Marines sticking with JLTV after Army cancels future vehicle buys
The joint program office for the Army and Marine Corps first picked Oshkosh Defense to build the JLTV in August 2015, and in 2023 awarded a follow-on contract to AM General, according to a Congressional Research Services report released Monday.
'The Marine Corps is fully committed to the JLTV program. It is our workhorse on the ground tactical vehicle fleet,' Marine Corps Commandant Gen. Eric Smith said in a House Appropriations subcommittee on defense hearing May 14. 'It's a little bit too early to assess the impact of the Army stopping their version of the program, but per-unit costs are clearly going to go up … when the orders go down.'
The JLTV was originally intended to replace the Marine Corps' and Army's light tactical vehicle fleets, which consist mostly of Humvees. The initial low-rate production contract awarded to Oshkosh Defense was valued at $6.7 billion for the first 16,901 vehicles, according to the CRS report.
A follow-on contract valued at another $8 billion awarded to AM General would have built another 30,000 JLTVs and 10,000 trailers for the vehicles.
Smith anticipates the unit cost to rise because of the Army decision, and the Corps is 'still assessing the full impact of the Army's abrupt exit from the joint program.'
'That's going to negatively impact the Marine Corps' ability to fulfill its ground tactical vehicle mobility strategy, which has me concerned,' Smith said.
The Marine Corps relies on the JLTV for its ROGUE-Fires and Marine Air Defense Integration System, or MADIS. The ROGUE-Fires system uses a remotely operated JLTV without a cab to fire the Navy/Marine Expeditionary Ship Interdiction System. The MADIS is a counter-drone weapon also mounted on the JLTV.
'At this time, AM General has [a] backlog for deliveries of vehicles through 2027 and AM General remains committed to meeting our contractual delivery requirements,' AM General said in a statement May 2 in response to the Army's decision to divest. 'As we work to understand the significance of the DoD's recent communications, we will continue to operate our HUMVEE and JLTV A2 assembly lines and our Aftermarket Fulfillment facility as normal to meet our contractual requirements and serve the Warfighter.'
The vehicle, available in two- and four-seat versions, can be transported by various aircraft, including rotary wing, according to the CRS report.
Instead of acquiring more JLTVs, the Army plans to fulfill some of its mobility requirements with the Infantry Squad Vehicle, a much smaller, scaled-down all-terrain vehicle.
An Army Transformation Initiative memo published May 1 noted the service would divest the vehicle over time. So far, the service has acquired 20,000 vehicles. The Army began fielding the JLTV in 2019, the same year the Marine Corps began receiving its first vehicles.
House Appropriations subcommittee member Rep. Betty McCollum, D-Minn., said she was 'dismayed' to learn the Army did not communicate its intentions to the Marine Corps before making the divestiture decision.
'That is beyond disappointing. Joint means joint. That's what the 'J' stands for. Joint decisions should be informed together as part of joint programs if they need to change,' McCollum said.
Speaking to reporters in Tennessee on May 14, Army Vice Chief Gen. James Mingus said the Army purchased its last tranche of JLTVs in January, according to Breaking Defense.
'We will do no future procurement buys for the JLTV, for the Army, but the Marine Corps, [Foreign Military Sales] partners [can],' Mingus said. 'We think that we have enough, they [USMC and foreign customers] can continue to do that. But for us, inside of our armor and heavy and Stryker formations, we have enough JLTVs. We've bought enough already.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Democrat calls Murkowski ‘cheap date' over whaling tax carve-out
Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Mass.) quipped that Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) was a 'cheap date' for voting for President Trump's giant tax and spending package, seemingly for a tax break for fishermen, during a House Rules Committee hearing on Tuesday. The comment came after Rep. Joe Neguse (D-Colo.) asked House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Rep. Jason Smith (R-Mo.) about a new tax break on whalers and fishermen. It was one of many Alaska-specific items that were added to the bill in the final weeks. 'Are you talking about allowing someone who uses a harpoon to deduct the cost of that harpoon? That's correct, that's included,' Smith responded. 'It's a business expense.' 'It's a new tax break,' Neguse interrupted. 'It's a business expense that was capped at 10,000 dollars and now they can deduct it,' Smith continued. 'Up to $50,000, right?' Neguse added, which Smith confirmed. 'Why was that added? I think we all know, right?' Neguse asked while smiling, seemingly referring to Murkowski, who was initially a 'no' on the bill but flipped after grueling last-minute negotiations. She sealed the deal as a crucial 50th vote for Republicans. 'You'd have to talk to the senators,' Smith responded. McGovern, a ranking member of the House Rules Committee, later interrupted Neguse to ask if that addition to the bill was 'all it took' for Republicans to get a 'yes' from Murkowski. 'Is that all it took?' McGovern asked Neguse. 'I'm not sure,' Neguse responded. 'Boy, she's a cheap date,' McGovern said before Neguse continued questioning Smith. The bill, which passed in the Senate on Tuesday and now heads to the House, allows a tax exemption for fishers from western Alaska villages and a separate provision that gives some whaling captains in the state the ability to deduct $50,000 of their expenses, a fivefold increase. Murkowski said on Tuesday that the process that led her to vote for the bill was 'agonizing,' noting that she hopes more will be done to improve the bill. She also said she 'struggled mightily' with the potential impact of cuts to Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) on vulnerable populations. 'This is probably the most difficult and agonizing legislative 24-hour period that I have encountered, and I've been here quite a while and you know I've got a few battle scars underneath me,' Murkowski told reporters.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Lightning Carriers: The Marines' secret weapon in the Pacific
As the U.S. military prepares for the possibility of a conflict in the Pacific, the Navy and Marine Corps are working on a new way to project airpower, and they're calling it the Lightning Carrier. The concept, which the Corps began testing in 2016, turns amphibious assault ships, like the Navy's America-class USS America, which is both easy to remember and ultra patriotic in a 'Team America' kind of way, into small, agile flat-top carriers bristling with F-35B Lightning II aircraft and about 1,800 Marines. With the F-35B vertical take-off and landing capability, they can fit up to 20 on the deck that can support Marines as they secure or defend remote outposts through the Pacific. The USS Tripoli served as a testbed for the concept in 2022, putting 16 of the fifth-generation fighters in place of MV-22B Ospreys and CH-53 Sea Stallions that typically occupied the flight deck. In that test, Marines and sailors kept a high operational tempo in order to demonstrate whether these relatively small ships, at just over 800 feet and 45,000 tons of displacement, could function as a floating forward operating airbase. The Lightning Carrier concept comes out of Force Design 2030, which has resulted in some radical changes across the Corps, such as getting rid of Abrams tanks and even creating entirely new units. The push to emphasize distributed operations — basically just lots of small, agile teams with serious firepower — has naturally bled into the branch's amphibious operations. With the People's Republic of China a major concern in the region, the Marine Corps is preparing for scenarios in which large, vulnerable platforms, like supercarriers such as the USS Gerald R. Ford, may not be able to get close enough to the fight to be effective. Lightning Carriers offer the Marines speed, flexibility, and a smaller operational footprint. They can operate from smaller ports, reach shallower waters, and function with fewer ships in support. Where a Carrier Strike Group consists of as many as 10 ships, including submarines, an Amphibious Ready Group (ARG) has just three. The F-35B aircraft are well-suited to this particular mission. They don't require catapults or arresting gear like the F-35C variant. With the onboard sensors, electronic warfare suite, and weapons, they can conduct intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance missions, close air support, and suppression of enemy air defenses. In addition to the air wing, a Lightning Carrier, and the other two ships that make up the Amphibious Ready Group, can carry roughly 1,800 Marines that make up a Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU) along with their equipment, providing a rapid response force that can be deployed by air or sea. When paired with the F-35B, this embarked force becomes a self-contained, forward-deployed force capable of responding to threats, reinforcing remote outposts, or securing islands. There are limitations and concerns, however. Lightning Carriers lack the defenses of larger carriers and other ships, making them more vulnerable to anti-ship missiles and other threats. Their smaller size also limits flight operations. With less space for ordnance, repair parts, and other supplies needed to maintain a high operational tempo, they'll require more frequent resupply. Without a catapult or arresting gear, those F-35B have a smaller range and payload capacity when compared to their Air Force and Navy cousins, and no other fixed-wing aircraft can operate from their decks. Despite these limitations, Marine Corps leaders seem to be viewing the Lightning Carrier as a practical and adaptable platform. As Vice Adm. Karl Thomas, who was the commander of the 7th Fleet during the 2022 experimentation, said, 'One day you can have F-35Bs on the flight deck, the next day you could have MV-22s and you can be putting Marines ashore.' Operation Midnight Hammer damaged, but may not have destroyed Iran's nuclear sites An Army base will now honor a Buffalo Soldier 2 aircraft carriers, 9 destroyers, and multiple fighter wings gather in the Middle East Marines and sailors are building trenches for the drone age The Army is deactivating police units in deep cuts to number of military cops
Business Insider
6 hours ago
- Business Insider
Tech execs from companies chasing defense contracts are now Army officers. A watchdog is calling for an investigation.
A watchdog group has called on the Defense Department's Inspector General office to probe whether the recent commissioning of four tech executives as part-time Army officers is in keeping with laws and practices against self-dealing. The Democracy Defenders Fund sent the letter on Tuesday, requesting that investigators determine "whether the assignment of these officials to the Army Reserve is consistent with the Federal conflict of interest laws" and whether their appointments qualify as "misuse of position and nonpublic information." The executives — Shyam Sankar, chief technology officer of Palantir; Andrew Bosworth, chief technology officer of Meta; Kevin Weil, chief product officer at OpenAI; and Bob McGrew, an advisor at Thinking Machines Lab who was the chief research officer for OpenAI — joined the Army Reserve just weeks ago. The men will forego traditional three-month boot camp for a two-week crash course on Army history and basic military knowledge. These executives may be in a position to influence Army and Defense Department contracts as newly minted lieutenant colonels or share vital inside information to benefit their companies, which could increase the value of compensation like stock options. It is not unusual for civilians with expertise to bypass the most junior officer ranks for mid-level appointments. Historically that has most often included chaplains, veterinarians, and medical providers, career fields that require advanced degrees to join. The Army has made efforts to recruit more Americans with cyber and tech experience, though the four executives are the highest-profile enlistments to date. The Democracy Defenders Fund outlined special concerns regarding ongoing contract work Palantir and OpenAI have undertaken with the DoD recently. It's common for military reservists to have civilian careers in the DoD. The problem with these tech execs, the group says, are the profound amounts of lucrative government contracts at stake for their companies. "Some of these individuals have significant personal financial stakes in their outside employers, including stock, stock options, restricted stock units, and performance-based bonuses, which they seem unlikely to divest for a part-time government position," the letter read. "Given the ongoing and clear financial interest these appointees have in the adoption of Artificial Intelligence by the Department of Defense, there is a real risk that these individuals may engage in self-dealing or use their positions or nonpublic government information to benefit their outside employers in violation of federal law," it continued. The executives' commissions are part of a larger Army effort to rapidly modernize to better harness Silicon Valley's tech for future battlefields. Some experts have previously noted that the expertise such executives have is likely to be an imperative for future peer-level conflicts. Business Insider asked Army officials if concerns regarding executives' potential conflicts of interest have already been addressed, but did not receive a response before Tuesday afternoon. Officials have previously said the executives will be held to the same ethical standard as other service members. "Palantir, Meta, OpenAI, and Thinking Machines each have a significant financial interest in DoD adopting AI," the letter read, adding that the DoD has already awarded over $1 billion worth of contracts to Palantir and its subsidiaries while OpenAI has a $200 million AI contract with the military.
