EC doubles pay for BLOs involved in roll revision
NEW DELHI: A day after asking its poll personnel in the field to ignore repeated threats and allegations by some opposition netas and continue working impartially, the
Election Commission
decided to reward the officers involved in electoral roll revision, reports Bharti Jain.
For booth-level officers (BLOs), annual remuneration and incentive for roll revision stands doubled to Rs 12,000 and Rs 2,000 respectively. These rates were last revised in 2015. BLOs will also get Rs 6,000 as special incentive for special intensive revision (SIR).
The BLO supervisor will receive an annual remuneration of Rs 18,000 as against Rs 12,000, in force since 2015. EROs and assistant EROs, who did not get any honorarium so far, will now receive an honorarium of Rs 30,000 and Rs 25,000 each.
Stating that pure electoral rolls are bedrock of democracy, EC Saturday commended the electoral roll machinery comprising EROs, Asst EROs, BLO supervisors and BLOs for doing "a lot or hard work" and playing "a pivotal role in preparation of transparent rolls".
The commission said decision to raise their remuneration/incentive 'reflects EC's commitment to adequately compensate election personnel who work tirelessly at field level to maintain accurate poll rolls, assist voters and strengthen the electoral process'.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Moose Approaches Girl At Bus Stop In As Suways - Watch What Happens
Happy in Shape
Undo
The raised compensation comes after repeated attacks by opposition parties against the EC. On Friday, Rahul Gandhi had accused the EC of 'vote chori' (vote theft) during Lok Sabha polls in Karnataka and said he had an 'atom bomb' of evidence to back his claim.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
42 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘They want a win in November': Trump administration schedules first ‘Golden Dome' test ahead of 2028 election -Here's what report said
The Pentagon has scheduled its first major test of President Donald Trump's space-based Golden Dome missile defence system just before the 2028 elections, CNN reported, citing sources. This ambitious schedule aims to demonstrate the feasibility of transforming President Trump's concept of a space-based protective shield for the entire United States. This scheduling aligns with Trump's May announcement to 'have it done in three years.' "Once fully constructed, the Golden Dome will be capable of intercepting missiles even if they are launched from other sides of the world," he said. A defence official informed CNN that while missile tests typically require extensive advance planning, the timing of this test in the fourth quarter of 2028 appears strategically placed. "They want a win to point to in November [2028],' the official told CNN and added, 'and DoD wants to avoid anything they perceive will slow them down.' The defence official revealed that the MDA plans to designate the test as FTI-X, where 'FTI' indicates Flight Test Integrated, encompassing the coordination of Golden Dome's various sensors and weapons systems against multiple targets. The three-year implementation presents significant challenges, considering the US has researched space-based missile interception for decades. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Average Cost To Rent A Private Jet May Surprise You (View Prices) Private Jet I Search Ads Learn More Undo The defence official highlighted technical complexities, particularly regarding the substantial number of satellites required for effective coverage of the continental United States. Space Force Gen. Michael Guetlein, appointed by Trump in May to oversee Golden Dome's development, addressed these challenges at a recent industry summit, focusing on the technical and economic feasibility of space-based interceptors at scale. Initial tests in 2028 may represent only the first phase, according to another source, emphasising the current focus on swift progress using existing systems to demonstrate the concept's viability for additional funding. The project's allocated budget of $25 billion, announced by Trump in May, is expected to expand significantly into hundreds of billions. Various companies are already testing relevant technologies, including Northrop Grumman's work on space-based interceptors. The Pentagon recently announced successful testing of a Lockheed Martin long-range radar system in Alaska, capable of tracking ballistic missiles from Russia and China, likely to be incorporated into Golden Dome. The industry awaits Guetlein's comprehensive system design plan. A memo signed by defence secretary Pete Hegseth outlined a 60-day deadline for initial architecture and 120 days for implementation planning. Concerns exist regarding the accelerated development approach and reduced oversight. The Office of the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation's role was diminished after announcing its involvement in Golden Dome testing oversight. Guetlein has been granted significant autonomy in contract allocation and technology procurement, reporting directly to Deputy Secretary Stephen Feinberg. The programme operates outside standard Pentagon oversight procedures for major weapons systems. Multiple companies, notably SpaceX, Anduril, and Palantir, are competing for involvement, having presented directly to Hegseth, who has expressed interest in their proposals.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
