US Supreme Court allows parents to opt children out of LGBTQ-themed lessons
The US Supreme Court on Friday ruled 6-3 to let parents opt their children out of LGBTQ-themed lessons at public schools, a move critics warn threatens the future of secular education by opening the door to broad religious objections. Justice Samuel Alito wrote for majority that "for many people of faith, there are few religious acts more important than the religious education of their children".(AFP)
The justices reviewed an appeal brought by Christian and Muslim parents against a Maryland public school district that, in 2022, added books tackling prejudice and exploring gender identity to its elementary curriculum.
President Donald Trump, who has made fighting "woke ideology" a hallmark of his second term, hailed the outcome as a "great ruling for parents."
"They lost control of the schools and they lost control of their child, and this is a tremendous victory for parents," he said at a White House press conference.
The court found that the Montgomery County parents were likely to prevail in their claim that blocking them from opting out "unconstitutionally burdens" their religious freedom.
"For many people of faith, there are few religious acts more important than the religious education of their children," wrote Justice Samuel Alito for the majority.
He said the books in question "are designed to present certain values and beliefs as things to be celebrated, and certain contrary values and beliefs as things to be rejected."
Alito cited specific texts including "Uncle Bobby's Wedding," which celebrates gay marriage, and "Born Ready: The True Story of a Boy Named Penelope," about a transgender boy.
The right-wing Heritage Foundation, which authored the blueprint for Trump's second term, also praised the ruling as "a resounding victory for parents across America, affirming their fundamental right to guide their children's moral and religious upbringing." Evolution next?
In dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor -- joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson -- defended public schools as places where "children of all faiths and backgrounds" gain exposure to a pluralistic society.
"That experience is critical to our Nation's civic vitality," she wrote. "Yet it will become a mere memory if children must be insulated from exposure to ideas and concepts that may conflict with their parents' religious beliefs."
She warned of a slippery slope: "Books expressing implicit support for patriotism, women's rights, interfaith marriage, consumption of meat, immodest dress, and countless other topics may conflict with sincerely held religious beliefs and thus trigger stringent judicial review under the majority's test."
The ruling could even reopen settled legal ground on how schools teach evolution and other scientific topics, said Daniel Mach, a legal expert with the American Civil Liberties Union.
"The issue had come up many times in lower courts, including where parents claimed a religious right to opt out of biology lessons on evolution," he told AFP. "In each of those cases, the courts rejected the claim, but now with today's decision, the door has been bashed open to invite all manner of objections."
Mach warned that schools may now choose to self-censor rather than navigate a patchwork of opt-outs in anticipation of lawsuits.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
20 minutes ago
- Business Standard
China shows tech resilience against Trump's export curbs over Rare earths
As Donald Trump brandishes US export controls on technology as a bargaining chip to wrest supplies of rare earth magnets from Beijing, China is showcasing what it can do without the most advanced American semiconductors. On a government-organized trip this month to Jiangsu and Zhejiang, two of China's richest provinces that spawned AI darling DeepSeek, authorities lined up a host of executives from technology companies to meet with journalists from Bloomberg News and other media outlets. The message was ultimately one of defiance: China's technology sector still aims at world dominance despite US curbs. Take Magiclab Robotics Technology Co., a firm in the eastern city of Suzhou founded barely more than a year ago. Its president, Wu Changzheng, said it had independently developed more than 90 per cent of the parts it uses to make humanoid robots. The rest consists of semiconductors and micro-controller units procured domestically and overseas, he said, adding that they don't use US chips. 