Apocalypse in the Tropics review – how Brazilian politics succumbed to rightwing fundamentalism
The politicians have a close association to televangelists like the always angry Pastor Silas Malafaia, interviewed at some length here, a strange man thrilled and energised by his own national celebrity and wealth, though irritated by questioning about his private plane, whose value, he says, has depreciated from over a million dollars new to about $800,000. Malafaia is someone for whom an ear-splittingly shrill and boorish rant about gays and communists is a natural mode of communication.
The Christian caucus helped deliver the fiercely reactionary, blandly self-satisfied Jair Bolsonaro to the Brazilian presidency in 2019, though Bolsonaro's callous and incompetent handling of Covid probably sowed the seeds for discontent with his posturing rule. But the film also shows how the Workers' Party ex-president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva – known universally as 'Lula' – ran again for the presidency in 2021 and was careful to court the evangelical vote.
Lula won in 2022 – and Bolsonaro, in Trumpian style, refused to concede, encouraged a coup and incited his supporters to storm government buildings. But what now? Is Lula simply the Brazilian Biden, ageing and uninspiring? Will someone else be the second coming of the Brazilian far right? Could it be the gruesome Pastor Malafaia himself perhaps? Or would he find the subsequent press scrutiny of all his personal dealings disagreeable? Democracy has never looked so vulnerable.
Apocalypse in the Tropics is in cinemas from 11 July and on Netflix from 14 July.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
China's Xi sends congratulations to Suriname President-elect Simons
BEIJING, July 13 (Reuters) - China's President Xi Jinping sent a congratulatory message to Suriname's President-elect Jennifer Simons, Chinese state media Xinhua reported on Sunday. Xi said he attaches great importance to the development of China-Suriname relations and that he is willing to work with Simmons to promote greater development of the strategic partnership between the two countries, Xinhua reported.
The Guardian
8 hours ago
- The Guardian
World must be more wary than ever of China's growing economic power
China is pulling every lever at its disposal to counter Donald Trump's economic blockade, and it's working. Trade is recovering after the massive hit from Washington's wide-ranging tariffs on Beijing's exports. According to data provider Macrobond and Beijing-based consultancy Gavekal Dragonomics, exports to the US were down by about $15bn (£11bn) in May, but up by half that figure to other countries that trade with the US. Exports to African countries have also risen sharply. Meanwhile, Chinese officials are poised to strike deals to deepen economic cooperation with countries ranging from Brazil and South Africa to Australia and the UK. The latest addition to China's growing list of conquests occurred last week when its premier, Li Qiang, and Brazil's beleaguered president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, signed a slew of cooperation agreements, including ones covering artificial intelligence (AI) and aerospace, further consolidating Beijing's Belt and Road scheme of tied investments. It matters to everyone that China's power and influence are expanding because the aims of its autocratic regime undermine the economic and political resources of the rest of the world. China might, by some, be considered the great provider, but its pseudo-communist regime is a malign actor on the international stage, much as Russia has become, and its search for ways to thrive must be strictly circumscribed. Without tough action, its voracious appetite for resources, information and intellectual capital will eat all of us. There are spies in every major university syphoning information back to Beijing about new developments and business opportunities. When intellectual property and patents can be hacked, they are duly stolen. Digital information is harvested on a vast scale and put into huge databases, waiting for developments in AI to allow for a more systematic analysis by Chinese officials. It might seem like a paranoid interpretation of China's day-to-day workings when Britons cast their eye over their own government and believe it barely capable of boiling an egg. China, though, is a very different place. Talk to local officials and you will quickly notice how concerned they are about the basics as much as they are about reasserting China's preindustrial revolution status as the world's greatest economic power. How to feed 1.4 billion people is a daily task and a constant worry. Nothing must stop the effort to keep the wheels of today's economy turning and the mission to usurp rivals such as the US and turn neighbours into supplicants. Australia's prime minister, Anthony Albanese, knows this ahead of a trip to three Chinese cities this weekend for talks about trade and investment and the UK energy secretary, Ed Miliband, understands how carefully he must tread when considering injections of Chinese cash and knowhow to build new offshore windfarms. What Beijing can offer is hugely attractive. It's not just the 10% depreciation in its currency against the dollar that makes its exports even cheaper than they were just a few months ago. It has cut-price digital infrastructure products that will transform an economy, an especially appealing offer to the industrialising nations also being punished by Trump's tariffs such as South Africa, Brazil and the Philippines. In the post-pandemic period of panic gripping much of the world, where the costs of making any kind of improvements are growing and government debts are escalating, China is one of the few big investors outside the Middle East with significant financial firepower. Cheap goods offset inflationary pressures while tantalising investments lure countries that Beijing knows are struggling to deliver on election promises. In this turbulent world, the UK, the EU and Australia can fend off China's demands for greater access in return for investment – primarily access to digital information. They can use polite language when they say no. Or they can cite China's alliance with Russia if they need a more forceful excuse. Beijing supplies Russia with much of what it needs in wartime in return for cheap oil. In this way it has embraced pariah status. Albanese says he will take back the port in Darwin from Chinese control. Likewise, Miliband should block Chinese investment in UK energy infrastructure. And David Lammy, the foreign secretary, should support planning objections to China's proposed new embassy in London, which the MoD has warned will be a huge spying station. Keeping China at bay when it has so much to offer won't be easy. It pays the wages of university lecturers by sending tens of thousands of students to the UK. It sends us cheap electric cars and much else from its vast warehouse of electrical and electronic products. That shouldn't be an excuse for adopting a breezy, laissez-faire attitude. We might not have wanted to take sides. There is no issue with the people of Russia and China, but their governments have forced us to be more independent, and take the financial hit that comes with that.
