BYD runs India remotely as China tensions shut out top brass
Like most Chinese companies, BYD has been unable to obtain visas for executives after a deadly clash between Indian and Chinese soldiers along a disputed Himalayan border in 2020 sparked a major deterioration in political ties. That's seen the EV giant resort to holding board meetings and high-level business interactions in Colombo in Sri Lanka and Kathmandu in Nepal, and even as far away as Singapore, according to sources familiar with the matter.
Ketsu Zhang, BYD's managing director for India, has been unable to obtain a work permit since he left the EV maker's local base in Chennai, despite government efforts to facilitate his travel, said the sources, who asked not to be identified because they're not authorised to speak publicly.
Zhang worked from the carmaker's headquarters in Shenzhen in 2021 before moving to Tokyo this year, they said. From Japan, he oversees Asian markets including India, the sources said.
An on-the-ground presence is particularly important for manufacturers, given the need for quick decision making, addressing productivity issues and establishing community ties.
Cold shoulder
The cold shoulder is mutual. As recently as March, travel restrictions were still being wielded in the political spat. That month, an Indian contingent wanting to visit a major meeting of BYD car dealers in Shenzhen had to be scaled down after the majority of participants, including the company's employees based in India, were unable to obtain visas, a source familiar with the matter said.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
A representative for BYD in India declined to comment.
Despite the operational difficulties, BYD has proved popular with Indian drivers, sales in the first half of this year are nearly touching the total units sold in 2024.
Indian officials have been clear that they will not welcome investment from the carmaker – Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal said earlier this year that it's a 'no' to BYD due to caution around the nation's strategic interests.
India has already rejected BYD's US$1 billion plan to build a plant in partnership with a local company. This leaves the Chinese firm unable to qualify for reduced tariffs on imported EVs in exchange for establishing a substantial manufacturing presence in India.
The freeze contrasts with the experience of Tesla Its chief executive officer Elon Musk met with India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi in the US earlier this year. The US carmaker opened its first showrooms in India this month, with deliveries set to begin as early as August.
Tesla does not have plans to establish local manufacturing, meaning it faces import taxes of as much as 110 per cent for fully-assembled vehicles.
Expanding overseas is critical for BYD, which risks missing its target to sell 5.5 million cars this year as demand in China stagnates and it draws the ire of Beijing following rounds of heavy price discounting.
But without the ability to invest in manufacturing in India, BYD relies on its assembly plant in the southern city of Chennai, which has an annual capacity of 10,000 to 15,000 units, to meet Indian demand.
Hefty duties
The company also imports most cars it sells in India, but hefty duties, aimed at shielding domestic firms, effectively double the cost of a vehicle and India restricts volumes unless a model has received a local roadworthiness certificate.
While tensions between China and India are thawing, it's unclear whether curbs on professional visas will be lifted or if BYD will ever be welcomed with open arms.
Still, there are tentative signs of progress. Earlier this month, India allowed Chinese nationals to apply for tourist visas again. BLOOMBERG
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
37 minutes ago
- Business Times
SG60: The future of Singapore's economy
AS SINGAPORE stands on the threshold of a new economic era, the central question is: What must we do today to thrive tomorrow? Over the next decade, the global landscape will be shaped by rapid technological advancement, climate change, demographic shifts, geo-economic fragmentation, and geopolitical polarisation. To remain a leading global hub and a resilient, vibrant society, Singapore must double down on targeted policy innovation, societal adaptability and visionary leadership. A legacy of reinvention Singapore has a long history of transformation. As a small island nation of six million people, its economic ascent has been propelled by strategic location, good governance and pragmatic policymaking. From a bustling trading post in precolonial times to an independent state in 1965, Singapore swiftly industrialised by attracting foreign direct investment and leveraging low-cost labour for export-oriented growth. In the 1970s, tightening labour markets and rising wages prompted a shift towards higher-value industries. Economic setbacks followed – oil shocks in 1975 and 1979, and a recession in 1985 due to eroded competitiveness. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Singapore responded decisively, cutting wages and rebounding swiftly. A similar resilience was seen during the Asian financial crisis in 1997-1998, and the global financial crisis a decade later. Structural reforms in the 2000s diversified the economy into financial and business services, high-tech manufacturing and the biomedical industry. Despite recent shocks – including economic disruptions due to the Covid-19 pandemic, higher global inflation and interest rates triggered by the war in Ukraine, protectionist trade policies and heightened US-China tensions – Singapore has responded by skilfully leveraging its fiscal buffers to turn adversity into opportunity. Embracing technological transformation Singapore now enters a critical phase of economic restructuring, driven by rapid advances in digitalisation and artificial intelligence (AI). The advent of generative AI, process automation and robotics presents a powerful opportunity to boost productivity and efficiency amid rising costs, a tight labour market and an ageing population. However, it also poses risks of widespread disruption to employment – particularly in middle-skill, routine and data-intensive jobs across manufacturing, finance, law, healthcare and transport. New entrants to the workforce will struggle to find employment in traditional sectors. This shift demands a deliberate and inclusive national response. To maintain global competitiveness, the government must support both startups and incumbent enterprises in adopting emerging technologies and reshaping business models. Despite recent shocks, Singapore has responded by skilfully leveraging its fiscal buffers to turn adversity into opportunity. PHOTO: ST Government agencies such as Enterprise Singapore and the Infocomm Media Development Authority should enhance funding and advisory services that help businesses embrace and pivot to digital and AI-augmented operations. Regulatory sandboxes and public-private test beds can help scale innovation while managing risk. At the same time, Singapore must proactively upskill its workforce. SkillsFuture must evolve into a dynamic, AI-enabled platform that offers real-time, individualised reskilling paths aligned with fast-changing job market needs. Workforce Singapore and tripartite partners should coordinate to deliver stackable skill credentials, apprenticeship programmes and career conversion programmes that offer portable skills across sectors. Protecting displaced workers and ensuring that young graduates have meaningful pathways into the new economy are essential for inclusive growth. Leveraging green growth as a strategic advantage The global climate change agenda is not just a moral imperative, but a strategic opportunity for Singapore to lead in green growth. Far from being a compliance exercise, the green transition is a source of innovation, investment and long-term competitiveness. As countries impose carbon pricing, border adjustment taxes, and stricter environmental, social and governance (ESG) mandates, early movers such as Singapore can gain significant strategic advantages. Singapore should aim to be the regional hub for carbon services, including carbon credit trading, emissions verification, and green finance. The Singapore Exchange and Monetary Authority of Singapore have been proactive in developing the regulatory framework and promoting sustainable finance, including green bonds, transition finance and ESG disclosure standards. Regional initiatives, such as Project Greenprint, can serve as models for digital infrastructure that enable reliable tracking of carbon emissions and sustainability metrics. Domestically, Singapore must accelerate decarbonisation by investing in solar energy, green hydrogen partnerships, energy storage systems and circular economy practices. Buildings and transportation – two high-emission sectors – should be fast-tracked for transformation through innovation grants and building codes. Climate resilience is equally critical. Defending coastal infrastructure and adapting to extreme weather must remain top priorities. Policymaking should align green objectives with commercial incentives to drive private-sector innovation and participation in the transition. Strengthening regional integration While Asia will remain the growth engine for the global economy in the coming years, the global trading system is being challenged by protectionist policies and the global supply chains that are reconfiguring in response. As in the past, the supply chain reconfiguration presents an opportunity for Singapore to play a facilitating and coordinating role. Despite rising costs, Singapore remains a premier gateway to Asean and broader Asia. Deepening regional integration can mitigate domestic constraints and broaden opportunities. Singapore should champion seamless cross-border data flows, harmonised