'China doesn't have many weak links in this industry,' Wu said, as he demonstrated a human-sized robot destined for factory floors. He brushed off Trump's recent ban on US firms exporting semiconductor design software to China, saying his robots only require 'standard chips.' Other entrepreneurs emphasized self-reliance over the five-day trip with companies spanning bio-pharmaceuticals, humanoid robotics, AI and autos — all sectors pivotal to President Xi Jinping's manufacturing ambitions. Many in China's business sector have rallied around Xi's government in the face of Trump's tariffs and expanding US export curbs. Access to so many executives at once is typically difficult for foreign journalists in a country where media access is tightly regulated and company officials can be reluctant to speak freely for fear of reprisal. The trip exemplifies Beijing's desire to boost global investor confidence in its $19 trillion economy, which has been plagued by a property crash, deflation and now the US's highest tariffs in a century. Although DeepSeek's surprise AI breakthrough earlier this year proved China can innovate with a limited supply of chips, Beijing still faces difficulty catching the US while being denied access to Nvidia Corp.'s most advanced semiconductors. On the press tour, the Chinese government mostly presented firms that don't require top-tier chips such as AISpeech Co, which makes in-car AI-powered audio and video tools. For companies pioneering autonomous driving models or artificial general intelligence — systems that possess human-level cognitive abilities — accessing the latest chips is likely to be far more important. Tiptoeing around sensitive topics like state subsidies, eight tech executives who addressed reporters throughout the trip downplayed the impact of a yearslong US campaign to curtail China's technological ascent, emphasizing the country's increased self-reliance as government officials listened attentively on the sidelines. The executives spoke about how they are instead leveraging local advantages they consider disruption-proof, from a vast talent pool to supply chains walled off from the outside world. Yu Kai, AISpeech's co-founder and chief scientific officer, said the company has hired more than 700 people in research centers in Beijing and Suzhou, after starting off with fewer than 10 people developing an algorithm in Cambridge. It has set up a subsidiary in Shenzhen for its proximity to smart equipment manufacturing and also runs a unit in southern China to produce software for cars built by a local auto-making partner. Illustrating the deep concern in Beijing on US tech controls, Xi has restricted China's rare earth magnets in recent months in a bid to unwind some of Trump's recent export curbs. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said last week that the US and China signed a document to codify trade terms reached last month in Geneva, including a commitment from Beijing to deliver rare earths used in everything from wind turbines to jet planes. China's economic stamina was a common theme of the trip that began in Nanjing, a city in Jiangsu where researchers publish three times more scientific papers than those in New York. Ferried by two buses, dozens of journalists went to Suzhou and neighboring Zhejiang province by high-speed train, as the focus of discussions shifted more to the development of green technologies. There's debate in China over how it matters to access state-of-the-art chipmaking machines, and Nvidia's most-advanced AI accelerators. Ren Zhengfei, the founder of Huawei Technologies Co., recently said Chinese firms can adopt means such as chip stacking to get results similar to the most cutting-edge semiconductors. Beijing also blocks most AI services from US rivals, meaning domestic players don't have to compete against American leaders. China has to put on a display of 'confidence and window dressing' after years of tech curbs, according to Julian Mueller-Kaler, director of the Strategic Foresight Hub at the Stimson Center in Washington. High-end chips for AI data centers, for example, can be replaced with less capable models, at the expense of more energy usage, he said. 'The reason the Chinese didn't really retaliate that much after the chips restrictions a few years ago is Beijing actually likes them, to a certain degree,' he said. 'It forces Chinese companies to develop their own capabilities and reduce the reliance on American tech — a political goal Chinese decision-makers had for a long time but was hindered by economic realities.' Still, for all the savvy on display, few companies will emerge unscathed from deteriorating ties with the US. Some executives on the trip mentioned they were feeling the pain as Trump's America First policy seeks to limit US investment in China's high tech sectors. 'The impact on financing is significant,' said Zhang Jinhua, chairwoman of IASO Biotechnology Co., which makes a life-saving cancer treatment. 'I tell my team to stop asking when this winter ends. We must treat winter as the four seasons and adapt to prolonged uncertainty.'
