Authorities must view stray poisoning incidents seriously
The recent incidents in two popular international destinations in Penang and Langkawi, have somewhat tarnished the image of the country.
Animal rights groups and citizens are outraged by the blatant use of dangerous substances to poison peaceful and harmless creatures sharing the space with humans.
The public demands that the relevant authorities view these incidents seriously.
There were several incidents before this, but despite all the investigations by the authorities, no one has been taken to task.
Questions are now raised as to the competence and seriousness of the investigating authorities.
Despite having the necessary resources and technological tools, it's disappointing to note the relevant authorities have yet to charge any individuals for the horrendous crime of poisoning harmless strays that are protected by the Animal Act.
The rampant poisoning of harmless strays is a wake-up call for animal lovers to join hands to demand justice as stipulated under the Act.
Strays are living breathing souls who feel pain, fear, joy and love. They may not have a home but have every right to live with safety and dignity in the same space as ours.
When these creatures are harassed and subjected to cruel poisoning and harassment, it's a failure of humanity and should concern all of us.
On behalf of all animal lovers, I urge the authorities to view the stray poisoning incidents and the easily available poisonous substances seriously.
Take the necessary preventive actions to safeguard the animals.
The views expressed here are those of the author/contributor and do not necessarily represent the views of Malaysiakini.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
16 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Heavier penalties for doxing, stalking, mental harassment as anti-bullying law takes effect
KUALA LUMPUR: The amendments passed by parliament last year to the Penal Code (Amendment) Act 2025 and the Criminal Procedure Code (Amendment) Act 2025, both aimed at addressing physical and cyber bullying, came into force today. The Prime Minister's Department Legal Affairs Division (BHEUU) said both Acts were passed in the Dewan Rakyat (House of Representatives) on Dec 10, 2024 and in the Dewan Negara (Senate) on Dec 16, 2024 with majority support from members of parliament. BHEUU said the enforcement of both Acts is an ongoing effort by the Madani government to strengthen the country's legal system and to keep pace with current needs and new challenges in the modern criminal landscape. "The implementation of these two Acts is to streamline legal procedures, improve the efficiency of the criminal justice process and allow for faster and stricter action against those who break the law," the BHEUU said in a statement. The amendments to both Acts introduce specific provisions that allow for stricter legal action against bullies in line with the government's commitment to protect society, especially vulnerable groups such as children, adolescents and individuals put under mental harassment by bullies. In addition, the amendments also introduce new sections such as Sections 507B to 507G, which specifically provide for proportionate punishment for offences of threatening, insulting or defamatory communications intended to cause emotional distress or fear to the victim. "It also includes the offence of distributing personal information without permission or doxing, which is now classified as a serious crime and punishable by up to three years in prison," it said. In addition, the introduction of the special provision stems from a review of the shortcomings in existing laws which were found to be insufficient to address various forms of psychological and emotional threats in the increasingly challenging digital environment. The government will also continue to ensure that the enforcement of this law is implemented fairly and equitably without affecting the right to freedom of expression as guaranteed by the Constitution. "With the implementation of this Act, the Madani government remains committed to ensuring that the country's laws remain relevant and responsive to the challenges of the digital world in the interest of safety, well-being and justice for all Malaysians."
