Sending Ukraine offensive weapons ‘could move Putin to the negotiating table,' says ex-NATO commander
Speaking ahead of the announcement of the US-NATO weapons deal for Ukraine, Stavridis said he was hoping the deal would 'move beyond strictly defensive weapons, such as the Patriot missiles, which are the air defense systems that the Ukrainians desperately need.'
'What I would like to see is a provision for the United States to send more harpoon missiles to go after the Black Sea fleet, more HIMARS, surface-to-surface weapons that can reach deep behind Russian lines, more offensive cyber capability, and Kate, maybe some more F-16 aircraft, all of which are very capable offensively,' Stavridis said in an interview with CNN's Kate Bolduan on Monday.
'I think that is what could move Putin to the negotiating table, which is what we want on our side,' he continued.
Trump announced Monday he brokered a deal to send more weapons to Ukraine without burdening the United States. Under the deal, weapons would be sourced from NATO allies in Europe that just agreed to step up their defense spending at a summit Trump hailed as a success.
While Trump said these deals would include Patriot missile defense batteries critical for Ukraine to guard its skies under increasing Russian bombardment, there was little information on what other weapons systems Trump is greenlighting for countries to purchase or what is being prioritized.
'It's everything. It's Patriots. It's all of them. It's a full complement with the batteries,' Trump said, adding that the batteries could arrive in Ukraine within days.
Trump on Monday also threatened Putin with sanctions if there is no deal to end the war in Ukraine in 50 days—which Stavridis said earlier on Monday he had been hoping to see.
'That sanctions bill that Lindsey Graham is pushing — that will have the effect of keeping Putin backing up,' Stavridis said earlier Monday. 'That's what we need to see.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
a minute ago
- The Hill
Homan hints Trump farm worker policy is coming
White House border czar Tom Homan said on Wednesday that the Trump administration is considering possible changes to its immigration enforcement policy as it relates to farm and hospitality workers. In an interview on NewsNation's 'Cuomo,' Homan said people in the White House are talking about various policy solutions and he expects he could see an announcement sometime soon. 'I know the Department of Homeland Security, along with the Department of Labor, and the Department of Agriculture are talking about policy changes now,' Homan said. 'I mean, the president's committed: there will be no amnesty, but there's a lot of smart minds at the White House talking about, is there something for farm workers? Is there something for hospitality?' 'So, we'll see what comes out of it,' he added. 'But people are talking about: is there something that can be done? And I know they're talking now. And I expect something will come out soon, but we'll see what goes on.' 'I don't want to get ahead of the president on what I think is coming, or if something's even coming, but I know people are talking,' Homan said. Homan said that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) will work to carry out whatever policy the president decides to pursue. 'I'm not going to get ahead of the president, what that decision would be,' he said. 'I can tell you this: I worked for six presidents… My job to is to operate within the framework provided me by the administration.' 'So if the president comes up with a policy and says, 'Okay, here's what we're going to do with farm workers,' then ICE will abide by that policy,' Homan continued. The Trump administration has sent mixed messages about its approach to immigration raids that affect farms and migrant farm workers. Last week, Trump announced a new program intended to support the agriculture industry, which has complained to the White House that the deportation efforts have disrupted business. Many farms rely on migrant workers, including workers without legal immigration status. The program would not provide 'amnesty,' Trump and Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins stressed at the time, though they offered few details about what the program would do. 'There's no amnesty,' Trump said. 'What we're doing is we're getting rid of criminals, but we are doing a work program.' He then asked Rollins to further explain the program, which she said would protect farmers and ensure they had the labor they needed but would not provide amnesty. Trump added, 'We got to give the farmers the people they need, but we're not talking amnesty.' Earlier this month, Trump had signaled deference to farmers who employ migrants without legal status, saying 'they know better' in a speech at a 'Salute to America' event in Des Moines, Iowa. He also indicated during his speech that his administration is working on legislation that would permit some migrants without authorization to stay in the country and continue working on farms. Trump last month acknowledged concerns among the agriculture and hospitality industries that his administration's immigration enforcement was taking away workers key to those businesses, which led to a pause in enforcement at farms, hotels and other locations. But days later, the administration seemed to reverse course.
