logo
UK move to lower voting age to 16 unlikely to be in place for Northern Irish elections

UK move to lower voting age to 16 unlikely to be in place for Northern Irish elections

Irish Times4 days ago
Politicians in
Northern Ireland
have broadly welcomed plans to lower the UK voting age to 16, with
Stormont
First Minister
Michelle O'Neill
hailing the change a 'step forward for democracy'.
Confirming the move on Thursday, the
UK government
said it expected the new age limit to be introduced before the next general election, in 2029.
Sinn Féin
, the
SDLP
and
Alliance
have all called for the law-change to be extended to the North before the next Assembly and council elections in two years' time.
However, the UK Electoral Commission said it is 'unlikely' to be implemented in time for Northern Ireland's local polls.
READ MORE
The
Ulster Unionist Party
(UUP) also welcomed the plan – which was promised in the UK Labour Party's election manifesto – but said it should be accompanied by changes in the education system to include 'political education' on how the voting system works.
The
Democratic Unionist Party
(DUP), is opposed to the decision, arguing it is 'not clear how the government can justifiably set the voting age at 16 rather than the current age threshold'.
'The prime minister's rationale for this move is essentially a 'no taxation without representation' argument,' DUP MLA Brian Kingston said. 'It is high time the government applied the same logic to Northern Ireland, where taxpayers here have no say on laws imposed by the European Union.'
People aged 16 or over can already vote in Holyrood, Senedd and local government elections in Wales and Scotland, but not in UK parliamentary elections.
For all elections in Northern Ireland, people must be 18 to vote.
[
Should 16 year olds have the right to vote? A political scientist and a youth leader debate
Opens in new window
]
Asked to comment on the likelihood of 16- and 17-year-olds being able to vote in the 2027 Assembly election, a spokeswoman for the UK Electoral Commission said: 'The change is expected to be in place for the 2029 Westminster elections, but it's unlikely to be implemented ahead of the 2027 Assembly and local council elections in Northern Ireland.'
In a post on X, Ms O'Neill said she welcomed the news and that it was a 'step forward for democracy and will enable young people to have a say in their future'.
'I'll now be contacting the British prime minister, Keir Starmer, urging him to ensure that the right to vote at 16 applies to the 2027 Assembly and council elections in the North,' she wrote.
SDLP leader Claire Hanna said voting rights should be changed at all levels.
'There are many young people in Northern Ireland actively engaged in politics and I know that for generations there has been frustration that they could not play a full role in the democratic process,' she said. 'The SDLP believes that these voting rights must stretch beyond general elections and be extended to voting for the Assembly and local councils.
'We will continue to make the case for that at Westminster and push for change to secure voting at all levels for 16- and 17-year-olds.'
Alliance North Antrim MLA Sian Mulholland said her party had long argued that the upper age limit for voting is a 'major democratic deficit' in Northern Ireland.
'Time is of the essence and we need urgent clarification that it will be a priority to see this implemented in time for the next NI Assembly election in 2027. We cannot afford any further delay.'
UK government ministers will bring forward the change through a new Elections Bill, which also includes plans to change forms of voter ID and tightening rules on political donations to protect against foreign interference.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Irish Times view on the Japanese election: heading for a leadership battle
The Irish Times view on the Japanese election: heading for a leadership battle

Irish Times

timean hour ago

  • Irish Times

The Irish Times view on the Japanese election: heading for a leadership battle

Japan's Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba has apologised to his Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) but defied tradition by refusing to resign following the party's loss for the first time in 70 years of control of both houses of parliament. For the time being Ishiba is being allowed to continue in office to preside over crucial talks with Donald Trump over 25 per cent tariffs threatened from August 1st. Few doubt the LDP, which remains the largest party in the Upper House, will then face a sharp leadership battle with the likely prospect of a winner emerging from the party's right to try to claw back the voters who defected to small hardline parties on Sunday. The weekend's Upper House election saw two-thirds of the 124 seats up for grabs going to opposition parties. The LDP, in power for all but a handful of years since 1955, lost the majority it held with coalition partner Komeito. It had already lost control of the more powerful Lower House in October. Populist parties of the right made major gains, most notably, Sanseito, a new party pushing Maga-like anti-immigrant and tax cutting politics. It warns of a 'silent invasion' of foreigners and promises to put 'Japanese First'. It ended up with 14 of the 248 seats. Striking gains were also made by the Democratic Party for the People, up from nine seats to 22. READ MORE Both parties won over younger voters with appeals to strengthen the military – some Sanseito candidates calling for Japan to build nuclear weapons – and cut a consumption tax that has paid for pensions to support Japan's growing retired population. Inflation, particularly the soaring price of rice, was a central grievance. The vote has left Ishiba's administration vulnerable to no-confidence motions although the upper house has less power in this regard. But the LDP's insistence on fiscal restraint, and a very jittery government bond market worried about Japan's ability to refinance its huge debt, make any concessions to opposition parties to pass policy all the more difficult.