The Guardian
17 hours ago
- The Guardian
World must be more wary than ever of China's growing economic power
China is pulling every lever at its disposal to counter Donald Trump's economic blockade, and it's working. Trade is recovering after the massive hit from Washington's wide-ranging tariffs on Beijing's exports. According to data provider Macrobond and Beijing-based consultancy Gavekal Dragonomics, exports to the US were down by about $15bn (£11bn) in May, but up by half that figure to other countries that trade with the US. Exports to African countries have also risen sharply. Meanwhile, Chinese officials are poised to strike deals to deepen economic cooperation with countries ranging from Brazil and South Africa to Australia and the UK. The latest addition to China's growing list of conquests occurred last week when its premier, Li Qiang, and Brazil's beleaguered president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, signed a slew of cooperation agreements, including ones covering artificial intelligence (AI) and aerospace, further consolidating Beijing's Belt and Road scheme of tied investments. It matters to everyone that China's power and influence are expanding because the aims of its autocratic regime undermine the economic and political resources of the rest of the world. China might, by some, be considered the great provider, but its pseudo-communist regime is a malign actor on the international stage, much as Russia has become, and its search for ways to thrive must be strictly circumscribed. Without tough action, its voracious appetite for resources, information and intellectual capital will eat all of us. There are spies in every major university syphoning information back to Beijing about new developments and business opportunities. When intellectual property and patents can be hacked, they are duly stolen. Digital information is harvested on a vast scale and put into huge databases, waiting for developments in AI to allow for a more systematic analysis by Chinese officials. It might seem like a paranoid interpretation of China's day-to-day workings when Britons cast their eye over their own government and believe it barely capable of boiling an egg. China, though, is a very different place. Talk to local officials and you will quickly notice how concerned they are about the basics as much as they are about reasserting China's preindustrial revolution status as the world's greatest economic power. How to feed 1.4 billion people is a daily task and a constant worry. Nothing must stop the effort to keep the wheels of today's economy turning and the mission to usurp rivals such as the US and turn neighbours into supplicants. Australia's prime minister, Anthony Albanese, knows this ahead of a trip to three Chinese cities this weekend for talks about trade and investment and the UK energy secretary, Ed Miliband, understands how carefully he must tread when considering injections of Chinese cash and knowhow to build new offshore windfarms. What Beijing can offer is hugely attractive. It's not just the 10% depreciation in its currency against the dollar that makes its exports even cheaper than they were just a few months ago. It has cut-price digital infrastructure products that will transform an economy, an especially appealing offer to the industrialising nations also being punished by Trump's tariffs such as South Africa, Brazil and the Philippines. In the post-pandemic period of panic gripping much of the world, where the costs of making any kind of improvements are growing and government debts are escalating, China is one of the few big investors outside the Middle East with significant financial firepower. Cheap goods offset inflationary pressures while tantalising investments lure countries that Beijing knows are struggling to deliver on election promises. In this turbulent world, the UK, the EU and Australia can fend off China's demands for greater access in return for investment – primarily access to digital information. They can use polite language when they say no. Or they can cite China's alliance with Russia if they need a more forceful excuse. Beijing supplies Russia with much of what it needs in wartime in return for cheap oil. In this way it has embraced pariah status. Albanese says he will take back the port in Darwin from Chinese control. Likewise, Miliband should block Chinese investment in UK energy infrastructure. And David Lammy, the foreign secretary, should support planning objections to China's proposed new embassy in London, which the MoD has warned will be a huge spying station. Keeping China at bay when it has so much to offer won't be easy. It pays the wages of university lecturers by sending tens of thousands of students to the UK. It sends us cheap electric cars and much else from its vast warehouse of electrical and electronic products. That shouldn't be an excuse for adopting a breezy, laissez-faire attitude. We might not have wanted to take sides. There is no issue with the people of Russia and China, but their governments have forced us to be more independent, and take the financial hit that comes with that.