Axios
a minute ago
- Axios
Trump administration sued by 20 states over FEMA funding cuts
The Trump administration is being sued by 20 states who are seeking to block the cancelation of a grant program that helped protect against potential natural disasters. The big picture: "By unilaterally shutting down FEMA's flagship pre-disaster mitigation program, Defendants have acted unlawfully and violated core separation of powers principles," says the lawsuit that was filed in Boston, Mass., on Wednesday on the program, which has helped states, local and territorial governments and Tribal Nations work to reduce their hazard risk. Driving the news: FEMA announced in an April that it was ending the Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities grant program and canceling all BRIC applications from fiscal years 2020-23. The post announcing the cuts that appears to have since been removed was titled, "FEMA Ends Wasteful, Politicized Grant Program, Returning Agency to Core Mission of Helping Americans Recovering From Natural Disasters." The suit that led by Washington and Massachusetts argues that by "refusing to spend funds Congress directed toward BRIC or trying to spend them on other programs" the administration had violated the Constitution and unlawfully intruded on Congress' "power of the purse." Zoom in: "The impact of the shutdown has been devastating. Communities across the country are being forced to delay, scale back, or cancel hundreds of mitigation projects depending on this funding," the states argue in the suit. Projects that have been in development for years, and in which communities have invested millions of dollars for planning, permitting, and environmental review are now threatened. And in the meantime, Americans across the country face a higher risk of harm from natural disasters. For the record: Most of the states suing the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Acting FEMA head Cameron Hamilton, the Department of Homeland Security and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem are Democratic-led. The states suing the administration are: Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington and Wisconsin.
Axios
a minute ago
- Axios
GENIUS Act back on track in House after massive delay
The House voted late Wednesday to take up a bill establishing a regulatory framework for stablecoin issuers, after a record-breaking session that involved intense negotiations to quell a rebellion from hardliners. Why it matters:"The vote puts the GENIUS Act on a glide path to Trump's desk this week for his signature. After huddling in Speaker Mike Johnson's (R-La.) office, members of the House Freedom Caucus switched their votes to "yes," ending a nearly 10-hour standoff. The House is set to vote Thursday on the GENIUS Act as a standalone measure. Conservatives were pushing to combine a trio of crypto bills into one package, but ultimately settled for a partial win. The latest: House GOP leadership unlocked support for the vote by agreeing to attach one of the key crypto measures, the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act, to the must-pass National Defense Authorization Act. Johnson told reporters he spoke with Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) on Wednesday about adding the provision to the NDAA. "We're hopeful that they'll hold the line," Johnson said of the Senate. The big picture: Wednesday's revote prevailed 217-212 and follows a meeting Trump said he held late Tuesday in the Oval Office with opponents. "I am in the Oval Office with 11 of the 12 Congressmen/women necessary to pass the GENIUS Act and, after a short discussion, they have all agreed to vote tomorrow morning in favor of the Rule," Trump posted on his Truth Social account. But that confidence proved premature. Catch up quick: The House floor ground to a halt Tuesday after the chamber rejected a procedural vote setting terms for floor debate on the GENIUS Act. Johnson abruptly cancelled votes for the rest of the day amid demands to combine the GENIUS Act with two other crypto bills the chamber is considering this week. That would have forced the Senate to reconsider the legislation, likely leading to significant delays. Zoom out: After months of delicate bipartisan negotiations, the Senate passed the GENIUS Act in June by a 68-30 vote. Although the House has drafted its own stablecoin legislation, it ultimately chose to take up the Senate-passed version — in part to avoid having to go back to the Senate.
