Live Updates: Jury Selected in Sean Combs Sex-Trafficking Trial
Before opening statements on Monday, 12 jurors and six alternates were sworn in, selected after Judge Arun Subramanian grilled them on what they had already seen and heard about the allegations against Sean Combs.
There are eight men and four women on the jury. Among the six alternates, two are women and four are men.
The jurors range in age from their 30s to their 70s. They live in Manhattan, the Bronx and Westchester County. The panel includes a massage therapist, an investment analyst, a deli clerk at Gristedes, a dietary aide at a nursing home and a retiree who used to work for JPMorgan.
The panel was supposed to be selected on Friday, but the judge had concerns that jurors would get 'cold feet' over the weekend and drop out of the trial, so he decided to delay the selection until Monday morning.
Over three days of questioning from the judge overseeing the case, potential jurors described the extent of their exposure to the allegations of sexual abuse and violence that have trailed Mr. Combs over the past year and a half. Some were excused from the jury pool if they betrayed bias against Mr. Combs or the prosecution.
But familiarity with the allegations against him was not disqualifying.
Several jurors who were chosen said that they had seen footage of him assaulting his former girlfriend, Casandra Ventura, in an incident at the center of the government's sex-trafficking case. Judge Arun Subramanian ruled last month that some footage of the assault could be shown at trial.
One juror who was selected declared that he would be a 'blank slate entering this courtroom.'
Another juror said she knew very little about the case. 'I didn't hear nothing,' she said during jury selection. 'All I know was he was arrested.'
The jurors are anonymous, meaning their names will not be disclosed in public court. They will not be sequestered, so it is entirely up to them to shield themselves from the media coverage and other chatter about the case.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
8 hours ago
- CBS News
Judge in Brian Walshe's murder case reveals she may have conflict of interest
The judge in the Brian Walshe murder case revealed at a hearing on Friday that she may have a conflict of interest. Norfolk Superior Court Judge Diane Freniere described an attorney appointed to represent the state in the case as a "mentor and friend." While she said she believes she can still be impartial in the case, she's letting the defense consider how it feels about this. Walshe is accused of murdering his wife, Ana, in Cohasset back in January 2023. She was last seen early on Jan. 1 and Walshe said she had been called to Washington, D.C. on a work emergency. The company, who reported her as missing, said there was no emergency. Prosecutors have said that starting Jan. 1 and for several days after, Walshe made multiple online searches for "dismemberment and best ways to dispose of a body," "how long before a body starts to smell" and "hacksaw best tool to dismember." Ana Walshe's body has never been found. Walshe's defense team is also seeking emails related to two other Norfolk County cases, including the Karen Read murder trial, particularly emails and text messages from State Trooper Michael Proctor, who helped lead the investigations that resulted in the arrests of both Walshe and Read. Proctor was fired in March for his actions during the Read investigation when he sent vulgar text messages about her to friends and family. Walshe's trial is set to begin in October 2025.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Inmate accused of attacking prison officer handing him a meal
A SERVING prisoner will stand trial later this year – accused of attacking an Isle of Wight prison officer who was passing him a meal. Nathan Giles, of HMP Isle of Wight, appeared before Island magistrates via video link on Friday, July 25. The 36-year-old is charged with, and denies, assault by beating of an emergency worker, in Newport, on January 28. He is accused of attacking a prison officer while being passed a meal through his cell door. Read more: Man accused of taking and crashing his own mother's car Woman harassed ex within 24 hours of court order being served Mr Giles elected for his trial to be heard at the Isle of Wight Crown Court. His case was adjourned for a plea and trial preparation hearing on September 1.
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Prosecutors seek substantial prison term for Sean 'Diddy' Combs as they oppose bail
Sexual Misconduct Diddy NEW YORK (AP) — Prosecutors said they now expect music mogul Sean 'Diddy' Combs could face a prison sentence 'substantially higher' than the four to five years they once thought he was likely to face after his conviction on two prostitution-related charges. They made the observation late Thursday in a Manhattan federal court written submission in which they also opposed Combs' request this week to be released on $50 million bail while he awaits an Oct. 3 sentencing. In early July, Combs, 55, was acquitted of racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking charges carrying potential life prison terms but was convicted of two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution for arranging for girlfriends and male sex workers to travel to engage in sexual encounters that he filmed. Each prostitution-related charge carries a potential maximum 10 years in prison. Prosecutors said after the verdict that they thought federal sentencing guidelines meant to prevent wide disparities in sentencings for the same crimes would likely call for a prison term of four to five years. But they said Thursday they believe the guidelines range 'will be substantially higher,' raising the risk Combs will flee. Judge Arun Subramanian will have wide latitude in determining a sentence and can choose to ignore the guidelines, which are not mandatory. Combs' lawyers have said they believe the guidelines, if properly calculated, will call for 21 to 27 months in prison. On the day of the verdict, prosecutors won a bail fight after defense lawyer Marc Agnifilo argued Combs should be freed immediately on bail. Subramanian denied the defense request, saying Combs had not met the burden of showing by clear and convincing evidence a 'lack of danger to any person or the community.' But he said Agnifilo could renew the request. In doing so Tuesday, Agnifilo cited other cases he said were comparable to Combs' conviction in which defendants were granted bail. And he cited severe conditions at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, where Combs has been held since his September arrest at a New York hotel. He also said Combs was being treated unfairly for engaging in a 'swingers' lifestyle in which he and his girlfriends sometimes invited male sex workers to join them in multiday marathon sex performances. Prosecutors said in their filing Thursday that Combs' conviction on the prostitution-related counts carried a mandatory requirement that he remain in jail prior to sentencing, unless he could prove exceptional circumstances, which they said he cannot. They said he should also remain in prison as a danger to the community, a claim that Agnifilo disputed in his papers. 'Sean Combs will not be violent to anyone. As we said in court, this jury gave him his life back, and he will not squander his second chance at life, nor would he do anything to further jeopardize his seven children not having a father, and four of his children not having a parent at all,' Agnifilo wrote earlier this week. Prosecutors also said conditions at the federal lockup had improved considerably before Combs was arrested. A federal judge in January 2024 had blasted conditions at the jail, including its extensive lockdowns and inadequate medical care. Prosecutors said cases cited by Agnifilo in which other defendants received bail were not comparable to the crimes Combs was convicted of carrying out, particularly because of his propensity for violence. 'The defendant's extensive history of violence — and his continued attempt to minimize his recent violent conduct — demonstrates his dangerousness and that he is not amendable to supervision,' they wrote. 'The defendant utterly fails to establish by clear and convincing evidence, as required, that he does not pose a danger to the community.'