The Hindu
23 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Japan auto trade ‘unfair', could buy more U.S. oil, Trump tells Fox News
Japan engages in "unfair" automobile trade with the United States and should increase its imports of U.S. energy resources and other goods to help reduce the U.S. trade deficit, President Donald Trump said in an interview broadcast on Sunday (June 29, 2025). Tokyo is scrambling to find ways to get Washington to exempt Japan's automakers from 25% automobile industry-specific tariffs, which are hurting the country's manufacturing sector. Japan also faces a 24% so-called reciprocal tariff rate starting on July 9 unless it can negotiate a deal. Also Read | Threatened by President Donald Trump's tariffs, Japan walks delicate tightrope between U.S. and China "They won't take our cars, and yet we take millions and millions of their cars into the United States. It's not fair, and I explained that to Japan, and they understand it," Mr. Trump said in an interview on Fox News' "Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo". "And we have a big deficit with Japan, and they understand that too. Now we have oil. They could take a lot of oil, they could take a lot of other things." The automobile sector accounted for about 28% of the total 21 trillion yen ($145 billion) worth of goods Japan exported to the U.S. last year.
Indian Express
27 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘BJP and JDU standing with Samajwad, RJD and SP are with Namazwad': BJP hits out at Tejashwi over anti-Waqf protest
Equating the Emergency and its disregard for the Constitution with the INDIA bloc's opposition to the Waqf Act, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) Monday attacked the Congress-RJD-Samajwadi Party combine in Bihar for standing with 'Namazwad' instead of remaining true to the ideological tenets of Socialism. Indicating that its focus was gradually shifting to the poll-bound Bihar, BJP national spokesperson Sudhanshu Trivedi said it was the BJP-led NDA alliance, which, with its ally the Janata Dal(United), was truly standing with the socialist principle of equal distribution of wealth. Trivedi's comments came a day after former Bihar deputy chief minister Tejashwi Yadav said the INDIA government in the state would relegate the Waqf Act to the dustbin after coming to power. Yadav was speaking at a protest organised against the Act by the Imarat-e-Shariah, a Muslim organisation, at Gandhi Maidan in Patna Sunday. 'We have recently commemorated 50 years of the blackest chapter in the history of the country's democracy, that the Emergency was. It is saddening that in the same Gandhi Maidan where during the Emergency lakhs had gathered to protect the Constitution, an INDI alliance leader, Tejashwi Yadav, said that we will throw a law which has been ratified by Parliament into the dustbin,' Trivedi said at a press conference. 'They will neither respect Parliament nor the judiciary when it comes to their need for a vote bank… It is clear that the INDI alliance is unable to get out of the 50-year-old mindset of throwing the Constitution in the dustbin,' he added. The BJP and the National Democratic Alliance, Trivedi said, were, on the other hand, committed to stopping any such attack on B R Ambedkar's Constitution or its provisions. He also questioned whether the provisions of the Waqf Act, which the INDIA bloc and its leaders were against, existed in Muslim countries such as Saudi Arabia, where Islam was born, or Indonesia which was the largest Islamic nation or others including Turkey, Pakistan, Bangladesh or even ISIS-dominated parts of Syria and Iraq. 'I want to ask the INDI alliance — are you thinking of establishing a bigger Shariah law in Bihar (than these countries)? Parties wearing the cloak of Socialism, such as the RJD and Samajwadi Party, I want to ask them, is equal distribution of wealth not what it says? What you are saying is that a handful of people should have control over 39 lakh acres of land,' he alleged. 'This mentality is against the principles of socialism… The socialism of the RJD and SP cannot be called that, but what is being called 'namazwad' on social media… Today it is we (the NDA) who are standing with the socialism of Bharat Ratna Karpoori Thakur, Jaiprakash Narayan and (Ram Manohar) Lohia by seeking that each poor gets their due… Today, it is the BJP and JDU who are standing with Samajwad while the RJD and SP are with Namazwad,' he added. It was through granting minority status to institutions, Trivedi alleged, that the INDIA bloc sought to snatch reservation from those belonging to the SC/ST/OBC communities 'through the backdoor.' 'We will not let these people succeed in their aim, the land that belongs to the people of the country will remain theirs…the country will function according to Ambedkar's Constitution and not the provisions of Shariah,' he added.
