UK parents think they had safer childhoods than their children
A YouGov survey of 4,017 parents and carers commissioned by the NSPCC to analyse children's playing habits also found that 52% of participants want their children to play more in person.
Overall, findings across the UK showed that 38% of parents believe their child plays online every day or multiple times a day.
(Image: Getty Images)
Once children reach their teens, this increases, with 53% of parents of 12–16-year-olds saying their children within that age group play online at least once a day.
In person play also decreases as a child ages. While 40% of total participants agreed that their children played in person once a day or more, for parents of 12-16 year olds this decreases to just 27%, and 16% for those with 17-18 year olds.
The survey comes as the NSPCC prepares for its fourth annual Childhood Day on Friday (June 6).
To mark the day, it has issued calls for families to come together and celebrate the joys of childhood, while also encouraging people to play their part to help keep children safe.
People can get involved by donating to the NSPCC, including in Lidl stores - either at cash donation tins or in small amounts via card payment at the till, thanks to digital micro-donation system Pennies.
They can also volunteer at a Childhood Day collection point or take on the NSPCC's Childhood Day Mile.
Lidl GB is sponsoring the NSPCC's Childhood Day for a fourth year as retail sponsor.
All the funds raised will go towards helping the NSPCC deliver vital services, like Childline which supports children at risk.
For information on how to get involved in Childhood Day including taking part in the Childhood Day Mile or volunteering at a fundraising collection, visit www.nspcc.org.uk/support-us/charity-fundraising/childhood-day/.
Chris Sherwood, CEO of the NSPCC said: 'It is human nature to want something better for your children, but our latest research suggests that parents today believe we are trending in the wrong direction in terms of childhood experiences.
'Lack of in-person play for children is a particular concern for parents, something we all have a responsibility to try and address. Children and young people playing more with their friends and family, both inside and outside, can only be a good thing for their physical and mental health and general sense of wellbeing.
"The NSPCC's Childhood Day is all about bringing families, friends and communities together to celebrate childhood and give everyone a really fun and positive in-person experience, while at the same time seeking to raise vital funds for the charity.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
13 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
How would I tell students about Gaza? The same as every genocide
As many of you know, before becoming a journalist I spent more than ten happy and successful years teaching English. In Scotland, that means having near total freedom to build a curriculum for your students and, influenced by those who taught me, I have always believed in presenting challenging literature and new writers that students might not have encountered before. One such author was Chinua Achebe, who is best known for his seminal novel Things Fall Apart, which remains the most widely translated and studied novel to have come out of Africa. But Achebe wasn't just a novelist. During the Biafra war – a brutal and too-often forgotten conflict in which more than one million people were starved to death in a besieged and blockaded territory – he wrote poetry that was subsequently published as a collection entitled Beware, Soul Brother. Although many of his poems are extremely powerful, there is one that stands out more than others: Refugee Mother and Child. Read more Lessons to Learn: The text offers a vivid and brutal snapshot of the plight of the Biafran people, distilling their suffering into the experiences of a young mother caring for a starving child 'she soon will have to forget'. Amidst the horror of a refugee camp she holds a 'ghost smile between her teeth' as she tends to the 'rust-coloured hair left on his skull', an act carried out 'like putting flowers on a tiny grave'. It is, above all, a stunning representation of pure love, dedication and dignity in the face of unspeakable pain. When teaching this poem I would very often use a photo by Don McCullin to help students fully develop their understanding and responses. Taken in 1968, Starving Twenty Four Year Old Mother with Child, Biafra is one of the most harrowing images ever produced by one of the world's great photographers, and features a young, emaciated woman looking straight into the camera as her starving son tries to feed at her visibly empty breast. Like Refugee Mother and Child, that photo shines an unflinching light on the best and worst of humanity, showing us both extremes of which we are capable. And last week, we saw that again in the now infamous photo from Gaza. Once again, a mother holds her starving child with love and dignity; once again, she does so under the shadow of the deliberate starvation of desperate, innocent people; once again, this all happens as the world looks on. Read more: Horrifying images are clearly the tipping point for public outrage over Gaza The image of a Gazan mother holding her starving child shocked the world (Image: Anadolu via Getty Images) When I taught about Biafra, students would ask why it was allowed to happen, why the world watched as a deliberate campaign of starvation was waged against a civilian population, why innocent children were left to face the most horrific suffering. Similar questions came up when I taught about Rwanda, which I often did using former BBC journalist Fergal Keane's utterly astonishing reflective essay, Spiritual