Rare blue lobster found on beach in Prince Edward Island
The Weather Network's Nathan Coleman just happened to spot one recently while he was on vacation in Prince Edward Island.
Check out Nathan's lucky beach discovery—and find out why the occasional lobster turns blue—by watching the video above.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
42 minutes ago
- Forbes
Audacious Idea That America Is Going To Have An Unnerving Sputnik Moment When It Comes To Attaining AGI And AI Superintelligence
Will the United States attain AGI and ASI first, before any other country, and does it really matter ... More which country is first? In today's column, I examine the provocative chatter that the United States might experience a said-to-be Sputnik moment when it comes to attaining artificial general intelligence (AGI) and artificial superintelligence (ASI). How so? The audacious idea postulates that rather than America being the first to achieve AGI and ASI, some other country manages to beat us to the punch. It is a seemingly unimaginable proposition. You see, the United States is indisputably a world leader in AI and known for the development of leading-edge advances in AI. It is nearly inconceivable that the U.S. won't arrive at AGI and ASI first. But is that wishful thinking rather than real-world thinking? Let's talk about it. This analysis of an innovative AI breakthrough is part of my ongoing Forbes column coverage on the latest in AI, including identifying and explaining various impactful AI complexities (see the link here). Heading Toward AGI And ASI First, some fundamentals are required to set the stage for this weighty discussion. There is a great deal of research going on to further advance AI. The general goal is to either reach artificial general intelligence (AGI) or maybe even the outstretched possibility of achieving artificial superintelligence (ASI). AGI is AI that is considered on par with human intellect and can seemingly match our intelligence. ASI is AI that has gone beyond human intellect and would be superior in many, if not all, feasible ways. The idea is that ASI would be able to run circles around humans by outthinking us at every turn. For more details on the nature of conventional AI versus AGI and ASI, see my analysis at the link here. We have not yet attained AGI. In fact, it is unknown whether we will reach AGI, or that maybe AGI will be achievable in decades or perhaps centuries from now. The AGI attainment dates that are floating around are wildly varying and wildly unsubstantiated by any credible evidence or ironclad logic. ASI is even more beyond the pale when it comes to where we are currently with conventional AI. The Saga Of Sputnik 1 There is immense speculation going on about AGI and ASI regarding which country will be the first to achieve the vaunted pinnacle of AI. One fiery comment that's floating around is that this could turn out to be another semblance of the infamous Sputnik crisis. You might be somewhat familiar with the unnerving exploits of Sputnik that occurred in the 1950s and 1960s, and beyond. I'll provide a quick recap for ease of recollection and then tie the historical reference to our modern times. In October 1957, the Soviet Union launched a small spacecraft known as Sputnik 1 that traveled in a low Earth orbit. A radio signal was then beamed from this orbiting spacecraft. People across the globe could hear the beeping sounds on their radios as retransmitted by amateur radio operators. This made enormous history as it was the first-ever artificial Earth satellite. At the time, this frightening action triggered the American Sputnik crisis. Worries were that the Soviet Union could end up controlling outer space. The Russians could potentially launch military weapons that orbited the planet and would readily threaten the United States and other countries of the world. The action also suggested that the scientific prowess showcased by the Soviet Union was superior to that of America. How much farther behind might the U.S. really be? The sky was the limit, or maybe not, and extended to the heavens far above. This served as a mighty impetus to spur the Space Race. Indeed, a few years later, President John F. Kennedy made his famous speech in 1962 that called for the United States to land on the Moon before the end of the decade. The oft quoted line was this: 'We choose to go to the Moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard; because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one we intend to win, and the others, too.' Will AI Be The Sputnik 2 Let's tie the Sputnik saga with the ongoing efforts to attain pinnacle AI. There is heated debate in dark backrooms that maybe the United States won't be the first to arrive at AGI and ASI. Some other country might get there first. Lots of big-name countries are vying for that prized position. Smaller countries are doing so too. An eclectic race is avidly underway. Suppose the U.S. isn't first? It would be reminiscent of the Sputnik 1 circumstance. Perhaps such an instance would cheekily be labeled as a kind of Sputnik 2 phenomenon (as an aside, there really was a Sputnik 2 in terms of a second spacecraft launched in November 1957 by the Soviet Union and was the first to put an animal in space, the dog named Laika). America could end up as a second fiddle in the AI race. The idea seems absurd at face value. The United States undeniably has many of the top AI makers, along with amazing academic institutions that are globally recognized as AI leaders, and gobs of first-class AI researchers. Billions upon billions of dollars are flowing into the AI race by American companies and via U.S. federal, state, and local