US Supreme Court grants DOGE access to Social Security data on millions of Americans
The decision came after the Trump administration appealed to the top court to lift an April order by a district judge restricting DOGE access to Social Security Administration (SSA) records.
"SSA may proceed to afford members of the SSA DOGE Team access to the agency records in question in order for those members to do their work," the top court said in a brief unsigned order.
The three liberal justices on the Supreme Court dissented, with Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson saying the move poses "grave privacy risks for millions of Americans."
"Social Security numbers, birth dates, addresses, bank-account numbers, medical records – all of that, and more, is in the mix," Jackson said.
"The Government wants to give DOGE unfettered access to this personal, non-anonymized information right now – before the courts have time to assess whether DOGE's access is lawful," she said.
In her April ruling, District Judge Ellen Hollander banned DOGE staff from accessing data containing information that could personally identify Americans such as their social security numbers, medical history or bank records.
Social security numbers are a key identifier for people in the United States, used to report earnings, establish eligibility for welfare and retirement benefits and other purposes.
Hollander said the SSA can only give redacted or anonymized records to DOGE employees who have completed background checks and training on federal laws, regulations and privacy policies.
The case before Hollander was brought by a group of unions which argued that the SSA had opened its data systems to unauthorized personnel from DOGE "with disregard for the privacy" of millions of Americans.
DOGE, which has been tasked by Trump with slashing billions of dollars of goverment spending, was headed at the time by SpaceX and Tesla founder Elon Musk, who has since had a very public falling out with the president.
Trump has been at loggerheads with the judiciary ever since he returned to the White House, venting his fury at court rulings at various levels that have frozen his executive orders on multiple issues.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
No woke AI: What to know about Trump's AI plan for global dominance
US President Donald Trump has said he will keep "woke AI" models out of US government, turn the country into an 'AI export powerhouse,' and weaken environmental regulation on the technology. The announcements come as he also signed three artificial intelligence-focused executive orders on Wednesday, which are a part of the country's so-called AI action plan. Here is what he announced and what it means. 1. No Woke AI One order, called 'Preventing Woke AI in the Federal Government,' bans "woke AI" models and AI that isn't 'ideologically neutral' from government contracts. It also says diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) is a 'pervasive and destructive' ideology that can 'distort the quality and accuracy of the output'. It refers to information about race, sex, transgenderism, unconscious bias, intersectionality, and systemic racism. It aims to protect free speech and "American values," but by removing information on topics such as DEI, climate change, and misinformation, it could wind up doing the opposite, as achieving objectivity is difficult in AI. David Sacks, a former PayPal executive and now Trump's top AI adviser, has been criticising 'woke AI' for more than a year, fueled by Google's February 2024 rollout of an AI image generator. When asked to show an American Founding Father, it created pictures of Black, Asian, and Native American men. Google quickly fixed its tool, but the 'Black George Washington' moment remained a parable for the problem of AI's perceived political bias, taken up by X owner Elon Musk, venture capitalist Marc Andreessen, US Vice President JD Vance, and Republican lawmakers. 2. Global dominance, cutting regulations The plan prioritises AI innovation and adoption, urging the removal of any barriers that could slow down adoption across industries and government. The nation's policy, Trump said, will be to do 'whatever it takes to lead the world in artificial intelligence". Yet it also seeks to guide the industry's growth to address a longtime rallying point for the tech industry's loudest Trump backers: countering the liberal bias they see in AI chatbots such as OpenAI's ChatGPT or Google's Gemini. 3. Streamlining AI data centre permits and less environmental regulation Chief among the plan's goals is to speed up permitting and loosen environmental regulation to accelerate construction on new data centres and factories. It condemns 'radical climate dogma' and recommends lifting environmental restrictions, including clean air and water laws. Trump has previously paired AI's need for huge amounts of electricity with his own push to tap into US energy sources, including gas, coal, and nuclear. 'We will be adding at least as much electric capacity as China,' Trump said at the Wednesday event. 