Your Earbuds Are Gross. Here's How to Clean Them Properly
Have you looked closely at your earbuds lately? I did, and I was horrified at how gross they were. My trusty Apple AirPods had become so mucky and caked in ear wax I was genuinely embarrassed, and almost reluctant to put something so nasty back in my ears.
But are my yellowing Airpods actually a risk to my health? I asked general practitioner Dr. Jonathan Webster, from Doctify, who explained that while earwax is protective and part of the normal cleaning process of the ear, 'problems arise because long-term use of the earbuds prevents the wax from naturally migrating outwards—and so it builds up, trapping moisture, and making it prone to getting infected.'
Earbuds can also push earwax deeper into the ear canal, leading to blockages and discomfort. There's a reason your ENT surgeon likes the saying, "Do not put anything smaller than your elbow in your ear." Dr. Webster also explained that 'there has definitely been a rise in problems associated with earbud use, including hearing loss, tinnitus and infections.'
Hearing loss has little to do with my poor headphone cleanliness, but it is worth remembering that 'prolonged exposure to loud noise can damage the very delicate hair cells in the inner ear (cochlear), leading to permanent hearing loss. With the in-ear headphones there is a concentration of the sound directed into the ear, which may make it more likely to cause a problem.'
It's also worth noting that the UK's National Health Service advises that headphone users should not listen to music at higher than 60 percent of the maximum volume, and not for more than an hour at a time. Can Dirty Earbuds Really Cause Infections?
There's not been a huge amount of clinical research into headphone cleanliness, but according to an investigation by ABC 11 back in 2019, microbiologist Dr. Michael Taveirne, from North Carolina State University, swabbed several different headphones and sent the cultures in for testing. The results showed staphylococcus and pseudomonas, two types of bacteria that can cause infection under the right circumstances.
Similarly, according to a Florida based ENT specialist headphones house around 2,700 times more bacteria than the average cutting board, or six times more bacteria than the kitchen sink.That's pretty gross—but even then you're not guaranteed to get infected.
Bacteria isn't inherently problematic, but if your earbuds don't fit properly and you're always fiddling with them, there's a higher risk of you scraping or damaging the ear canal, which will create the perfect conditions for bacteria to thrive. Add in sweat from sports, and hours of daily wear, and you could be in for a nasty surprise. How to Clean Your Earbuds
So, your earbuds are disgusting—but fortunately it is surprisingly easy to restore their cleanliness safely with just a few household essentials. Disinfectant spray or wipes : Alcohol-free wipes and sprays won't harm rubber, plastic, silicone or acrylic, but will make quick work of your grubby buds, dissolving wax quickly.
: Alcohol-free wipes and sprays won't harm rubber, plastic, silicone or acrylic, but will make quick work of your grubby buds, dissolving wax quickly. Earbud cleaning tool : There are countless options available, each designed to get into the smallest spaces. But before you invest, try using an old toothbrush or Q-tip first.
: There are countless options available, each designed to get into the smallest spaces. But before you invest, try using an old toothbrush or Q-tip first. A microfibre cloth : If you have a lens cleaner with your sunglasses this will work fine, although specific tech cloths are available. The key is to use a fabric that won't scratch, as well as minimise static build-up.
: If you have a lens cleaner with your sunglasses this will work fine, although specific tech cloths are available. The key is to use a fabric that won't scratch, as well as minimise static build-up. Soapy water : A mild soap without added moisturizers will remove any exterior residue. Check the IP water resistance rating of your buds before you do anything other than a careful wipe.
: A mild soap without added moisturizers will remove any exterior residue. Check the IP water resistance rating of your buds before you do anything other than a careful wipe. Silica gel pack: Chuck one in your gym kit bag along with your headphones and it will help to absorb excess moisture.
Some people recommend using isopropyl alcohol (rubbing alcohol), but do so with caution as it can damage certain materials. If you do, always dilute it with water and use a small amount on a soft, lint-free cloth.
