logo
If Trump Destroys Inflation Reduction Act, Economic Fallout May Come

If Trump Destroys Inflation Reduction Act, Economic Fallout May Come

Forbes23-03-2025
Block Island, R.I: Deepwater Wind installing the first offshore wind farm at Block Island, Rhode ... More Island, August 14, 2016. (Photo by Mark Harrington/Newsday RM via Getty Images)
Louisiana may be known as an oil and gas state, but it is now getting its feet wet by trying to build offshore wind energy developments in the Gulf of Mexico. Even though the deal has bipartisan support, the Trump Administration is trying to block all such wind projects in federal waters.
President Trump signed an executive order that stopped all offshore wind energy projects. Trump doesn't believe in climate change and thinks fossil fuels are the way to go. What makes him tick? The administration said this strategy will lower energy costs, create more jobs, and meet the growing energy demand. However, look to ruby-red Louisiana, which views offshore wind as a job creator and a vehicle to reduce electricity price volatility.
'We are at an inflection point now on the way energy economics works,' says Fox Swim, a senior solar researcher for Aurora Solar, in a Zoom interview. 'This administration is willing to break the law and norms. It is willing to inflict economic damage on the rest of the country to fulfill its vision. The renewable energy industry must lean hard on state governments. If states value stability in our grid and renewable energies, then these jurisdictions must do the right thing.'
The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) is in danger now. It passed in 2022, creating green energy programs nationwide. But if the projects die, economic stimulation does as well. If the Trump Administration gets rid of the IRA, then Energy Innovation said it would cost consumers $32 billion in energy bills, while gross domestic product falls by $190 billion by 2035. We lose hundreds of thousands of jobs too.
Trump cannot simply eliminate the law, but he can gradually dismantle it. He could slow the rollout or make fossil fuel investments more valuable than those in renewable energy. So even if the law is still on the books, it might not have much of an effect.
Swim points to the Endangerment Finding, the scientific and legal basis for regulating greenhouse gases that cause climate change. In 2009, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency started overseeing those emissions under the Clean Air Act. She thinks the administration will rewrite the law to say, 'Climate is not a problem.' She also believes the administration will revise the IRA to say which technologies qualify for tax credits.
So, here's the scoop: Aurora's new survey revealed that 57% of business owners favor keeping the IRA, while only 29% want it gone. And guess what? A whopping 78% of business owners want to make the most of their IRA benefits. Now, let's talk about homeowners. Awareness of the IRA has skyrocketed from 51% in 2024 to a colossal 77% in 2025.
Interestingly, 48% of installers believe that a reduction in funding from the IRA would negatively impact their business.
'Joe Biden created the IRA, and he fundamentally shifted the way we do clean energy in the U.S. Trump could just as easily shift the needle in the opposite direction,' says Swim. 'The government uses subsidies to promote technologies and industrial policy. The subsidies must exist to bring renewables to the level where they can compete with extremely subsidized petroleum industries.'
GULF OF MEXICO - JUNE 25: The Transocean Discoverer Enterprise drillship burns off gas collected at ... More the BP Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico off the coast of Louisiana on June 25, 2010. An approaching tropical disturbance may force collecting operations involving ships and other siphoning equipment to be temporarily halted. This may cause oil to flow unchecked from the well until the weather improves and siphoning operations can be restored. (Photo by)
New York State planned to transform one of its largest fossil fuel plants into a renewable energy powerhouse. It would've used offshore wind energy, battery storage, and geothermal power to make clean energy. But guess what? Those plans are on hold because of Trump's executive order that put a stop to all offshore wind projects. This deal would've been a game-changer, providing power to 2 million homes and generating a massive 2.6 gigawatts of electricity.
The Trump administration has started undoing over 30 environmental rules that were put in place by the previous administration. They're eliminating caps on power plant emissions, reducing protections for rivers and streams, and making it easier for cars to pollute.
The president has given his EPA the green light to keep some coal plants running. That's on top of the plans to weaken rules for monitoring pollution from power plants. For instance, he's targeting the mercury rules and those that regulate coal ash, which is the waste left behind when coal is burned and caused widespread damage in the Tennessee Valley Authority's areas. Trump has also called the IRA the 'Green New Scam.'
Trump has also withdrawn from the voluntary Paris Agreement that tries to limit temperature increases to 3.5 degrees Fahrenheit by mid century.
'We're not going to do the wind thing,' Trump told rallygoers. 'Big, ugly windmills, they ruin your neighborhood.' He later wrote on social media, 'After years of being held captive by Environmental Extremists, Lunatics, Radicals, and Thugs, allowing other Countries, in particular China, to gain tremendous Economic advantage over us by opening up hundreds of all Coal Fire Power Plants, I am authorizing my Administration to immediately begin producing Energy with BEAUTIFUL, CLEAN COAL.'
Have we become immune to this language? The madman theory applies to the idea that foreign foes shouldn't tempt a leader because they are too unpredictable. Trump, though, is driven by vindictiveness and the desire to undo the successes of his predecessors, and not by the greater good.
WASHINGTON, DC - AUGUST 12: Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) (L) and Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) arrive for ... More a news conference with fellow members of the House Progressive Caucus ahead of the vote on the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 outside the U.S. Capitol on August 12, 2022 in Washington, DC. Despite not achieving everything the House liberals wanted, the $737 billion act will focus on slowing climate change, lower health care costs, and creating clean energy jobs by enacting a 15% corporate minimum tax, and a 1% fee on stock buybacks, and enhancing IRS enforcement. (Photo by)
The real checks and balances might not come from the legislative branch, which seems scared of him, but from American businesses, which might actually have more power than the president.
Market powers trump presidential levers. Companies have gone beyond just focusing on shareholders. They now include communities and employees in their mission. This strategy is called the 'triple bottom line,' which considers the planet, people, and profits. Ignoring this can hurt a company's well-being. Cisco, Oracle, and IBM are among the many companies that are leading the sustainability challenge.
America's energy picture illustrates the point: Coal has fallen from 50% of the electricity mix in 2008 to 16% today, while renewables keep blossoming, now at 20%. That's a market choice. No U.S. utility company has any plans to build coal-fired power, including the two biggest, American Electric Power and Souther Company, which are trying to ditch their coal plants.
Aurora's Swim worries that corporations will reverse their net-zero goals, although that is a gamble—one that could bring lawsuits, lose customers, and damage their brands. That said, Earth.org listed a series of "backtracking companies:" Goldman Sachs, Wells Fargo, Citi Bank, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, and JPMorgan pulled out of a industry climate alliance. Meanwhile, Blackrock withdrew from the Net-Zero Asset Managers, and American Airlines removed a reference to its "urgent" climate actions.
"Trump is here for four years," says Swim. "There will be a midterm, and political gravity will catch up with his actions. But this administration is willing to inflict economic damage —even incurring a recession—to remake the country into the vision it has.' Witness the tariffs and the whirlwind they have taken this country.
"There are strong conservative and economic cases for renewables," she continues. "Supporters must push legislators to say these policies make sense for your state and bring tangible benefits to your community. Maybe their leaders don't care about climate change, but they do care about power outages and recovery costs.'
If Trump destroys the IRA, economic fallout could follow. While the president may be bound to the past and blinded to the country's future promise, he knows how to read the political landscape—the best hope of staving off a free fall and even more environmental problems.
Renewables Will Best Fossil Fuels Over Time
Trump's Energy Agenda And Its Economic Impact
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump labor secretary touts ‘native-born' share of job gains
Trump labor secretary touts ‘native-born' share of job gains

