logo
Woman who harassed Dubai businessman who she had one-night stand with after meeting in a nightclub is facing arrest after no-show in court

Woman who harassed Dubai businessman who she had one-night stand with after meeting in a nightclub is facing arrest after no-show in court

Daily Mail​5 days ago
A woman who was ordered to pay £25,000 damages after harassing a Dubai businessman she had a one-night stand with is facing arrest following a no-show in court.
Cynthia Chia, 38, was ordered to pay the five-figure sum, for both harassment and libel, to energy trader Idowu Ogunkanmi, 44, after she launched a 'horrific' campaign of harassment and falsely accused him of raping her.
She met the father of three in a London nightclub in 2015, and they had a one-night stand before Mr Ogunkanmi flew back to Dubai, where he lives and works.
The High Court heard earlier this month that in the following months, Chia subjected him to a 'sustained, relentless and vindictive' campaign of harassment that lasted almost nine years.
A restraining order was imposed on Chia, and she was due to appear at Westminster Magistrates' Court for breaching it twice, but failed to turn up.
Prosecutor Rizwan Amin said: 'On March 23, Chia is alleged to have posted images of Mr Ogunkanmi on social media.
'She later spotted Mr Ogunkanmi on a street, when she approached and called him out by name, and then proceeded to insult him.'
Mr Amin said the same offence happened again on May 3. Magistrate Simon Burke ordered a warrant for Chia's arrest.
The High Court was told Chia falsely claimed Mr Ogunkanmi drugged her, raped her and bribed police officers to destroy evidence against him.
She also made a series of untrue online posts about him.
Speaking exclusively to MailOnline earlier this month, Mr Ogunkanmi said: 'When I met her she seemed perfectly normal. For someone to be that persistent for so long on a lie, I pray for her. There's definitely something wrong with her, I don't know what it is.
'I met this person for less than 12 hours, that was it... to me that's been the scariest part.'
Mr Ogunkanmi says he was left 'traumatised' and 'shocked' by the allegations, explaining: 'I think she is a very hateful and troublesome person and she lied for so many years about something like that, reposting the same thing.
'There were so many accusations: rape, stealing her kids, conniving with the Met Police, getting her pregnant. It was all just baseless accusations. The accusations were beyond belief. I only ever met her once in my life.
'She probably thought I had a lot of money and was looking to extort me. Because I refused to be extorted, she started this hateful Instagram campaign on me and her friend.
'It's unbelievable that anyone could come up with these kind of things.'
Mr Ogunkami says he is relieved by the legal victory but believes he should have been awarded more 'as it does not fully account for the depth of damage to my reputation and well-being'.
He also said social media companies have a greater role to play, adding: 'Anyone can just go to the internet now or Instagram, create a fake post and say anything about anyone and Instagram will keep it there. I don't understand it.
'There are people who could have committed suicide. You could lose your job, you could lose your family just by someone out there creating these remarks about you.'
Court documents show the pair met when Mr Ogunkanmi asked one of Ms Chia's friends, Prisca Okoye, to pass on his number to her.
They partied together at the Steam Bar in the Hilton Hotel, Paddington, west London, and proceeded to have a one-night-stand at his room later that night.
Mr Ogunkanmi then flew back to Dubai the following day and despite only meeting once, they stayed in contact.
However, by early 2016 their relationship exploded when Ms Chia accused him of having sex with Ms Okoye which they both denied.
It was at this point that Ms Chia then began to repeatedly confront Mr Ogunkanmi about allegedly having sex with her friend - including threatening to 'destroy' him and asking him to send her thousands of pounds.
Mr Ogunkanmi, who admits he continued to speak to her about other matters, says he transferred her £250 which he believed was to cover her phone bill.
However, the intimidating messages from Ms Chia then escalated with her threatening to tell his friends and repeatedly calling his workplace, sometimes more than 100 times a day, the court heard.
Distressed by the harassment, Mr Ogunkanmi returned to London in May 2016 to report Ms Chia to the Met Police.
She was arrested and quizzed over the allegations in June that year before being bailed on the condition that she did not contact him or contact his colleagues.
But just six weeks later, Ms Chia texted one of his colleagues, saying Mr Ogunkanmi 'will spend the rest of his life in jail.'
However, this was only the start.
Mr Ogunkanmi's world would come crashing down when Ms Chia then accused him of raping her in September 2016.
He returned to London for a voluntary police interview in October 2017 and was subsequently cleared when detectives told him that no further action would be taken over the rape allegation.
But by January 2018, she started to bombard him with calls again before setting up multiple Instagram profiles - with names including cindylicious11 and u_smell-nice-witch - where she would post defamatory statements, the court heard.
In the flurry of posts, she repeatedly accused him of being a 'rapist' and shared his name and photo publicly. She also alleged that he had paid police officers and medical staff to destroy evidence.
Launching a lawsuit against Ms Chia, he claimed that the impression of the posts from a member of the public would be that he was a 'rapist' and that he had paid authorities to 'alter or destroy the evidence in the course of a criminal investigation against him.'
Ms Chia continued to share defamatory posts on Instagram over several years between January 2018 and at least December 2021.
On December 31, 2021, where she shared a photo of his face and claimed he had 'drugged, raped and impregnated' her.
In September 2022, the harassment continued on Twitter, now X, where she repeated the allegation that he was a rapist.
She then made an Instagram account with the username rapist_trying_to_avoid_justice where she again shared photos of his face and published eight defamatory posts.
Amid the bombardment of false allegations, she also claimed he had abused her child, tagging the Met Police, Dubai Police and National Crime Agency.
Mr Ogunkanmi sued her for defamation amid her online claims that he was a rapist, drugged her, bribed police officers and medical staff to destroy evidence, conspired to pervert the course of justice and abused her child.
He said the impact 'would have on his reputation are obviously so severe as to pass the threshold of serious harm on their face'.
His lawyer, Mr Symes, submitted that his client should have been awarded £120,000 for the harassment and defamation - however the judge ruled Ms Chia would only be ordered to pay £25,000.
Mr Ogunkanmi also sued Ms Chia over harassment following her repeated calls to him and his workplace as well as threatening damaging messages to his family and friends.
Ms Chia did not appear in court and was not represented. Deputy High Court Judge Susie Alegre said she 'has not engaged at all with the proceedings', which resulted in a default judgment being ordered.
The judge therefore only had to rule the amount of damages to award against Ms Chia and whether any injunctive relief was required against her.
Deputy High Court Judge Susie Alegre ruled: 'It is important for general damages in a defamation action to vindicate the Claimant's good name and it should be clear, from this judgment, that there is no truth at all in the defamatory posts.
'The fact that the Mr Ogunkanmi had a consensual sexual encounter with Ms Chia does not reflect 'a kernel of truth' and in no way justifies the horrific campaign of harassment, abuse and defamation that he has been subjected to for over nine years.
'The posts were clearly malicious which may be considered an aggravating factor and one for which a degree of compensation is due for injury to feelings.
'In light of all the circumstances of this case, weighing up the gravity of the allegations, the backdrop of years of harassment, malicious intent and a failure to engage on the part of the Defendant against the very meagre evidence of harm, particularly in this jurisdiction, and the limited distribution of the libel, I award a global figure of £25,000 in damages for both the harassment and the libel.'
The court also heard that 'arising out of her obsession with Mr Ogunkanmi, she has 'physically attacked Ms Okoye several times in public'.
Ms Chia was convicted of common assault in February and sentenced to 10 weeks in prison with a restraining order for five years.
The judge also ruled that injunctive relief was 'justified' to protect Mr Ogunkanmi's reputation and his right to a private life.
The judge added: 'It is clear that such injunctive relief is a necessary and proportionate measure to put a stop to the ongoing attacks on the Claimant.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What are the rules around police giving out a suspect's nationality?
What are the rules around police giving out a suspect's nationality?

BBC News

time11 minutes ago

  • BBC News

What are the rules around police giving out a suspect's nationality?

Ministers have said police should be more transparent about the nationalities of people who are charged. But what exactly are the rules?When a police force in England and Wales arrests or charges a suspect and they are thinking of giving information to the media, they need to have two things in mind: the laws about contempt of court which are designed to make sure suspects have a fair trial, and the College of Policing guidance on media of court laws are quite simple in this context. No-one should make public any information that might make a future trial unfair, for example giving out details of the evidence that police officers have collected. In most cases publishing the nationality of the person charged is unlikely to make the trial unfair, so the contempt of court laws are not often College of Policing guidance is more complicated. Before 2012 police forces made decisions on what information to give to the media on a purely case by case basis. These decisions were often nuanced, but were based on how much that information was considered relevant, and were sometimes simply dependent on the force's relationship with an individual journalist. But after Lord Leveson published his report into the ethics of the press in 2012 police forces became much more cautious abut what information they culminated in the College of Policing guidance on media relations which says that if someone is arrested (but not yet charged) police should only give the suspect's gender and age. The guidance does not say anything about nationality or asylum status at this stage. Once a suspect has been charged the guidance says police can give out information such as the name, the date of birth and the address of the nationality and asylum status are not mentioned, but the guidance says: "The media are aware of automatic reporting restrictions and it is their responsibility to follow them. Any information permitted under such restrictions should be released upon charge, including the following: name, date of birth, address, details of charge, and date of court appearance. "The person's occupation can be released if it is relevant to the crime - for example, a teacher charged with the assault of a pupil at the school where they work."So there is nothing in the guidance that prevents police giving information about that nationality, asylum status or even ethnicity of someone who has been charged. But there is nothing that specifically mentions them Warwickshire Police charged two men in connection with the rape of a 12-year-old girl, the force would not say whether the men were asylum seekers. The force said: "Once someone is charged with an offence, we follow national guidance. This guidance does not include sharing ethnicity or immigration status." While this last sentence is true, the guidance does not actually make suggestions one way or another on ethnicity and immigration UK leader Nigel Farage accused the police of a response, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper told BBC Radio 4's Today programme on Tuesday: "We do think there should be greater transparency. We do think more information should be provided, including on issues around nationality including on some of those asylum issues."The prime minister's official spokesman had earlier said: "Our position is that authorities, whether it is the police or whether central government, should be as transparent as possible on these issues."In truth, what information should be released to the media is largely at the discretion of the police force. As events in Liverpool in May showed, when forces think it is in the public interest they will release information about a suspect's ethnicity even before they have been charged. When a car ploughed into crowds celebrating Liverpool FC's winning of the Premiership title, Merseyside Police quickly said the man arrested was white and British, in order to quash rumours of a terrorist College of Policing said: "Police forces make challenging and complex decisions on a case-by-case basis and transparency is essential to prevent misinformation and reassure the public."It said that its guidance was "already under review" and that police forces were considering how to balance their legal obligations with "their responsibility to prevent disorder".The issue of what information police can release about a suspect came sharply into focus last summer when Axel Rudakubana was arrested for murdering three young girls, Alice Aguiar, nine, Bebe King, six, and Elsie Dot Stancombe, seven, in first Merseyside Police did not release any information about him or his religion, which allowed false information that he was a Muslim asylum seeker to spread. Such disinformation was at least partly responsible for last summer's riots. At the time Merseyside Police said it was not giving out more information because of the contempt of court Law Commission has also been looking at contempt of court laws, with a review due to report next month.