'Every company will be given the right to build their own power plant'. Many tech giants are already well on their way toward building new data centres in the US and around the world. OpenAI announced this week that it has switched on the first phase of a massive data centre complex in Abilene, Texas, part of an Oracle-backed project known as Stargate that Trump promoted earlier this year. Amazon, Microsoft, Meta, and xAI also have major projects underway. The tech industry has pushed for easier permitting rules to get its computing facilities connected to power, but the AI building boom has also contributed to spiking demand for fossil fuel production, which contributes to global warming. United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres on Tuesday called on the world's major tech firms to power data centres completely with renewables by 2030. The plan includes a strategy to disincentivise states from aggressively regulating AI technology, calling on federal agencies not to provide funding to states with burdensome regulations. 'We need one common sense federal standard that supersedes all states, supersedes everybody,' Trump said, 'so you don't end up in litigation with 43 states at one time'. Call for a People's AI Action Plan There are sharp debates on how to regulate AI, even among the influential venture capitalists who have been debating it on their favourite medium: the podcast. While some Trump backers, particularly Andreessen, have advocated an 'accelerationist' approach that aims to speed up AI advancement with minimal regulation, Sacks has described himself as taking a middle road of techno-realism. 'Technology is going to happen. Trying to stop it is like ordering the tides to stop. If we don't do it, somebody else will,' Sacks said on the 'All-In' podcast. On Tuesday, more than 100 groups, including labour unions, parent groups, environmental justice organisations, and privacy advocates, signed a resolution opposing Trump's embrace of industry-driven AI policy and calling for a 'People's AI Action Plan' that would 'deliver first and foremost for the American people.' Anthony Aguirre, executive director of the non-profit Future of Life Institute, told Euronews Next that Trump's plan acknowledges the "critical risks presented by increasingly powerful AI systems," citing bioweapons, cyberattacks, and the unpredictability of AI. But in a statement, he said the White House should go further to protect citizens and workers. "By continuing to rely on voluntary safety commitments from frontier AI corporations, it leaves the United States at risk of serious accidents, massive job losses, extreme concentrations of power, and the loss of human control," Aguirre said. "We know from experience that Big Tech promises alone are simply not enough".
LeMonde
3 hours ago
- LeMonde
EU-US trade war looms as an uneven agreement takes shape
Although Ursula von der Leyen is in Asia, scheduled to attend a summit of European Union and Chinese leaders on Thursday, July 24, her attention is undoubtedly focused on the United States. The EU's relations with Beijing are far from smooth. On the contrary, there have been several points of friction between the two. Yet with one week remaining before August 1, the date on which United States President Donald Trump threatens to impose 30% tariffs on European imports if no agreement is reached between Washington and Brussels, von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission, fears a trade war that would be disastrous for Europe. Since he returned to the White House, Trump has already increased tariffs to 25% on cars, 50% on steel and aluminum and 10% on a wide range of products. He has also warned that he might target pharmaceuticals or semiconductors. Leaders on the European side, however, have so far chosen to tread carefully to avoid dangerous escalation, and no retaliatory measures have been implemented yet. The EU Commission, which sets the bloc's trade policy, and the US administration have been in negotiations for weeks, without any success to show for it. The EU commissioner for trade, Maros Sefcovic, has already traveled across the Atlantic seven times. He has spoken with US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick; US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer; and Trump's economic adviser, Kevin Hassett, almost every day. Exceptions on the table Nevertheless, on July 23, an agreement seemed achievable, even if it was far from being finalized, and the unpredictable President Trump, who would have the final say on it in Washington, had yet to make a decision. That day, von der Leyen's chief of staff, Bjoern Seibert, presented an outline that could serve as a basis for an agreement to 27 EU member states' ambassadors, to gauge whether the member states would be willing to follow along with it. He explained to the diplomats that the terms would be as follows: all European goods, including pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, cars and steel, would be subject to 15% tariffs (up from the current average of 4.5%), which would, more or less, represent confirming the status quo. Exceptions would be made for the aerospace sector and for spirits. "We still need to review, sector by sector, what this would mean," cautioned a European diplomat.
France 24
4 hours ago
- France 24
US President Donald Trump under fire over pedo-criminal Epstein files
02:58 20/07/2025 Astronomer CEO announces resignation after viral kiss cam video at Coldplay concert Americas 19/07/2025 Donald Trump escalates war on the press as journalists face mounting pressure Americas 19/07/2025 New searches in Brazil: Jair Bolsonaro ordered to wear ankle monitor Americas 19/07/2025 Venezuelan migrants detained in the US returned to Caracas after prisoner swap Americas 19/07/2025 US revokes visas of Brazilian judges over Bolsonaro 'witch-hunt' Americas 17/07/2025 Donald Trump lashes out at MAGA base as Epstein row escalates Americas 17/07/2025 Brazil: Whales make waves in Rio de Janeiro Americas 17/07/2025 Why the Jeffrey Epstein case is an obsession for the MAGA world Americas
