NM lawyers helping 250 immigrant kids uneasy after federal funding was cut, then restored, last week
A team at the New Mexico Immigrant Law Center representing children in immigration court is breathing an uneasy sigh of relief after the majority of the team's funding was abruptly cut, and then just as abruptly, restored last week.
The immigrant law center currently has about 250 children as clients, including some as young as 2 or 3. Without the center's help, the vast majority of the kids would have to represent themselves in immigration court, said Andres Santiago, leader of the center's children's team, in an interview Friday with Source New Mexico.
The center is a subcontractor for Acacia Legal Services, which receives funding from the federal Office of Refugee Resettlement to represent roughly 26,000 children under 18 who crossed the border without their parents. On Tuesday, the United States Department of the Interior issued the center a stop-work order and required it to inform its subcontractors across the country about the order.
The children's team in New Mexico receives up to three-quarters of its funding from the federal government, Santiago said. The Tuesday announcement sent the team of seven attorneys into a flurry of activity. They called families of their clients and tried to reschedule court hearings to prevent a child going before a judge alone, he said. Families and kids called the center seeking urgent help, but the center was forced to put their cases on hold.
Santiago said he never got a clear explanation why the funding was cut. The same held true Friday morning when the stop-work order was rescinded.
'Just as quickly as the announcement came, came the announcement that it was being rescinded,' he told Source New Mexico. 'And I think this kind of highlights the precarious nature of the funds. We're kind of at the whim right now to what may happen in the future.'
The children the center represents have extended family in New Mexico. The children all crossed the border without their parents, including at ports of entry and elsewhere, largely coming from Guatemala, Honduras and Mexico, with a smaller number from Cuba and Venezuela, Santiago said.
A large number of them have suffered some form of abuse or neglect, Santiago said, including human or sex trafficking.
After federal immigration authorities encounter a child, they are held in custody for up to 72 hours and then sent to juvenile detention centers across the country for up to 30 days while authorities find and vet members of their extended families in the United States, Santiago said. The kids whose families live in New Mexico are paired with NMILC attorneys as their immigration cases proceed.
Thousands surrender to Border Patrol as Title 42 ends
Many of the children qualify for humanitarian visas or are seeking asylum. Their lawyers help with that and also can argue to a judge that the kids should not be deemed high priority for deportation because they have a pathway to residency, Santiago said. It's hard to imagine what would happen to those kids if there weren't lawyers on their behalf in the courtroom, he said.
'Literally toddlers like 2 and 3 years old are some of the youngest ones that we're working with,' he said. 'And a stop-work order for them — like to expect a toddler or even a young person to represent themselves in court — it's unjust, and it's really cruel.'
Santiago said he remains mystified that President Donald Trump's administration would seek to cut funding for immigrant children's legal help. Democrats and Republicans in Congress and the White House have repeatedly reauthorized funding, including for the current fiscal year.
'I can't really speak to things on, like, a national level. What I can speak to is that we currently represent about 250 kids,' he said. 'I can speak to the work that we're doing has a real impact on the kids that we serve.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Jeanette Jara is a coalition Communist who wants to be Chile's next president
By Alexander Villegas SANTIAGO (Reuters) -Saddled with an unpopular incumbent president, Chile's left has made a bold choice to contest a resurgent right in November's election - Jeanette Jara, a member of the Communist Party. Jara, who was chosen by voters last month to be the candidate for the ruling Unity for Chile coalition, told Reuters she plans to win over skeptical voters by championing her track record of pushing through popular legislation on pensions and a reduced workweek under President Gabriel Boric. But Jara still faces an uphill battle, encumbered by Boric's unpopularity and her own party affiliation in a country that remains haunted by the Augusto Pinochet dictatorship that followed the 1973 coup against democratically elected Marxist president Salvador Allende. "I think a lot of stories about the (Communist Party) stem from the Cold War and aren't representative of the current situation," Jara said in an interview. "In Chile we have a profound commitment to democracy and respect for institutional norms." Jara joined the party as a student leader in the 1990s and bounced between government and the private sector. Before serving as Boric's labor minister, Jara worked in several ministries under center-left former president Michelle Bachelet. In the primary vote, the charismatic 51-year-old Jara beat out three other candidates, including the presumptive favorite. She benefited from her popularity with younger voters and vows to build a broad coalition. "We were looking at a situation where there was no competition or representative leadership to build a broad view under a single candidate and I thought I could contribute that," Jara said. Speaking to Reuters outside her small, plant-filled, yellow-brick home in Santiago on Friday, Jara said she is seeking to emphasize her pragmatism and dealmaking, noting her leadership role in legislation that reduced the workweek to 40 hours and reformed pensions. "I didn't do it alone, I did it hand-in-hand with workers and Chilean business owners to come to an agreement," Jara said. "We have experience, we don't have all the answers - nobody is infallible. But we have an ability to govern the country with the reforms it needs." Opinion polls show that Jara is likely to make it to a run-off, but most scenarios have her losing to a right-wing candidate in the second round. Chile's presidential elections are slated for November 16 and will go to a run-off in December if no candidate receives a majority. CAMPAIGN FOCUS Jara said her campaign would have three pillars: economic growth, social issues and public safety. She said she wants to focus on matters that impact a majority of Chileans, such as job creation and recurring questions over income inequality, which triggered widespread protests in 2019. "We can't keep having two Chiles in the same country, one for well-off sectors and other for the vast majority," she said. She said she would also seek to address crime. While Chile remains one of the safest countries in Latin America, an influx of organized crime has led to a rising murder rate and hurt economic growth, with a recent spike in high-profile incidents like kidnappings and assassinations. But she blasted hardline proposals like building border walls or placing landmines along the border that have been suggested by some