Child health programs including even pediatric cancer research see cuts in Ohio House budget draft
From changes to Medicaid to elimination of lead abatement funding, the Ohio House budget proposal concerns many who have championed child wellbeing and improvement of metrics with which Ohio struggles, like infant mortality, as important budget priorities.
'It just felt like they had taken a hacksaw to some of these line-items without real consideration to what they did,' said Kathryn Poe, budget and health researcher for the think tank Policy Matters Ohio.
Poe said it seems as though state legislators are taking cues from the federal government are trying to drastically cut spending, but that don't improve the state in the process.
'These cuts at the federal level also feel really haphazard,' Poe said. 'But the state doesn't have the amount of money or time or influence to make these sort of haphazard cuts.'
Specifically, Poe sees the elimination of Ohio's Medicaid expansion as a significant change that will create struggles for low-wage workers who count on Medicaid for their health insurance, and who will be prevented from planning for the future without the ability to count on proper health insurance.
As Poe put it, 'what do you do when 700,000 people lose their insurance overnight?'
The House's version of the budget absorbed a proposal by Gov. Mike DeWine in his executive budget that creates a trigger effect, eliminating Group VIII, or the Medicaid expansion eligibility group, 'if the federal government sets the federal medical assistance percentage below (its current level of) 90%,' according to budget documents.
The federal medical assistance percentage (or FMAP) refers to the amount of federal funding the state receives for Medicaid, based on a state's per capita income.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
The expansion group is made up of Ohioans ages 19 to 64 who have household incomes of less than 138% of the federal poverty line and aren't eligible in other Medicaid categories. According to the Health Policy Institute of Ohio, the Medicaid expansion 'has been a major contributor to Ohio's uninsured rate dropping by half from 14% in 2010 to 7% in 2022.'
The group said the expansion has also improved access to care, with data showing a 31% decrease in Ohioans who went without care due to cost from 2013 to 2023.
According to the state, the expansion population caseload is projected to be 779,000 Ohioans in fiscal year 2026, and 772,000 in 2027. That would account for more than $13.5 billion in expenditures over the two fiscal years.
Without the expansion, workers under the program would be less likely to have insurance, partly because many workers earning less than 138% of the federal poverty line are working jobs where they aren't given enough hours to receive medical benefits, such as entry-level retail jobs or customer service.
Citing data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Health Policy Institute of Ohio said even workers in the skilled trades like electricians and medical assistants could lose benefits, considering the federal poverty level of 138% for a family of three represents an annual income of $36,777.
'It would be a devastating economic loss,' Poe said. 'The answers (for Ohioans who would lose the coverage) are everything from going to the emergency room, to not getting care, to letting that pain in your abdomen go on so long that you have to go to the emergency room anyway.'
The budget proposal comes amid attempts by DeWine and the state to apply work requirements to that particular group of Medicaid participants.
Not only will it create expensive health decisions, but the ripple effects will extend to the ability to afford groceries or have reliable transportation, according to Poe.
Those effects would trickle all the way down to Ohio's children as well, according to advocates. Groundwork Ohio criticized a House measure that would end a requirement that the Medicaid department 'seek approval to provide continuous Medicaid enrollment for Medicaid-eligible children from birth through age three
Budget documents say the change could create 'possible service cost savings.'
Groundwork called on the legislature to take back the changes, saying nearly 48% of all Ohio children under the age of 6 'depend on Medicaid for health coverage.'
'The program covers about half of all births in the state and thousands of Ohio women rely on Medicaid to ensure a healthy pregnancy and support postpartum recovery,' according to an analysis of budgetary proposals in the House draft.
The organization also criticized a provision of the budget that would limit Medicaid coverage for doulas, leaving the coverage for only the six counties with the highest infant mortality rates.
The House plan also cuts pediatric cancer research by $5 million and eliminates lead abatement programs within the Ohio Department of Health. Groundwork Ohio noted the lead abatement program as part of their analysis of the budget plan, saying Ohio has 'nearly double the national rate of children with elevated blood lead levels.'
