This Pilot's Attempt To Win 'Blind Landing' Bet Killed 70 Passengers
On October 20, 1986, a domestic Aeroflot flight in the Soviet Union became the setting for one of the most senseless and shocking aviation tragedies in history
As the tragic Ahmedabad – London Air India plane crash rekindles sorrow and raises new questions about aviation safety, the world is once again reminded of past flight disasters that remain etched in collective memory. Among them is a haunting incident from 1986, an accident not born out of mechanical failure or bad weather, but sheer human folly.
On October 20, 1986, a domestic Aeroflot flight in the Soviet Union became the setting for one of the most senseless and shocking aviation tragedies in history. The cause? A reckless bet between two pilots in the cockpit.
According to the official investigation, the captain of the flight, entrusted with the lives of 70 passengers, challenged his co-pilot to perform a 'blind landing" using only the aircraft's instrument systems, without any external visibility. To enforce the challenge, the captain ordered all cockpit windows to be covered, leaving the co-pilot to rely solely on the plane's Instrument Landing System (ILS), a technology not intended to substitute for trained visual coordination in unpredictable real-world conditions.
What was initially treated as a daring experiment quickly spiraled into catastrophe. Unable to correctly align the aircraft for landing without any visual references, the co-pilot failed to reach the runway. The aircraft slammed into the ground short of its target, killing all 70 people on board.
The crash sent shockwaves across the Soviet Union and the aviation world. It wasn't just an accident; it was a failure of judgment, professionalism, and protocol. Experts later emphasised that while ILS is a critical tool for safe landings, especially in low-visibility conditions, it cannot and should not replace comprehensive pilot training or override safety protocols. Blind landings, without proper systems and redundant visual cues, remain one of the riskiest maneuvers in aviation.
What made the 1986 Aeroflot tragedy even more chilling was the cavalier attitude displayed by those in command. Instead of safeguarding lives, the cockpit became a site of arrogance and hubris. In the aftermath, multiple officials were held accountable, and the crash was seared into history as a grim reminder of what happens when recklessness takes the reins of responsibility.
This incident remains one of the darkest chapters in Soviet aviation history, not merely because of the loss of lives, but because it was entirely avoidable. It stands as a cautionary tale, an enduring lesson that in aviation, as in life, overconfidence and negligence are a deadly mix.
As investigations into the Ahmedabad plane crash continue, memories of past tragedies like this one resurface to urge vigilance, discipline, and respect for the grave responsibility carried by those who pilot aircraft across our skies.
Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from geopolitics to diplomacy and global trends. Stay informed with the latest world news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
a day ago
- Indian Express
History Headline: 6 decades ago, how MiGs won out, joined IAF
Sixty-two years after it joined the Indian Air Force (IAF) at Air Force Station Chandigarh, the MiG-21 will fly into history from the same station in a poignant farewell ceremony. It was in March 1963 that the first IAF Squadron equipped with MiG-21s was raised in Chandigarh. The No. 28 Squadron came up with Wing Commander (later Air Chief Marshal and Chief of Air Staff) Dilbagh Singh taking over its command on March 2, 1963. The MiG-21s inducted into the No. 28 Squadron back then were the MiG-21 F-13 type, the older version of the Soviet aircraft. Seven officers had been selected by the IAF headquarters to be sent to Russia for training on the MiG-21s — Wing Commander Dilbagh Singh, Squadron Leaders MSD Wollen and S K Mehra, and Flight Lieutenants A K Mukherjee, H S Gill, A K Sen, Denzil Keelor and B D Jayal. Keelor could not complete the training due to medical reasons while Wollen later succeeded Dilbagh Singh as the Commanding Officer of the squadron and commanded it during the 1965 Indo-Pak war. Incidentally, Wollen and Mukherjee were involved in the first MiG-21 crash near Chandigarh in December 1963 when two of the aircraft collided mid-air while practising for the 1964 Republic Day parade. The two survived the crash. Over the years, the MiG-21 and its variants would be in the news for several crashes, eventually earning it the pejorative sobriquet 'The Flying Coffin'. The first six MiG-21s arrived in Chandigarh in April 1963 after they were flown from No. 2 Equipment Depot Bombay to Chandigarh via Agra. They were earlier received in Bombay in a disassembled condition and had been put together by a team of Soviet engineers and were test flown by their pilots. The No. 28 Squadron rightly earned the name of 'The First Supersonics' with the induction of the MiG-21s and retain that name to date. The unit now flies the MiG-29 aircraft and is stationed in Adampur in Punjab. The induction of the supersonic MiG-21s into the IAF was preceded by some hectic diplomatic manoeuvring by the USA. In 1963, given India's war with China the previous year