right-wing candidates, who have blamed the rising crime on increasing numbers of migrants. "While some shout louder or have ideas that aren't grounded in reality, I trust citizens' ability to evaluate proposals that could lead to solutions," Jara said, adding that she would seek to increase funding for the police and introduce biometric screening at the border. "None of this is an easy fix," she said. LITHIUM EXTRACTION As the world's largest copper producer and one of the largest lithium producers, Chile's economy relies heavily on mining. Boric has sought to boost lithium production with a joint venture between state-run copper giant Codelco and local lithium miner SQM. But the deal has faced opposition from right-wing candidates, Indigenous groups and Jara herself. "I don't agree with an agreement with (SQM) that would extend their lithium concession by 30 years," Jara said, citing a campaign finance scandal in 2015 and SQM's sale to Pinochet's son-in-law during the dictatorship. "If Boric closes the deal during his government I'll respect it. If not, I'll propose a national public company to operate alongside the private sector like Codelco with copper," she said. U.S. President Donald Trump has threatened heavy tariffs on copper and Jara said in response that she would focus on strengthening trade with Latin America, China and others. "We recently signed a trade agreement with India that I hope to expand and strengthen," Jara said. Relations with the United States would remain diplomatic and cordial under her government if she were elected, she said, adding: "We have to act prudently to safeguard our national interest." Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
08-07-2025
- Yahoo
World's top copper producer Chile in wait-and-see mode after Trump tariff bombshell
By Daina Beth Solomon and Fabian Cambero SANTIAGO (Reuters) -Chile, the world's No. 1 copper producer, is in wait-and-see mode after U.S. President Donald Trump announced a surprise 50% tariff on imports of the red metal, with the Andean nation blindsided while its top miner held out hope of exemptions. In a phone call with Reuters shortly after Trump's remarks, the chairman of Chilean state miner Codelco Maximo Pacheco said the firm wanted to know which copper products would be included and if the tariff would hit all countries. "I believe what we need to do is understand what this is about. What products are affected? Because he referred to copper in general terms. But copper includes a variety of products," Pacheco said on Tuesday in his first comments since the announcement. "Then, we have to see whether this will apply to all countries or only some. We've always known that exceptions are made, and therefore, I think it's premature to comment." U.S. Comex copper futures jumped more than 12% to a record high after Trump announced the planned tariffs. Chile's foreign ministry said in a statement that the Andean nation - the single biggest copper supplier to the U.S. - had not received any formal official communication regarding the implementation of U.S. copper tariffs. "It is important to remember that we participated in the public consultations within the framework of the investigation carried out by the current U.S. administration," the ministry said in a statement to Reuters. "We continue to be in contact and dialogue on this and other matters with the competent authorities and technical teams." Chile, along with Canada and Peru, had previously pushed back against a probe by the Trump administration into imports of the metal and said they should not face tariffs. Pacheco said the U.S. would need growing amounts of copper, which goes into electric vehicles, military hardware, the power grid and many consumer goods. "The United States is a country that needs a lot of copper, and it will continue to need even more copper," he said, adding it was getting harder to ramp up production. Codelco has seen output hit a 25-year low in recent years. Pacheco estimated global demand would increase some 3% this year, which was creating a supply gap on top of flat output. "The global copper supply is increasingly hard to raise. In fact, I believe that this year, it will be hard to produce more copper than last year," he said. "We also have to consider the reality of what's happening in the market." Chile sends most of its copper exports to China, which consumes half of the world's copper each year. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
03-07-2025
- Yahoo
Latin America court calls for unified climate action as legal fights mount
By Alexander Villegas SANTIAGO (Reuters) -Member states must cooperate to tackle climate change and not take actions that set back environmental protections, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACHR) said in a non-binding advisory opinion issued on Thursday. The court holds jurisdiction over 20 Latin American and Caribbean countries and the advisory opinion, requested by Colombia and Chile, said that countries must also regulate and monitor corporate activities, especially those that generate greenhouse gases. The opinion also said companies must adopt "effective" measures to combat climate change and states should discourage "greenwashing" and undue corporate influence in politics and regulations related to climate change. States must also pass legislation for companies to act with "due diligence when it comes to human rights and climate change along their value chain." States must also set binding GHG emission mitigation goals that "are as ambitious as possible" with concrete time frames. Cooperation must go beyond transboundary harm, the opinion said, and should go beyond mitigation and adaptation and cover all necessary measures to comprehensively respond to the climate emergency. Maria Antonia Tigre, director of global climate change litigation at the Sabin Center at Columbia Law School, said that many countries rely on these opinions as precedent, even though they're non-binding. "The (IACHR) is a little bit of a special case because it's highly influential in domestic courts," Tigre said, adding that regional supreme courts often cite IACHR opinions. "The other aspect is if there is a contentious case on the topic, it will likely follow what's said in the advisory opinion," she said, citing a 2024 IACHR as an example. In 2024, the IACHR ordered Peru to pay damages to a mining town, a decision that followed the 2017 interpretation of an 2017 advisory opinion the court issued that stated that a healthy environment was a human right. The ruling builds on a global wave of climate litigation as countries, organizations and individuals are increasingly turning to courts for climate action. Last year, the European Court of Human Rights said climate inaction violates human rights and a South Korean court said that the country's climate change law does not effectively shield future generations. Vanuatu has also urged the top United Nations court to recognize the harm caused by climate change in its judgment on the legal obligation of countries to fight it and address the consequences of contributing to global warming. The ruling is expected this year. The IACHR opinion noted that climate litigation is an "emerging field" but also an increasingly essential tool for holding states and companies accountable for climate change and obligations.