'Even small amounts of lead exposure in early childhood can harm the brain, delaying growth and development, and may cause learning, behavior, speech and other health problems,' the group stated.
Advocates have already been publicly critical of the House plan to slash public education funding and drop a child tax credit proposed by DeWine in his budget plan. But adding the Medicaid changes, along with reducing funding in the areas of child development and a $1.5 million cut to 'infant vitality' programming just make things worse, advocates say.
'The House's proposal represents a step backward at a time when we can least afford it,' said Lynanne Gutierrez, president and CEO of Groundwork Ohio, in a statement. 'We urge lawmakers to fully restore these investments and prioritize Ohio's future.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
What documentation is required for Medicaid in New York state? A guide
Paying attention to the documentation required to apply for and sustain Medicaid coverage in New York is more important than ever under President Donald Trump's tax cut and government spending bill. That's because the federal bill includes a $1 trillion reduction in spending over the next decade for Medicaid, the state-federal government insurance program for low-income Americans. And a big chunk of those cuts involve imposing a nationwide Medicaid work requirement that takes effect Jan. 1, 2027. The legislation requires "able-bodied" Medicaid recipients to work 80 hours a month or qualify for an exemption, such as being a student, caregiver or having a disability. The work requirement applies to parents of children older than 13. Further, the bill requires states to double Medicaid eligibility checks to twice a year. And states, which administer Medicaid, would have to set up systems to verify a person's employment or exemption status. While it remains unclear exactly what state regulators would use to verify Medicaid recipients are meeting the new work requirement. Below are key details to know about the Medicaid enrollment process under the current state-run program. Medicaid, like all 'means-tested' programs where eligibility is based on income and assets, requires extensive documentation to establish eligibility, state records show. Proof is required to verify identity, residence, citizenship, disability (if the applicant is under 65 and is claiming to have a disability), marital status, income and resources and, in some cases, other information which may be necessary for an eligibility determination. The documentation includes: Personal identification — Birth certificate; baptismal certificate; hospital certificate of birth; passport or immigration papers; current driver's license. Financial information — Documentation must be submitted to verify all sources of earned and unearned income. The applicant's total monthly income will be compared against the Medicaid income standard to determine if the applicant has excess income. Applicants with excess income are offered Medicaid under the Surplus Income Program. Those income records include: Award letter from a benefits program; copy of check from benefits program; pay stubs showing earnings; bank statement of interest earned. More: 58% of NY's rural hospitals were at risk of closing. Now more are in danger. See the list Asset and resource statements for the last 36 months — Medicaid requires all applicants to open their financial history to a review process. The purpose is to see if the applicant has any unreported income or whether there are any large withdrawals that are not allowed by the Medicaid program. This documentation includes: savings bank books checking statements stock and bond certificates life insurance policies burial fund, burial plot, or funeral agreement deed to real property If the documents requested by the Medicaid agency are not obtainable, the applicant should present any substitute evidence available to establish eligibility. Medicaid is jointly responsible with the applicant for exploring all factors concerning eligibility and should assist the applicant. There are various Medicaid enrollment assistance programs through NY State of Health, the state-run health insurance marketplace. That includes assistors and brokers who are certified experts who provide free and personalized Medicaid application and enrollment assistance to individuals, families, and small businesses. Politics: House GOP-led committee probing whether NY 'unlawfully abused' Medicaid. What they allege To speak with the NY State of Health marketplace customer service center call (855) 355-5777. You can also call the the Medicaid helpline (800) 541-2831. There are also staff members at local Department of Social Services Offices devoted to aiding with the Medicaid enrollment process. A list of those offices is available through the Health Department's website, at That Social Services list includes the Monroe County offices at 111 Westfall Road, Rochester (585) 753-2750 and Westchester offices at White Plains District Office, 85 Court St., White Plains (914) 995-3333. This article originally appeared on Rockland/Westchester Journal News: Medicaid in NY: What documentation is required? A guide, what to know