The Hill

time22 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump labor secretary touts ‘native-born' share of job gains

Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer touted that native-born employment increased in the latest dismal jobs report, which showed the U.S. added only 73,000 jobs in July. While calling for the Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell to cut interest rates, Chavez-Deremer argued that businesses need to be able to borrow money at a lower rate so they can invest in their companies. She then pointed to the data about jobs for American-born workers. 'We've seen positive job growth. We have seen consumer confidence go up. We've seen unemployment hold steady,' Chavez-DeRemer said Friday in an interview with Fox Business. 'While we could have seen better jobs numbers, right now we're seeing American workers are being put first — native-born workers account for all of the job growth and that's key.' 'We're setting the table for a positive economy and the American worker is going to win in this occasion because the president has their back,' she told 'Varney & Co' host Stuart Varney. The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) report released on Friday suggested the economy and labor market are much weaker than previously thought. The report though found that job growth among American-born individuals was 133,035,000, an increase from 131,037,000 for the same month in 2024. Among foreign-born individuals, employment declined to 30,764,000 in July from 31,001,000 a year ago. President Trump's response to the jobs report was furious. He fired BLS commissioner Erika McEntarfer, accusing her, without evidence, of politicizing previous job reports in the run-up to last year's presidential election. Chavez-DeRemer praised Trump's decision, saying she agreed 'our jobs numbers must be fair, accurate, and never manipulated for political purposes,' without offering any evidence to support Trump's claim.

