logo
4 Things to Avoid After 5 P.M. to Reduce Stroke Risk, According to Experts

4 Things to Avoid After 5 P.M. to Reduce Stroke Risk, According to Experts

Yahoo11 hours ago

Reviewed by Dietitian Karen Ansel, M.S., RDNStroke is a leading cause of death, but small, consistent habits can reduce your risk.
It's easy to focus on what to do by day, but experts say our nighttime habits matter, too.
They suggest moving more, getting enough sleep and avoiding late meals and alcohol.Stroke is one of the leading causes of death in the United States. And according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, it's on the rise. So, you may be wondering how you can reduce your odds. Part of the answer may lie in your nighttime habits. 'It's the small, consistent habits we do every day that can have a significant impact on reducing our risk of multiple chronic diseases, including heart disease and stroke,' says Simran Malhotra, M.D., DipABLM, CHWC. 'Modifiable risk factors of stroke are things that are in our control, like eating a whole food fiber-rich diet, regular movement, restorative sleep and limiting risky substances like tobacco and alcohol.'
In fact, research shows that up to 84% of strokes are linked to modifiable lifestyle factors. Some of that means focusing on your 9-to-5. Yet what you do–and don't do–after hours can also have a lasting impact on your odds. To help you make the most of those evening hours, we reached out to cardiovascular health experts. Here are the key nighttime habits they recommend avoiding to cut your risk of having a stroke.
Eating late at night might feel like a normal part of your routine, especially if the day gets away from you. But it could be putting your brain and heart health at risk. 'Late meals may disrupt your body's circadian rhythm and negatively affect blood pressure and metabolism, says Michelle Routhenstein, M.S., RD CDCES, a dietitian who specializes in cardiovascular health. Over time, these disruptions may increase your risk of cardiovascular issues, including stroke.
Research has found that eating your last meal of the day after 9 P.M. is associated with a higher stroke risk compared to eating dinner earlier. A similar increased risk is linked to eating a late breakfast, suggesting that the timing of both your first and last meals may play a bigger role in stroke risk than previously believed. Making a habit of eating earlier, both in the morning and at night, could support your body's natural rhythms and protect against stroke.
After dinner, it can be tempting to park yourself on the couch to relax for the evening, especially after a long day. While rest is important, spending too much time lounging around at night could increase your risk of stroke, particularly if you already sit for long periods during the day. Even if you're young. For instance, one large study found that physically inactive people under 60 who spent more than eight hours a day watching TV, using the computer or reading were three and a half times more likely to experience a stroke than people who spent less free time in sedentary activities.
The good news is even small amounts of activity can be beneficial. 'Taking a 20-minute post-dinner walk can help with digestion while optimizing blood sugar control,' says Malhotra. 'This can help with reducing the risk of prediabetes, diabetes, high blood pressure and ultimately heart disease and stroke.' If you're walking to lower your risk of stroke, picking up the pace can help even more. According to one meta-analysis, every 0.66-mile-per-hour increase in a person's walking speed was linked to a 13% reduction in stroke risk.
If your evening wind-down routine includes a glass or two of wine, beer or bourbon, you may be setting the stage for stroke without realizing it. While past research suggests drinking may provide some protection against stroke, more recent evidence challenges that idea. 'Alcohol increases inflammation and damages cells,' says Troy Alexander-EL, M.D. For instance, one of the largest international studies on stroke risk found that moderate and high alcohol intake were linked to a greater risk of stroke. Even downing five or more drinks per day just once a month raised a person's risk. Given the entirety of the evidence, swapping your routine nightcap with an herbal tea or mocktail could be a simple way to reduce your odds.
If you're burning the midnight oil watching TV, scrolling on your phone or catching up on work, you may be doing more harm than good. 'Sleep is the foundational longevity pillar and the most underrated lifestyle habit,' says Malhotra. Research has found both too much or too little sleep can up your risk of stroke. However, sleeping too much may be even more detrimental than not sleeping enough. The proof? One meta-analysis found that people who slept five or fewer hours per night were 33% more likely to experience a stroke. However, those odds rose to 71% in people who slept eight or more hours nightly. Since both too little and too much sleep are problematic, getting those nightly eight hours is a good goal. Keeping consistent bed and wake-up times, even on weekends can also be helpful, says Malhotra.
Stroke is a leading cause of death, and its numbers are on the rise. While some risk factors, like age and family history, are out of your control, your health habits can go a long way in reducing your odds. Of course, it's easy to focus on what we do during the day. But what you do–and don't do–after 5 P.M. can have a surprising impact on your chances of having a stroke, say cardiovascular health experts. To reduce your risk, they recommend skipping that nightcap, spending less time on the couch, avoiding late meals and turning in early. These simple evening choices may sound small, but they can add up to big benefits for your heart and brain health.
Read the original article on EATINGWELL

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The natural cell-ution of aesthetics
The natural cell-ution of aesthetics

