The Freedom Charter at 70: A vision betrayed by the ANC?
The ANC and the Freedom Charter: A Betrayal of Foundational Ideals
Image: Cara Viereckl/Independent Media
As South Africa marked the 70th anniversary of the adoption of the Freedom Charter, leading voices in South Africa have raised concerns about the ideals enshrined in the nation's founding document, having been hollowed out, replaced by elite-driven agendas and systemic failures that threaten to undo the progress made in the liberation struggle.
Seventy years ago, in the dusty streets of Kliptown, Soweto, the African National Congress (ANC) and its allies adopted the Freedom Charter - a bold, inclusive blueprint for a democratic South Africa rooted in the principles of equality, shared wealth, and social justice.
The Charter was born from a comprehensive, cross-class, and cross-race consultative process. It embodies millions' hopes for a free, fair, and united nation.
Today, as South Africa marks this significant milestone, critics argue that the ANC has drifted far from those foundational ideals, betraying the very values that inspired the struggle against apartheid.
The Freedom Charter articulated a vision where 'the people shall share in the country's wealth,' land would be shared among those who work it, and poverty, unemployment, and inequality would be eliminated.
It was more than a document; it was a rallying cry-a call for grassroots involvement, gender inclusivity, and racial unity. Its adoption in 1955 symbolised collective resistance, galvanising the fight against apartheid and laying the groundwork for the democratic Constitution of 1996.
In the decades following democracy, the ANC claimed to be the custodian of the Charter's ideals. Yet, many South Africans now see a stark contrast between the lofty promises of 1955 and the reality of today's socio-economic landscape.
Poverty persists, unemployment remains entrenched, and inequality is among the highest globally. The triple burden the Charter sought to eradicate continues unabated, raising questions about the ANC's fidelity to its founding principles.
The political landscape has shifted dramatically. The ANC, once the undisputed leader of South Africa's liberation movement, is now relegated to a coalition partner in a fragmented multiparty system following its failure to secure a majority in the 2024 elections.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
According to Professor Bheki Mngomezulu, Director of the Centre for the Advancement of Non-Racialism and Democracy, this marks a pivotal moment but questions the party's direction.
'The ANC has had ample time to realise the promises of the Freedom Charter. Their inability to deliver on key clauses, particularly wealth sharing and land redistribution, reflects a betrayal of those ideals.'
'Many South Africans believe that the ANC has reneged on its promise to implement the clauses of the Freedom Charter. They base their assessment on the condition of their lives and unfulfilled promises made by the ANC in each election.'
Mngomezulu drew disparities in the ANC, which holds a view that only two of the ten clauses of the Freedom Charter have not been fulfilled.
'These are clauses three, which says, 'The people shall share in the country's wealth,' and clause four, which says, 'The land shall be shared among those who work it.' However, even with these clauses, the ANC claims it is a work in progress.'
He argued that it was safe to say that the question on poverty and other challenges have not all been answered, as people still lived in poverty.
Political Economy Analyst Zamikhaya Maseti proposed marking the 70th anniversary by returning to the roots of the Charter and holding the commemorative events in Kliptown itself.
'Kliptown was the site where our great-grandparents gathered under difficult, illegal conditions on June 25–26, 1955, to craft a vision for a democratic South Africa,' Maseti noted.
'Their gathering produced the Freedom Charter, a lodestar for the liberation struggle. Today, we face an equally historic task: rebuilding South Africa born from their sacrifices. A nation now fractured and drifting, desperately in need of repair.'
She said that 'holding the anniversary in Kliptown would root it in the moral soil of people's struggles and remove the sting of elitism that often surrounds state-led initiatives. It would strip the dialogue of unnecessary extravagance.'
Maseti stressed that 'the original Congress of the People saw delegates arrive by bus, taxi, train-some even on horseback.
'Reflecting this spirit, the proposed R700 million budget for this national dialogue is seen as absurd and morally indefensible I am relieved that the Presidency rejected that outrageous proposal.'
Former ambassador Lassy Chiwayo reflected on the nation's current state as the nation comme 70th anniversary approaches. He warns of a dangerous phenomenon.
'Political sclerosis' is a form of institutional rigidity that stifles progress.
'Once, the ANC was Africa's most respected liberation movement- an icon of hope,' Chiwayo laments. 'Today, what has happened to that movement, and what does it mean for our nation?'
He described 'political sclerosis' as 'a state of stagnation, gridlock, and paralysis,' warning that 'when our institutions become inflexible, they stop functioning effectively, and progress stalls.
The ANC is suffering from a kind of political leprosy that threatens to consume the very ideals it once stood for.' If unchecked,' he warns, 'this disease could lead to the collapse of hope and the end of our dreams for a free, liberated Africa.'
Chiwayo urges the movement to shed its sclerosis, embrace flexibility, and reconnect with the core principles of liberation and service.
'Otherwise, we risk losing the very essence of what our ancestors fought for-an Africa free from foreign domination, inequality, and oppression.'
Activist and author Kim Heller laments that 'the Freedom Charter lies in ruins in democratic South Africa.'
She argued that 'today, the portraiture of the ANC as a devoted and dutiful servant to its citizens has all but collapsed. The party has abandoned its scripture.'
Heller critiqued the current elite-driven, VIP-dominated political culture, contrasting it with the grassroots participation and volunteerism underpinning the Charter's formation.
She pointed out that the proposed R700 million National Dialogue, led by President Ramaphosa, 'lacks the nation-building spirit and grassroots involvement that defined the Charter and the UDF. It appears to be an elite talk shop, disconnected from the struggles of ordinary South Africans.'
Independent analyst Professor Sipho Seepe highlighted that the implementation of the Charter was doomed from the start.
'The ANC adopted a constitution that appreciated past injustices but made socioeconomic transformation difficult,' he stated.
'The architecture of apartheid remains largely intact, and inequality has only worsened, making South Africa the most unequal country in the world.'
He criticised the ANC's partnership with the Democratic Alliance (DA) in government, arguing that 'the party has become an empty shell incapable of delivering on the promises of equality and justice, betraying the very ideals of the Freedom Charter.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
30 minutes ago
- Daily Maverick
DA withdraws from National Dialogue, will vote against budgets of ‘corruption accused' ANC ministers
The DA will oppose the budget votes of 'corruption accused ANC ministers' – including Human Settlements Minister Thembi Simelane and Higher Education Minister Nobuhle Nkabane. The DA is not leaving the Government of National Unity (GNU), but it will not participate in the looming National Dialogue, following the axing of its Deputy Minister of Trade and Industry Andrew Whitfield. 'Frankly, the President cannot even dialogue meaningfully with his own coalition partners, so there is little point in pretending there is any substance to an ANC-run National Dialogue,' DA leader John Steenhuisen said at a press conference in Cape Town on Saturday, 28 June. 'Effective immediately, the DA will therefore have no further part in this process. 'We will also actively mobilise against it to stop this obscene waste of R740-million – starting with a call on civil society to join us in demanding that the National Dialogue not proceed until President [Cyril] Ramaphosa fires ANC corruption accused and other delinquents from the executive,' Steenhuisen continued. Earlier this month, Ramaphosa announced the appointment of 31 prominent South Africans to lead the National Dialogue expected to take place on 15 August this year. The initiative – meant to tackle a wide range of South Africa's pressing issues including unemployment, poor governance and gender-based violence – was met with immediate opposition owing largely to its R740-million price tag. Steenhuisen announced the decision of the DA's Federal Executive (FedEx) after Ramaphosa removed Whitfield from his position on Wednesday, 25 June, providing no reason for his dismissal. Whitfield's removal, it later emerged, was apparently due to an 'unauthorised' trip he took to the US for the DA in February this year. On Thursday, Steenhuisen gave the president an ' ultimatum ' to clean house of the ANC ministers and deputy ministers implicated in corruption within 48 hours or face 'grave consequences'. He accused Ramaphosa of a 'flagrant double standard' and had specifically called on him to remove Human Settlements Minister Thembi Simelane, Higher Education Minister Nobuhle Nkabane and Deputy Minister of Water and Sanitation David Mahlobo from his Executive. The political developments surrounding South Africa's fragile coalition government, caused Ramaphosa to cancel his trip to Seville, Spain, on 30 June, to attend a conference on financing for development. He instead delegated International Relations Minister Ronald Lamola to attend. 'President Ramaphosa has delegated Minister Lamola as the Head of Delegation for the Summit following recent political developments that require close monitoring and management in the country,' his office said in a statement on Saturday. According to a Sunday Times report earlier on Saturday, the DA was said to be considering leaving the GNU. In response to questions from reporters on why the party has decided to remain in the coalition government, Steenhuisen said the DA did not believe that it was 'in the interest of South Africa for the current GNU to collapse'. He said that if the GNU were to break, it would cause 'significant economic damage' to the country. Steenhuisen said the country 'benefits' from having the DA in the GNU. 'A more impactful way would not have been to leave the Government of National Unity, because that would've opened South Africa up to the coalition of chaos and destruction, and would have led very clearly to more disastrous consequences for South Africa,' he said. Steenhuisen threw the ball back into Ramaphosa's court, saying it was up to the ANC whether they wanted to kick the DA out of the national coalition. 'The ball is in the President's court and the ANC's court – if they want to take a strong stance against us and want to stop us [from] standing against corruption, well, they must fire us from the Government of National Unity,' he said. DA to vote against budget votes In addition to mobilising against the National Dialogue, Steenhuisen said the DA would also be voting against the individual budget votes for Simelane and Nkabane's departments. ' A second, critically important step that the DA is taking, is to vote against upcoming departmental budget votes for the departments headed by Simelane, Nkabane, and other corruption accused ANC ministers. 'We will keep voting against those departmental votes until those ministers are removed. 'In this way, the DA will strike the appropriate balance by allowing the broader GNU budget process to proceed to ensure the stability of the country, while forcing the ANC to act against specific ministers. 'If the ANC wants our support for those departmental budgets, they must replace the incumbent ministers with alternatives that meet the very standard the President has set for himself through Whitfield's axing,' said Steenhuisen. He said that the ministers in those portfolios would need to source other ways of getting their budgets passed in Parliament. 'We won't be voting against the globular budget and, I think, that is a result of the fact that we want to ensure that delivery proceeds for the people of South Africa. But those individual budget votes where ministers are severely compromised and sitting at the top of those departments, will obviously have to find other ways to get those budgets passed,' he said. Steenhuisen added that the party's Federal Executive had also considered tabling a motion of no confidence in Ramaphosa. However, he said the DA understood the concerns of many South Africans if Ramaphosa were removed as President. 'While the FedEx decided not to table a Motion of No Confidence at this stage, it is clear that the DA is in the process of losing confidence in his ability to act as a leader not of the ANC, but of the GNU of which we are the second-largest component,' said Steenhuisen. 'If the ANC fails to course-correct, the FedEx will seriously consider exercising our constitutional prerogative by tabling a motion of no confidence.' He mentioned, on several occasions, that the GNU Statement of Intent had been undermined by Ramaphosa and the ANC. 'I think the intent of the Statement of Intent is correct, but it would be great if that was being honored. It is being repeatedly violated. It says a lot about where we're at that a year later, we still have a conflict resolution mechanism; that the Clearing House in the GNU has no terms of reference,' he said. Steenhuisen said that Ramaphosa had not afforded him the opportunity to inform Whitfield himself about what was expected to happen before he received a letter from Ramaphosa alerting him of his removal. 'That is not respectful and that is not right,' he said, suggesting that certain clauses relating to consultation and consensus in the Statement of Intent were violated. 'The Statement of Intent needs to be respected in both letter and spirit,' he said. A replacement for Whitfield Steenhuisen did not provide any names for Whitfield's replacement, saying that the decision was with the party's FedEx. 'We will be submitting a replacement name, and that will obviously be a matter for our Federal Executive to take through the process. It is a DA position, and once again, the fact that we got six ministers and six deputy ministers, is also another example of how we put South Africa first. We, proportionately, are entitled to a lot more than that, and yet it is another matter we had to swallow at that particular time to make sure we got a GNU that worked,' he said. DM
