
Canadian report recommends creation of UAP reporting office
Also called Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP), the preferred term used by governments and scientists seeking to avoid the stigma associated with UFOs, the topic of strange objects in the sky has been in the headlines recently.
The report notes that new technology and increased aerial activity can lead to an increased number of sightings that are, at least to the observer, unexplained.
'Whether satellites, drones, planes or atmospheric events, no one would deny that there is more and more activity in the skies above us.,' the report reads. 'Our ability to understand what we observe depends on a multitude of factors, such as time of day, cloud cover, distance and colour contrast.'
'Rarely does anyone mistake a flock of geese flying in V formation for a fighter squadron flying at high altitudes,' it continues. 'But sometimes what is being observed in the sky is not immediately clear, and a person may wonder if what they are seeing is a natural phenomenon, a new type of aircraft or something else altogether.'
The Sky Canada project was created in 2022 under the Office of the Chief Science Advisor of Canada, cardiovascular scientist Dr. Mona Nemer.
Report recommends new UAP office
The report suggests there is a need for Canada to establish an office to collect and investigate UAP reports, with a suggestion that the Canadian Space Agency could be a partner in the effort as a trusted scientific source.
Trust was one issue raised by the report, which noted that reports of unexplained sightings can lead to the spread of misinformation and disinformation.
'One of the primary issues with misinformation and disinformation is their impact on public trust. When people are repeatedly exposed to false narratives, they may become skeptical of credible sources, including scientists, journalists and government institutions,' the report reads.
Reducing UAP stigma
The findings also urge such an office to encourage pilots, air traffic controllers and cabin crews to report UAP sightings without fear of stigmatization.
It also recommends making the records available to the public and creating tools for data collection and combating disinformation.
The report also noted that credible UAP reports received by several government departments and agencies are overlooked as they don't clearly fall under the mandates of those authorities.
The project estimated there could be as many as 1,000 UAP sightings per year in Canada, with reports coming from professional pilots, military and law enforcement members and the general public.
Canada is not alone in focusing on UAP reports. The Pentagon's All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) is tasked with investigating reports in the U.S. and other countries, including France, Chile and China, which also have official offices to look into sightings.
The question of extraterrestrial life
While the report recommends more investigation into UAPs, the report is also clear in stating that the goal of the project was not to address the question of extraterrestrial life or visitors.
In the U.S., AARO has remained firm in saying there is no evidence linking UAPs to non-human intelligence, despite claims to the contrary from whistleblowers.
The Canadian report acknowledged a lack of evidence linking alien life to UAPs while also admitting that some sightings remain a mystery.
'UFOs are by their very definition unidentified, but this does not imply that they are of extraterrestrial origin, that they defy natural or scientific explanation, or that they would not be identifiable with access to additional or better data and tools,' it said. 'Nonetheless, some UAP sightings — for which data exist — remain unexplained even after investigation.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Los Angeles Times
2 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Trump is undermining his own ‘action plan' for AI, experts say
WASHINGTON — President Trump revealed an 'action plan' for artificial intelligence on Wednesday ostensibly designed to bolster the United States in its race against China for AI superiority. But experts in the field warn the administration is sidestepping safety precautions that sustain public trust, and is ignoring the impacts of research funding cuts and visa restrictions for scientists that could hold America back. Trump introduced the new policy with an address in Washington, a new government website and a slew of executive actions, easing restrictions on the export of AI technology overseas and greasing the wheels for infrastructural expansion that would accommodate the computing power required for an AI future — both top requests of American AI companies. The plan also calls for AI to be integrated more thoroughly across the federal government, including at the Pentagon, and includes a directive targeting 'woke' bias in large language models. The new website, says the United States 'is in a race to achieve global dominance in artificial intelligence,' and lays out three pillars of its plan for success: 'Accelerating Innovation, Building AI Infrastructure, and Leading International Diplomacy and Security.' Scholars of machine learning and AI believe that whichever country loses the race — toward general artificial intelligence, where AI has capabilities similar to the human mind, and ultimately toward superintelligence, where its abilities exceed human thought — will be unable to catch up with the exponential growth of the winner. Today, China and the United States are the only powers with competitive AI capabilities. 'Whether we like it or not, we're suddenly engaged in a fast-paced competition to build and define this groundbreaking technology that will determine so much about the future of civilization itself, because of the genius and creativity of Silicon Valley — and it is incredible, incredible genius, without question, the most brilliant place on Earth,' Trump said on Wednesday in his policy speech on AI. 'America is the country that started the AI race. And as president of the United States, I'm here today to declare that America is going to win it,' he added. 'We're going to work hard — we're going to win it. Because we will not allow any foreign nation to beat us. Our children will not live in a planet controlled by the algorithms of the adversary's advancing values.' Yoshua Bengio, founder of Mila-Quebec AI Institute and a winner of the Turing Award for his work on deep learning, told The Times that the urgency of the race is fueling concerning behavior from both sides. 