Apple has a comprehensive guide to AirPod maintenance that is equally relevant for other earbud brands. The main takeaway from their guide is that everything from soap to moisturizer, hair dye and acidic food can stain your earbuds, but a quick wipe with a disinfectant wipe should do the trick.
Similarly, Kimberley Bradshaw, from Hearing Aid UK suggests 'wiping down your earbuds and case with a microfibre cloth after each use [especially after sport] to remove dirt and sweat. Alcohol-free disinfectant wipes are great for earbuds, but avoid getting moisture on the internal parts.'
Use a cotton bud or old toothbrush: This ensures that you can get deep into every corner. With AirPods, for instance, the protective mesh over the ear tip gets blocked easily, but a quick brush should remove even the smallest particles. Having done this, I also noticed my headphones sounded better, too.
Soak your ear tips: Once you've removed any wax or dust, let the silicone tips soak in soapy water for half an hour. Dry thoroughly before reattaching them to the headphones.
Don't forget the cable: If you're a hipster or an audiophile you may still have wired headphones. You'd be surprised how often you touch the cable, so remember to give it a regular wipe to remove any bacteria buildup.
Clean the charging case: There's no point cleaning your buds if you're just going to plonk them back in a wax-smeared charging cradle. A once-over inside with a clean cotton bud will remove any debris and keep the charging points clear. The outside can be wiped down with soapy water, although avoid contact with the charging socket. Remember to remove any dust from the socket with the toothbrush or (carefully) with a bent paperclip if it's really impacted. Headphone Cleaning Kits
If you want to really go to town on your wax-off overhaul, here are our recommended all-in-one solutions to give your earbuds (and your ears) a treat. iFixit Precision Cleaning Kit : This includes 12 precision cleaning tips and contact cleaning liquid that's safe for electronics. A bargain at $10.
: This includes 12 precision cleaning tips and contact cleaning liquid that's safe for electronics. A bargain at $10. Belkin AirPods Cleaning Kit : A simple, Apple-approved cleaning kit consisting of brush, cleaning liquid, deionized water, microfibre and cloth.
: A simple, Apple-approved cleaning kit consisting of brush, cleaning liquid, deionized water, microfibre and cloth. Jlab headphone cleaning kit: Multipurpose one-piece tech cleaning kit with push-up pen nib for getting in the cracks, refillable cleaning spray bottle, soft sponge and brush—plus the outer case is covered in microfiber for polishing.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Disturbing research reveals alarming disparity in seafood served to tourists and locals: 'Contain potentially hazardous chemicals'
Disturbing research reveals alarming disparity in seafood served to tourists and locals: 'Contain potentially hazardous chemicals' In one Mexican fishing town, tourists dine on lobster while locals are left with microplastic-tainted fish. What's happening? In Puerto Morelos, fishers are risking their lives at sea to catch high-value seafood that ends up on affluent tourists' plates. Meanwhile, as Wired explains, they are left to feed their families with local fish caught near the town's beaches, which are contaminated with microplastics. These anglers also complain about pirates who fish offseason with "total impunity," resulting in a drop in lobster populations. This narrative is supported by a study, published in the journal Marine Biology, that documented these fishers' lives and analyzed contaminants in 424 locally caught fish. Scientists found that fish caught with a simple line and hook in shallow waters near the coast had significantly more plastics in their digestive systems than those caught in deeper waters, Wired noted. Why is this study concerning? This study adds to a mountain of research that has uncovered microplastics in food, water, air, and soil. For instance, one study on different animal and non-animal protein sources found microplastics in nearly all samples, including beef and tofu. While scientists are trying to better understand how microplastic exposure can affect us, these tiny plastic particles have already been tied to health problems such as cancer, dementia, kidney disease, and impaired blood flow in the brain. Still, more research needs to be done to understand the full impacts of microplastics, according to Omar Oslet Rivera-Garibay, lead author of the new study. "Microplastics contain potentially hazardous chemicals, such as plastic monomers and additives, and they absorb toxic contaminants from the environment, like harmful microbes and algae that may cause illnesses in humans," he told Wired. "However, there is still no solid evidence that