Court restores powers to local representatives
A two-member bench comprising Justice Syed Arshad Ali and Justice Farah Jamshed presided over the case. The petitions were filed by Humayun Mayar, Zubair Ali, and others, and were argued by Advocate Babar Khan Yousafzai.
During the hearing, Yousafzai informed the court that local government elections were held in Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa in February 2022, after which the newly elected representatives took oath and began performing their duties. However, the provincial government soon initiated efforts to curtail their authority and, later that year, amended the Local Government Act.
Yousafzai argued that these amendments significantly rolled back the powers of elected local bodies and stripped them of their authority to allocate and utilize development funds. These powers were instead transferred to the district administration and other government departments. He pointed out that the majority of seats in the first phase of elections were won by opposition parties, prompting the government to tighten its control by changing the law.
The lawyer further contended that by shifting most powers from the Act to the Rules, the government bypassed legal safeguards. Specifically, amendments were made to Sections 23A and 25 of the Local Government Act, altering the composition of the Tehsil Local Government structure originally defined in the 2019 version of the law.
He emphasized that the 2022 amendments not only took away powers from local representatives such as Tehsil Mayors and Village Council members, but also deprived them of any developmental funds for the past three years.
This, he noted, had created a situation of uncertainty and pressure, as representatives face public expectations without any resources to meet them.
Yousafzai argued that if such amendments were deemed necessary, they should have been applied prospectively, during future elections, rather than retroactively undermining the authority of currently elected officials under the 2019 Act.
In response, the Additional Advocate General contended that the amendments were lawful and within the authority of the provincial government. He claimed the changes were presented before the provincial assembly and that the elected representatives had been granted their due rights.
After reviewing the arguments, the bench declared the provincial government's amendments invalid, restoring the original powers and funding mechanisms for local government representatives as per the 2019 Local Government Act.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
a day ago
- Express Tribune
Military court convicts entitled to 'file petitions'
In a landmark judgment, the Peshawar High Court (PHC) has ruled that individuals convicted by military courts had the constitutional right to file writ petitions before the High Court. The decision came as a significant blow to the federal government's stance, which had argued that such petitions were inadmissible due to the availability of alternative forums for appeal. A two-member bench comprising Justice Waqar Ahmad and Justice Sadiq Ali Memon issued the detailed verdict while hearing a petition filed by Adnan and others from Mardan, who had been convicted by military courts in connection with the May 9 incidents following the arrest of Imran Khan. The petitioners have contended that they had not been involved in the unrest that had taken place at the Mardan City police station and had been wrongfully implicated. They have pointed out that while their co-accused had been tried in anti-terrorism courts, they had been handed over to military courts without being provided an explanation or legal documentation. During the hearing, the Deputy Attorney General objected to the admissibility of the petition, arguing that the petitioners had an alternative appellate forum which they had failed to approach within the prescribed timeframe. Therefore, he claimed, the petition was time-barred and not maintainable. In response, the petitioners' counsel, Barrister Amirullah Chamkani, maintained that the Supreme Court of Pakistan had in a recent short order suggested that the federal government amend the Pakistan Army Act to formally recognize High Courts as appellate forums for military court convictions. However, the counsel pointed out, the government had failed to implement these amendments, thereby depriving the petitioners of an appellate remedy. Chamkani further argued that his clients were unaware of the charges against them, had not been provided any trial documents, and had only been informed after the lapse of the appeal period. He, therefore, contended that it was unjust to declare their petition inadmissible. The PHC, in its written order, observed that constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 could not be denied, especially in situations where no effective remedy was available to the aggrieved parties. The court ruled that the absence of any appellate forum and the lack of transparency in the trial process justified the maintainability of the writ petition. Referring to the precedent set in the Brigadier Ali case, the court noted that even the Supreme Court, while upholding military trials under the Army Act, had accepted that High Courts could exercise jurisdiction in such matters.
