logo
Wizz Air quit Gulf after Abu Dhabi went back on deal, boss says

Wizz Air quit Gulf after Abu Dhabi went back on deal, boss says

Telegraph5 hours ago
Wizz Air's decision to quit the Middle East was triggered by a row with its Abu Dhabi government partner over alleged favouritism shown to the Gulf state's airline, its chief executive has said.
The budget airline last week suspended all flights from its Abu Dhabi hub, blaming the 'hot and harsh' climate, as high temperatures and sand particles degraded its engines.
But Jozsef Varadi, chief executive of Wizz Air, told The Telegraph that the move was also driven by curbs imposed on its local division by the Abu Dhabi authorities.
These included a refusal to let Wizz Air Abu Dhabi – a joint venture between Abu Dhabi and the airline – fly to India and Pakistan as previously agreed, despite the two countries having granted it access rights.
Mr Varadi said the move was probably designed bolster Abu Dhabi's airline, Etihad, which is owned by the Gulf state.
'Six years ago, Abu Dhabi was booming and the whole system was supportive of bringing in an ultra-low-cost carrier,' he said.
'Everyone was contributing, without any discrimination between the home airlines. But that changed and it became a case of Etihad first, with everyone else subordinated.
'That is not what we agreed when we made a commitment to invest in Abu Dhabi and it's not a game we're prepared to play. We said at the beginning that we would not be coming to be a second-class citizen.'
Wizz last week said it was abandoning the joint venture, which was established with the Abu Dhabi's sovereign wealth fund ADQ in 2019.
Mr Varadi said the launch of flights to the Indian subcontinent had always been the venture's ultimate goal, with the region accounting for 60pc of the travel market from Abu Dhabi.
He said: 'We all had an understanding that we would be accessing markets like India and Pakistan. It was specifically mentioned in our investment memorandum.
'We got designated by Abu Dhabi and we started working with India and Pakistan and both of them approved our designation.
'But at that point Abu Dhabi changed its mind and they decided to remove our designation and hand that over to Etihad. So we were excluded from more than half of the market. That is not acceptable and not how we do business.'
Mr Varadi said the change in attitude coincided with the deepening of government efforts to focus Etihad more on local travel needs, rather than have it compete in global markets with Emirates and Qatar Airways.
Etihad slashed its aircraft order book and cut long-haul routes as a result of the rethink, and in October 2022 came under the ownership of ADQ, which also held a 51pc stake in Wizz Air Abu Dhabi, to Wizz's 49pc.
'People don't like flying over war zones'
The chief executive said the escalating conflict in the Gulf has also influenced the decision to quit the region, with a quarter of Wizz flights forced to divert in the past 12 months, increasing costs and putting off travellers.
He said: 'Demand is a lot weaker than before. People don't like flying over rockets and war zones, and this has become a regional conflict. It's no longer local.'
Wear and tear issues with the Pratt & Whitney engines on Wizz's jets, which grounded 20pc of the fleet, were a further factor, being more acute in the 'hot and harsh' environment of Abu Dhabi and nearby destinations such as Saudi Arabia.
He said: 'The engines were degrading three times faster, so it became incredibly punitive from an engine lifetime and cost perspective.'
Mr Varadi said Wizz, which is due to provide an earnings update on Thursday, will delay orders from Airbus as it falls back on core European markets, where it competes with Ryanair and EasyJet. While based in Budapest Wizz is listed in London and has major bases at Gatwick and Luton.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UAE's Al-Futtaim to acquire 49.95% of Saudi's Cenomi Retail
UAE's Al-Futtaim to acquire 49.95% of Saudi's Cenomi Retail