the safety of seafood is compromised by microplastics." What's being done about microplastics? Microplastics are difficult — but not impossible — to remove from the environment. In fact, researchers in Australia have created an absorbent in the form of a powder additive that attracts microplastics and dissolved pollutants. Another group of scientists has found a way to remove them from farm soil by using a type of processed farm waste. You can help be part of the solution by stopping microplastics at their source. Microplastics most often enter the environment as larger plastics that degrade over time. Simple actions such as using a reusable water bottle, opting for a reusable shopping bag, and bringing your own to-go containers to restaurants can make a big difference. Do you think Americans use too much plastic? Absolutely Only in some states We're getting better We're doing fine Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Join our free newsletter for easy tips to save more and waste less, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Vox
4 days ago
- Vox
The testosterone theory of politics
is an essayist and critic based out of New York. He's written about the intersection of technology & culture for Wired, Polygon, Mother Jones, and others. Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who oversees the US Department of Health and Human Services, has supported the debunked ideas that vaccines cause autism and that organizations like the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have helped cover up the link. He's skeptical of the chemicals in our foods and skies, and worries that we've veered too far from all that is good and natural. Yet for all this, he admits to taking testosterone regularly as part of his 'anti-aging protocol from my doctor.' In April, in an interview with Fox News' Jesse Watters, the septuagenarian began to lament the testosterone levels of our youth. 'A teenager today, an American teenager, has less testosterone than a 68-year-old man,' he claimed. When Watters expressed disbelief, he doubled down, saying that testosterone levels have dropped as much as 50 percent from 'historic levels.' It's not clear exactly what 'historic levels' he was referencing— or, for that matter, what, if any, research he was citing. It's possible that he was misinterpreting the results of a 2007 study that analyzed data gathered from adult men from the 1980s onward and observed a 1 percent decline in average testosterone levels per year (meaning that a 68-year-old man in 1997 would have had 10 percent more testosterone than a 68-year-old man in 2007). The study, however, said nothing about how teenage or young adult testosterone compared. Still, the Fox News clip made its rounds online. On platforms like X, users reshared the video and parroted Kennedy's unsubstantiated claim, voicing suspicions of an intentional campaign to weaken the nation and sounding well-worn dog whistles. 'Mass poisoning mass murder mass replacement,' read one post responding to the video. Questions of scientific literacy aside, it was clear that Kennedy had struck a chord. Testosterone is having a moment. Within the sweaty halls of the gym bro internet, the trend of testmaxxing has gathered steam, with countless videos dedicated to how someone might 'naturally' (and not so naturally) increase their testosterone levels by, say, eating nearly a dozen eggs a day or simply getting on testosterone replacement therapy. The supplements hawked by alt-right podcasters like Alex Jones are often studded with possibilities of '[supporting] normal testosterone levels in men.' Famously, in 2016, Trump paraded his testosterone levels in his presidential bid against Hillary Clinton. And lest we think obsession with testosterone is restricted to the echo chambers of the manosphere, we should bear in mind that the physique idealized in mainstream Hollywood wouldn't be possible without artificially elevated levels of it, as Alex Abad-Santos previously observed for Vox. The same move that supposedly identified the chemical makeup of masculinity revealed just how unstable it was. We live in strange times, surrounded by positions that can seem like contradictions: Our HHS secretary doesn't believe in vaccines, but takes a hormone regularly; the Republican Party works tirelessly to limit access to the substance for people seeking gender-affirming care while simultaneously gutting the federal agency responsible for regulating testosterone in our farming industries (which employs it to increase the 'efficiency by which [the animals] convert the feed they eat into meat'). Meanwhile, evangelical leaders condemn trans people for existing, while also platforming doctors telling post-menopausal women to take testosterone so they might get back their curves. In many ways, testosterone sits at the crossroads of the tensions cutting through our culture today. By paying close attention to the history of the hormone and the often paradoxical roles it is made to play, we can better understand the forces shaping modern life. The road to testosterone Ask most people what testosterone is, and you'll probably hear that it's the 'male hormone.' In fact, type that very phrase into Google and all search roads will tend to lead back to T. The two are considered so interchangeably that they often function as synonyms: testosterone as the chemical essence of masculinity, masculinity as the product of testosterone. Online, this line of reasoning gets pushed to its limits. In one TikTok with more than half a million views as of this writing, a user boldly claims that 'Low testosterone is the cause of 99 percent of all male problems. When a transgender woman wants to feel like a man, she takes testosterone. Why? Because testosterone is what makes you feel like a man.' With testosterone comes all the characteristics and advantages ascribed to men: strength, mental acuity, competitiveness. Just last year, Elon Musk responded to a post on X featuring a 4Chan screenshot that argued that 'women and low T men' weren't fit for leadership because they would naturally defer to consensus beliefs, compared to 'high T alphamales' who were capable of objectively assessing a situation. 'Interesting observation,' replied the world's richest man. Despite the ubiquity and weight testosterone holds today, it's a relatively new entrant in our understanding of the body. In Testo Junkie, Spanish philosopher Paul B. Preciado explains that for most of Western history before the 17th century, sex was understood by a logic of similarity and inferiority. 'Female sexual anatomy was set up as a weak, internalized, degenerate variation of the only sex that possessed an ontological existence, the male,' he writes, citing the scholar Thomas Laqueur. You might call this the Eve-as-Adam's-rib model of sex. Women weren't seen as a distinct category, separate from men in their own right, as much as they were considered a 'worse' version of men. Then, at the dawn of the modern era, a new approach began to emerge. We started to create discrete categories that we might fit the world into, purifying it of ambiguity and hybridity: nature versus culture, animal versus human. Sex was no exception, and an oppositional, binary understanding of man versus woman emerged. Women and men were placed in entirely separate categories, overturning the previous understanding of women as imperfect men. Sex assignment became hyper-focused not so much on the complex web of social roles, anatomy, temperament, and reproductive capacities that organized identity previously, but on easily observable, 'mechanical' features like the shape and size of one's genitals. As Laqueur points out, organs like the ovary, which didn't even have a 'name of its own' for millennia (since it was often referred to by the same word used for male testes), became no less than a 'synecdoche for woman' during this time. These categories were 'not only natural but even transcendental,' in Preciado's words. Or as Ben Shapiro likes to phrase it, 'facts don't care about your feelings.' Today, you can still see this system hard at work whenever a troll uses a hashtag like #WeCanAlwaysTell to discredit someone's gender identity. Of course, the supposed facts didn't always line up quite so neatly with reality itself — as was the case with intersex people who challenge this paradigm — but doctors conveniently solved for this by creating sub-classifications like 'female pseudo-hermaphrodites' that still preserved the 'truly male,' 'truly female' binary. Testosterone didn't properly enter the scene until 1935. That was the year that three independent teams of researchers, each backed by a different pharmaceutical company, identified and synthesized it. There was only one catch: The long-awaited 'male hormone' didn't fit quite so neatly into the binaries that organized our understanding of the body. Research uncovered that hormones weren't exclusive to one sex. Everyone had testosterone, even if average rates tended to differ between traditional sex lines. It turns out that before menopause, women produce three times as much testosterone as estrogen. In fact, contrary to popular opinion, testosterone isn't the 'opposite' of estrogen, it's the precursor — men and women convert testosterone into estrogen using the enzyme aromatase, and higher levels of testosterone in men can actually result in higher levels of estrogen. The same move that supposedly identified the chemical makeup of masculinity revealed just how unstable it was. It was born as a paradox, the double-edged essence of manhood that never was. Maximizing masculinity These tensions haunt testosterone today. On the one hand, we still largely think about sex in terms of binaries, and of testosterone as the chemical distillate of a natural and inviolable maleness. At the very extremes, testosterone has been used to violently enforce old hierarchies. In the '40s, Nazis transplanted testosterone glands into gay men's penises in a brutal attempt at conversion therapy. On the other hand, it doesn't take much to sense the unease that the fluidity of testosterone has opened us up to. If maleness or femaleness were once something you unassailably possessed at birth based on unchanging physical markers and roles, then the presence of testosterone across sexes — alongside the development of other chemical interventions that disrupted traditionally sexed functions like the Pill — contributed to the growing awareness that these categories aren't given as much as they are produced. Critically, these scientific developments happened against the backdrop of broader social movements that sought to challenge the core ideas underpinning patriarchy. As second-wave feminists critiqued the idea of a 'natural' order where men ruled, and women were integrated into more spheres of economic and social life, traditional notions of masculinity began to lose their grip. Testosterone lives between these two slowly colliding cultural tectonic plates. The desire to compare T-levels — whether it's between 'low T men' and 'high T alphamales' or teenagers and 68-year-olds — ultimately boils down to the desire to lament the state of masculinity today while simultaneously legitimizing the reality of 'maleness' by pinning it on some objective and measurable metric. In short, testosterone has become a way that men can not only ground their masculinity in a moment when our ideas of gender are more fluid than ever, but even quantify it — all while borrowing the veneer of scientific legitimacy to feel assured in their manliness. It's this tension that lets conservative mouthpieces insist on the 'immutable biological reality of sex,' as one Trumpian executive order phrased it, while simultaneously making a profit by selling supplements that claim to enhance testosterone levels (and by extension your manhood). This doublethink is on full display whenever a product like Force Factor's Test X180 Legend advertises itself with lines like, 'Let's be honest: being a man is relatively straightforward. … Biologically, to achieve this goal you want more testosterone and less estrogen – maximizing your masculinity.' Major pharmaceutical companies are competing over the growing testosterone replacement therapy market, which is set to break $2 billion in the next few years. In the same ways that marketers for Listerine generated demand for mouthwash in the 1920s by popularizing 'halitosis' (or bad breath) as a medical and treatable condition, testosterone has become positioned as a salve for the supposed crisis of masculinity today. Masculinity is now both something straightforwardly given at birth, but also always needing to be maximized through consumable supplements, a commodified 'biotech industrial artifact' as Preciado provocatively calls it. Of course, this commodity isn't available to everyone. The desire to preserve traditional boundaries also helps us understand the restrictions that have been historically applied to the hormone. One of the reasons that testosterone therapy failed to gain larger traction in the 1940s after its synthesis was that physicians were worried about its effects on women, including vocal change and hair growth. Even today, although the Food and Drug Administration has approved 31 different testosterone products for men (not to mention the many products it has approved for livestock), it hasn't greenlit a single product for women out of this fear, despite studies that indicate that testosterone could offer women a range of benefits from breast protection to osteoporosis prevention. The hormone's male bias has impeded the kind of expansive testing needed for regulatory approval and created a host of misconceptions around its effects on women, even as interest in testosterone for women appears to have grown organically in recent years. It's not hard to imagine the commercial motivation to keep it this way either. Though women might represent an untapped market, offering testosterone to women could also result in what advertisers call 'brand dilution,' or overextending a product to the point of undermining its value. Natural and unnatural In his conversation with Jesse Watters, Kennedy attributed the decline in teenage testosterone levels to the quality of food being consumed today. 