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
How Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' is affecting his approval ratings: See recent polls
President Donald Trump's second term continues to spark emotions - most recently with the approval of his controversial "One, Big, Beautiful Bill" just ahead of America's Independence Day weekend. The massive tax and spending bill was signed into law on July 4 at a White House ceremony. The plan makes permanent the 2017 tax cuts from Trump's first term. It reduces some taxes, but raises others - including substantially cutting Medicaid and other safety net programs - and changes spending amounts. Here's a snapshot of the President's approval ratings across the U.S.: The Economist Trump approval rating, according to the latest from The Economist (July 7, 2025): Favorable: 42% Unfavorable: 54% Not sure: 5% The report shows that voters believe the top three most important issues Americans are facing are inflation/prices, jobs and the economy, followed by health care. This ranking has remained steady in the past few months. Silver Bulletin Trump approval rating according to Pollster Nate Silver's 'Silver Bulletin' newsletter (July 6, 2025): Favorable: 45% Unfavorable: 52% New York Times Trump approval rating, according to the latest New York Times poll (July 6, 2025): Favorable: 45% Unfavorable: 52% Rasmussen Trump approval rating, according to the latest Rasmussen poll (July 4, 2025): Favorable: 49% Unfavorable: 48% The latest figures include 36% of U.S. voters who "strongly approve" of the job Trump is doing as president as well as 41% of voters who "strongly disapprove," according to the report. Navigator Research Trump approval rating, specifically regarding the public's perception of President Trump, according to the latest Navigator Research poll (July 3, 2025): Favorable: 47% Unfavorable: 52% The economy continues to lead as the top overall issue, with 41% identifying either 'inflation and the cost of living' or 'jobs and the economy' as a priority, according to the report. Also noted, 61% of Americans polled said the economy is doing 'not so good' or 'poor," and 45% of those polled "believe the economy will be worse a year from now." Real Clear Politics Trump approval rating, according to the latest Real Clear Politics poll (July 2, 2025): Favorable: 47% Unfavorable: 50% Quantus Insights Trump approval rating, according to the latest from Quantus Insights poll (July 2, 2025): Favorable: 47% Unfavorable: 49% Not sure: 4% The report also asked how people felt about American pride, with 77% responding they are proud to be American and 23% said not proud. Those polled were also asked what American values they hold most dear; the top three responses were freedom of speech, equality under the law and democracy/voting rights. Morning Consult Trump approval rating, according to the latest Morning Consult poll (June 30, 2025): Favorable: 47% Unfavorable: 50% Quinnipiac University Trump approval rating, according to the latest Quinnipiac University poll (June 26, 2025): Favorable: 41% Unfavorable: 54% Reuters/Ipsos Trump approval rating, according to the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll (June 21-23, 2025): Favorable: 41% Unfavorable: 57% Gallup Trump approval rating, according to the latest Gallup poll (June 1-19, 2025): Favorable: 40% Unfavorable: 57% No opinion: 3% Cygnal Trump approval rating, which has "barely budged since May," according to the latest Cygnal poll (June 10, 2025): Favorable: 46% Unfavorable: 51% Note: Polls are constantly changing and different pollsters ask different varieties of the population. These numbers were reflected as of Monday, July 7, 2025, at 6:30 a.m. A president's approval rating reflects the percentage of Americans polled who approve of the president's performance. Anything can impact a president's rating, such as legislation passed, actions and elections. According to ABC News, an approval rating doesn't just represent how well the administration is faring for the general public but could factor into the outcome of an upcoming election or how much they accomplish while in office. Presidential approval ratings were first conducted by the founder of the American Institute of Public Opinion, George Gallup, around 1935 to gauge public support for the president of the United States during their term. While Gallup has tracked presidential approval for 70 years, other organizations also conduct and release their own polls. Among them, Ipsos and Morning Consult. A historical analysis by Gallup shows Trump's approval ratings in June of his first years in office − both as the 45th and 47th presidents − are lower than any other modern president at the same time in their administrations. The average is 52%, according to the report. In the poll - conducted from June 2-19 - 40% approved of Trump's job performance. Here is how that compares to other presidents in June of their first year of their term, according to Gallup: Joe Biden (June 2021) - 56% approve Donald Trump (June 2017) - 38% approve Barack Obama (June 2009) - 61% approve George W. Bush (June 2001) - 54% approve Bill Clinton (June 1993) - 41% approve George H.W. Bush (June 1989) - 70% approve Ronald Reagan (June 1981) - 59% approve Jimmy Carter (June 1977) - 63% approve Richard Nixon (June 1969) - 63% approve John F. Kennedy (June 1961) - 73% approve Contributing USA Today network This article originally appeared on Rockland/Westchester Journal News: Donald Trump approval ratings after controversial bill: See polls