Daily Express
20 hours ago
- Daily Express
August 12 ruling on Naimah's constitutional reference appeal
Published on: Friday, July 11, 2025 Published on: Fri, Jul 11, 2025 By: Ho Kit Yen, FMT Text Size: Naimah Khalid is charged with failing to declare her ownership of companies, several plots of land, and two vehicles. (Bernama pic) Kuala Lumpur: The High Court has set Aug 12 to deliver its decision on Naimah Khalid's appeal against a lower court's refusal to refer constitutional questions concerning the validity of her asset declaration charge to the Federal Court. Justice K Muniandy set the date after hearing submissions from deputy public prosecutor Law Chin How and Naimah's lawyer, Gurdial Singh Nijar. Naimah, the widow of the late Daim Zainuddin, claimed trial in the sessions court last year to a charge of failing to comply with the terms of an asset declaration notice issued by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC). She was charged under Section 36(2) of the MACC Act 2009 with failing to declare her ownership of companies, several plots of land here and in Penang, and two vehicles. In her reference application, she claimed that Section 30(5) of the Act violated her rights against self-incrimination and to a fair trial. Section 30(5) provides that all persons to whom a notice is issued shall be legally bound to truthfully disclose all information within their knowledge, available to them or capable of being obtained by them. The sessions court dismissed her application earlier this year. Earlier today, Law told the court that Section 30(5) was legally sound, arguing that the provision was designed to compel individuals assisting in graft-related investigations to 'tell the truth'. He added that Naimah – who was summoned as a witness in a probe against Daim – had no right 'to remain silent' in the course of MACC investigations. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available. Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia
Daily Express
20 hours ago
- Daily Express
Vietnamese man's 4-year jail term for keeping leopard parts reinstated
Published on: Friday, July 11, 2025 Published on: Fri, Jul 11, 2025 By: V Anbalagan, FMT Text Size: Nguyen Van Tien claimed he was given 54 portions of leopard to take home when he met several other Vietnamese nationals here in Malaysia. (Wikipedia pic) PUTRAJAYA: The Court of Appeal has reinstated a Vietnamese man's four-year jail term for illegal possession of 54 leopard parts, after allowing the prosecution's appeal on the inadequacy of his sentence. A three-member bench chaired by Justice Hashim Hamzah said they were restoring the jail term imposed by the sessions court on Nguyen Van Tien as the offence relating to wildlife is serious. 'We set aside the High Court ruling which had imposed a two-year jail term. The penalty of a RM300,000 fine, or 12 months' imprisonment, however, remains,' he said. Justices Zaini Mazlan and Noorin Badaruddin were also on the bench. Nguyen was caught by wildlife rangers on Dec 12, 2023 at Taman Negara in Pahang with the leopard parts, weapons and tools. He was charged under Section 68(1)(b) of the Wildlife Conservation Act with keeping any part or derivative of a totally protected wildlife without a special permit. Those found guilty may be jailed for up to 15 years and fined a minimum of RM150,000. The leopard is a protected species in Malaysia. It is on a special list in the Act which carries some of the most severe penalties in the law. On April 24, 2024, the Raub sessions court sentenced Ngyuen to four years' jail and a fine of RM300,000 after he pleaded guilty at the second mention of the case. In September, the High Court reduced his jail term by two years but maintained the fine. Nguyen had also faced three charges under the Taman Negara (Pahang) (Amendment) Enactment 2018 for trespassing and illegal possession of weapons and tools, for which the court sentenced him to 24 months' jail on each charge. The court ordered the jail terms to be served concurrently, and Nguyen did not appeal against the sentences. Today, Nguyen, who came to seek employment in Malaysia, claimed that he met several other Vietnamese nationals who gave him the leopard meat in 54 portions to take home. 'I'm sorry for being ignorant of Malaysian laws regarding the protection of wildlife,' he said through a Vietnamese interpreter as he was not represented by a lawyer. He pleaded to the court to maintain the two-year jail term so that he could return home to care for his aged parents, his four children and his wife. Deputy public prosecutor Aznee Salmie Ahmad said the court should be at the forefront of creating awareness on wildlife protection by imposing a deterrent sentence. She said protected wildlife was a national heritage. 'The offender was bold enough to commit the offence at our national park,' she said, adding that a clear message must be sent to all that Malaysia was committed to conserving its wildlife. Aznee said the Court of Appeal should interfere and correct the sentence imposed by the High Court, which she described as manifestly inadequate. Representatives of Traffic South East Asia, a wildlife trade monitoring network, and Justice for Wildlife Malaysia were present to observe the proceedings. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available. Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia