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Steenhuisen's challenge to Ramaphosa: A look at the DA's role in the GNU
DA leader John Steenhuisen says the DA would vote against budgets of the departments that are led by ministers that are allegedly corrupt. Image: Henk Kruger / Independent Newspapers Without the DA, the government will continue to function as the ANC will invite other parties, which are represented in parliament, to join the Government of National Unity (GNU). In anticipation that the DA might quit, political analyst Tessa Dooms said even if the DA were to leave the 10-party GNU, the ANC would bring in eight other parties to replace it. Addressing the press briefing in Cape Town on Saturday afternoon, it became clear that DA leader John Steenhuisen had no intention to announce the party's departure from the GNU. 'If the ANC wants to kick the DA out for fighting against corruption, well, so be it,' said Steenhuisen. The DA had on Thursday reacted harshly to President Cyril Ramaphosa removing its MP, Andrew Whitfield, as the Trade, Industry and Competition deputy minister on Wednesday. In a statement, Steenhuisen threatened the GNU. He called on Ramaphosa to replace Whitfield with a capable DA MP, who can continue to deliver and service the department. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading However, Steenhuisen announced that the party would no longer participate in the National Dialogue, which Ramaphosa launched to unite the country after last year's national elections. Steenhuisen challenged Ramaphosa to prove that he was not acting in bias against Whitfied by also removing ANC's Human Settlements Minister Thembi Simelane, Higher Education Minister Nobuhle Nkabane, and Water and Sanitation deputy minister David Mahlobo whom he accused of underperforming and corruption. While the DA will remain in the GNU, Steenhuisen said it would protest against corruption by voting against the budget votes of the departments that are led by alleged corrupt ministers. 'The second and critical step that the DA is taking is to vote against upcoming departmental budget votes for the departments headed by Simelane, Nkabane, and other ANC accused ministers. 'We will keep voting against those budget votes until those ministers are removed,' said Steenhuisen. 'As long as ANC members implicated in corruption remain as members of the executive, the DA will not support the departmental budget,' Steenhuisen said. He called on the ANC to urgently change the way it engages with its coalition partners and also fight corruption and grow the economy. 'We are demanding that the dialogue should not proceed until President Ramaphosa fires ANC corrupt individuals in the national executive. Political analysts had already predicted that the DA would not leave the GNU as it was enjoying some powers. Dooms said Ramaphosa fired Whitfield, knowing that the DA was powerless to break the GNU. 'It is very unlikely that the DA would leave because the opportunity to have as many ministerial roles, positions and power right now is one that they are not ready to give up. 'Or, they can say that they won't vote with the ANC in parliament,' said Dooms. University of KwaZulu-Natal (UKZN) political analyst, Sakhile Hadebe, was also of the view that the GNU was something that could not be easily collapsed. 'The survival of GNU can be threatened by something huge [that] I can't imagine right now, not firing disobedient Dep Ministers. 'DA enjoys sizable power in that GNU, they are not just helping the ANC to govern,' he said. Another UKZN political analyst, Zakhele Ndlovu's concern was not concerned about how long the GNU would last. 'We should be worried that the inability of the GNU to forge cooperation comes at a significant cost,' he said. Ndlovu said the GNU's resilience has gone through a lot of tests and survived disagreements on the Basic Education Laws Amendment Act, the National Health Insurance Act, the Expropriation Act, and the budget impasse in its first year. 'It appears that GNU partners are still learning the art of cooperation, compromise, negotiation, and accountability, to name a few,' said Ndlovu. The DA's spokesperson Willie Aucump said that if the decision to fire Whitfield was not protested, it would set a bad precedent for ANC, using Ramaphosa to fire its members from the cabinet for minor offences. Ramaphosa fired Whitfield for breaching the Ministerial Handbook by taking a trip to the United States of America on behalf of the DA without the president's approval. Ahead of the trip early this year, Whitfield wrote to Ramaphosa on February 12 requesting approval, but Ramaphosa did not respond to the request, leading to him leaving the country unauthorised and apologising on his return. 