Damage. It is a text that always elicited powerful responses from students who, as with Biafra, often knew little or nothing about a genocide in which up to a million people were slaughtered, many of them hacked to death by their neighbours. Keane writes about the smell of death seeping into his clothes, his skin, and his soul. He confronts the racism that was (and still is) used to excuse 'a final solution of monstrous proportions' as being simply a manifestation of 'ancient tribal hatred' or, even worse, just something that Africans do. At one point, he explains that his belief in the ultimate triumph of good over evil was 'whittled away' in Rwanda, suggesting a slow and painful change that took place massacre by massacre, body by body, machete wound by machete wound. He also refers to the colonial roots of the violence, the role of German troops who 'tutored Rwandan peasants in the arts of massacre', and the fact that the Americans – who successfully demanded that UN troops were removed from Rwanda once the genocide had begun – had 'bickered over the funding of armoured vehicles' that might have saved lives. The wider implication was never lost: countries like ours didn't just let it happen, they were complicit. Often our discussions would lead us to talk about Christine Shelley, the US State Department official who admitted that 'acts of genocide had occurred', and then could not or would not answer when asked the obvious follow-up: 'How many acts of genocide does it take to make genocide?' Asked if she had been given 'specific guidance' not to use the word genocide 'in isolation', she offered a waffling, technocratic response that even today, more than twenty years on, remains sickening. Why wouldn't they use the term 'genocide' or even properly consider the possibility? According to a then-secret, and now declassified, memo from the US Dept of Defence, legal officials were worried that doing so would require the government 'to actually 'do something''. And that, too, is now happening again, as so-called world leaders refuse to call a genocide by its true name, and in doing so make themselves, and their countries, and all of us, even more complicit in the escalating horrors that are unfolding. One day I might go back to the classroom, and if I do I will still teach about historic injustices, but I will also end up teaching about Gaza. Perhaps I'll use the work of Refaat Alareer or Hiba Abu Nada, both killed by Israeli airstrikes back in 2023. And it will all happen again. I'll be asked why the world didn't stop it. I'll be asked why presidents and prime ministers justified the horror, and why they refused to use the word genocide. I'll be asked why we left children to be starved to death in their parents' arms. And the worst part is that the answers will be the same as well.
Scotsman
3 days ago
- Scotsman
Most Popular Dogs of 2025 So Far: Here are the 13 top dogs of the year according to latest figures - led by the loving Labrador Retriever
When it comes to popular pets, the dog rules the roost - there are around 13.5 million living in the UK, meaning more than one-in-three households has a furry friend. There are a remarkable 221 different breeds of pedigree dog to choose from, according to the UK Kennel Club, alongside numerous popular crossbreeds , like Labradoodles and Cockapoos. Breeds go in and out of style over the years, but the Kennel Club keeps a close eye on them, publishing regular registration statistics. Traditionally the Labrador Retriever is the UK's - and the world's - most popular dog, but it's been challenged in recent years by trendy breeds like the French Bulldog and the Dachshund. Here are the 15 most popular breeds of pedigree dogs right now, according to the Kennel Club figures for the first quarter of 2025 - and how many have been registered. 1 . Labrador Retriever They are the world's most popular dog and the Labrador Retriever remains the most commonly registered breed of any size in the UK by quite some distance. There were a huge 34,141 new Labradors registered with the Kennel Club last year - meaning it easily tops the list of most common large dog breeds. | Canva/Getty Images Photo Sales 2 . Golden Retriever The second most popular large dog is the Golden Retriever, with 10,201 new registrations last year. The breed was created by Sir Dudley Marjoribanks at his Scottish estate in the late nineteenth century. | Canva/Getty Images Photo Sales 3 . German Shepherd One of the world's most useful dogs, the German Shepherd was originally bred as a herding dog but now is popular for everything from disability assistance and search-and-rescue work, to helping the police hunt criminals and serving in the army. They are also great companion pets, with 4,817 registrations in 2024 - making them the third most popular large dog breed. | Canva/Getty Images Photo Sales 4 . Boxer The top dog in the Kennel Club's working group is the adorable Boxer, with 2,427 registrations in 2024 - making it the fourth most popular large dog breed. The Boxer was bred from the Old English Bulldog and the now extinct Bullenbeisser. | Canva/Getty Images Photo Sales
Scotsman
4 days ago
- Scotsman
Which Tropical Fish Live Longest 2025? Here are the 13 colourful aquarium fish with the longest lifespans
4 . Goldfish - up to 43 years Probably the world's most popular aquarium fish, the Goldfish comes in a whole array of sizes, shapes and colours (not only gold, but also combinations of white, yellow, orange, red, brown, and black). Don't be tempted to pop one on a tiny bowl, these fish may be hardy but still need plenty of space and filtration to thrive. Originally from China, you can expect them to live for 10-25 years if you look after them correctly, with the record being 43 years. | Canva/Getty Images
