logo
HK activists appeal convictions in '47 democrats' case

HK activists appeal convictions in '47 democrats' case

Perth Now14-07-2025
Twelve Hong Kong pro-democracy activists are appealing their subversion convictions and jail terms in a national security case that's spotlighted Beijing's crackdown on dissent and drawn international criticism.
The appeal stems from the "47 democrats" case, named for the number of activists who were arrested and charged with 'conspiracy to commit subversion' in 2021.
The court eventually found 45 of the defendants guilty of organising and holding an unofficial primary election in July 2020 after massive pro-democracy protests brought the city to a standstill.
Prosecutors considered the action to be a "plot" to undermine the Hong Kong government.
Security was tight around the West Kowloon law courts building on Monday as scores of police officers, some with police dogs, patrolled the area and occasionally searched passers-by.
"I want to see all of them," said an elderly man who was among around 100 people queuing to get a public ticket for the hearing.
"They're not criminals."
Foreign diplomats from over half a dozen countries were in attendance for this latest stage of the legal saga that began with dawn police raids on the homes of high-profile democrats in early 2021.
Some countries such as the United States have condemned the case as "politically motivated" and are calling for the immediate release of the democrats who were sentenced last November to prison terms of up to ten years.
Hong Kong and Chinese authorities have defended the independence of the judiciary and say no one is above the law and the democrats have received a fair trial.
Of the 16 democrats who pleaded not guilty during the trial, 11 have decided to appeal, including Gordon Ng, Gwyneth Ho and Owen Chow, who were all jailed for over seven years.
Another democrat, Prince Wong, who pleaded guilty, is appealing her sentence.
One defendant, Michael Pang, decided to withdraw his application on Monday.
The appeals are expected to take around 10 days, and will also include a government appeal against the acquittal of one of the democrats, barrister Lawrence Lau.
A years-long crackdown under a China-imposed national security law has resulted in arrests, the closures of liberal media outlets and civil society groups.
The last two remaining pro-democracy parties, the Democratic Party and the League of Social Democrats, disbanded this year citing growing pressures.
The case is one of the most prominent so far under a 2020 national security law that was imposed by China in response to mass pro-democracy protests in 2019.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Communications Minister once hailed YouTube as a place for kids — now she appears ready to ban it
Communications Minister once hailed YouTube as a place for kids — now she appears ready to ban it

Sky News AU

time36 minutes ago

  • Sky News AU

Communications Minister once hailed YouTube as a place for kids — now she appears ready to ban it

Communications Minister Anika Wells once fawned over YouTube as a way to entertain her young children — now she appears ready to ban it as a legal furore erupts in the tech world. Minister wells is considering banning children under 16 from YouTube, but just a few years ago she praised the video sharing platform as a means for a young parent to navigate the "parliament hustle". "How do I handle the parliament hustle? Sturdy baby gates and The Wiggles on YouTube," she wrote in December, 2022, at a time she was sports minister. Minister Wells appeared to confirm for the first time publicly that she would formally adopt a push from eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant to prohibit children from creating accounts on YouTube. 'The eSafety Commissioner made it clear in her advice to the Minister that the law relates to children under the age of 16 having their own social media accounts,' Minister Wells told 'eSafety's recommendation does not prevent children from watching videos like The Wiggles on YouTube Kids or on their parent's account.' Under this scenario, kids would still be able to access YouTube logged out, which means they would not be protected by Google's sophisticated parental controls. YouTube has argued this move would make the internet less safe, a clear contradiction with the original intent of the Act. A formal decision is expected as early as Thursday this week but the government has been criticised for confusion around the rollout of these new laws. And it isn't just parents confused by Labor's flip-flopping on the social media ban. The rushed implementation of the laws and the lack of industry clarity has infuriated multiple platforms involved in negotiations, leading to tense and highly complex legal discussions behind closed doors. TikTok is understood to have made a legal threat on constitutional grounds over the ban. TikTok denies this but in a submission to the government, the Chinese owned platform alleged the laws would be fundamentally unworkable and anti-competitive in nature, if YouTube was exempt. Labor appears to have listened to these warnings and could announce a major change to the child ban policy as early as next week. After learning Labor was preparing to U-turn on a pledge to exempt YouTube, Google also called in the lawyers. The video sharing platform argued the child ban breaches the implied constitutional protections Australians have to engage in political speech. In March, TikTok wrote a scathing submission to the government which focused almost entirely on lobbying for YouTube to also be banned. TikTok's submission alleged the laws were "unsupportable" and "anti-competitive" in nature, and accused Labor of reverse engineering legislation. "Excluding any major platform by name from the minimum age obligation on educative grounds is unsupportable without evidence," the submission said. "What is clear is that the Government has begun its analysis from the starting position that YouTube must be exempt and then attempted, half-heartedly, to reverse-engineer defensible supporting evidence. "Handing one major social media platform a sweetheart deal of this nature - while subjecting every other platform in Australia to stringent compliance obligations - would be illogical, anti-competitive, and short-sighted." TikTok also warned that an exemption for YouTube raised anti-competition legal issues which, it argued, had already been highlighted by the ACCC. 'That Google or any rational economic actor in its position would seek to lobby Government for favourable treatment is comprehensible. That the Government would accede to it, against the warnings of its own competition watchdog, is not,' the submission said. In a forward to the submission TikTok warned the government the laws "would not work" if YouTube was exempt. "For the reasons set out in this submission, we have grave concerns that the Rules, if implemented in their current form, would not work," TikTok said. "We are particularly concerned that carving out any major platform by name - in this case, YouTube - from the minimum age obligation would result in a law that is illogical, anti-competitive, and short-sighted." eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant was accused earlier this month of misleading Australians after her push to have children banned from the platform was not supported in her own research. It was revealed that even Ms Inman Grant's office used YouTube to educate children as part of her own publishing strategy, specifically targeting the demographic. In late 2022, while Ms Inman Grant was in charge of the body, a series of videos called 'eSafety Mighty Heroes' including characters such as Dusty the frilled neck lizard, River the sugar glider, Billie the bilby, and Wanda the echidna was released on the same day - content clearly published with the intent to educate children.

US, China negotiators meet in Stockholm to extend trade truce
US, China negotiators meet in Stockholm to extend trade truce

AU Financial Review

timean hour ago

  • AU Financial Review

US, China negotiators meet in Stockholm to extend trade truce

Beijing | US and Chinese officials are meeting on Monday to extend their tariff détente beyond a mid-August deadline, and haggle over other ways to further defuse trade tensions. Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng and US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent will lead the delegations for two days Stockholm — their third meeting in less than three months. The agenda includes discussions about how long the current tariff truce can be extended, as well as US levies tied to fentanyl trafficking and Chinese purchases of sanctioned Russian and Iranian oil.

‘He's had a gutful': Man nicknamed ‘Rambo' emerges as a possible Democratic presidential contender
‘He's had a gutful': Man nicknamed ‘Rambo' emerges as a possible Democratic presidential contender

Sky News AU

time2 hours ago

  • Sky News AU

‘He's had a gutful': Man nicknamed ‘Rambo' emerges as a possible Democratic presidential contender

Political analyst Joe Siracusa discusses Rahm Emanuel, a Democratic contender contemplating running in the 2028 presidential election, and his recent remarks. 'He's also very tough, his nickname is 'Rambo', even his mother calls him 'Rambo',' he told Sky News Australia. 'He's had a gutful of the Democratic Party's political correctness. 'He's got a very severe view of how the Democrats run.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store