'These technologies hold enormous economic potential,' Bengio said, 'but intense competition between countries or companies can create dangerous incentives to cut corners on safety in order to stay ahead.' Silicon Valley may be getting much of what it wants from Trump — but the administration's continued assault on the student visa program remains a significant concern for the very same tech firms Trump aims to empower. Yolanda Gil, senior director of AI and data science initiatives at the USC Viterbi School of Engineering, said that the Trump administration's reductions in funding and visas 'will reduce U.S. competitiveness in AI and all technology areas, not just in the near future but for many years to come,' noting that almost 500,000 international students in science and engineering are currently enrolled in U.S. universities. The majority of America's top AI companies have been founded by first- or second-generation immigrants, and 70% of full-time graduate students at U.S. institutions working in AI-related fields have come from abroad. Yet the administration's revocation and crackdown on F-1 visas risks crippling the talent pipeline the industry views as essential to success against China. Funding cuts to research institutions, too, threaten the stability of programs and their attractiveness to the best foreign minds, said Sheila Jasanoff, a professor of science and technology studies at the Harvard Kennedy School. 'Our openness to ideas and people, combined with steadiness of funding, drew bright talents from around the globe and science prospered,' Jasanoff said. 'That achievement is in a precarious state through the Trump administration's unpredictable and exclusionary policies that have created an atmosphere in which young scientists are much less comfortable coming to do their science in America.' 'Why would a talented young person wish to invest in a U.S. graduate program if there is a risk their visa could be canceled overnight on poorly articulated and unprecedented grounds? It's clear that other countries, including China, are already trying to benefit from our suddenly uncertain and chaotic research environment,' she added. 'We seem to be heading into an era of self-inflicted ignorance.' Teddy Svoronos, also at Harvard as a senior lecturer in public policy, said that the president is deregulating the AI industry 'while limiting its ability to recruit the highest-quality talent from around the world and de-incentivizing research that lacks immediate commercial use.' 'His policies thus far convince me that the future of the U.S. will certainly have more AI,' Svoronos said, 'but I don't see a coherent strategy around creating more effective or more aligned AI.' Aligned AI, in simple terms, refers to artificial intelligence that is trained to do good and avoid harm. Trump's action plan doesn't include the phrase, but repeatedly emphasizes the need to align AI development with U.S. interests. The deregulatory spirit of Trump's plan could help expedite AI development. But it could also backfire in unexpected ways, Jasanoff said. 'It's not clear that technology development prospers without guardrails that protect scientists and engineers against accidents, overreach and public backlash,' she added. 'The U.S. biotech industry, for example, has actively sought out ethical and policy clarification because missteps could endanger entire lines of research.' The plan also has the United States encouraging the development of open-source and open-weight AI models, allowing public access to code and training data. It is a decision that will allow AI to be more readily adopted throughout the U.S. economy — but also grants malicious actors, such as terrorist organizations, access to AI tools they could use to threaten national security and global peace. It is the sort of compromise that Bengio feared would emerge from the U.S.-China race. 'This dynamic poses serious public safety and national security risks, including AI-enabled cyberattacks, biological threats and the possibility of losing human control over advanced AI — outcomes with no winners,' Bengio said. 'To realize the full benefits of these technologies,' he added, 'safety and innovation must go hand in hand, supported by strong technical and societal safeguards.' The must-read: National Guard came to L.A. to fight unrest. Troops ended up fighting boredomThe deep dive: Hollywood's being reshaped by generative AI. What does that mean for screenwriters?The L.A. Times Special: As west Altadena burned, L.A. County fire trucks stayed elsewhere More to come,Michael Wilner—Was this newsletter forwarded to you? Sign up here to get it in your inbox.


Bloomberg
2 days ago
- Bloomberg
US Defense Fuels Expanding $613 Billion Global Space Economy
The Pentagon's spending on space grew faster than space-related military outlays by other nations in 2024, with the American total likely to soar as President Donald Trump's administration moves ahead with his proposed Golden Dome missile shield. The US defense space expenditure increased 7.7% from a year earlier to $49.5 billion, more than the 2.3% growth by all other nations, which spent a combined $11.3 billion for defense space programs, according to a report from the Space Foundation.
Yahoo
6 days ago
- Yahoo
Next-generation destroyers to pack more missiles, energy weapons
The U.S. Navy is planning for its next-generation destroyer, currently known as the DDG(X), to feature directed-energy weapons and more capacity to carry and launch missiles. According to a report this month from the Congressional Research Service, the service is requesting $133.5 million in research and development in its proposed fiscal 2026 budget to manufacture the DDG(X), which it hopes to procure in the early 2030s. The design for the DDG(X) is larger than previous proposals, with the report noting that it now calls for the ship to have a displacement of 14,500 tons, representing a boost of 1,000 tons from the design put forth in the Navy's shipbuilding plan for fiscal 2024. The report questions how an enlarged design would be consistent with the Navy's stated aim of transitioning to a modernized fleet featuring smaller vessels. To modernize the fleet and cut costs, the Pentagon has been turning to autonomous vessels, and the Navy recently integrated small unmanned surface vessels into a major Baltic Sea exercise. The DDG(X) is intended to replace what are called 'Aegis destroyers,' which include the Ticonderoga-class cruisers and Arleigh Burke-class destroyers. They are known as 'Aegis destroyers,' because they feature the Aegis Combat System, described by the Navy as 'the first fully integrated combat system built to defend against advanced air and surface threats.' The first version of the Aegis was operationally tested in 1973, and the first cruiser equipped with Aegis, the Ticonderoga, was commissioned in 1983. The Arleigh-Burke class came into being as a smaller destroyer featuring an updated Aegis system, with the first ship of this class commissioned in 1991. There are still 22 Ticonderoga-class cruisers procured between fiscal 1978 and 1988 in the U.S. fleet, including ships that entered service between 1983 and 1994. 'The Navy began retiring the remaining 22 ships in FY2022 and wants to retire all 22 by the end of FY2027,' according to the CRS report. Like past destroyer designs, the DDG(X) will feature elements of the Aegis combat system design. The DDG(X) will have increased cruising range and hold 96 standard Vertical Launch System cells, with an ability to replace 32 of these with 12 missile launch cells. It will also feature a power system able to support the deployment of directed energy weapons. These use electromagnetic energy to inflict damage and can include lasers, microwaves or particle beams. The Navy also hopes that the cruisers will produce less underwater noise while at sea, and thus have 'reduced vulnerability due to reduced infrared, acoustic and underwater electromagnetic signatures.'