Health Secretary told Sky News's Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips that the changes 'have put us in a much better position'. 'As a result of the changes, it means anyone watching this morning who's in receipt of personal independence payments now has the peace of mind of knowing that their situation is protected,' he said. Labour MP Louise Haigh meanwhile said she planned to back the Welfare Bill next week but needed to see the full detail of the new plans on Monday. The former Cabinet minister also said it was a moment for the Government to 'reset'. 'I think this is a moment and an opportunity to reset the Government's relationship with the British public and to move forward, to adopt a different approach to our economic policy and our political strategy,' she told the BBC. On Saturday, the Prime Minister told the Welsh Labour conference the 'broken' welfare system must be fixed 'in a Labour way'. The original plans restricted eligibility for Pip and cut the health-related element of universal credit Existing recipients were to be given a 13-week phase-out period of financial support in an earlier move that was seen as a bid to head off opposition. Now, the changes to Pip will be implemented in November 2026 and apply to new claimants only, while all existing recipients of the health element of universal credit will have their incomes protected in real terms. The concessions on Pip alone protect some 370,000 people currently receiving the allowance who were to lose out after reassessment. Ministers had hoped the reforms would get more people back into work and save up to £5 billion a year, but the concessions left Chancellor Rachel Reeves needing to find money elsewhere and point to possible tax rises in the autumn.
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Comedian Rosie Jones issues four-word warning over 'terrifying' welfare changes
Comedian Rosie Jones, who has cerebral palsy, has warned 'no one is safe' from Labour's welfare cuts despite major concessions over their plans on Personal Independence Payments Comedian Rosie Jones has warned 'no one is safe' from Labour 's welfare cuts despite major concessions over their plans. The well-known celebrity, who has cerebral palsy, said it is 'terrifying' that ministers are 'victimising a vulnerable part of this country'. She raised concerns that current claimants of Personal Independence Payments could still end up losing the benefit when they are reassessed. Speaking about Labour's newly announced protections for current claimants, Rosie said: 'They're not thinking about the millions of people who will become disabled in the future but you are also forgetting that millions of people who are in danger are getting reassessed, which could be me, so no one is safe.' She added that she has always been a Labour voter but that this Government was been "incredibly disappointing". "This is not a Labour government that I recognise. I voted for them because I truly believed that they were the government that cared about individuals," she said. "That's not what I'm seeing from the government right now. They care more about stats. They care more about looking good, but they're looking good by victimising a vulnerable part of this country. They're putting lives in danger, and that is terrifying." Asked if she was reassured the Government's review would put disabled people at the heart of it, Rosie told the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg: "I think disabled people should have been at the heart of the matter from the beginning. "They were never considering the real effect that this would have on us, and I have seen no evidence that they genuinely care for disabled people and our future. So I want to believe them, but so far they're not giving me any evidence to say they will do exactly that." Last week Keir Starmer offered significant concessions to rebel MPs to swerve a humiliating Commons defeat next week. Leading rebels told The Mirror"serious progress" had been made in crisis talks with No10 over cuts impacting hundreds of thousands of disabled people. Changes to PIP and the health element of Universal Credit will now apply only to new claimants. It means around 370,000 people will avoid losing around £4,150-a-year. Existing recipients of the health element of Universal Credit will also have their incomes protected in real terms. But campaigners said it risked "betraying the next generation of disabled people" and could create a "two-tier" system- and some Labour MPs remain opposed ahead of a Commons vote next week. Mr Starmer today said he wished he had reached a 'better position' with Labour MPs earlier, before the major rebellion over welfare cuts erupted. In an interview with the Sunday Times, he said he was distracted by international affairs, which he admitted was not an 'excuse'. 'I'm putting this as context rather than excuse: I was heavily focused on what was happening with Nato and the Middle East all weekend,' the PM said. Wes Streeting said he is confident the Government will win a crunch vote on welfare next week. But he admitted "we've got to listen" if further concessions on PIP were demanded. Former Cabinet minister Louise Haigh said it was "really welcome" that Mr Starmer has "acknowledged that mistakes have been made'. She urged the PM to use this moment 'to reset the government's relationship with the British public'.
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Why Labour must take urgent action to restore investor confidence and turbocharge economic growth
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Almost exactly a year on from the Labour party sweeping to power, we are beginning to see how Sir Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves plan to deliver on their ambitions to restore confidence in the UK's economic prospects and turbocharge growth. The spending review and now the industrial strategy have both provided more detail on the government's vision, building on some of the positive moves the government has already made. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad No one would dispute that the Prime Minister and Chancellor of the Exchequer are operating in an evolving – and often difficult – international context, and that they have acted swiftly and effectively to mitigate emerging challenges. Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves have been engaging in good faith with business, but the October Budget hit business confidence (Picture: Jacob King) | PA Good work undermined Similarly, the government has begun a process of regulatory reform that could help stimulate business activity and it continues to show a willingness to engage in good faith with industry, including financial services. Plans to reduce energy costs for some industries, albeit on an elongated timescale, will also be welcome. Yet it is fair to say that much of this good work had been undermined by less positive changes elsewhere. Few would dispute that the October Budget knocked business confidence at a time when momentum finally appeared to be returning to the UK economy. Further negative changes later this year may dent confidence still further. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Equally, while the government continues to favour reform, many businesses are growing increasingly frustrated at the pace of change. Above all, there is a sense that the optimism that surrounded the new government's economic prospectus is – a year on – rapidly diminishing. Strong interest in Scotland Following a recent trip to the United States to promote investment in our financial services industry, it is clear there is still strong international interest in what Scotland and the wider UK have to offer. We may have challenges around infrastructure and the general business environment, but Scotland's financial and professional services sector continues to punch well above its weight. The strength of our universities, the depth of our talent base, our record in innovation, our relative political stability and the clarity of our regulatory frameworks are all powerful selling points. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad While economic fundamentals matter, so too does sentiment, so it is important that we address some of our weaknesses, otherwise there is a risk of the UK's attractiveness deteriorating in comparison to other locations. The government is making efforts to address some of these challenges and recent announcements offer an opportunity to restore investor confidence. That is one reason why Scottish Financial Enterprise is organising a Global Investment Summit, which will take place in Edinburgh this October. Convened in partnership with the City of London and the Lord Mayor, the summit will bring together major international investors, UK business leaders, politicians and policymakers to help unlock the next wave of growth. Clear government support will send a strong message that financial and professional services remain a key part of the UK's economic future, and that Scotland is central to that. After a year in office, the government's probationary period is now over. The country and economy urgently need momentum – and, with its plan now in place, the government must kickstart it.