EC asks Tejashwi to hand over voter ID for investigation: ‘Not issued officially'
Patna/New Delhi: The Election Commission (EC) on Sunday asked Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) leader Tejashwi Yadav to 'hand over for investigation' a voter ID card that he claimed to be in possession of despite having been 'not issued officially', in a development that came a day after the Leader of Opposition in the Bihar assembly claimed that his voter ID card was not available in the new draft electoral roll. LoP in Bihar assembly and RJD leader Tejashwi Yadav attends Adhikaar Mahasammelan programme at S.K. Memorial hall, in Patna on Saturday. (ANI Photo)(Rahul Sharma) Meanwhile, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) lashed out at Yadav, alleging that the RJD leader had two EPIC (Election Photo Identity Card) numbers and two Voter IDs, and termed his accusation against EC a 'conspiracy to defame India.' Addressing a press conference in Patna on Saturday, Yadav demonstrated an online search, with the EPIC number RAB2916120, to claim that his name was missing in the draft electoral rolls published as part of special intensive revision (SIR). Also Read: EC junks Tejashwi Yadav's claim, says voter ID he showed does not exist The former Bihar deputy chief minister questioned whether he would be allowed to vote in the upcoming assembly elections slated to be held in October-November this year. EC, however, later clarified that Yadav's officially registered EPIC number was RAB0456228 and he had used the same in his 2020 election affidavit. 'Our preliminary investigation suggests that the EPIC number you mentioned at the press conference on August 2 was not issued officially. You are therefore requested to hand over the EPIC card in original for detailed investigation,' the sub divisional magistrate of Patna Sadar-cum-electoral registration officer for Digha assembly constituency said in a letter to Yadav. Later, the RJD leader alleged that his EPIC number had been 'changed', but the same was refuted by Patna district magistrate Thiyagaraja SM. 'The EPIC number in the electoral rolls is the one that was submitted by the honourable leader of the opposition in his affidavit in the 2020 assembly polls. If he is in possession of another EPIC card with another number as well, then it is a matter of investigation,' the DM said. The ruling BJP lashed out at the Opposition over this issue, with party lawmaker Sambit Patra accusing Tejashwi Yadav of spreading misinformation about the electoral process. 'This means he (Tejashwi Yadav) had two EPIC numbers... Did he have two voter IDs? The way in which Congress and RJD are scathing an attack on the EC, is a conspiracy to defame India,' Patra told reporters in Delhi. Though Yadav did not make any comment on the letter issued by the SDO Patna Sadar till Sunday evening, RJD spokesperson Chittaranjan Gagan alleged that the letter to the Opposition leader was a ploy by EC to divert attention from the questions raised by Yadav regarding alleged anomalies in the SIR exercise. '...In the draft rolls issued in which Tejashwi's name figures with a particular house number, several other electors' names having different surnames have been mentioned having the same house number. Does one family have members with different surnames? This must be clarified by ECI,' Gagan said.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Centre didn't comply with NGT order on Great Nicobar project: Plea
The Union government has not complied with the National Green Tribunal's (NGT) April 3, 2023 order on revisiting the deficiencies in the environmental clearance granted to the Great Nicobar Holistic Development project, a petitioner challenging the green nod to the key project has claimed before NGT. The petitioner prayed that ecologically sensitive areas be excluded from project areas. (AFP) In a 39-page detailed submission made on July 24 by petitioner-environmentalist Ashish Kothari said the objective of this application is to seek the enforcement and implementation of the law. The petitioner highlighted that the three terms of reference for the NGT-appointed high-powered committee (HPC) were not met — specifically related to coral transplantation, environmental baseline data collection and review coastal regulation zone (CRZ) boundaries of the proposed port project. On April 3, 2023, NGT directed that clearance dated November 11, 2022 be revisited in the light of 'some unanswered deficiencies' pointed out by the appellants which need to be addressed. 