governmental agencies. Any notion of the United States not landing on AGI and ASI before any other country would seem utterly ludicrous and summarily rejected. The Logical Suppositions Whoa, comes the retort, you can't blindly assume that the United States will necessarily be the first to attain AGI and ASI. That is a haughty assumption. It belies the intense efforts taking place beyond the United States. This begs the question as to why America would not be the first to reach that desired goal. I will go ahead and give you a rundown on some of the most compelling reasons that have been expressed on this dicey matter. They consist of these five primary contentions: Let's briefly unpack each of those. Unknown Path To AGI And ASI First, no one anywhere can say for sure how AGI and ASI can be achieved. The whole endeavor is pretty much a shot in the dark. There isn't a pristine map that lays out the steps involved. Furthermore, it is conceivable that AGI and ASI will not be attained at all, i.e., no one will achieve the pinnacle AI. The United States is in the same boat as everyone else, namely, trying all sorts of clever ways to move toward AGI and ASI. No guarantees are to be had. All countries might come up blank on the AGI and ASI pursuit. Thus, no matter how much money or brainpower is employed, the end result might consist nicely of more advanced AI, but not the total package of true pinnacle AI. Marching To The Same Tune A second point is that perhaps a birds of a feather mindset could undermine the United States. Here's what that entails. Some have criticized that, by-and-large, we are using the same methods and similar AI internal structures across the board to reach AGI and ASI, see my analysis at the link here and the link here. If that's the case, our all-alike AI approach could be akin to putting all our eggs into one basket. The true path to pinnacle AI might be something outside of that presumed avenue. Unwilling To Take Risky Chances Another somewhat related consideration is that with the vast investments going into AI efforts, this might be making us more risk-averse. The logic is this. You would find it difficult to take in bucko bucks and not be pursuing AGI and ASI like others are. The investors won't be happy that you are trying some oddball angle. If you don't succeed but have followed the same approach as others, you can hold your head high and proclaim that everyone was caught off guard. On the other hand, if you opt for a risky path that no one else chooses to pursue, you'll have little headspace cover when it comes to explaining why your zany method didn't arrive at AGI and ASI. You will be fully exposed and readily vulnerable to reputational attack. Stealing AI To Reach The Pinnacle Here's a twist for you. Theft might come into play. It is suggested that maybe another country will steal our budding AI and manage to undertake the final steps to AGI and ASI before we do. In other words, suppose we have gotten down to the 90% mark and are struggling to get the final 10% done. Some other country that isn't anywhere near AGI and ASI decides to take a shortcut by stealing the AI that we have. Next, they manage to get the remaining 10% undertaken under their own auspices. Of course, they tout to the world that they did the pinnacle AI by themselves, entirely from A to Z. For more details on the chances of stealing AI, see my coverage at the link here. Discovery By Luck Or Chance One of the most intriguing reasons for the U.S. not being the first to achieve pinnacle AI is that perhaps there is some out-of-the-blue discovery that needs to be made. The ardent belief is that there is a missing piece that nobody has identified yet. No one knows what that piece is. There isn't any definition of it. It is the classical dilemma of not knowing what we don't know. The kicker is this. Suppose that discovering the missing piece is going to be based mainly on luck rather than skill. Assume that there is no inherent advantage in having the biggest AI labs and the biggest AI budgets. AGI and ASI might hinge on a completely left-field discovery that could happen anywhere and at any time. I've pointed out that this particular theory or conjecture has given rise to the credence that AGI and ASI might be achieved on a solo basis, see my discussion at the link here. Yes, instead of vast teams arriving at pinnacle AI, some enterprising individual in their pajamas and in their basement arrives there first. If you believe in this fanciful missing piece concept, it seems plausible that a solo developer with incredible luck might discover it. The solo developer might be in the tiniest of countries, and ergo, bring AGI and ASI to that country before any other country figures it out. Presumably, unbelievable fame and fortune await that solo developer. Being First Does Matter Those above-described handful of mainstay reasons are on the minds of many. Please know that additional reasons are being bandied around. It's a hot topic and raises the heat when emphatically discussed. A smarmy viewpoint about this dire handwringing conundrum is that being first is perhaps overrated. If the U.S. doesn't get to AGI and ASI before some other country, maybe it's not such a big deal, and we are making an undue fuss. A preoccupation with being first can be a bad thing. Go with the flow. However things perchance go, they go. The counterargument to this offhandness is that we all pretty much acknowledge that AGI and ASI have supremely dual-use consequences, doing grand good for the world but also potentially grand bad for the world. The first to get to pinnacle AI might unleash quite a vicious storm upon the globe and muscle themselves into a geo-economic position