standards for e-commerce, and interoperable digital payment systems within Asean. Its leadership in the Asean Digital Economy Framework Agreement can help shape future-ready trade infrastructure. In professional services, Singapore's legal, healthcare and education sectors can be further internationalised by forming partnerships and regulatory bridges with neighbours. Additionally, Singapore can leverage its strengths in governance, dispute resolution and project finance to co-lead regional infrastructure development. Initiatives such as the Belt and Road – if aligned with transparency and sustainability – offer platforms where Singapore can serve as a neutral, trustworthy intermediary. Building an inclusive and resilient society A high-tech economy must not come at the cost of social cohesion. Technological and structural changes will exacerbate inequalities if left unmanaged. As the gig economy grows and traditional employment declines, Singapore must fortify its social compact by revamping and enhancing the social protection framework to reflect new modes of work and emerging vulnerabilities. Singapore must fortify its social compact by revamping and enhancing the social protection framework to reflect new modes of work and emerging vulnerabilities. PHOTO: ST Gig workers, freelancers and part-time workers require access to portable benefits including health insurance, Central Provident Fund-style retirement savings and unemployment support. The rise of platform work necessitates adaptive policy tools – such as centralised benefits administration and universal access to basic protections – while still preserving flexibility. Beyond labour reform, Singapore must address demographic pressures by empowering women, seniors and marginalised communities. Family-friendly policies – including affordable childcare, parental leave and caregiver support – can enhance workforce participation and help reverse declining fertility. Age-inclusive hiring, flexible working arrangements and senior training programmes are critical to extend productive lifespans. The goal is a society that is not just future-ready, but also future-inclusive. Redefining education Singapore's world-class education system has underpinned its economic success, but the education system must now evolve to keep up with the rapid rise of AI and digital technology, and their impact on the workplace. The nature of work is evolving more rapidly than traditional curricula can accommodate. Success in the AI era will depend not only on technical proficiency and knowledge acquisition, but also on agility, creativity and the capacity for lifelong learning. The education system must evolve to keep up with the rapid rise of AI and digital technology, and their impact on the workplace. PHOTO: ST Education must become more experiential, interdisciplinary and learner-centric. Beyond academic rigour, schools should nurture curiosity, collaboration and ethical decision-making. Students should learn to be more discriminating in their consumption of news and information in the age of social media. Tertiary institutions must partner with industry to co-design programmes that equip students with evolving job market skills needed to operate in an AI-augmented environment. Most importantly, learning must continue throughout life. Lifelong learning should be normalised through incentives, digital credentials and recognition frameworks that value all forms of growth. Conclusion Singapore has repeatedly turned challenges and adversity into opportunities and success – through industrialisation, globalisation, and constantly upgrading and moving up the global value chain. The next transformation will be more complex and challenging – balancing technological efficiency with social equity, environmental sustainability with growth, and geopolitical risk with regional cooperation. The nation's small size need not be a weakness, but a strength – enabling agility, precision and unity of purpose. With visionary leadership, an inclusive society and a willingness to adapt and innovate, Singapore can once again defy the odds. The next decade offers not only challenges, but also an opportunity to write the next chapter of resilience, renewal and reinvention. The writer was chief economist of Asean+3 Macroeconomic Research Office (Amro) from 2016 to 2025, where he was responsible for country and regional surveillance, as well as related research activities, of the Asean+3 economies. Prior to joining Amro, Dr Khor was deputy director of the Asia and Pacific department at the International Monetary Fund, overseeing the surveillance work on six Asean and 12 Pacific Island countries. He was previously also assistant managing director at the Monetary Authority of Singapore, where he oversaw economic research, monetary policy, macro-financial surveillance and international relations.
Business Times
37 minutes ago
- Business Times
Should OCBC's incoming CEO pursue a transformative acquisition?