News24

timean hour ago

  • News24

The natural cell-ution of aesthetics

We live in a world where everyone wants to be young forever and thanks to dedicated surgeons that is now possible through using your own stem cells. Stem cells harvesting can enhance your aesthetic while making it look natural. Stem cell therapy has gained immense popularity in recent years, with cosmetic surgery patients seeking options that offer more than traditional cosmetic enhancements. By utilising the body's own regenerative cells, cosmetic surgeons can achieve more natural-looking results, while also minimising recovery times and reducing the risk of complications. So, what is stem cell harvesting? Stem cell harvesting involves collecting stem cells, typically from adipose (fat) tissue, which can then be re-injected into the body to promote healing and rejuvenation. These cells have the remarkable ability to differentiate into various cell types, aiding in tissue repair and regeneration. As a result, patients undergoing procedures such as face lifts, liposuction and reconstruction/enhancement of buttocks, breasts and burns. Benefits of stem cell use in cosmetic surgery: Natural results: Stem cell therapy allows for more organic-looking enhancements, as the body recognises and integrates these cells. Accelerated healing: The regenerative properties of stem cells can significantly reduce downtime, allowing patients to return to their daily activities sooner. Minimise Scarring: Procedures utilising stem cells often results in less scarring compared to traditional methods. Versatile applications: From facial rejuvenation,hair restoration and body contouring, stem cells can be applied in various cosmetic procedures, providing versatile treatment options. Read more | 11 foods that may be making you struggle to lose weight 'The technology around stem cells is already changing the world of medicine, offering a better life for so many people around the world. That technology is also being incorporated into plastic surgery. It's without a doubt become a focal point for my team and I this year' says Dr Weyers. Dr Deon Weyers, South Africa's leader in plastic surgery, has recently begun this offering of cutting-edge stem cell harvesting techniques to his patients and is one of the first to do so in South Africa What are some of the advantages to stem cells in the world of plastic surgery? 'Benefits include their ability to transform into most cell types, thereby repairing damaged tissue. Because of this, researchers think they may have a role in treating a range of medical conditions. The growth factors, genetic messengers and tissue cells are good for all types of the skin but also injured tissue such as skin that is affected by aging, injury, cancer. These substances can help repair, rejuvenate and protect.'

Spend $1, Get $3 Back From Washington: The Medicaid Funding Conundrum
Spend $1, Get $3 Back From Washington: The Medicaid Funding Conundrum

Forbes

timean hour ago

  • Forbes

Spend $1, Get $3 Back From Washington: The Medicaid Funding Conundrum

Computer graphics of dollar banknotes stream flying around United States Capitol. Colorful twilight ... More sky with clouds in backgrounds. Finance, banking, monetary policy and quantitative easing concept. The great wave off Kanagawa homage to Hokusai. As the U.S. Senate deliberates the One Big Beautiful Bill, a key healthcare issue sparking debate is how to divide Medicaid costs, which serve low-income Americans, between state and federal taxpayers. Since 2014, Medicaid spending has surged 76%, reaching $872 billion in 2023—only 15% less than Medicare's budget, which serves seniors and Americans with disabilities. Medicaid's budget has grown faster than Medicare (66%), Social Security (60%), and the U.S. GDP (57%). Policymakers aiming to curb federal spending naturally focus on Medicaid. Medicaid costs are shared between the federal and state governments. One commonly used state funding practice—provider taxes—raises fiscal concerns for the federal government, according to the Government Accountability Office. Here's how it works: A state levies a provider tax on hospitals and other healthcare providers, based on revenue or other measures of size. It then claims this tax revenue (e.g., $1 billion) as its share of Medicaid funding and receives $3 billion in federal matching funds. The state returns most of the combined $4 billion to hospitals and uses the reminder for self-directed purposes related to Medicaid. It's a lucrative investment for hospitals—pay $1, get nearly $3 back. For states, it's an even better deal: a windfall of federal dollars with no real cost. But this game is rigged against federal taxpayers, who are left footing the bill. Worse still, both hospitals and states are now incentivized to expand provider taxes for bigger payoffs, further burdening federal taxpayers. The Government Accountability Office found that provider taxes drive a substantial and rapidly growing share of Medicaid spending, undermining accountability to federal taxpayers and limiting resources for patients in need. Moreover, as health policy expert Ann Kempski and I wrote in Health Affairs Forefront, this harms employers and workers. Directly, hospitals raise commercial prices to maximize Medicaid payments. Indirectly, large hospitals gain a competitive edge over smaller facilities and independent physicians, accelerating market consolidation and driving up commercial prices. States can achieve federal matching rates exceeding 12:1 for social needs, such as purchasing air conditioners for Medicaid beneficiaries. By offering such strong incentives, the federal government is effectively urging states to pursue these windfalls. It would be almost fiscally irresponsible for states not to do so. The root cause undermining Medicaid's program integrity is the separation between management and funding: federal taxpayers do not administer the program but generously foot the bill, giving states every incentive to overspend in order to receive even more. Various solutions have been proposed to address the Medicaid funding conundrum, including federalizing the program, delinking federal payments from state contributions, reducing matching rates, freezing provider taxes, and capping service payments. Solutions that tackle the root cause—the separation between management and funding—would generate greater federal savings but face stronger resistance due to their fiscal impact on states and providers, compared to those that merely treat the symptoms. Soon, we'll find out where the political winds in Washington settle.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store