Statisticians blast Trump over BLS firing: ‘Dangerous precedent'
Statisticians blast Trump over BLS firing: ‘Dangerous precedent'

The Hill

time22 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Statisticians blast Trump over BLS firing: ‘Dangerous precedent'

Statisticians railed against President Trump on Friday following his decision to fire Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) commissioner Erika McEntarfer for 'inaccuracies' and ' incompetence ' after presenting a low job growth report for the month of July. Former BLS chief William Beach slammed the 'totally groundless' rebuke alongside the Friends of BLS, an organization that advocates on behalf of the agency which he co-chairs. 'The totally groundless firing of Dr. Erika McEntarfer, my successor as Commissioner of Labor Statistics at BLS, sets a dangerous precedent and undermines the statistical mission of the Bureau,' Beach wrote in a Friday post on the social media platform X. The Friday job report from the agency lowered May and June job growth numbers by the initial 258,000 positions reported. The organization also published a strongly worded statement condemning the shift in leadership at BLS, denying Trump's accusations that McEntarfer deliberately reported 'fake' numbers to tarnish his administration's standing. 'This baseless, damaging claim undermines the valuable work and dedication of BLS staff who produce the reports each month,' a Friday statement on the organization's website reads. 'This escalates the President's unprecedented attacks on the independence and integrity of the federal statistical system. The President seeks to blame someone for unwelcome economic news,' they added. 'The Commissioner does not determine what the numbers are but simply reports on what the data show.' Regardless, the president on Friday remained skeptical of the adjustments made to the two previous BLS job reports. 'No one can be that wrong? We need accurate Jobs Numbers. I have directed my Team to fire this Biden Political Appointee, IMMEDIATELY,' Trump wrote in a Truth Social post. 'She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified. Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes,' he added. Democrats said the president fired McEntarfer with political motives to skew data while investors with a similar view weighed heavily on the market. As of Saturday morning, the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell by 542 points, Nasdaq Composite dropped 2.3 percent and the S&P 500 decreased 1.6 percent of its value. 'Just absolutely insane, absolutely nuts. The economy is tanking and he's terrified and he's acting like a dictator,' Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) said in reference to Trump's dismissal. A chorus of Democrats in the upper chamber chimed in. 'That's some weird Soviet s‑‑‑,' Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) said. 'Blaming the messenger? Nothing's ever his fault.' 'Speaks for itself,' he said.

Letters to the Editor: Kamala Harris would've been the governor to protect California's future
Letters to the Editor: Kamala Harris would've been the governor to protect California's future

Los Angeles Times

time22 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Letters to the Editor: Kamala Harris would've been the governor to protect California's future

To the editor: I'm sorry former Vice President Kamala Harris decided not to run for governor of California ('Kamala Harris says she is not running for California governor,' July 30). She is the only Democrat who has the total package to protect California's future. Harris has the character; the state, local and national political skills; and the necessary experience, expertise and leadership to fight President Trump and the tactics he's trying to use to get California to bend the knee. Harris is a statesman respected by leaders around the world, where character, trust, integrity, truth and commitment matter. And in her presidential bid to lead the country, she had a solid domestic agenda that Trump dismissed with lies about his own abilities. California needs 'Gov. Harris,' a governor who would know about our struggles with the homelessness crisis, high home-buying costs, high costs of living and how to protect our economy and people from being attacked by the Trump administration. Hopefully, Harris will reconsider her decision not to run for governor and recognize her leadership is necessary here. Donald Peppars, Pomona .. To the editor: Harris has nothing to prove to anyone. Her record speaks for itself. She served California with distinction as attorney general and senator. Her service as vice president of the United States has only amplified that impact on a national and global scale. Speculation or political noise, the truth is clear: She's already made history and more importantly, she's made a difference. She ran an inspiring campaign for president and the masses are now realizing the kind of leadership we missed. Whatever her next steps may be, her voice, experience and advocacy are needed and appreciated. Conrad Angel Corral, Cathedral City .. To the editor: It was mildly surprising to note that Harris will not seek the California governor's seat. One would have thought she would see it as a stepping stone to the presidency. But on the front page of the California section, the apparent reason comes to light with a story about how a 2026 governorship would interfere with the timeline for the next presidential nomination cycle ('By scrapping bid for California governor, Harris boosts White House prospects — if she runs,' July 30). Columnist Mark Z. Barabak posits that she wouldn't want to enter the presidential cycle as a sitting governor if she won. Really? As Barabak points out, other governors have. The Democrats would be insane to even consider her for their nomination after the results of the 2024 election. But don't underestimate them. Joseph A. Lea, Mission Viejo .. To the editor: Two words for Harris regarding her option to run for president: please don't ('Run for president? Start a podcast? Tackle AI? Kamala Harris' options are wide open,' July 31). We need new leadership, someone who can demonstrate understanding and empathy for both parties as well as offering solutions that meet a wider variety of needs. A reaction to the current administration is not what's needed. A new vision that includes both parties is. Dan Brumer, Encino

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store