'What if next week the ANC becomes fed up with Dr. Leon Schreiber being minister of Home Affairs, Siviwe Gwarube being minister of Basic Education, and the president then gets instructions from his party to fire them? 'We cannot have ministers working with an axe behind their necks that they might be fired by the president anytime,' said Aucamp. He said that although the constitution empowers the president to hire and fire ministers and deputies at will without having to explain, there was another decision that he should take into consideration when he makes decisions, 'because the ANC is not governing alone anymore.' 'They are a minority party, and they have partners within this NGU that he needs to consult with as he has to respect the Statement of Intent that his party signed when the GNU was formed,' he said. He said the fact that the president ignored Steenhuisen's request for permission to communicate with his party before Whitfield was fired showed that Ramaphosa was undermining the GNU partnership. The DA believes that the underlying reason for Whitfied was that he was opposed to certain lucrative tenders, including the lottery contract, which was worth R7 billion, being awarded to politically connected people. The DA believed that Ramaphosa deliberately ignored Whitfield's letter requesting permission. 'Ten days went by without getting a reply from the president, and on every single one of those 10 days, Whitfield followed up with the office of the president and the president and he did not get a reply. 'If the president did not want him to go, why didn't the president just write him a letter saying, 'I do not grant you permission to travel overseas?' 'Why does the president ignore a request letter from a member of the executive? The deputy minister did what he was supposed to do. 'One would have expected the office of the president to be more efficient and reply to the deputy minister,' said Aucamp. When asked why Ramaphosa failed to grant or deny the traveling permission, his spokesperson, Vincent Magwenya, said, 'That's not the issue.' 'He did not have permission to travel, period. If the President felt his trip was a government priority, he would have responded in the affirmative. 'It doesn't hold that just because you did not get a response in the time you expected it, then you can go against the rule,' said Magwenya.
The South African
2 hours ago
- The South African
Steenhuisen stuns Mzansi with DA's decision on GNU
Democratic Alliance (DA) leader John Steenhuisen says the party will remain in the Government of National Unity (GNU) despite the axing of Deputy Minister of Trade and Industry Andrew Whitfield. However, the DA's Federal Executive has resolved to withdraw from the National Dialogue with immediate effect. In a media briefing, Steenhuisen accused the African National Congress (ANC) of displaying double standards and abusing its power. He warned that the DA's withdrawal from the GNU would have disastrous consequences for the country. Steenhuisen stated that DA members of the executive have remained focused on delivering for South Africans. However, he slammed Ramaphosa for not doing the same. 'Instead of upholding the wishes of the people by working in a respectful and collaborative manner with all partners in the GNU, the ANC has repeatedly undermined these principles. Time and again, it has slapped away the hand of substantive cooperation and co-creation in favour of arrogant and narrow political self-interest,' said Steenhuisen. Steenhuisen also criticised Ramaphosa for ignoring a 48-hour ultimatum issued by the DA following Whitfield's dismissal, calling on him to act against corruption within the ANC. 'If the ANC does not urgently change the way it engages with its coalition partners so that we can fight corruption and start growing the economy, then they imperil the future of the country and its people,' he warned. He emphasised that the DA has acted in the best interests of South Africa since the formation of the GNU, and called on Ramaphosa and the ANC to do the same. Many South Africans took to social media to express their disappointment with the DA's announcement. On X, several users shared that they had expected the party to withdraw entirely from the GNU. Others also questioned the DA's credibility and whether its actions matched its rhetoric. WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT THE DA'S DECISION TO REMAIN IN THE GNU? Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 11. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news
