
The road to the Stanley Cup Final: Ranking the 14 playoff series that got us here
All in all, it's been a mixed bag of a postseason. We avoided having even one sweep, which is impressive. We also had half the series end in five games, which generally isn't impressive. It's a top-heavy list, but having gone through it all, I'm not sure we can complain about what the hockey gods served up. Let's start at the bottom and work our way up.
Expectations: An epic battle for Eastern supremacy, with the red-hot Hurricanes finally facing a true contender. Hey, at least this time it won't be a sweep, right?
What we got: A series where, by the end, we were disappointed we didn't get a sweep.
Overtimes: None.
Mandatory controversy: We had a few, including Shayne Gostisbehere shooting a puck at Brad Marchand in Game 1. But maybe the most memorable moment from a not-very-memorable series came when it was over: Paul Maurice appearing to lecture an annoyed Rod Brind'Amour about handshake-line etiquette.
Advertisement
Defining moment: Brind'Amour making the gutsy call to bench Frederik Andersen after two shaky performances, only to watch Pyotr Kochetkov get shelled in a Game 3 loss that basically ended the series.
Bottom line: We've seen worse series over the years, but given how good this should have been, I'm not sure there have been many bigger letdowns.
Expectations: A relatively quick and easy Carolina win over the depleted Devils.
What we got: A relatively quick and easy Carolina win over the depleted Devils.
Overtimes: Two, with the teams splitting double-OT decisions that included the series-ending Game 5.
Mandatory controversy: Timo Meier briefly earned a rare goaltender interference major for trucking Andersen in Game 4, only to have it rescinded on replay review. Andersen ended up leaving the game, and Brind'Amour was not happy.
Defining moment: We pretty much have to go with Sebastian Aho's series winner on the power play in OT.
Bottom line: Pretty much what we expected, although Game 5 was a wild ride that elevated the series just enough to keep it out of the running for the bottom of the rankings.
Expectations: The consensus was that the Hurricanes would win, maybe even convincingly. But the Capitals had been surprising us all season, so maybe they'd do it again with a classic series.
What we got: The former, unfortunately.
Overtimes: One, in the opener, that was won by Jaccob Slavin's seeing-eye shot.
Mandatory controversy: Was there one? I'm not even sure. Do stolen mouth guards count?
Defining moment: We'll go with Andrei Svechnikov's series winner, which wasn't pretty but fit the Hurricanes' 'just get it on net' ethos.
Bottom line: This was the round that legitimately got the 'Wait, are the Hurricanes boring or just effective?' discussion going, which is rarely a good sign of a fascinating series. I'm pretty sure they're also the only team to ever take up all three spots at the bottom of a best-series list, so … congrats?
Advertisement
Expectations: A nice warmup for Vegas as it looked to get back into championship form.
What we got: A tougher series than most were expecting, with the underdog Wild giving the Golden Knights just about all they could handle.
Overtimes: Two, coming back-to-back in games 4 and 5, with the Golden Knights winning both. Switch even one of those results and we would have been in serious upset territory.
Mandatory controversy: Late in Game 5, the Wild scored what appeared to be the potential winner before a double review eventually wiped it out.
Defining moment: I'm going with Brett Howden's overtime winner in that crucial Game 5, which gets bonus points for being the final play of Marc-Andre Fleury's 21-season career.
Bottom line: A lot of us were sleeping on this one heading in, but it delivered some compelling opening-round drama.
Expectations: The star-studded rematch from last year's conference final, featuring an Oilers team seeking Stanley Cup redemption facing a Stars team that had gone all in on getting over the third-round hump.
What we got: One truly good period from the Stars, which was enough to win Game 1 but not enough to make this a competitive series.
Overtimes: None. And thanks to empty-netters, all five games ended up being decided by three goals or more.
Mandatory controversy: Darnell Nurse's slash on Roope Hintz didn't lead to a suspension, but it did lead to all sorts of conspiracy theories about the Stars forward having faked an injury, right up until he had to miss the crucial Game 4.