'By way of instance, it is pointed out that out of 20,668 coral colonies, 16,150 are proposed to be translocated without any mention of threat to the remaining 4,518 coral colonies. It is pointed out that ICRZ Regulations prohibit destruction of corals. Further, data collected for impact assessment is only of one season as against requirement of three seasons. It is also shown that part of the project is in the CRZ IA area where Port is prohibited,' the NGT had said. HT had reported on April 7, 2023 that NGT had constituted a high-powered committee, headed by Union environment ministry secretary, to revisit the environmental clearance (EC) granted by the ministry to the Great Nicobar township and area development project. Experts, however, have questioned how a subordinate authority headed by the environment secretary revisit the green nod granted by its own ministry? In the submission to NGT, the petitioner has pointed out that several clauses of the Island Coastal Regulation Zone (ICRZ) Notification, 2019 and its annexure prohibit the destruction of corals. Annexure I to the notification prohibits destruction of corals, coral reefs and surrounding areas and allows coral transplantation activities only when necessary for regeneration after obtaining permission under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972. Activities like dredging and discharge of ballast water are also prohibited in and around coral reefs. 'Even according to the MoEFCC, the HPC has only looked at the Zoological Survey of India's (ZSI) proposal to translocate coral colonies, and has agreed with the recommendation of ZSI. The mandate of the law, the fact that coral reefs are protected and that their translocation is not permitted by law etc. have not even been considered by the HPC,' the submission said. Importantly, the petitioner has pointed out that fringing coral reefs around the island have been marked clearly in the draft ICRZ coastal land use plans prepared under the 2019 notification but they are not there in the approved land use plans. 'Even according to the MoEFCC, the ZSI's report itself states that 16,150 coral colonies need to be translocated due to the port project. The ICRZ Notification, 2019 does not permit such transplantation to facilitate or clear the area for a port. Coral reefs and their associated biodiversity are extremely sensitive and cannot be moved around to suit the convenience of project proponents,' the submission added. It further claimed that the second aspect of TOR was also not met. 'The MoEFCC and the HPC have failed to see that the requirement of comprehensive EIA, i.e, an EIA based on three season data collection, is mandated under the ICRZ Notification, 2019 and the EIA guidance manual itself requires data collection of more than one season...' it said, adding that the survey of ecology and biology was conducted between December 14 and 22, 2020, and the survey of leatherbacks was conducted between February 12 and 18, 2021 and hence the season was not covered. The third ToR was to 'Review the boundaries of the port project with respect to ICRZ Notification, 2019.' The tribunal in its April 2023 verdict has observed that 'it is also shown that part of the project is in the CRZ IA area where Port is prohibited.' The 2019 notification lists mangroves, corals and coral reefs, biologically active mud flats, turtle nesting grounds, nesting grounds of birds as CRZ IA — ecologically sensitive areas. 'It is submitted that coral reefs, turtle nesting sites, megapode (bird) nesting grounds, mangroves, etc. do not and cannot magically disappear to suit the convenience of the project proponent. It is shocking that the HPC has relied only on a report of the NCSCM, the consultant of the project proponent, to come to the conclusion that no part of the project area falls under CRZ IA,' the submission said. The petitioner also prayed that ecologically sensitive areas be excluded from project areas. 'Unless this tribunal directs the exclusion of admitted CRZ IA areas such as coral reefs along the coast, turtle nesting grounds, megapode nesting grounds, biologically active mudflats etc. from the project area, they will be converted and destroyed,' it said. The matter was heard by NGT's eastern bench on July 24. People aware of the matter said additional solicitor general (ASG) Aishwarya Bhati submitted that the ministry did not violate any law and was aware of the sensitive nature of the island's environment and has ensured that sustainable development is achieved while keeping in mind the strategic requirements to ensure national security. The hearing was adjourned and the tribunal directed the MoEFCC to produce the revised layout which excludes all the CRZ-1A areas from the port, according to lawyers. The matter will be heard again on August 6. ASG Bhati did not respond to HT's request for a comment on whether the ministry will be making a submission on other concerns raised in the application. The Great Nicobar Holistic Development Project has four major components: an international container transshipment terminal (ICCT); an international airport; a power plant; and a township. The total cost is estimated at ₹81,800 crore. The Nicobar Islands fall in the Sundaland Biodiversity Hotspot and cover the western half of the Indonesian archipelago. Union environment minister Bhupender Yadav in August last year said that 'exemplary mitigation measures' have been incorporated to minimise the environmental impact of the project, 'keeping the strategic, national and defence interests' in mind. .