of a disconcerting nature (see my analysis at the link here, along with why the United Nations also is trying to have a role in the AGI/ASI arrival, see the link here). The planetary and humankind existential stakes underlying AGI and ASI are huge. Whichever country gets there first is, in fact, an important consideration. Humanity And The Future A final thought to ruminate on. Some have likened the attainment of AGI and ASI to the likes of achieving atomic energy and the atomic bomb. Historically, the case can be made that getting there first did make a difference. We now know that being first was significant, and we also know that what happens after the first attainment is an ongoing struggle and vitally crucial too. Thinking further ahead in terms of pinnacle AI, the question arises whether some or all other countries of the world will eventually possess and/or control AGI and ASI. That's another substantive topic worthy of keen chatter. Per the wise words of Albert Einstein, we earnestly need to keep this pointed remark in mind: 'The solution to this problem lies in the heart of mankind.'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Life Biosciences Announces Research Collaboration with SingHealth Duke-NUS Regenerative Medicine Institute of Singapore (REMEDIS) to Expand Pipeline of Cellular Rejuvenation Therapies
Collaboration in Singapore aims to further expand the broad potential of Life Bio's Partial Epigenet BOSTON, July 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- – Life Biosciences ('Life Bio'), a biotechnology company pioneering cellular rejuvenation therapies to reverse and prevent multiple diseases of aging, today announced the signing of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with SingHealth Duke-NUS Regenerative Medicine Institute of Singapore ('REMEDIS'), a joint research institute under the auspices of the SingHealth Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre, to continue to build out its therapeutic portfolio. The REMEDIS collaboration will enhance Life Bio's growing R&D efforts to advance its cellular rejuvenation technology across age-related diseases by targeting multiple organ systems and will also continue to accelerate scientific capabilities in Singapore. 'Singapore is emerging as a global leader in healthy aging with its renowned scientific talent and facilities. Our collaboration reflects our shared commitment to advancing transformative therapies that target the fundamental causes of aging,' said Jerry McLaughlin, Chief Executive Officer of Life Bio. 'By combining REMEDIS's biological and translational expertise with our Partial Epigenetic Reprogramming Platform, we have a powerful opportunity to accelerate development of novel therapeutics to reverse and prevent a wide range of age-related diseases. This partnership marks the first milestone in Life Bio's strategy to align with leading research centers in longevity science across the globe.' David Sinclair, PhD, AO, Professor in the Department of Genetics at Harvard Medical School and co-founder of Life Bio, added, 'This collaboration reflects our belief that aging is a universal process that can be treated, which offers opportunities for interventions that may help address multiple age-related diseases. By partnering with REMEDIS, we will build on our scientific progress, such as tissue and organ rejuvenation in laboratory settings. Together, we're working to responsibly advance therapies designed to prevent or lessen the impact of age-related decline and contribute to longer, healthier lives.' Professor William Hwang, Co-Director of REMEDIS, added, "By combining REMEDIS's extensive clinical expertise with Life Biosciences' cutting-edge platform, we hope to accelerate innovations in regenerative medicine. Our collaboration aims to pioneer targeted treatments for age-related diseases and chronic conditions, opening new possibilities for transformative patient care." About REMEDIS: The Singhealth Duke-NUS Regenerative Medicine Institute of Singapore (REMEDIS) was established in May 2021 to explore the potential of regenerating diseased cells, tissue, and even organs to tackle age-related diseases and chronic conditions. Established and led by the clinical and research expertise of Professor William Hwang (Co-director and Clinical Lead) and Professor Yibin Wang (Co-director and Scientific Lead), REMEDIS will focus efforts on 7 disease areas: 1) musculoskeletal diseases, 2) bone marrow diseases, 3) blood disorders 4) cardiovascular diseases, 5) Acute and Chronic Wound Healing, 6) Neurosensory diseases and 7) Retinal and corneal eye diseases. A scientific breakthrough with REMEDIS has been the development of laminin-based technologies that have successfully expanded clinically relevant cells of the heart, eye, and skin. These technologies have led to the formation of a groundbreaking biotechnology company and are being translated into clinical applications to treat ischemic heart disease, blindness, and major skin burns. REMEDIS researchers are also working to treat various diseases like osteoarthritis using autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy for cartilage repair, muscle wasting with treatments for sarcopenia, and blood cancers with expanded blood stem cells and immune cells. In collaboration with multidisciplinary research hubs and local clinical groups, the mission of REMEDIS is to Restore Function to patients, so that patients can better Embrace Life by reducing the burden of age-related and chronic disease. About SingHealth Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre The SingHealth Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre (AMC) draws on the collective strengths