Reuters

time2 hours ago

  • Reuters

UAE's Al-Futtaim to acquire 49.95% of Saudi's Cenomi Retail

RIYADH, July 20 (Reuters) - Emirati conglomerate Al-Futtaim is to buy a 49.95% stake in Saudi Arabian franchiser Cenomi Retail in a deal worth more than 2.5 billion riyals ($667 million), Cenomi Retail said in a statement on Sunday. Cenomi Retail's founding shareholders signed a share purchase agreement with Al-Futtaim with shares priced at 44 riyals each, said the statement. As part of the share purchase agreement's completion conditions, the two companies are negotiating a shareholder loan of at least 1.3 billion riyals to boost Cenomi Retail's balance sheet. Cenomi Retail is a large franchiser in Saudi Arabia operating food and retail outlets, while Al-Futtaim of the United Arab Emirates is a private business group with operations ranging from financial services to real estate and retail. "This investment represents substantial foreign direct investment (FDI) from the UAE private sector and underscores the robust economic partnership between our countries," Al-Futtaim's Vice Chairman and CEO Omar al-Futtaim said in the statement. Saudi Arabia has been attempting to boost FDI as part of its Vision 2030 program to diversify the economy away from oil dependency and expand the private sector. ($1 = 3.7509 riyals)

Iran could hold nuclear talks with European powers next week, Tasnim reports
Iran could hold nuclear talks with European powers next week, Tasnim reports

Reuters

time3 hours ago

  • Reuters

Iran could hold nuclear talks with European powers next week, Tasnim reports

DUBAI, July 20 (Reuters) - Iran, Britain, France and Germany could hold talks next week on Tehran's nuclear programme, Iran's semi-official Tasnim news agency reported on Sunday, following warnings by the three European countries that failure to resume negotiations would lead to international sanctions being reimposed on Iran. "The principle of talks has been agreed upon, but consultations are continuing on the time and place of the talks. The country in which the talks could be held next week has not been finalised," Tasnim reported, quoting a source informed on the matter. The report on possible talks comes a few days after the foreign ministers of the so-called E3 nations, as well as the European Union's foreign policy chief, held their first call with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi since Israel and the U.S. attacked Iranian nuclear facilities a month ago. The three European countries, along with China and Russia, are the remaining parties to a 2015 nuclear deal reached with Iran - from which the United States withdrew in 2018 - that lifted sanctions on the Middle Eastern country in return for restrictions on its nuclear programme. The E3 have said they would restore U.N. sanctions on Tehran via the so-called "snapback mechanism" by the end of August if nuclear talks that were ongoing between Iran and the U.S. before the Israel-Iran air war do not resume or fail to produce concrete results. "If EU/E3 want to have a role, they should act responsibly, and put aside the worn-out policies of threat and pressure, including the 'snap-back' for which they lack absolutely [any] moral and legal ground," Araqchi said earlier this week. The snapback mechanism can be used to restore U.N. sanctions before the U.N. Security Council resolution enshrining the deal expires on October 18. Prior to the Israel-Iran war, Tehran and Washington held five rounds of nuclear talks mediated by Oman but faced major stumbling blocks such as uranium enrichment in Iran, which Western powers want to bring down to zero to minimise any risk of weaponisation. Tehran maintains its nuclear programme is solely meant for civilian purposes.

Recognised Palestinian state could develop disputed gas resources, expert says
Recognised Palestinian state could develop disputed gas resources, expert says

The Guardian

time3 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Recognised Palestinian state could develop disputed gas resources, expert says