and continued tensions with Pakistan, a supersonic aircraft in the IAF arsenal was a pressing need. The USA had already supplied one of its newest aircraft, the F-104 Starfighter, to Pakistan and there was considerable anxiety in the minds of the political and military leadership in India. The US F-104 had also been considered by the IAF for induction, but the US was not very keen to supply them in large numbers in order to keep a balance between India and Pakistan. Incidentally, given its high accident rate, the F-104 Starfighter too ended up earning an unflattering reputation as 'The Widowmaker'. Back in the late 1950s and early 1960s, there had been efforts on the part of several US officials posted at the embassy in India as well as the State department in Washington to urge their government to sell F-104s to India in substantial numbers. Their aim was to prevent India from entering into a deal with the Soviet Union as they feared that this would help the Soviets make inroads into the Indian military. They were proven right in the years to come. Declassified records of the US State Department reveal correspondence with the US Embassy in Delhi where the latter pointed out that in the 'absence of a favorable United States policy, India will go to Soviets for military equipment'. The US Ambassador to India at the time, John Kenneth Galbraith, predicted that if India decides to buy MiG-21 and/or other types of major military equipment from the Soviet, it will lead to a large number of Soviet technicians being introduced into the Indian defence establishment. 'Soviet training and technical advisors who would accompany purchase of Soviet equipment will have inevitable influence on younger post-independence Indian military officers now rising to position of prominence,' wrote Galbraith in a telegram to the State Department. A September 1962 paper by the Bureau of Near Eastern and South Asian Affairs of the US State Department, titled 'Status of Indian Negotiations for MiGs' quotes Galbraith as reporting that 'Nehru has become increasingly cool to the expenditures necessary for a MiG deal and his disposition is to postpone it or scale it down. When asked about the MiG deal by reporters in London on September 9, Nehru said, however, that 'negotiations have gone a good bit further'.' The Soviets, too, had their misgivings. Archival documents of the US State Department talk of indications that the Soviets had their doubts, for both technical and political reasons, about providing India with a manufacturing capability for the MiG-21. 'The Soviets apparently have had some question about Indian ability to handle so complicated a program as manufacturing supersonic fighters. This seems to us to be reasonable caution on the part of the Soviets. Additionally, we have received reports that the Soviet Union has been meeting strong Communist Chinese objections, particularly to the proposal for manufacturing MiG's in India,' says the State Department paper. In order to encourage India to turn down the Soviet offer of MiG-21, US President Kennedy even approved a simultaneous US offer to sell India nine C-130 transport aircraft in Rupees currency. All these efforts came to a naught and India not only went on to induct MiG-21s but also manufactured them on large scale at the Hindustan Aeronautics Limited facility in Ozar near Nashik (Maharashtra) and in Koraput (Odisha), where the engines were manufactured. The writer is Assistant Editor, The Indian Express
Time of India
3 days ago
- Time of India
From war horse to ‘flying coffins': India's MiG-21s that helped liberate Bangladesh set for final flight
From war horse to 'flying coffins': India's MiG-21s that helped liberate Bangladesh set for final flight Team TOI Plus Jul 25, 2025, 07:43 IST IST A ceremonial farewell for these iconic jets, which took part in all major conflicts but later gained notoriety for a high crash rate, is scheduled for September 19 in Chandigarh The Indian Air Force's (IAF) first truly supersonic fighters — the Soviet-era MiG-21s, later manufactured in India — will take to the skies for the final time this September, marking the end of over six decades of service. Only two MiG-21 ' Bison ' squadrons remain in operation, comprising 36 aircraft based at the Nal airbase in Rajasthan. A ceremonial farewell for these iconic delta-wing jets, which took part in all major conflicts but later gained notoriety for a high crash rate, is scheduled for September 19 in Chandigarh.
Hans India
3 days ago
- Hans India
49 people killed in Russia plane crash
Moscow: A Russian passenger aircraft carrying 49 people crashed on Monday in the country's Far Eastern region near the border with China, killing everyone on board. Air traffic controllers lost contact with the aircraft midway through its flight, and minutes later, rescuers located parts of the burning fuselage. Preliminary analysis suggests that pilot error during landing in poor visibility may have caused the crash in the town of Tynda in the Amur region. The local emergencies ministry said the Antonov An-24 aircraft, operated by the Siberia-based Angara airline, vanished from radar while attempting a second landing after an initial approach to Tynda airport was unsuccessful. The aircraft was from the Soviet era and was nearly 50 years old, and its tail number showed it was built in 1976.
