logo
In conversation with Sanjena Sathian, author of Goddess Complex

In conversation with Sanjena Sathian, author of Goddess Complex

The Hindu25-07-2025
What would you do if you found that there is an imposter out there living the life once prescribed to you? That there are questions about identity that need to be answered and choices that need to be made. You will probably feel lost (and perhaps even a little provoked), like Sanjana, the narrator in author Sanjena Sathian's latest novel, Goddess Complex (HarperCollins India). At once psychological thriller and feminist satire, the story delves into the personal and the political behind women's freedom and their right to choose. Edited excerpts from an interview with Sathian:
Q: How much of your own life in the U.S. is reflected in your narrator Sanjana's dissonance — between being a 'bad brown girl' and feeling 'insufficiently' white?
A: I will politely disagree with your characterisation of the novel. I don't think this book is about 'white versus brown identity'. Insofar as it is about a demographic identity category, it is about gender. That said, race is not something you can ignore in America, and so race comes up — often in comic ways that frustrate Sanjana. But I also have to say that neither the narrator nor I are torn between whiteness and brownness; we are both brown and neither of us has any desire to be white. I think it's important not to reduce Indian American storytelling.
Q: The protagonist reaches a point in the story where she feels 'divorced from [her] body'. What was capturing that like?
A: At the start of the novel, [Sanjana] tells us that she's recently had an abortion, and she then spends the first half of the novel being harangued by people who inexplicably think she's pregnant. I chose this somewhat darkly absurd situation to literalise what many women feel every day: even as we walk around thinking of ourselves as full humans, with desires and secrets and darkness, there are people out there looking at us as wombs with legs. That's uncanny.
Q: The novel employs inner dialogue, retrospection and reflection as tools of storytelling; where the idea of the self constantly disperses and re-emerges. Did you choose this format or did it evolve with the story?
A: I think you're talking about the novel's internal quality: we spend a lot of time in Sanjana's head. She's a first-person narrator, and an unreliable one. For much of the first half, we watch her decline and disintegrate in her own mind. Eventually, we see some of her inner messiness spill over into external messiness, i.e., the character's internal dramas become external plot points. I wrote it that way because that was how I got to know the character. I knew that she was going to be trapped in herself and that in order for the novel to have the alchemical effect on the reader, which novels can and should have, I would need [that to happen] at some point.
Q: Between the Shout Your Abortion Movement and the recent shift in U.S. reproductive policy, where does 'Goddess Complex' fit in, in defining a woman's right to choose?
A: Goddess Complex is a social novel; it's cognisant of social movements around reproductive rights, and the narrator is often reacting to those social movements and finds that some of the brave, social justice language of social media doesn't exactly work for her real life. [While] I do have characters talking about [these] social and political issues, the novel is set pre-Dobbs (the overruling of the fundamental right to abortion by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2022).
Ultimately, it's a really personal story about one woman having a breakdown and going through some really weird stuff. It's not a book that can or should have to define a person's right to choose, because novels are not about defining rights. Novels are these radically hopeful objects that have to take for granted certain freedoms — freedom of thought, freedom of choice. Novels are too subtle, politically, to win rights for us. They can only give us insight into the private selfhood that political rights are there to preserve.
Q: At what point do you feel womanhood becomes synonymous with motherhood?
A: I don't think womanhood and motherhood are synonymous, but if you live in a society where the assumption is that all women are either potential mothers or people who should have been mothers but failed to be, then you lose the ability to understand womanhood outside of motherhood. Personally, I'm not even that interested in defining 'womanhood' at all. I'm interested in the self, and all the ways that our arbitrary social stories interfere with knowing our true selves.
The interviewer is a freelance writer. Instagram @read.dream.repeat
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Kal Penn reveals regret doing teen sex comedy Van Wilder: ‘I played a fairly stereotypical Indian exchange student'
Kal Penn reveals regret doing teen sex comedy Van Wilder: ‘I played a fairly stereotypical Indian exchange student'

Indian Express

time3 hours ago

  • Indian Express

Kal Penn reveals regret doing teen sex comedy Van Wilder: ‘I played a fairly stereotypical Indian exchange student'

Actor, author, and former White House staffer Kal Penn, known to many for his work in both film and public service, was the latest guest at Express Adda, a platform for candid conversations hosted by The Indian Express Group. In a conversation with Anant Goenka, Executive Director of The Indian Express Group, Kal opened up about his early days in Hollywood, revealing a moment in his career that he still looks back on with mixed feelings: his role in the 2002 teen sex comedy Van Wilder. 'You know, I did this movie, Van Wilder, one of my first films with Ryan Reynolds, he was fantastic,' Kal recalled. 'But I played a fairly stereotypical Indian exchange student. It's a very classic, like, early 2000s teen sex comedy, right.' Kal shared how, at the time, he was navigating a deeply limited and often stereotypical landscape for actors of Indian origin. He recounted how his agent excitedly called him about the role, believing it could be a major break in his career. 'Like any other profession, any other job, and put yourself in the late '90s, early 2000s in Hollywood, you need credits on your resume in order for anybody to take you seriously for that next job,' he explained. His agent emphasized the rarity of opportunities for South Asian actors back then. 'She said, 'It's really hard if you're not white or Black, at that time especially, because there are very few credits you can get on your resume. Nobody's going to go out of their way to cast you unless a role was specifically written Indian or Indian American, and those were few and far between.'' Kal was initially sceptical. When told the character's name was Taj Mahal, he immediately hung up the phone. 'She called me back. 'I had a feeling you were going to hang up,'' he said, laughing. 'I was like, look, I can tell you without reading the script exactly what this is about to be, and I don't really have an interest in it.' Also Read | Kal Penn defends Priyanka Chopra for choosing hot dogs over vada pav; recalls being told to cook Indian food during celebrity cook off: 'Can't Indians like other things?' Despite his hesitation, Kal Penn ultimately auditioned and took the role, trying to steer the character away from crude ethnic caricature where possible. 'I worked with the writers and the director on trying to find jokes that weren't just based on the guy's name or where he's from. And really, it's a teen sex comedy, right? So most of the jokes are not based on identity. And identity jokes tend to be the most boring anyway, you know, 20 years ago and even today.' Though he admits he regrets doing Van Wilder, Kal acknowledged that the film did help open doors for him. Reflecting on how one project often leads to the next, he said: 'But I get this question a lot when I do these interviews with college kids: 'On a scale of one to 10, how much do you regret doing that project?' And I'm just like: first of all, you're welcome.' He continued: 'Had I not done Van Wilder, I would not have had the chance to do Harold and Kumar Go to White Castle. And the reason for that is that there was no shortage of Indian-origin actors to play Kumar. They auditioned people in L.A., New York, London, Toronto, Miami. One of the reasons that I got that part, ultimately, was I think I was the only one on the shortlist who had a credit, a studio film credit, on his resume, because I had done Van Wilder.' Express Adda is a series of informal yet thought-provoking conversations hosted by The Indian Express Group, bringing together public figures from diverse fields. Past guests have included Nobel Laureate Amartya Sen, External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar, His Holiness the Dalai Lama, philanthropist Bill Gates, and Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta, among others.