[SINGAPORE] Helen Wong made waves when she was appointed group chief executive of OCBC in April 2021 – becoming the first female to lead a major local bank. Wong leaves her role at the end of this year. Her stint at the helm will be just over four-and-a-half years by then – shorter than past CEOs Samuel Tsien and David Conner, who served for about nine years and 10 years, respectively. At rival DBS , Piyush Gupta was CEO for more than 15 years before handing over to Tan Su Shan earlier this year. Wee Ee Cheong has been CEO at the other major local bank, UOB , since April 2007. OCBC's performance During Wong's tenure to date, OCBC, like its peers, has done well. Nonetheless, OCBC's performance trails market leader DBS'. Versus pre-Covid pandemic in 2019, DBS' net profit rose 77 per cent to S$11.3 billion in 2024, while OCBC's net profit climbed 56 per cent to S$7.6 billion in 2024. Over each of 2022, 2023 and 2024, OCBC's return on equity (ROE) lagged DBS'. During the three years, the simple average ROE for OCBC and DBS were 12.8 per cent and 17 per cent, respectively. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up In 2022, DBS and UOB announced deals to buy Citigroup's consumer banking business, with DBS acquiring the Taiwan business and UOB buying Citigroup's consumer banking franchise in Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam. These deals have since been successfully completed. Should OCBC have taken a bite as well? On the other hand, 2024 and 2025 were for OCBC marked by its attempt to get insurance subsidiary Great Eastern Holdings (GEH) privatised, a goal that remained unrealised. OCBC is the longest established Singapore bank, formed in 1932 from the merger of three local banks, the oldest of which was founded in 1912. Over time, OCBC has weathered numerous major geopolitical upheavals and financial crises. Last week, OCBC reported that net profit for the second quarter fell 7 per cent from a year ago to S$1.8 billion amid a drop in net interest income due to lower net interest margin. Wong noted continued headwinds from tariffs and geopolitical tensions, and that global as well as regional growth could be slower from the second half. Incoming CEO's challenges Tan Teck Long will take over as CEO on Jan 1, 2026, at a challenging time for OCBC. Looking ahead, economic conditions are choppy in OCBC's home market of Singapore, whose economy is heavily trade-reliant. Local businesses that OCBC services might struggle with the US' imposition of higher trade tariffs. The group has a large exposure to Greater China, and the Chinese economy is undergoing a period of painful economic adjustment. Other key markets of OCBC's, namely Malaysia and Indonesia, might see their growth badly hampered by the tariffs that the US is levying on imports from these countries. Could earnings and dividend payments come under pressure from potentially slower loan growth, soft net interest margin and deteriorating credit quality? Nevertheless, Tan, who is deputy CEO as well as head of global wholesale banking and has more than 30 years of banking experience, will take over a strong financial services group. OCBC is well-capitalised and has robust credit ratings of 'Aa1' from Moody's and 'AA-' from both Fitch and S&P. The group offers a broad range of financial services and is anchored in Asia, where the long-term economic outlook is positive. It is well-positioned to capture opportunities from expanding Asean-Greater China connectivity. Among others, OCBC is well-placed in private banking through its wholly owned subsidiary Bank of Singapore, life insurance in Singapore and Malaysia via GEH, and asset management through Lion Global Investors, which is one of South-east Asia's leading asset management companies. Last year, at DBS, then-incoming CEO Tan Su Shan admitted there were ' big shoes to fill ' with the departure of the long-serving and much admired Gupta. While Wong has done a commendable job at the helm of OCBC, she was not there long enough to stamp her mark as Gupta had done. Thus, Tan may find it relatively easy to win over internal and external stakeholders. Wong has championed the 'One Group' approach to boost growth and synergy. Tan looks set to continue banking on reaping synergies from different parts of OCBC group working together in closer collaboration. M&A Sure, size is not everything in the financial services business. And acquisitions present challenges whether from over-stretching the balance sheet or difficulties in integration. Nonetheless, might an OCBC led by Tan look to deploy some of its capital on acquisitions? After all, executing well on acquisitions can add skillsets to a business and at times provide the requisite scale for a business to be more competitive. German insurer Allianz's failed offer to buy a majority stake in Singapore's Income Insurance disappointed many of Income's minority shareholders. Might OCBC's GEH have an opportunity to buy into Income? Elsewhere, OCBC could look to deepen its Malaysian presence, perhaps by investing in a locally owned banking franchise there or buying a foreign bank's Malaysian business. In June, OCBC said that it has committed more than RM11 billion (S$3.3 billion) in financing to support businesses in the Johor-Singapore Special Economic Zone since 2024. While OCBC is in good shape and has a proud history, it is critical for the group to close the gap on key performance metrics with DBS and be competitive across its various business lines and geographic markets. Perhaps, Tan will not only get various parts of the OCBC group to work well as one and manage risk effectively, but also do a transformative acquisition to give OCBC an extra edge.
Business Times
37 minutes ago
- Business Times
Has Trump won the trade wars?