Business Recorder
2 days ago
- Business Recorder
KP launches carbon asset inventory to enter global markets
PESHAWAR: The Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa has officially launched the province's first Carbon Asset Inventory for its renewable energy portfolio on Friday. The launch event, held in Peshawar, marks a significant milestone in KP's journey to access international carbon markets and unlock new pathways for climate finance. Developed in collaboration with the UK International Development-funded Sustainable Energy and Economic Development (SEED) Programme, the inventory maps renewable energy projects owned by the Pakhtunkhwa Energy Development Organization (PEDO), assessing their potential for carbon credits and International Renewable Energy Certificates (I-RECs). Speaking at the event, the Chief Minister of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Ali Amin Khan Gandapur stated that this initiative is a bold testament to KP's leadership in climate action. It demonstrates our resolve to expand clean energy solutions, attract green finance, and ensure that the benefits of sustainability are equitably shared among our people.' The Chief Minister termed the launch of the Carbon Asset Inventory as a historic moment, stating that this step is evidence that our province is ready to align with global environmental goals. He said this initiative also reflects the government's commitment to adopting market-based mechanisms for sustainable economic development. He appreciated the collaboration between PEDO and the SEED Programme, stating that it was through the collective efforts of all stakeholders that the province's first Carbon Asset Inventory was made possible. Ali Amin Gandapur stated that this inventory is a modern tool that maps PEDO's renewable energy projects and establishes a carbon emissions baseline, enabling PEDO to quantify the emissions it has saved. He added that this initiative will pave the way for the province's access to the international renewable energy market and will also lay the foundation for promoting climate financing in the province. The CM expressed his determination to fully benefit from climate financing opportunities to promote green energy solutions in the province and to make this approach a permanent part of his development strategy. Ali Amin Gandapur said the province has special potential in renewable energy, with multiple projects under implementation by PEDO and several others in the pipeline. He termed the agreement between PEDO and PAT as a milestone, under which the renewable energy potential will be effectively utilized for the province's economic stability. He stated that economic self-reliance and environmental sustainability are among the top priorities of his government, and for this purpose, focus is being given to the development of all sectors with untapped potential. Earlier, briefing the participants about the outcomes of newly launched inventory, the authorities told that the Carbon Asset Inventory evaluates PEDO's hydropower and solar portfolio against leading carbon credit standards-Verra, Gold Standard, and the Global Carbon Council (GCC) and finds that 8 projects are eligible for Verra, 13 for Gold Standard, and 37 for GCC, while the entire portfolio qualifies for I-RECs. Collectively, these projects could avoid 5.4 million tonnes of CO2 emissions annually and generate up to 11.9 million I-RECs, creating a significant opportunity for revenue through carbon markets. In a major step forward, PEDO also signed an agreement today with the Pakistan Environment Trust (PET) to register with Evident, the global I-REC registry. This positions KP to formally enter international renewable energy markets, with five projects being registered in the first phase. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
Notices in military courts convictions issued
Fateh Khan, Fazal Ghaffar and Tajir Gul had been convicted of carrying our terror attacks in the country by military courts. CREATIVE: AAMIR KHAN A two-member bench of the Peshawar High Court (PHC), comprising Justice Sahibzada Asadullah and Justice Khurshid Iqbal, has issued notices to the relevant authorities in response to appeals filed by individuals convicted by military courts in connection with the May 9 riots. The appellants hail from Bannu, Chakdara, and Balambat in Lower Dir, and their legal counsel has challenged the legality and transparency of their convictions. The appeals, filed against the sentences handed down by military courts under the Field General Court Martial (FGCM), argue that the convicts were denied a fair trial and not provided with verdict copies or related legal documents. During the hearing, the appellants were represented by Barrister Amirullah Chamkani, who told the court that the convictions and subsequent prison terms – ranging from two to 10 years – were based on allegedly unlawful trials. According to Chamkani, his clients include Rahimullah, Izzat Gul, Naik Muhammad, Khalid Nawaz, Ikramullah, Ameenullah, Saqlain Haider, Khizar Hayat, and Afaq from Bannu, who were sentenced to 10 years each. Sohrab Khan and Asadullah Durrani from Balambat received two-year terms, while Rais Ahmad and another individual named Ikramullah from Chakdara were sentenced to four years. All were charged under the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) for allegedly protesting against the arrest of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder Imran Khan and damaging state properties, including security installations and police stations. The lawyer noted that although similar charges were faced by other protestors, many of them were tried in anti-terrorism courts and were acquitted due to lack of evidence. In contrast, the current appellants were handed over to military courts without any explanation, raising serious concerns about selective prosecution and lack of due process. He emphasized that under Pakistan's Constitution, specifically Article 10-A, every citizen is entitled to a fair trial and access to necessary legal documentation, including a written copy of the verdict. However, the appellants were neither given formal charges nor informed of the exact nature of their alleged offenses. Chamkani argued that the appellants only became aware of their sentences after the statutory period for appeal had lapsed, effectively denying them their legal right to challenge the convictions in a timely manner. Moreover, he pointed out that none of the appellants were directly named in the original FIRs; their names were added at a later stage without any disclosed basis. Despite several efforts to obtain clarity from authorities and request documentation, their concerns have been met with silence, further undermining the legitimacy of the process. Citing a recent Supreme Court observation, the counsel stressed that while military trials of civilians were upheld, the apex court maintained that such convicts must have the right to appeal. Since no appeal forum currently exists for military court convictions, he asserted that the high court has jurisdiction to hear the matter. Concluding his argument, Chamkani requested the court to declare the military court convictions null and void and to direct that the cases be tried afresh in accordance with civil laws and constitutional guarantees. After hearing the preliminary arguments, the PHC issued notices to the Secretary of Defence, the Field General Court Martial, the federal government.