'The food our kids are eating today is not really food, it's food-like substances,' he claims. He's not wrong. A recent study found that over half the calories consumed at home in the US come from ultra-processed foods, or 'industrial formulations containing no or minimal whole foods and made entirely or mostly from substances extracted from foods.' Like any medicine, it is both a poison and a cure depending on how it's used. Our renewed interest in testosterone isn't just about the erosion of borders between gender classifications, but about the slowly crumbling walls separating us from the world we inhabit. Around a century ago, hormones like testosterone upended our ideas about how the body communicates with itself — allowing us to see how organs could speak to each other using our bloodstreams. Now, as we discover that the world has worked its way into our bloodstreams in the form of microplastics and the 'food-like substances' we ingest daily, it makes sense that this hormone would be caught up in these broader anxieties. As one user commented in the r/Testosterone subreddit, 'hormones given to animals we eat, pollutants in the air and water, blue light from devices etc all contribute to lowering of hormone production.' High testosterone is seen as a sign of a healthy and self-regulating body, and concerns about declining hormone levels stand in for a broader concern that the natural balance in us has been disrupted by our environment. At the heart of our fascinations and fears lies the growing awareness that our bodies are far more malleable and open to the world than we once thought, that our identities are far more unstable and fluid than assumed. What remains to be seen is where we'll go from here. There are those that want to lean into this radically chemicalized body. Sports leagues like the Enhanced Games, endorsed by transhumanist types like Bryan Johnson, are experimenting with steroids and testosterone regimens in an attempt to 'redefine superhumanity.' Meanwhile, Kennedy's use of testosterone despite his vaccine skepticism comes from the desire to preserve some delineation between what is natural and synthetic — to let in what is real (testosterone) and do away with what is artificial (vaccines). Many like Kennedy are unsettled by the idea that the borders of our bodies and identities are highly permeable, and taking testosterone is a way to try to get the body back to a 'natural' state, before it was disrupted by the unnatural forces outside of us. This desire to use testosterone to protect the 'natural' also runs through evangelicals who see it as a way for women to retain their femininity as they get older, as well as industrial farmers who use it to reinforce a natural order in which animals are treated chiefly as meat for human consumption.
New York Post
5 days ago
- New York Post
90k shoppers bought this electric toothbrush last month –– get yours for 20% off
New York Post may be compensated and/or receive an affiliate commission if you click or buy through our links. Featured pricing is subject to change. It's only natural. As you get older, your teeth get more exposure to the environment. You've simply smiled more than an eight-year-old has. Or at least, we hope. You've also eaten more food, drunk more coffee, have maybe had a glass of wine or two over the years. Such is life. Time goes on, and your teeth yellow. As they say in France, 'c'est la vie,' which roughly translates (we believe) to something along the lines of 'que sera sera.' Why so unbothered, you may ask? Because there are tons of solutions on the market to get those teeth back to mint condition. And better yet, some of those solutions are on sale. Enter: Aquasonic Black Series Ultra Whitening Toothbrush, available for 20% off this week on Amazon. Join 90k other Amazon shoppers (yes, you read that right), in purchasing this Aquasonic Toothbrush, and save 20% on cleaning up your pearly whites, for less! Amazon The Aquasonic Black Series Ultra Whitening Toothbrush delivers 40,000 vibrations per minute for deep cleaning and staining reduction. With four modes (Clean, Gentle, Whitening, Massage), a smart 30‑second quadrant timer, wireless charging, and up to four weeks of battery life, it comes bundled with eight DuPont brush heads and a travel case. ADA‑accepted for plaque removal. Best of all? It's available for 20% off for a limited time. This article was written by P.J. McCormick, New York Post Commerce Deals Writer/Reporter. P.J. is an expert deal-finder, sifting through endless brands and retailers to deliver only the best savings opportunities on truly worthwhile products. P.J. finds Prime Day-worthy deals all year long on some of our favorite products we've tested and our readers' beloved best-sellers, from Wayfair furniture sales to the lowest prices on Apple AirPods. P.J. has been scouring sales for Post Wanted shoppers since 2022 and previously held positions at Rolling Stone, Pitchfork and Hyperallergic. Please note that deals can expire, and all prices are subject to change. Looking for a headline-worthy haul? Keep shopping Post Wanted.
