Thousands join Walk for Truth as Yoorrook Justice Commission truth-telling inquiry concludes
The four-year Aboriginal-led inquiry will become Victoria's longest-ever state-run royal commission when it formally concludes on June 30.
Since 2021, the inquiry has been tasked with establishing an official record of the history of colonisation of Victoria and its ongoing impacts on First Peoples.
In the inquiry's final weeks, Yoorrook Commissioner Travis Lovett has walked across half of the state in an attempt to raise awareness of the commission's historic work.
The Kerrupmara Gunditjmara traditional owner has already been joined by thousands of supporters on his 25-day Walk For Truth.
The walk began on Commissioner Lovett's traditional country near Portland, the earliest site of permanent European settlement in Victoria.
"It's about walking side by side, listening deeply with respect and taking steps toward a fairer Victoria for everyone."
Today the walk led by Commissioner Lovett is scheduled to arrive at Melbourne's Parliament house.
Yoorrook's final report is expected to be delivered to government in coming days and then made public sometime next month.
Over the last four years, Yoorrook has collected evidence from thousands of people as part of its comprehensive investigation into the past and ongoing impacts of colonisation in Victoria.
Designed and led by Victorian First Peoples, its mandate has been unprecedented in Australia.
It has heard from Stolen Generations survivors, elders, historians, experts and non-Indigenous advocates about the true impacts of colonisation and ways the state can improve outcomes for future generations.
In interim findings, Yoorrook, which means 'truth' in the Wamba Wamba language, uncovered evidence of grave and ongoing human rights abuses against First Peoples.
In September 2023, it called for sweeping reforms to Victoria's criminal justice and child protection systems.
Those proposals received a lukewarm reception from government, which now fully supports just six of the inquiry's 46 interim recommendations.
It is understood Yoorrook's final report will include more than 100 recommendations including changes to the way Victoria's history is taught in schools.
While this truth-telling process ends, it's expected a call for further and ongoing- truth-telling opportunities will be pushed for as part of state-wide Treaty negotiations.
Australia's first formal Treaty negotiations are now underway in Victoria, though Victoria's Liberal opposition no longer support a treaty between the state and First Peoples.
While Victoria has participated in joint state-Commonwealth royal commissions which have run for more than four years, upon its conclusion Yoorrook will become the longest ever state-run royal commission in Victoria.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
7 minutes ago
- ABC News
The Tasmanian state election is over — here's when we get a new government
For Tasmanians wondering when they might have a parliament in place and a government doing actual government things, it could still be weeks off. However, the official process to commission a government is underway. More than a fortnight since the Tasmanian state election, the writs are now expected to be returned to the governor. Once the writs — the written commands for the election of a new parliament — are returned, it starts a seven-day process during which Governor Barbara Baker must commission a premier and swear in at least some ministers. Premier Jeremy Rockliff has said he intends to request Governor Baker recommissions his government. But it remains unclear when exactly parliament will return. The Tasmanian Electoral Commission (TEC) will hold the declaration of the polls ceremonies for each electoral division today. These are formal ceremonies where the newly elected members of the House of Assembly are announced. After that, the electoral writs from each division will be returned to the governor. Electoral Commissioner Andrew Hawkey said the premier will meet with the governor once the writs have been returned. "The premier is the premier, until the premier is not the premier, essentially," Mr Hawkey said. "So, the premier will go to Her Excellency and there'll be discussions — similar to the ones prior to the election being called — about if they're sure they can form government." The governor will also need to determine when parliament will next sit. When parliament resumes, Mr Hawkey said the lower house will then need to elect a speaker. But how soon parliament resumes will be up to the discretion of the governor — although it must be within 90 days of the writs being returned. The timeline isn't fixed, with the governor having the option to bring parliament back sooner if she deems it necessary after meeting with Mr Rockliff. However, election analyst Dr Kevin Bonham told ABC Radio Mornings it could be more than a month away. "I would think, hopefully, as early as possible given the circumstances." If Mr Rockliff is recommissioned as premier, Labor's pathway to power would have to be through a no-confidence vote in the premier when parliament resumes. It's a scenario that's happened before in Tasmania. The 1989 election also resulted in a hung parliament, with the incumbent Liberals winning 17 seats and Labor 13. An accord between Labor and the five "Green independents" was made, meaning the new coalition had 18 seats, enough to form government. Returning Liberal premier Robin Gray refused to resign, instead asking then-governor Sir Phillip Bennett to call another election. Governor Bennett refused, and Mr Gray faced a no-confidence vote in parliament, which he lost. "He said, 'I can form government even though I'm in minority', there was no confidence and that transitioned directly into Michael Field's Labor government, with the Greens' support. "We may see something similar across