CBS News
7 hours ago
- CBS News
Colorado agency that administers Medicaid will make big changes under new federal law
Agency that administers Medicaid will make big changes under new federal law, state official says Agency that administers Medicaid will make big changes under new federal law, state official says Agency that administers Medicaid will make big changes under new federal law, state official says As executive director of the Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing, Kim Bimestefer oversees the state's largest health insurance program. Kim Bimestefer, executive director of the Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing CBS Medicaid covers 1.2 million Coloradans, or one in five residents. Verifying the eligibility of so many people each year is already a colossal task. Bimestefer says, under President Donald Trump's new tax and spending law, it will become far more challenging. "We've got to set up an entire industry in 18 months," Bimestefer said. Bimestefer says the state has sophisticated software that can automatically check things such as age, income, address and citizenship. But the new law creates new requirements, including 80 hours of work, school or community service each month for people between the ages 19 and 64 who aren't pregnant, disabled or have kids under age 14. There is no automated system for that or a master list to know who's in school and who's volunteering to verify eligibility. And Bimestefer notes the state now must do that verification twice a year. "We have to build the entirety of the infrastructure to capture and automate and to make sure that we don't have people impeded of getting through the eligibility process and therefore losing coverage," Bimestefer said. "Because the down-streaming impacts of people losing coverage are absolutely catastrophic." Bimestefer says up to 377,000 Coloradans could be impacted by the new eligibility requirements. It's estimated about 56% of them are already working, but Bimestefer says verifying that will be the challenge. Bimestefer worries thousands of Coloradans will lose coverage. "They'll move. They'll change their email address. They won't realize have to do it," Bimestefer explained. That will lead to more uninsured patients, Bimestefer says, and more uncompensated care, which will increase costs for everyone. "The north star is to have people covered but, again, this is going to be part of many difficult decisions that this state is going to have to step up and make," Bimestefer said. While most of the changes to Medicaid -- including the new eligibility requirements -- don't take effect for at least a year and a half. Bimestefer says she needs to start preparing now, which takes money. Bimestefer says lawmakers -- who decide what services are covered -- will have to make tough decisions soon. Gov. Jared Polis is expected to call them back to work next month. The new law provides $200 million to help with implementation, but the money will be shared among all states. The state of Kentucky alone spent about $270 million on a work requirement only before a court blocked it. "Are we going to lower provider reimbursements? Are we going to change benefits? All those are very difficult decisions," Bimestefer said. "But were going to have to move some of those levers in order to deal with the fiscal realities that the costs will continue to go up, and the revenues available will continued to be strained." Bimestefer says, not only will Colorado have to spend millions of dollars on new hires and new systems to implement the law, it will have to do so as it loses millions of dollars. Starting in 2027, the law limits federal matching funds that Colorado has used to increase provider reimbursements. The state budget is already expected to take a billion-dollar hit from other provisions in the law, so the legislature won't be able to backfill the lost revenue, which Bimestefer says could be as much as $2.5 billion. She says the money has helped double the number of providers that accept Medicaid over the last 5 years. If reimbursement drops, providers may limit how many Medicaid patients they see. The law provides $50 billion to help offset the loss of funds for rural hospitals, which see the most Medicaid patients. Bimestefer says the state should know in the next few months how much of that money Colorado will receive. The original bill included a provision that cut additional federal funding to states like Colorado that pay for health care for undocumented immigrants, but that was dropped from the final bill. Bimestefer says that doesn't mean the Cover All Coloradans program won't face cuts. It was expected to serve about 3,600 people this year at a cost of $27 million, but it serves nearly six times that -- 21,000 -- at a cost of more than $50 million.