TRADE tensions are continuing to evolve, as US President Donald Trump last week unveiled his much delayed reciprocal tariffs. He increased tariffs on merchandise from about 70 countries and raised the rate on certain products made in Canada to a punitive 35 per cent. Trump claims his moves will rebalance a global trade system that he argues has been tilted against the world's largest economy. But the question of whether Trump has emerged victorious from the trade wars requires a complex economic and geopolitical assessment that focuses on economic outcomes, strategic objectives and long-term implications for American competitiveness. As of now, the trade war landscape remains dynamic and contentious, reflecting volatility rather than clear victory. After Trump increased his tariffs, China retaliated in March by imposing 10 to 15 per cent tariffs on select agricultural, meat and dairy products. The escalation reached unprecedented levels as Beijing responded to Trump's moves with retaliatory tariffs at 125 per cent on certain goods in April. Yet, there have also been attempts at de-escalation. In mid-May, the Trump administration reached an agreement with China to lower tariffs dramatically and open some markets that both sides had closed off as tensions rose. Tariffs on Chinese imports fell to 35 per cent from 145 per cent. Whether the temporary trade truce will be extended beyond Aug 12 remains unclear even after recent talks in Stockholm last week. In separate trade deals with Japan and the European Union (EU), the Trump administration secured significant concessions from its partners without offering equivalent ones in return. The EU and Japan will accept 15 per cent tariffs on most exports to the US, with the EU agreeing to make large purchases of American energy and military equipment, and the Japanese agreeing to invest US$550 billion in the US and to increase purchases of American-sourced fossil fuel, nuclear energy and aircraft. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up From a fiscal perspective, the tariffs appear to generate substantial revenue, with the Tax Foundation estimating that they will raise over US$2 trillion through to 2034. However, once the tariffs' negative impact on the US economy is accounted for, the realistic dynamic revenue falls to US$1.4 trillion – a figure that is eroded even more by foreign retaliation. This demonstrates that the fiscal gains come at a direct cost to overall economic growth. The trade war's intensification has created significant economic disruption for US businesses and consumers. According to an Aug 1 analysis by the Budget Lab at Yale, the full scope of US tariffs and foreign retaliation is projected to reduce payroll employment by 497,000 jobs by the end of 2025. Furthermore, the report estimates that the US economy will be persistently 0.4 per cent smaller in the long run. These represent substantial economic costs that must be weighed against any strategic gains. One of Trump's central promises has been to revitalise American manufacturing through protective tariffs, but the results have been disappointing. The sector lost a combined 14,000 net jobs in May and June, according to federal data. Factory employment has dropped to the lowest level in five years. This runs contrary to Trump's assertion that higher tariffs would translate to more American manufacturing jobs. Trump's tariffs have largely failed to overcome broader economic forces driving manufacturing overseas, pointing to structural challenges that run deeper than trade policy alone. From 1997 to 2024, the US lost around five million manufacturing jobs, experiencing one of the largest drops in manufacturing employment in history. Moreover, despite the aggressive tariff strategy, America's fundamental trade imbalance persists. The real US trade deficit has increased every year since 2016, reducing GDP growth by roughly 0.25 per cent annually over 2017 to 2019, according to the Economic Policy Institute. Tariffs alone cannot solve these structural trade imbalances. The trade war's ultimate success or failure may depend on developments that extend well beyond Trump's current term. The structural challenges facing American manufacturing, including automation, global supply chains and comparative labour costs, cannot be solved through tariffs alone. Meanwhile, the economic costs of sustained trade conflict continue to accumulate. China's retaliatory capacity and economic resilience have also proven greater than many initially anticipated, while US businesses and consumers bear the burden of higher prices and economic uncertainty. The temporary truces and agreements reached so far suggest that both sides recognise the need for de-escalation, but fundamental disagreements remain unresolved. While the tariffs have achieved some tactical objectives, like generating revenue and forcing periodic negotiations, they have largely failed to deliver on their primary strategic promises of manufacturing revival and trade balance improvement. The economic costs have been substantial and measurable, while the benefits remain largely theoretical or temporary. Most significantly, the trade war has not reversed the long-term decline in American manufacturing employment or meaningfully reduced trade deficits. At the same time, there are questions about the durability of the trade agreements that the Trump administration has signed, with foreign governments wondering whether the president will honour the new pacts. Rather than a clear victory, Trump's trade wars represent an ongoing strategic gamble with uncertain long-term payoffs.