Sydney Sweeney's 'good jeans' ad sparks controversy on race and beauty standards; Twitterati react
Sydney Sweeney's 'good jeans' ad sparks controversy on race and beauty standards; Twitterati react

Time of India

time2 days ago

  • Time of India

Sydney Sweeney's 'good jeans' ad sparks controversy on race and beauty standards; Twitterati react

Sydney Sweeney made a splash with her new advertising campaign for US fashion retailer American Eagle. The ad blitz included "clever, even provocative language" and was aimed to "push buttons," the company's chief marketing officer said to trade outlets. And going by the reactions, the campaign has managed to get everyone talking. Titled "Sydney Sweeney has great jeans," the campaign sparked a wave of backlash, debates about race, Western beauty standards, and even support with some calling it a clap back at "woke" culture. Most of the negative reception focused on videos that used the word "genes" instead of "jeans" when discussing the blonde-haired, blue-eyed actor known for her roles in the global hit series 'Euphoria' and 'White Lotus'. Some critics saw the wordplay as a deliberate pun on race. A viral video of an Indian American going viral online has her saying, "It is so difficult to grow up as a person of colour, specifically a woman, and view yourself as beautiful in any sense of the word." Even rapper Doja Cat seemingly mocked the ad in a viral social media post. Other accused netizens of reading too much into the campaign's message. "I love how the leftist meltdown over the Sydney Sweeney ad has only resulted in a beautiful white blonde girl with blue eyes getting 1000x the exposure for her 'good genes,'" former Fox News host Megyn Kelly wrote in a tweet. Another slammed the controversy saying, "Can't even be white anymore! Y'all are mad at Sydney Sweeney because she's white, she's blonde, she's blue eyed, and she looks good. I am DEI'd out!!" Another chimed in, "As a PROUD black man, I see nothing wrong with Sydney Sweeney and American Eagle parading her 'good genes/jeans.' Celebrating blue eyes and blonde hair isn't 'white supremacy.' Those are conventionally attractive, GOOD GENES. That doesn't mean they're the ONLY good genes." A day after Sweeney was announced as the company's latest celebrity collaborator, the brand's stock closed more than 4% up. The campaign reportedly shares a lineage with Calvin Klein jeans ads from 1980 that featured a 15-year-old Brooke Shields saying, "You want to know what comes in between me and my Calvins? Nothing." Some TV networks declined to air the spots because of its suggestive double entendre and Shields' age. Meanwhile, reports state that the jeans brand also plans to launch a limited edition Sydney jean to raise awareness of domestic violence, with sales proceeds going to a nonprofit crisis counselling service.

19 years on, Kiran Desai has a 2nd shot at Booker
19 years on, Kiran Desai has a 2nd shot at Booker

Time of India

time3 days ago

  • Time of India

19 years on, Kiran Desai has a 2nd shot at Booker

Nineteen years after winning the Man Booker, Kiran Desai, 53, has returned to the award longlist with a novel about two Indians navigating life in the US. The Indian American author, who became the prize's youngest-ever winner in 2006 with her second novel 'The Inheritance of Loss', is now among 13 writers vying for the literary trophy. Her mother Anita Desai - with whom she shares an inheritance, not of loss but of fine storytelling - has been shortlisted for the Booker thrice but never won. After her win, Kiran acknowledged the debt: "I wrote this book so much in my mother's company that it feels almost like her book.' While the two craft very different literary landscapes, they do have many things in common, including the habit of escaping to Mexican villages to write. The 88-year-old Anita's last novella 'Rosarita', which released last year, was also set in Mexico. Kiran's longlisted 'The Loneliness of Sonia and Sunny' which will be out in Sept, has taken almost two decades to take shape. By her own admission, she writes slowly, piecing her novels together like a jigsaw puzzle. Going by the promos, the storyline seems almost filmi: a love story about two young people who first see each other on a train. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like No annual fees for life UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo But, as always, she remains conscious of her role in the wider world, exploring themes like migration, modernity, and the complicated bonds that link one generation to the next. "Intimate in its details, epic in its reach," is how Manasi Subramaniam, editor-in-chief at Penguin Random House India, describes it. "While it is about the weight of familial love, the violence of class and the ache of displacement, it is sharp, funny, tragic and endlessly surprising," says Subramaniam.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store