Recognition of Palestine as a state would put beyond doubt that the Palestinian Authority (PA) is entitled to develop the natural gas resources of the Gaza Marine field, according to one of the experts that worked on the stalled project. Michael Barron, the author of a new book on Palestine's untapped gas reserves, has suggested the field could generate $4bn (£3bn) in revenue at current prices and it is reasonable that the PA could receive $100m a year over 15 years. He said the revenues 'would not turn the Palestinians into the next Qataris or Singaporeans, but it would be their own revenue and not aid, on which the Palestinian economy remains dependent'. Plans to develop the field have a near 30-year history, during which time legal controversies over ownership have stalled exploration. A law firm representing Palestinian human rights groups sent a warning letter to the Italian state-owned firm ENI that it should not exploit the gas fields in an area known as Zone G, where six licences were awarded by Israel's energy ministry. In their letter, the lawyers claim that roughly 62% of the zone lies in maritime areas claimed by Palestine and, as such, 'Israel cannot have validly awarded you any exploration rights and you cannot validly have acquired any such rights'. Palestine declared its maritime borders, including its exclusive economic zone, when it acceded to the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) in 2015, and set out a detailed claim in 2019. Israel is not a signatory to UNCLOS. Barron said recognition of Palestine, particularly by states with large oil firms registered in their jurisdiction, would effectively end the legal ambiguity, and provide the PA with not only a new secure source of income, but regular supplies of energy independent of Israel. Since the legal letter, ENI has told pressure groups in Italy that 'licences have not yet been issued and no exploratory activities are in progress'. Another group, Global Witness, claims the East Mediterranean Gas pipeline that runs parallel to the Gaza coastline is unlawful since it runs through Palestinian waters, and is not providing any revenue to the PA. The 56-mile (90km) pipeline transports gas from Ashkelon in Israel to Arish in Egypt, where it is then processed into liquefied natural gas for export, including to Europe. 'The Oslo Accords agreed in 1993 clearly give the Palestinian National Authority jurisdiction over territorial waters, the subsoil, power to legislate over oil and gas exploration and to award licences to do so,' Barron said. 'Control over natural resources was an important element of [the] state-building agenda of the Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat. Israeli exploitation of Palestinian resources was and remains a central part of the conflict.' Gas was discovered in the Gaza Marine field in 2000 in a joint venture owned by the BG Gas group, a giant privatised off-shoot of British Gas and the Palestinian Consolidated Contractors Company. The plan was for the gas to be used by the sole power station on the Gaza strip to end the territory's perennial energy shortages. Barron argues in his book – The Gaza Marine Story - that the fate of the project is a microcosm of how Israel worked to increase Palestinian dependence on Israel while at the same time trying to separate Palestinians from Israelis. The project was dogged by issues of commercial viability and an Israeli court ruling that the waters were a 'no-man's water', partly because the PA was not a sovereign entity with unambiguous powers to award licences. The court also did not resolve whether the rights to Palestinian territorial waters clearly provided for in the Oslo Accords included a Palestinian 'exclusive economic zone', a zone that normally extends 200 miles off the coast. The accords were only intended to be an interim arrangement before full statehood and so did not delineate the full maritime border. Territorial waters are normally defined as only 12 or 20 miles off the coast and Israel always argued that any licence for Gaza Marine 20 miles off the Gaza coast should be seen as a gift to the PA by Israel, and not a right. After Hamas took control the Gaza strip in 2007, Israel did not want the revenue to fall into its hands, so it blocked the development, prompting the BG group to put the project on hold and then eventually to quit. In June 2023 Israel approved plans for an Egyptian firm EGAS to develop the field, only for the war in Gaza to start. Gaza Marine is estimated to contain only 30 billion cubic metres (BCM) of natural gas, which is a small fraction of the more than 1,000 BCM contained in Israel's own territorial waters. Barron argued that Israel has its own gas supplies and so long as a Palestinian state with unified governance is recognised, Israel will have no motive or legal right to block Palestine exploiting its single greatest natural resource. The whole controversy around private sector investment in Israel's acknowledged occupation of Palestine moved centre stage with a report published last week by the UN special rapporteur on Palestine, Francesca Albanese, warning corporations against sustaining what has been declared an unlawful occupation by the international court of justice (ICJ). She claims ICJ decisions place on corporate entities a prima facie responsibility 'to not engage and/or to withdraw totally and unconditionally from any associated dealings with Israel, and to ensure that any engagement with Palestinians enables their self-determination'. Her claim has been rejected wholesale by Israel.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store