HIVE Digital co-founder Frank Holmes says sanctioned countries like Iran are secretly mining Bitcoin
Hive Digital (Nasdaq: HIVE) co-founder Frank Holmes said that several countries, including those under sanctions, may be secretly mining Bitcoin to generate revenue — and hinted at how geopolitics is shaping global mining operations.
'You talk about the fact that you hodl your Bitcoin, which for those who are listening means basically, hold on for dear life,' TheStreet Roundtable host Scott Melker said, pointing out Hive's long-term BTC strategy. Holmes affirmed that commitment — with one caveat.
'Yes, we believe that purchasing power is so important to have and we will hold on and hold on as much Bitcoin as we can,' Holmes said. 'Sometimes we've had to sell... like how we quadrupled basically our profile at Paraguay because Bitfarms was selling so we could fast track. So we had to sell some Bitcoin to do that.'Still, Holmes sees the value returning through boosted production. 'It's like seven hundred and sixty thousand a day in revenue and it's going to a million three as we increase our production.'
'Axis of Evil' mining Bitcoin, Holmes alleges
He also revealed that Bitcoin mining is being used by governments not typically associated with crypto-friendly policies — citing a striking example.
'When Israel bombed Iran and America came in and dropped the B2 special bombs, the difficulty for Bitcoin mining fell by 15%,' Holmes said. 'Why is that? Because the Iranian military were basically illegally mining Bitcoin to get US dollars and the power stations got hit.'
That connection between global conflict and hash rate drop reveals, Holmes said, a deeper trend: 'All these other countries are doing everything if they can't get US dollars, they're going to mine Bitcoin.'
Melker then asked: 'Do you think that a lot of nations are mining Bitcoin that we haven't heard about yet?'
'Yes, I do,' Holmes replied. 'It'll come out and it's a large source of revenue for the Axis of Evil. There's no doubt about that.'He added that under Trump, Bitcoin mining in America is only expected to grow — especially with allies like Paraguay. 'Paraguay is pro-America... very different than Colombia... or Venezuela,' Holmes said. 'We're excited to be in a country that is aligned with America's vision.'
As of this week, Hive Digital surpassed 14 EH/s in Bitcoin mining capacity, generating $315 million in annualized revenue. It now aims to hit 25 EH/s by Thanksgiving — a move that could place it among the most efficient Bitcoin miners globally.
EH/s stands for exahashes per second, a measure of computing power used in Bitcoin mining. One exahash equals 1 quintillion (1,000,000,000,000,000,000) hashes per second. The higher the EH/s, the more powerful the miner — and the better their chances of earning Bitcoin block rewards.
HIVE Digital co-founder Frank Holmes says sanctioned countries like Iran are secretly mining Bitcoin first appeared on TheStreet on Aug 1, 2025
This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Aug 1, 2025, where it first appeared.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Professor Coin: What Gives Bitcoin Its Value?
Professor Andrew Urquhart is Professor of Finance and Financial Technology and Head of the Department of Finance at Birmingham Business School (BBS). This is the eighth installment of the Professor Coin column, in which I bring important insights from published academic literature on cryptocurrencies to the Decrypt readership. In this article, I discuss what gives Bitcoin value. In just over a decade, Bitcoin has gone from a niche innovation in cryptography to a globally traded asset with a market capitalization in the hundreds of billions. Yet despite its prominence, a persistent question remains: what gives Bitcoin its value? Bitcoin doesn't generate cash flow like a company, isn't backed by physical reserves like gold, and has no central authority guaranteeing its worth. So why are people willing to pay tens of thousands of dollars for a digital token? Recent academic research points to several factors. Scarcity and Monetary Policy The first pillar of Bitcoin's value is its programmed scarcity. Bitcoin has a fixed supply: only 21 million coins will ever be created. This limit is enforced by the network's consensus rules and is viewed by supporters as a bulwark against inflation. Academic studies have likened Bitcoin to gold because of this scarcity. Pagnotta and Buraschi (2018) model Bitcoin as a decentralized network whose value stems from user adoption and security, both of which are underpinned by the incentives embedded in its monetary policy. In their equilibrium framework, scarcity plays a key role in sustaining long-term value. Why is Bitcoin's supply limit set to 21 million? Scarcity makes Bitcoin attractive as a hedge against inflation, particularly in a world of expanding money supply. A number of economists