Sinn Féin wants 111 changes to Bill reforming ‘triple lock' Irish troop deployment
Sinn Féin wants 111 changes to Bill reforming ‘triple lock' Irish troop deployment

Irish Times

time2 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Sinn Féin wants 111 changes to Bill reforming ‘triple lock' Irish troop deployment

The Government is set to square off with Opposition parties over proposed amendments to its plan to reform the 'triple lock' mechanism for deploying Irish troops overseas. Public sessions were held by the Oireachtas defence committee as part of pre-legislative scrutiny of the Government's plan to remove the need for United Nations Security Council approval of Irish peacekeeping missions with more than 12 troops. The Government contends countries like Russia have the power, under the UN Security Council motion requirement, to veto Ireland's participation in missions. The defence committee must publish a report on the proposal before it is sent back to the Dáil and Seanad for further consideration. A draft report has been circulated and amendments have been proposed by Opposition parties. READ MORE Sinn Féin has submitted 111 amendments to the Bill. The committee is due to meet in private this week to discuss its recommendations and conclusions, which have not yet been agreed. While the committee is chaired by Sinn Féin's Rose Conway-Walsh , Government TDs and Senators have a majority of the membership. Sinn Féin's defence spokesman, Cork South Central TD Donnchadh Ó Laoghaire , is seeking to insert a recommendation that the Government must drop the sectionthat would remove the UN mandate requirement. Currently the UN mandate, Government approval and a Dáil vote make up a triumvirate of pre-deployment sanctions that have come to be known as the triple lock. [ The triple lock - a guardrail of neutrality, or an abandonment of sovereignty? Opens in new window ] The Bill, as proposed by Government, envisages just Government and Dáil approval would be needed in future. The vast majority of the evidence heard by the committee during the pre-legislative scrutiny stage relates to this aspect, which is by far the most contentious part of the Bill. The draft report outlines that the committee heard Ireland 'appears to be in a unique position globally' in explicitly requiring a UN mandate for the overseas deployment of military personnel as part of an international force. It outlines that some witnesses and contributors - and a majority of public submissions received - 'were clear in their view that neutrality is a key consideration which is central to the proposed legislation'. Sinn Féin is further arguing that the proposed legislation should be modified to recommend the convening of a citizens assembly to consider potential wording for a constitutional provision outlining and protecting Ireland's neutrality. The party wants a referendum to be held thereafter to 'definitively enshrine neutrality in the Constitution'. The Labour Party has also sought changes, including in connection with its concern that each overseas mission could end up being litigated to ensure it is consistent with UN Charter principles. It wants to an amendment calling on the Minister for Defence to publish details about how the new arrangements will work. It also wants safeguards against the dispatch of the Defence Forces in circumstances where it could give rise to liability for the crime of aggression before the International Criminal Court. The party also wants a change to the Bill to the effect that the triple lock would only be lifted if a proposed mission was denied UN Security Council approval due to a veto from a permanent member. It is asking for specific circumstances to be set out in the legislation where troops might be deployed under the new system and seeks for troops to remain under Irish command.