Defining moment: Two, both from Game 5. First, Pete DeBoer's panic move that saw him yank Jake Oettinger out of an elimination game. Second, Connor McDavid's breakaway dagger against backup Casey DeSmith to snuff out any comeback momentum.
Bottom line: Like the Hurricanes and Panthers, this one should have been a classic but ended up as a dud. In related news, I'm starting to think Mikko Rantanen might not be a sure thing for the Conn Smythe anymore.
Expectations: The Battle of Ontario, playoff edition, finally revived after more than two decades.
Advertisement
What we got: A pretty good series and a reminder that modern rivalries aren't what they used to be.
Overtimes: Three straight, with the Leafs taking a 3-0 series lead before the Senators battled back in Game 4.
Mandatory controversy: In maybe the dumbest controversy of the entire postseason, we got 24 hours of discourse about pregame warmup puck shooting.
Defining moment: After plenty of hand-wringing over whether the first Ottawa playoff crowd in eight years would actually be supporting the home team, Sens fans finally rose and got loud early in overtime of Game 3 … only to have Simon Benoit immediately silence them with a seeing-eye winner.
Bottom line: A good series that teased us with what would have been an epic Ottawa comeback, but this felt like more of an appetizer for potential rematches in the coming years.
Expectations: The classic battle for the Pacific title that we all had penciled in since September.
What we got: A fun series with some ups and downs that needed another game or two to live up to the hype.
Overtimes: Two, both won by Edmonton, in Game 2 and the series-finale Game 5.
Mandatory controversy: That Game 2 overtime winner for the Oilers came shortly after Viktor Arvidsson appeared to use a can opener to send Brayden McNabb head-first into the boards. Bruce Cassidy was not impressed.
Defining moment: We didn't realize it at the time, but it was probably Tomas Hertl taking out Calvin Pickard in Game 2. We all figured the return of Stuart Skinner spelled doom for the Oilers, and he wasn't sharp in Vegas' Game 3 win. But then he closed the series with back-to-back shutouts and now heads into the final as the unquestioned starter.
Bottom line: The series delivered big stars, bad blood and some fascinating moments, packing about as much drama into five games as you could reasonably ask for. We just wish we'd been able to see a longer series.
Advertisement
Expectations: Two teams that had soared past expectations all season to end up at opposite ends of the Eastern seeding. The standings told us this one should be an easy call, but going in, it felt like anything could happen.
What we got: A series that was over quickly but packed some interesting twists and turns into its short run time.
Overtimes: One, in the opening game, which featured a third-period comeback by the Habs followed by the first playoff overtime goal of Alex Ovechkin's career.
Mandatory controversy: There were a few, including a brawl on a bench and a potential phantom icing call in that Game 1 overtime. But the biggest impact, literally and figuratively, came from Tom Wilson's hit on Alexandre Carrier in Game 4. Habs fans thought it could have been a penalty, but the refs disagreed, and it led directly to a series-altering goal.
Defining moment: We could pick several crucial goals, skilled plays or big hits, but let's be honest: We all know it was when Wilson made that face.
Bottom line: For a weird crossover wild-card matchup, this one was fun without overstaying its welcome. No complaints.
Expectations: It was a first-round rematch for the fourth year running, but this time the Kings had home ice to go with the best home record in the league. If they were ever going to show they could hang with the Oilers, this was their chance.
What we got: They could not, in fact, hang with the Oilers.
Overtimes: One, in Game 4, a crucial Oilers comeback that tied the series.
Mandatory controversy: That OT goal came on a power play thanks to a tripping call, which you don't often see in sudden death. We also got a puck-over-glass controversy, because those are always fun.
Defining moment: It's an easy call for this series — the disastrous Jim Hiller challenge in Game 3 that served as the turning point for the game, the series and potentially even the entire postseason. You know a challenge is bad when nobody is even pretending to do the whole 'nobody understands goalie interference' schtick.
Advertisement
Bottom line: The loss led to big changes in the Kings front office and a team questioning where it goes from here. And honestly, if we're not going to get an existential crisis or two out of the first round, what's even the point?
Expectations: A rematch from 2023, pitting a desperate Leafs team on the verge of finally quieting the doubters against the reigning champs.
What we got: The ultra-rare seven-game series that still manages to feel like a blowout.
Overtimes: One, coming in Game 3. The Leafs had a chance to grab a 3-0 stranglehold on the series, but Marchand had other ideas.
Mandatory controversy: Plenty, but none bigger than Sam Bennett taking Anthony Stolarz out of the series with an elbow to the head in Game 1. This was a big deal right up until the next day when Maurice ordered everyone to stop talking about it, and we did.
Defining moment: Toronto fans booing and tossing jerseys on the ice while the Panthers turned the biggest Leafs game in decades into an embarrassingly easy blowout win. Oh, wait, that happened twice.
Bottom line: You have to be good to beat the champs, and the Leafs just couldn't get close to that level when the series was on the line.
Expectations: The latest installment of the Battle of Florida was set up to be the best one yet, with most of the experts thinking Tampa Bay would reclaim control.
What we got: A surprisingly quick and easy Florida win.
Overtimes: None.
Mandatory controversy: Plenty of ugly hits, including suspensions for Aaron Ekblad and Brandon Hagel (but not Matthew Tkachuk). Even the coaches got into it. If you're looking for the playoff series with the most bad blood, this was it by a mile.
Defining moment: In a rare break from the teams exchanging dirty hits, the Panthers got two goals in 11 seconds late in the third period of Game 4, turning a series that was about to be tied into one that was about to be over.
Advertisement
Bottom line: Even without any OT or all that much suspense, this was a nasty, old-school series that left you wanting more.
Expectations: A heavyweight battle between two Cup-worthy teams.
What we got: Pretty much that.
Overtimes: One, in Game 6, with Thomas Harley ending the Jets' season.
Mandatory controversy: There were two biggies, both favoring Dallas, with Mason Marchment somehow getting away with swatting an official and Alexander Petrovic's game-winning goal in Game 3 being allowed to stand despite looking like this.
Defining moment: It's hard to choose in a series that was packed with them. We could go with Rantanen's domination in the opener, or a pair of Connor Hellebuyck home shutouts between continued road struggles, or Mikael Granlund's hat trick in Game 4. But I think the moment we'll remember most from the series actually came in a losing cause: Mark Scheifele's return to the lineup after his father died, and the goal he scored to give the Jets a lead they couldn't hold.
Bottom line: This series didn't miss much, aside from a Game 7.
Expectations: A conference-final-worthy showdown between two legitimate Cup contenders, with sky-high hopes for an absolute classic.
What we got: Somehow, a series that blew away even our wildly high expectations.
Overtimes: Two, with the Stars winning games 2 and 3.
Mandatory controversy: Every postseason needs one series to serve as the lightning rod for complaints about the playoff format, and this was it. We also got a late call on Jack Drury that led to the Game 7 winner, which Colorado fans did not appreciate.
Defining moment: The Mikko Rantanen Game, featuring arguably the best period any player has ever had in the postseason ever.
Bottom line: The hockey was ridiculously good, the drama was off-the-charts and the Rantanen factor was irresistible. In any other year, this series is No. 1 by such a large margin that it almost makes the entire post feel pointless. But not this year.
Expectations: The Blues were a reasonably fun story with some long-shot upset potential, and they'd give the Presidents' Trophy winners just enough of a fight to make the series worth watching before quietly making their exit.
Advertisement
What we got: A combination of a Jets meltdown and Blues defiance that came as close as you can possibly come to an upset before … well, you know.
Overtimes: Just one, but it was double-overtime in Game 7.
Mandatory controversy: We had the coaches feuding over Scheifele's injury, a pregame scolding from the league and even a malfunctioning airplane.
Defining moment: For most of the series, it looked like it would be the image of Hellebuyck fishing a puck out of his net. But that storyline disappeared — well, it took a few days off — thanks to one of the greatest Game 7 comebacks we've ever seen.
How good does a game have to be for the double-OT series winner to be only the third-most-memorable goal? I still can't believe this all happened.
Bottom line: I could see having the Stars and Avs in the top spot on your list. Both series were all-timers, and you could argue the two Game 7s were the best games we've ever had on back-to-back nights. I'm going with the series that produced a game that's in the running for the most dramatic ever, but I don't think there's a wrong answer. Thank you, 2025 Central Division: You were the true MVP of the postseason.
(Photo of Tim Stutzle, Simon Benoit, Mason Appleton and Miro Heiskanen: Claus Andersen and Cameron Bartlett / Getty Images)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
FOX analyst suggests Michigan Wolverines football legend J.J. McCarthy has little room to improve in the NFL
FOX analyst suggests Michigan Wolverines football legend J.J. McCarthy has little room to improve in the NFL originally appeared on The Sporting News Despite Shedeur Sanders' status in the Cleveland Browns' quarterback battle and Caleb Williams' persistent struggles producing most of the mainstream headlines out of training camp, there seems to be a growing concern with the Vikings' young signal-caller. J.J. McCarthy missed his rookie season after numerous complications following a torn meniscus, so naturally, there will be growing pains as he acclimates himself to the league. It doesn't help that he will be under center for a team coming off a 13-win campaign, which was a game away from winning the division and being the top seed in the NFC. Coach Kevin O'Connell and star wideout Justin Jefferson have defended the 22-year-old's development, but the local media beat hasn't been impressed with his performance. On his show "The Herd," responding to a report that McCarthy is working on his touch as a passer, Colin Cowherd scoffed at the notion he's in a similar position as a young Josh Allen. "Josh Allen was a total project, but he was a moldable piece of clay," Cowherd said. "McCarthy got three years of great coaching from Jim Harbaugh—you're looking at what he is. This idea that he's going to go two or three levels up from what he's been is unlikely." Suggesting that young talent can't improve in the NFL if they had elite college coaching seems a bit tone-deaf. There are too many cases of backups at blue-blood programs turning pro and outproducing their draft slot. McCarthy is still raw—it's not like Michigan asked him to command its offense. Who knows how well he could diagnose defenses and grasp a scheme? Maybe we should let him play a few meaningful games first before suggesting his ceiling is capped.
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NFL holdouts, contract negotiation tracker: Now that Kyren Williams has a deal, how close are other stars to getting their own?
NFL training camp season is officially upon us, which means holdout/hold-in season is too as players seek new contracts. While Rams running back Kyren Williams was never a hold-in, his contract situation was one of the buzziest this year. On Tuesday he agreed to a reported three-year, $33 million deal with Los Angeles, including $23 million in guaranteed money. [Subscribe to Yahoo Fantasy Plus and unlock Instant Mock Drafts today] Williams was more diplomatic than some of his peers seeking new contracts have been, which isn't to say there's a right or wrong way to go about it. All situations are different. But now that Williams' deal is done, how close are the other star players seeking new contracts to sealing theirs? Let's take some temperatures, from closest to furthest. Buffalo Bills RB James Cook This is a bit of a dart throw. After participating in camp each day from the start, Cook has now sat out Bills practice two days in a row due to "business." Sounds like the situation is getting more tense, not less, right? Well, now that Kyren Williams' deal is done, it can provide some semblance of a template for the $15 million a year Cook is seeking. It won't be straightforward — negotiations rarely are — but Cook's agent works for LAA Sports, which just resolved Shemar Stewart's flap with the Bengals, which was a more difficult situation than this. (We think.) Given how valuable Cook is to the Bills' offense, we're going to assume this gets done by end of next week. Cincinnati Bengals pass rusher Trey Hendrickson Hendrickson still hasn't practiced since reporting to camp on July 30, and the Bengals's offer is reportedly well past $30 million, per Sports Illustrated's Albert Breer. The issue remains the guarantees structure, but the Bengals already softened a clause in Shemar Stewart's contract to get a deal done, and we're guessing they'll do more softening with Hendrickson's wishes by the end of preseason since he's the reigning sack king and their best defender by a mile. San Francisco 49ers WR Jauan Jennings Jennings has yet to practice since reportedly aggravating a calf injury on July 27. Is that time missed injury-related, or business-related? "You can ask him that," 49ers head coach Kyle Shanahan said Monday. Jennings is reportedly seeking a new deal after a breakout 2024 season, and is set to make $7.5 million this season on the final year of a two-year extension. We're guessing the, shall we say, extra time away from the field will help expedite a deal here before the season kicks off. Dallas Cowboys pass rusher Micah Parsons Micah Parsons requested a trade late last week. Jerry Jones said Cowboys fans shouldn't lose sleep over it. It's wildly difficult to envision a scenario in which Dallas trades Parsons, who looked very engaged not just with players but also with team leadership — minus the Joneses — on Monday, per Yahoo Sports' Jori Epstein. This has all the earmarks of a deal that gets done the week the season kicks off — especially, as Yahoo Sports' Nate Tice pointed out on the latest episode of "Football 301", considering it would steal some headline thunder from the rival Eagles hosting the opener as Super Bowl champions. Washington Commanders WR Terry McLaurin McLaurin has been standing on his trade request since July 31, and while there isn't a ton of animus here, the moving parts indicate a new contract could take a while to get done, if it does at all. NFL Network reported teams haven't exactly been burning the Commanders' phone lines inquiring about McLaurin, and there appears to be a significant gulf between what McLaurin and his team thinks he's worth (north of $30M per year) and what Washington does (maybe closer to the $23 million per year Courtland Sutton just got). McLaurin is officially designated on the PUP list with an ankle injury. Who knows how soon he'll move off it. Green Bay Packers OL Elgton Jenkins Jenkins is moving from guard to center, and wanted a reworked deal that reflected it. It sounds like he won't get it before this season, and that Jenkins has made peace with that. There are two years left on his current contract extension, which reportedly includes non-guaranteed base salaries of $11.7 million this season and $18.5 million in 2026. All signs point to zero movement here until after the season.
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Packers' Matt LaFleur diagnoses Lukas Van Ness's 'desire for perfection' for slow career start
Packers' Matt LaFleur diagnoses Lukas Van Ness's 'desire for perfection' for slow career start originally appeared on The Sporting News The Green Bay Packers will be a team to watch this season. They've been doing everything possible to ensure their offense is tough to handle this year, and they're aiming to do the same on defense. On Monday, the Packers signed Corey Ballentine to bolster their secondary. 'Ballentine was on the Packers' practice squad and active roster from 2022-24. Over three seasons with Green Bay, he appeared in 37 regular-season games with seven starts and three postseason contests,' wrote. One name that has drawn attention throughout the summer for the Packers' defense is former first-round pick Lukas Van Ness. Van Ness entered the league with a lot of hype, but last season, despite injuries to others, he didn't see an increased role. 'Whatever snaps were freed up by Smith's departure weren't handed to Van Ness. Instead, Brenton Cox and Arron Mosby got more opportunities and largely delivered. Both Cox and Mosby put interesting reps on tape last year as pass rushers, though their size made them liabilities in the run game,' Joe Meerdink wrote. Van Ness's lack of production has made him a frequent topic of trade speculation this summer. However, on Tuesday, head coach Matt LaFleur suggested that Van Ness's desire for perfection has held him back. 'Matt LaFleur suggests Lukas Van Ness has been held back a bit by a desire for perfection. 'This is an imperfect game and sometimes you just gotta go.' Said he's doing a better job of that this year,' Locked on Packers' Peter Bukowski wrote. Follow The Sporting News on WhatsApp This could be a promising sign for Van Ness, who will likely need to prove himself this season. It's a make-or-break year for the former first-rounder, and with a new mindset, a breakout season could be on the horizon. Now that Van Ness understands that hiccups are part of the process, he may be less hard on himself and more willing to take risks.