have investigated whether Bitcoin's scarcity can explain its valuation with Kruger, Meyer, and Withagen (2022) showing the widely discussed stock-to-flow model fits historical data reasonably well, reaffirming the importance of scarcity as one component of Bitcoin's perceived value. Network Effects and Utility Scarcity is not sufficient without demand—and Bitcoin's demand comes from its use as a peer-to-peer digital asset and from the belief that others will accept it in the future. This is where network effects come into play. According to Cong, Li, and Wang (2021) Bitcoin's value grows with its user base. Their tokenomics model shows that the more people adopt and trust Bitcoin, the more valuable the network becomes. This dynamic helps explain why Bitcoin has survived multiple boom-and-bust cycles. Furthermore, Bolt and van Oordt (2016) argue that the value of a virtual currency arises if users expect it to retain value and be accepted in transactions. Their model formalizes how expectations of acceptance can stabilize a volatile asset like Bitcoin. Cost of Production and Network Security Bitcoin is also underpinned by a real-world cost: mining. To secure the network and process transactions, Bitcoin relies on a system called proof-of-work, where miners compete to solve cryptographic puzzles using electricity and hardware. This energy-intensive process is not without controversy, but researchers such as Hayes (2015) have shown that the cost of production provides a fundamental floor for Bitcoin's price. He finds that Bitcoin rarely trades below the marginal cost of mining, reinforcing the idea that energy and security provision matter for valuation. Moreover, the work of Pagnotta and Buraschi (2018) supports this by showing that mining incentives and the strength of the network's security are central to Bitcoin's equilibrium value, not just supply and demand in the traditional sense. Speculation, Sentiment, and Attention In practice, however, Bitcoin's price also reflects investor sentiment and speculation. A surge in media coverage or social media buzz can trigger price rallies or sharp selloffs. Studies by Urquhart (2018) and Shen et al (2019) demonstrate that Bitcoin prices are strongly correlated with online search trends and that trading volume in turn, drives investor attention. Similarly, Liu and Tsyvinski (2021) show that cryptocurrency returns are significantly predicted by investor attention proxies. Unlike traditional assets, Bitcoin lacks ties to macroeconomic fundamentals, so sentiment and belief play an outsized role. Macroeconomic Role and Portfolio Demand Bitcoin's value is also shaped by its role in the broader financial system. In a low-interest-rate environment and amid concerns about fiat currency debasement, investors have turned to Bitcoin as a non-sovereign store of value. This is demonstrated by early work by Baur et al (2018) who show that investors are holding Bitcoin for long periods, but is supported by followup work by Jahanshahloo et al (2025). Recent research has reassessed Bitcoin's role in portfolios, particularly in times of market stress. Corbet, Larkin, and Lucey (2020) find that Bitcoin behaves more like a speculative asset than a traditional safe haven, but it can act as a weak diversifier under certain market conditions. In a similar vein, Ji, Bouri, Lau, and Roubaud (2021) use time-varying spillover models and show that Bitcoin's hedging properties fluctuate significantly, with greater hedging effectiveness during tranquil periods rather than during crises. Professor Coin: Can Bitcoin Replace Gold? Conclusion: Value from Code, Community, and Belief Bitcoin's value emerges from a blend of engineering and economics: scarcity enforced by code, utility derived from decentralized consensus, and demand shaped by sentiment, costs, and macro conditions. It behaves like a commodity, a tech stock, and a speculative token—often all at once. That complexity is what makes Bitcoin both so fascinating and so difficult to value with traditional models. In the end, Bitcoin's worth is anchored not in what it does today, but in what its users believe it can become tomorrow. And as long as that belief persists—backed by utility, adoption, and incentives—the value may persist too. References Baur, D. G., Hong, K-H., Lee, A. D. (2018). Bitcoin: Medium of exchange or speculative assets? Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 54, 177-189. Bolt, W., & van Oordt, M. R. C. (2016). On the Value of Virtual Currencies. Journal of Financial Stability, 17, 81–91. Cong, L. W., Li, Y., & Wang, N. (2021). Tokenomics: Dynamic Adoption and Valuation. Review of Financial Studies, 34(3), 1105–1155. Corbet, S., Larkin, C., & Lucey, B. (2020). The contagion effects of the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from gold and cryptocurrencies. Finance Research Letters, 35, 101554. Hayes, A. (2015). A Cost of Production Model for Bitcoin. Telematics and Informatics, 34(7), 1308–1321. Jahanshahloo, H., Irresbeger, F., Urquhart, A. (2025). Bitcoin under the microscope. British Accounting Review, forthcoming. Ji, Q., Bouri, E., Lau, C. K. M., & Roubaud, D. (2021). Dynamic connectedness and integration in cryptocurrency markets. International Review of Financial Analysis, 74, 101670. Kruger, P., Meyer, C., & Withagen, P. (2022). Is Bitcoin's Stock-to-Flow Model Valid? Finance Research Letters, 48, 102956 Liu, Y., & Tsyvinski, A. (2018). Risks and Returns of Cryptocurrency. NBER Working Paper No. 24877. Pagnotta, E., & Buraschi, A. (2018). An Equilibrium Valuation of Bitcoin and Decentralized Network Assets. Review of Financial Studies, 31(9), 3498–3531. Shen, D., Urquhart, A., Wang, P. (2019). Does twitter predict Bitcoin? Economics Letters, 174, 118-122. Urquhart, A. (2018). What Causes the Attention of Bitcoin? Economics Letters, 166, 40-44. Sign in to access your portfolio


CNBC
3 hours ago
- CNBC
Expect the crypto rally to cool in August as new tariffs ratchet up macroeconomic concerns
Institutional adoption of cryptocurrencies has been trouncing the macroeconomic narrative as the main performance driver for the past two months. Now investors should look for a reversal of that dynamic over the coming month, however. Ether stole the spotlight from bitcoin in July, roaring ahead more than 49% in the month, but bitcoin still managed an 8% gain and climbed to a new all-time high at mid-month. The price action in both coins was largely supported by inflows into ETFs – a steady stream of new investment dollars that continued in bitcoin ETFs and was coupled with a sudden explosion of flows into ether funds – as well as the new crop of crypto treasury companies focused on accumulating the coins. But after the broad sell-off in stocks and rally in bonds on Friday , following weak jobs data and President Donald Trump's new tariffs ranging between 10% and 41% , investors expect crypto to pull back in August with traders likely to dump their more highly speculative and volatile assets. "Bitcoin is caught between ETF-driven optimism and uncertainty around global trade tensions," said Ray Youssef, CEO of crypto app NoOnes. "It remains the risk benchmark, but it may trade in a tighter range unless a new macro catalyst emerges, such as another unexpected rate move or geopolitical shift … I expect August to be relatively muted in terms of price volatility, but deceptively active in terms of positioning." mountain 2025-07-01 Ether (ETH) and bitcoin (BTC) since July 1 Given how hot cryptocurrencies and stocks were in the second quarter, some investors see any pullback as a healthy and strategic cooldown rather than a reaction to a crisis. Especially in what has historically proven a weak trading month for many markets. Among crypto-related stocks, Coinbase gained 27% in the past two months, Galaxy Digital jumped 45%, and the bitcoin miner Iren surged 76%. As part of a rotation from bitcoin to ether-focused plays, ether treasury company Bitmine Immersion soared 136% and stablecoin stock Circle surged more than 400%. "Near term, I think bitcoin stays range-bound unless we get a big macro shift," Pauline Shangett, chief strategy officer at crypto exchange ChangeNOW, told CNBC. "ETH has more momentum thanks to ETF demand and whale activity , which could help it hold up better even in a choppy market," she said, referring to ether, and large investors who hold large positions in a particular asset. Ether ETFs saw more than $5 billion in inflows in July alone, bringing its total inflows to $9.64 to date. Bitcoin ETFs saw monthly inflows of about $6 billion in July, out of a cumulative $55 billion since their introduction. "We are taking advantage of this consolidation and playing for this highly compelling setup to reaccelerate and break out," Read Harvey, technical analyst at Wolfe Research, said in a note Wednesday. "For now, we're buyers of pullbacks in the space and expect reaccelerations in coming weeks, a development that should lead to further crypto outperformance vs. equities." Youssef at NoOnes expects bitcoin to trade between $114,000 and $120,000 for most of August, and find buying support whenever it trades between $103,000 and $109,000. If ether can hold above $3,750 per coin, bulls could push for a retest of $4,000 – a challenging psychological and technical level for traders since the 2021 bull market – with support between $3,200 and $2,900, according to Youssef. "The real wildcard is the September Fed meeting," Youssef said. "[Chair] Jerome Powell's remarks often create sharp, short-term volatility, and with geopolitical tensions rising, we could see sudden shifts in sentiment. Still, unless macro conditions deteriorate significantly, both BTC and ETH appear to be building momentum beneath the surface." —CNBC's Michael Bloom contributed reporting.