the board. We don't know yet, we'll have to wait and see." Despite those similarities, the lower house today looks very different from that of 1989. If the Liberals are unable to form government, Labor would need to do it with support from a large crossbench. The Liberals have 14 seats, Labor 10, and the crossbench is made up of five Greens, five independents, and one Shooters, Fishers and Farmers MP. One of the independents — Craig Garland — has already ruled out doing a confidence and supply deal with the Liberals. And the Greens won't be offering their support to the Liberals either. Mr Rockliff has said, unlike last time, he won't rely on confidence and supply agreements to form government. Despite the general make-up of parliament appearing similar to last one, in terms of the major parties' seats, Dr Bonham said there was an important difference. "Last time, we had the very inexperienced Jacqui Lambie Network grouping, who didn't have such a strong sense of what issues they were standing on," he said.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Why banning future bridge protests could be risky for NSW Premier Chris Minns
When a judge authorised Sunday's massive pro-Palestinian demonstration on the Sydney Harbour Bridge, the premier may have breathed a partial sigh of relief. Publicly, he says he doesn't regret his vocal opposition to the protest, declaring that it's not "open season" for demonstrations on the bridge. However, having seen the enormous crowds that marched on Sunday, he must have quietly contemplated the alternative scenario. Had the Supreme Court sided with police it's likely that a significant number of protesters would have marched anyway. The premier himself has acknowledged a "huge groundswell" of concern about the suffering of civilians in Gaza, and protest organisers believe many participants would have been undeterred. That could have led to ugly scenes, with the potential for mass arrests or injuries to both protesters and police. And with a crowd that big, police may have still been forced to close the bridge on public safety grounds. That would have undermined their authority — and that of the government. So, the court's authorisation has saved the government that particular headache. However, in doing so, it may have created an even bigger dilemma for Chris Minns. The premier is concerned the court may have set a precedent, making it even more difficult to oppose future protests on the bridge. The road he chooses in response is littered with potholes. While the Palestine Action Group has promised another major protest on August 24, spokesperson Josh Lees says there are no plans to demonstrate on the harbour bridge any time soon. Without another protest application being tested in court, it remains unclear whether Saturday's ruling will pave the way for a future demonstration. However, to remove all doubt, the opposition is calling on the government to consider legislation to stop the bridge being used for a future protest. While the premier says he has no desire to rush legislation, he's not ruling it out either. It's a risky strategy. Legislation would almost certainly face a legal challenge. It could also be ignored by defiant protesters, putting them on a collision course with police, who have a tough enough job as it is. Such a move could also cause major disquiet amongst Labor MPs, some of whom are already angry about existing laws restricting protests. When the premier faces caucus on Tuesday morning, he'll do so knowing several of his colleagues marched on Sunday. Two of his ministers, Penny Sharpe and Jihad Dib joined the protest. MPs Julia Finn, Lynda Voltz, Cameron Murphy, Stephen Lawrence, Bob Nanva and Anthony D'Adam were amongst those marching too. Last year, the premier warned his MPs who spoke out on Gaza to either focus on state issues or "run for federal parliament". He's unlikely to be as dismissive when caucus meets today. Mr Minns sensed the community's horror in the wake of Hamas' terrorist attacks on October 7. But having seen the enormity of Sunday's protest, he says he also understands the depth of concern surrounding the humanitarian situation in Gaza. While he says he's "repeatedly" expressed those concerns, his language on Monday was noticeably stronger. While he said he was "terrified and appalled" by Hamas, he spoke of the "IDF's [Israel Defense Forces] action in bombing hospitals," describing it as a "massive concern as a human being." While Israel has repeatedly argued that Hamas operates beneath hospitals, the images of civilian casualties are difficult to ignore. He also said that stopping aid from entering Gaza had been "disastrous" for civilians there. Israel's government has criticised the weekend's protest. The country's foreign minister, Gideon Sa'ar posted a photo of a demonstrator who appeared to be holding a photo of Iran's supreme leader, Ali Khamenei, who has called for Israel's destruction. However, the premier said most protesters went with the "right intentions". Until now, the premier has shown a distinct lack of patience with pro-Palestinian demonstrations, particularly when they create cost and inconvenience. Sunday's scenes suggest that any further attempts to block them could backfire, both in caucus and on the streets.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
River Torrens swimming proposal floated, but ecologist resists 'community pool'