Giant US-UK armada takes to water in ‘Talisman Sabre' show of force with aircraft carriers shrouded by fighter jet fleet
Giant US-UK armada takes to water in ‘Talisman Sabre' show of force with aircraft carriers shrouded by fighter jet fleet

The Irish Sun

time4 hours ago

  • The Irish Sun

Giant US-UK armada takes to water in ‘Talisman Sabre' show of force with aircraft carriers shrouded by fighter jet fleet

AN IMPOSING US-UK armada has taken to the water as part of the allied Exercise Talisman Sabre war drills. The impervious aircraft carriers and fighter jet fleets are taking part in live-fire exercises in Australia which include 35,000 military personnel from 19 different nations. Advertisement 9 An imposing US-UK armada has taken to the water as part of the allied Exercise Talisman Sabre war drills Credit: SWNS 9 Aircraft carriers USS George Washington (top) and HMS Prince of Wales (bottom) sail in formation with US and UK warships Credit: SWNS 9 35,000 military personnel from 19 different nations took part in the Australian drills Credit: SWNS Australia marked the historic event, the largest war drills in their history , by firing missiles from its M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS). The HIMARS launchers were recently bought from the US and were unleashed today at the Shoalwater Bay Training Area in Queensland. Elsewhere, a striking display of allied naval might saw the UK and US deploy their USS George Washington and the HMS Prince of Wales aircraft carriers. The UK - who sent over 3,000 troops - also used vessels such as HMS Richmond, HMS Dauntless, RFA Fort Victoria, and RFA Argus for the exercise. Advertisement read more in war drills The expansive multinational flotilla was shadowed by warships from Canada, Norway, and Australia as well. The huge fleet were paired up with air operations and joint ground manoeuvres which took place across Australia's Northern Territory and Queensland. Brigadier Nick Wilson told reporters after the drills: "Today was the first time the Australian Army has live-fired our long-range, multi-domain platforms being the HIMARS, so it is a remarkable day." British Defence Secretary John Healey added: "The historic bonds between Britain and Australia run deep, and through AUKUS and exercises like Talisman Sabre we are strengthening these ties for the challenges of tomorrow. Advertisement Most read in The US Sun "Our commitment to the Indo-Pacific is unwavering, as this huge military exercise demonstrates. "We will continue to work alongside our closest allies to maintain the security and stability that underpins global prosperity." Britain pledges more support to Ukraine as NATO warships prepare for largest drills since Cold War Talisman Sabre has been a This year saw dozens of other countries take part such as Canada , Fiji, France, Germany, India, Japan, the Netherlands and South Korea among others. Advertisement The drills stretched all the way from Darwin to Brisbane as the allies imposed themselves across the Indo-Pacific. The waters are often closely monitored by Chinese surveillance ships. dating back to 2017. Defense Industry Minister Pat Conroy said he expects China to monitor them again this time around. Advertisement Conroy said: "We'll adjust accordingly. We'll obviously observe their activities and monitor their presence around Australia. "But we'll also adjust how we conduct those exercises." 9 U.S. Navy aircraft and the George Washington Carrier participate in the dual carrier operations Credit: SWNS 9 A US F18 launches from US Aircraft Carrier, USS George Washington Credit: SWNS Advertisement 9 An Australian soldier from the 1st Military Police Battalion is seen participating in Exercise Talisman Sabre 2025 Credit: Getty It all comes as Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese began a six-day visit to China of his own. He is expected to hold a fourth face-to-face meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping on Tuesday. Albanese said despite Chinese surveillance being a concern, he would not raise it as an issue amid the Talisman Sabre operations. Advertisement China has been routinely trying to scare the West through their own military drills in recent weeks. Earlier this month, dramatic footage captured a fleet of Chinese tank boats And China's new giant These developments have raised fears that a Chinese invasion on Taiwan could be imminent. Advertisement Bringing the self-governed province back in line with mainland China has been a goal of president The self-governing nation has been protected by the firepower of ally America for decades. The latest Talisman Sabre drills will give Taiwan further hope of protection from not only the US but also the entire allied fleet. The exercises are also aimed towards striking fear into other Western allies such as North Korea and Russia. Advertisement Russia 's relationship with Europe has drastically worsened as Vladimir Putin continues to defy all warnings and continue with his deadly invasion of Ukraine. But even Vlad, with all his firepower and huge army, faces a serious battle against a unified West due to his lack of aircraft carriers. Russia only boasts a Ukraine and has instead been languishing in the grim Arctic port of Murmansk, in northwestern Russia. Advertisement 9 A terrifying fleet of Chinese tank boats seen charging through the sea near to Taiwan earlier this month Credit: X 9 Vladimir Putin's only rustbucket aircraft carrier is poised to be scrapped after seven years of failed repairs - leaving the despot vulnerable Credit: EPA 9

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store