CNN
3 hours ago
- CNN
TikTok pulls video of Huda Kattan after beauty mogul spreads conspiracy theories
TikTok this week removed an inflammatory anti-Israel video posted by celebrity beauty mogul and influencer Huda Kattan. Kattan, the founder and face of the billion-dollar brand Huda Beauty, shared a video to her more than 11 million followers on TikTok, accusing Israel of orchestrating World War I, World War II, the September 11 terrorist attacks and Hamas' attack on Israel on October 7. World War I (1914-1918) and World War II (1939-1945) both occurred before the State of Israel was established in 1948. 'All of the conspiracy theories coming out and a lot of evidence behind them — that Israel has been behind World War I, World War II, September 11, October 7 — they allowed all of this stuff to happen. Is this crazy?' Kattan said on camera in her since-removed TikTok post, which included other unfounded claims about Israel. 'Like, I had a feeling — I was like, 'Are they behind every world war?' Yes.' A representative for TikTok confirmed to CNN that it removed Kattan's video for violating its community guidelines. 'In a global community, it is natural for people to have different opinions, but we seek to operate on a shared set of facts and reality,' TikTok's community guidelines state. 'We do not allow misinformation that may cause significant harm to individuals or society, regardless of intent.' Kattan's agency did not respond to CNN's request for comment. A manager listed on public databases as a representative for Kattan was contacted by CNN and said in an email that they no longer represent her. Kattan's video has spurred calls across social media and among Jewish groups for retailers like Sephora to cut ties with her popular beauty brand, Huda Beauty, which was valued at $1.2 billion in 2017 and brings in roughly $200 million in annual sales, according to Forbes. A representative for Sephora has not responded to CNN's request for comment. This is not the first time the beauty influencer has faced calls for boycotts due to her public commentary after October 7. Kattan, whose company has over 57 million followers on Instagram, has been an outspoken critic of Israel and a staunch supporter of Palestinians in Gaza. Within a week of Hamas attacking Israel on October 7, 2023, an Israeli Instagram user threatened to boycott her products, to which Kattan replied: 'I don't want blood money.' In response to that comment, a petition was launched and received over 30,000 signatures, calling on Sephora to remove Huda Beauty products from its stores. Kattan's most recent TikTok video drew swift backlash from Jewish groups. 'Huda Kattan built a brand around beauty — but these antisemitic conspiracy theories are nothing short of ugly hate,' said Jonathan Greenblatt, CEO of the Anti-Defamation League. 'Spreading vile myths about Jews to millions of followers isn't just reckless — it's dangerous.' The American Jewish Committee posted Kattan's since-removed TikTok video on social media, writing, 'Huda Kattan, founder of Huda Beauty, is using her massive platform to spread vile antisemitic conspiracy theories — accusing Jews of harvesting the organs of Palestinians, causing 9/11, and running global pedophile rings. This isn't 'criticism of Israel.' It's centuries-old hate, repackaged and broadcast to millions.' 'Retailers have a choice,' said Ari Hoffnung, managing director of the Jewish nonprofit, JLens. 'They can continue to platform a brand whose founder promotes hate-fueled conspiracy theories, or they can take a stand against antisemitism.' Forbes included Kattan on their 2023 list of America's Richest Self-Made Women and on their list of Most Powerful Women in Business in 2024.