In the minds of many Adelaideans, the River Torrens has collected some unwanted baggage over the years — it can evoke images of murky waters and muddy shallows, as well as intermittent algal blooms and a submerged car or two. But the river has not always possessed this rather regrettable tendency to dredge up unpleasant associations, and there is a renewed push to restore it to a more swimmable state. A public forum was held last night on the subject of making River Torrens-Karrawirra Parri, especially the Torrens Lake along the CBD, safer for swimming. The idea has periodically raised its head over the years and is now being floated again by business consultant Sam Taylor, a former Adelaide City Council candidate who wants it to become an election issue. Mr Taylor has put the topic back on the agenda as part of the council's current Central Ward election campaign, which was triggered by a court ruling that voided the 2022 result. "You only have to look at every postcard of Adelaide and the Torrens is right there, so there's something that pulls the heartstrings," he told ABC Radio Adelaide yesterday. "This has been a place of gathering and a place of swimming for many thousands of years, that existed certainly before the new city started unfortunately polluting the place." Amid South Australia's devastating ocean algal bloom, Mr Taylor said the environment was also at the core of his proposal — making the river safe for bathing would, he argued, secure its broader health. "Swimming is a great human goal, but from my perspective I'm really seeing this as a proxy not only for the environment … but as a real symbol for, 'We're a can-do place'." Mr Taylor has linked the idea to "swimmable cities" — a movement encouraging the cleaning of urban waterways to better support recreational use of them. The idea has gained currency along stretches of Melbourne's Yarra River, and was given an extra push by the use of the Seine for events at the 2024 Paris Olympics. "A lot of these things point to what our first peoples in Australia have known for many years — that the health of our waterways and the health of our communities are interconnected," Swimmable Cities co-founder Matt Sykes said. The proposal for Torrens swimming has the in-principle support of Adelaide Lord Mayor Jane Lomax-Smith, who said she had just got back from Switzerland where river dips were a popular pastime. "I think it's a very important aspiration," she said. "We need real attention [on] upstream polluters. We know that there's too much nitrogen going into our rivers, we know that there's too much rubbish that's going into our rivers and we have to clean them up seriously. "If we clean them up, we get rid of the carp, I'll be the first to get in the water." According to the city council's website, activities on the Torrens Lake that involve "primary body contact" — including swimming — are "not permitted due to the condition of the water". "You are encouraged to obey all signage, particularly when the lake is closed, and use the waterway at your own risk," it states. While the thought of dipping as much as a toe into the Torrens might send shivers down the spines of many locals, that has not always been the case. From the late 1800s, before public pools were built, the River Torrens was a popular area for residents to escape the heat of summer. But swimming came with hazards as well as tragedies — old newspaper records on Trove indicate that drownings in the river were fairly common. To help curtail the high number, the Gilberton Amateur Swimming Club — which had its first meeting in early 1915 — introduced free swimming classes. The Adelaide Park Lands Association's website states that the decline of river swimming coincided with rising pollution levels in the 1960s — a problem that has continued to blight the catchment in decades since. "When we have a large flood or rain event, very large volumes of water containing all sorts of stuff off the roads, from people's backyards, are washed into the river," University of Adelaide urban ecologist and Green Adelaide chair Chris Daniels explained. "There's this continual battle, if you like, between cleaning up the river and improving it as much as we can, and then dealing with a sudden influx of a large amount of material, particularly plant material and other forms of pollution. "We also continually monitor the river for bacteria — particularly E. coli which comes from faeces from ducks and dogs and all sorts of other sources, and also cyanobacteria, which can build up in the summer months." But Professor Daniels added that the river's reputation for pollution did not always reflect the reality. "The view that rivers are bad if they're brown is one that isn't actually true," he said. "A river that's very closely associated with vegetation and life is always brown. When you have completely sparkly clear water like you might get in a New Zealand melt-stream coming off glaciers — that runs over a rocky substrate — it's clear because there's nothing in it." Thanks to environmental restoration, an "enormous amount of improvement" has taken place in the river's general health over the past 25 years. "The [Torrens is] in so much better condition now than it was, but it's always going to vary in quality because it depends on rainfall and inflows," Professor Daniels said. On the subject of whether the Torrens should be made safer for swimmers, he said that was the "wrong question to ask". "If you want the river for swimming — in perpetuity, without testing — that people can have faith in, you'd want to get rid of all of the trees, all of the plants, all of the fish, all of the birds, you'd want to make sure there's no inflow into it," he said. "Do we really want to do that? Why are we making it like a community swimming pool? I don't quite understand why people want that to be its function. "Its function as an urban river is to be a repository for biodiversity, to be a high-quality habitat." But Mr Taylor described his own vision in not dissimilar terms, and said ecology needed to be at the forefront of river management. "It's really about something deeper, if you excuse the pun, than just a surface-level, 'Let's look at something recreational to do in the city'," he said. "It's something that I think is quite deeply connected to our sense of place."