of SingHealth and Duke-NUS Medical School to provide our patients and community with the best outcomes and experience. By leveraging the synergies in clinical care, research and education created through our Academic Clinical Programmes, Disease Centres and Joint Institutes, the SingHealth Duke-NUS AMC fosters the exchange of scientific knowledge and clinical perspectives to accelerate innovation and new discoveries, advance the practice of medicine as well as nurture the next generation of healthcare professionals. SingHealth delivers comprehensive, multi-disciplinary and integrated care across a network of acute hospitals, national specialty centres, polyclinics and community hospitals. Offering over 40 clinical specialties, SingHealth is Singapore's largest public healthcare cluster. Duke-NUS, Singapore's flagship graduate-entry medical school, nurtures 'Clinician Plus' graduates to become leaders in the global healthcare and biomedical ecosystem, while scientists from its five Signature Research Programmes and 10 Centres transform medicine and improve lives in Asia and beyond. For more information, please visit: About Life Biosciences Life Bio is a biotechnology company pioneering cellular rejuvenation therapies to reverse and prevent multiple diseases of aging. The company's proprietary Partial Epigenetic Reprogramming platform utilizes three transcription factors—Oct4, Sox2, and Klf4—to restore older and damaged cells to a younger state. This innovative approach targets a root cause of aging at the epigenetic level, thereby offering the potential to address a wide range of serious age-related diseases. Life Bio's lead program, ER-100, is being developed for optic neuropathies, including glaucoma and non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION), with plans to enter the clinic in the first quarter of 2026 for both indications. Beyond ER-100, the company is strategically broadening its therapeutic pipeline to address additional age-related diseases, underscoring the platform's versatility and transformative potential. For more information, visit or follow Life Bio on Twitter (X) and LinkedIn. Media ContactLifeSci Communicationslifebio@ in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ancient Canadian fault could produce major earthquakes in the future
The Tintina, a major geologic fault that extends 1,000 km northwestward across much of the Yukon Territory, was thought to have been inactive for at least 40 million years, but new research led by a team at the University of Victoria (UVic) finds evidence of 'numerous large earthquakes', suggesting additional earthquakes could occur in the future. The team used high-resolution images from satellites, airplanes, and drones. They found a 130-km-long fault segment near Dawson City, suggesting seismic activity in the Quaternary Period, dating from 2.6 million years ago to today. "Over the past couple of decades, there have been a few small earthquakes of magnitude 3 to 4 detected along the Tintina fault, but nothing to suggest it is capable of large ruptures," Theron Finley, recent UVic PhD graduate and lead author of the recent article, says in a statement. "The expanding availability of high-resolution data prompted us to re-examine the fault, looking for evidence of prehistoric earthquakes in the landscape." Canada's current understanding of earthquake frequency and risk is limited to the last couple of hundred years, the authors say, and it is comprised of data derived from Indigenous records, historical archives, and modern technology. 'However, for many active faults, thousands of years can elapse between large ruptures,' the authors say in a statement. Large or shallow quakes can rupture Earth's surface, creating a linear feature in the land known as a fault scrap. This feature, which can be hundreds of kilometres long, can remain for tens of thousands of years and provide insight into seismic activity in the area. They're notoriously difficult to detect, especially in Canada's dense forests. The high-resolution topographic data used in the study is one of the best ways to detect fault scraps. It revealed glacial landforms that formed about 2.6 million years ago were laterally offset across a fault scrap by 1000 metres. Some that are 132,000 years old are offset by 75 metres. 'These findings confirm that the fault has slipped in multiple earthquakes throughout the Quaternary period, likely slipping several meters in each event. What's more, landforms known to be 12,000 years old are not offset by the fault, indicating no large ruptures have occurred since that time. The fault continues to accumulate strain at an average rate of 0.2 to 0.8 millimetres per year, and therefore poses a future earthquake threat,' the authors write in a statement. Finley says future earthquakes on the Tintina fault could be major, exceeding a mangitude 7.5, potentially causing severe shaking in Dawson City, a community with a population of about 2,350 people. 'Compounding the hazard from seismic shaking, the region is prone to landslides, which could be seismically triggered. The Moosehide landslide immediately north of Dawson City and the newly discovered Sunnydale landslide directly across the Yukon River both show ongoing signs of instability,' the authors write. The research will be shared with local authorities, governments, and infrastructure planners to help mitigate risk. Earthquake frequency in Canada Small earthquakes are common in Canada, with the Geological Survey of Canada recording and locating an average of 4,000 earthquakes annually, or 11 per day, nationwide. Header image: Approximate location of the Tintina fault. Cheryl Santa Maria for The Weather Network.