Teen who raped 13-year-old and sexually assaulted young girl in woodland jailed
Teen who raped 13-year-old and sexually assaulted young girl in woodland jailed

STV News

time11 minutes ago

  • STV News

Teen who raped 13-year-old and sexually assaulted young girl in woodland jailed

A teenager who raped a 13-year-old and sexually assaulted a 12-year-old on the same day has been jailed for five years. The 17-year-old, who cannot be named for legal reasons, targeted his victims in woodland in Dundee. The High Court in Edinburgh heard the offender carried out the attacks in the Ardler area of the city on February 10, 2023, when he was 15 years old. The accused was found guilty earlier this year of rape and sexual assault charges. He had denied any wrongdoing and pled not guilty. On Tuesday, the youth, who has no previous convictions, appeared for sentencing. His lawyer Jim Stephenson told the court that his client had suffered adverse childhood experiences. Mr Stephenson added: 'He has witnessed domestic abuse. He is a vulnerable person. He has shown a lack of maturity.' Passing sentence, Judge Michael O'Grady told the youth that he would be supervised by the authorities for three years following his release from custody. Passing sentence, judge O'Grady added: 'These assaults were cowardly, humiliating and cruel. 'These were wicked acts. 'The victims here are the girls – no one should lose sight of that.' The teen was also placed on the Sex Offenders Register for life. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country

M&S apologises after girl, 14, was left 'freaked out' when 6ft 2in transgender employee asked if she needed help in bra department
M&S apologises after girl, 14, was left 'freaked out' when 6ft 2in transgender employee asked if she needed help in bra department

Daily Mail​

time11 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

M&S apologises after girl, 14, was left 'freaked out' when 6ft 2in transgender employee asked if she needed help in bra department

Marks & Spencer has apologised after a transgender employee approached a 14-year-old girl in the bra section and offered to help. The child's furious mother complained to the retail giant and said it was 'completely inappropriate' for her daughter to be approached by a 'biological male' in the lingerie section of the shop, where she was hoping to have a bra fitting. She detailed in an email to M&S the 'horror' her daughter experienced when she was approached by the male identifying as female. 'He is at least 6ft 2in daughter recoiled, so I politely declined the offer and we left immediately. She was visibly upset and said she felt freaked out.' The retailer replied and said they were 'truly sorry' and 'deeply regret the distress your daughter felt during her visit to our store'. It added they took her concerns 'very seriously' and wish to make arrangements for a better experience in their next visit, including 'assistance from a female colleague'. An M&S spokesperson said: 'We want our stores to be inclusive and welcoming places for our colleagues and customers. 'We have written to this customer and explained that our colleagues typically work across all departments in our stores and customers can always ask to speak to the colleague they feel most comfortable with.' It is understood the employee works across the clothing section and does not carry out bra fittings. However the mother, who has chosen to remain anonymous, said she did not feel satisfied by the retailer's response that her daughter would not be approached by the transgender employee again, although they had acknowledged 'this colleague is not female'. The incident occurred in March just weeks before the supreme court ruled that trans women can be excluded from women-only spaces as Britain's highest court ruled they are not legally women and equality law refers only to biological sex. The outraged mother has asked M&S to work up a policy that ensures transgender members of staff would not approach girls and young women. Human rights boss of the charity Sex Matters, Fiona McAnena, told The Telegraph: 'M&S needs to rethink its priorities and remember that women and girls have rights too, and that this man should not be permitted to hang around in the women's underwear department as a matter of common decency. 'This is what happens when a business centres the feelings of men who identify as women, even at the expense of their own customers. It is entirely inappropriate for a man to approach a teenage girl in a lingerie department.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store