Neuralink device helps Monkey see something that's not there
Elon Musk's Neuralink Corp. used a brain implant to enable a monkey to see something that wasn't physically there, according to an engineer, as it moves toward its goal of helping blind people see.
The device, called Blindsight, stimulated areas of a monkey's brain associated with vision, Neuralink engineer Joseph O'Doherty said Friday at a conference. At least two-thirds of the time, the monkey moved its eyes toward something researchers were trying to trick the brain into visualizing.
The results were the first Neuralink has publicized about tests of Blindsight, a brain chip that mimics the function of an eye. This is a closely watched frontier for brain device development, a scientific field that's testing the boundaries of how technology can be used to potentially treat intractable conditions.
As with all animal studies, it's an open question how the results would apply to humans. The device isn't approved for human use in the US.
The short-term goal of Blindsight is to help people see, and the long-term goal is to facilitate superhuman vision — like in infrared — Musk has said. The company has been testing Blindsight in monkeys for the past few years and is hoping to test it in a human this year, the billionaire said in March.
On the sidelines of the conference, O'Doherty declined to comment further about Neuralink's work.
Neuralink is also implanting devices in people who are paralyzed that allow them to communicate directly with computers, one of several companies in the growing technological field.
Five people have received Neuralink implants so far, Musk has said. Three were implanted in 2024 and two in 2025, according to O'Doherty's presentation at the Neural Interfaces conference. In some cases, patients are using their Neuralink device for about 60 hours a week.
In the future, brain devices using similar technology could allow paralyzed people to move or walk, Musk has said. O'Doherty co-authored a poster with academic researchers, which was presented at the conference, describing an experiment that used the Neuralink implant to stimulate the spinal cord of a monkey, causing its muscles to move. Other researchers have been working on spinal cord stimulation to restore muscle movement for several years.
Musk's medical aspirations are a stepping stone toward the goal of increasing the speed of human communication for everyone, allowing people to 'mitigate the risk of digital super-intelligence,' Musk said in 2024. He's also building artificial intelligence through his company xAI Corp.
Eventually, the company wants the Blindsight system to include a pair of glasses to help make the chip work, O'Doherty said in his talk.
Testing in monkeys has advantages. The visual cortex in a monkey is closer to the surface of the brain than in a human, making it easier to access, O'Doherty said in the presentation. Neuralink could use its surgical robot to insert its implant into the deeper regions in a person's brain, he added.
Swetlitz writes for Bloomberg
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
2 hours ago
- Gizmodo
Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg Want to Control AI by Crushing ChatGPT's Father
The AI race was never going to be polite. But what's unfolding in Silicon Valley in 2025 looks more like Succession meets Black Mirror than a traditional tech rivalry. Forget code. This is about power, control, and a rapidly closing window to dominate the most transformative technology in history. At the center of the fight: three men, three worldviews, and one finish line. Let's break down the combatants. This one is personal and litigious. Musk and Altman co-founded OpenAI in 2015 as a nonprofit devoted to building safe, open-source artificial intelligence. But the bromance collapsed when Musk attempted to take control of the company in 2018 and failed. He left bitterly and has been attacking OpenAI ever since. In 2023, Musk sued OpenAI and Altman, accusing them of betraying the nonprofit's mission by aligning too closely with Microsoft and putting profit over safety. The lawsuit is still grinding through federal court. Among other things, it claims OpenAI's flagship product, ChatGPT, is a closed-source commercial weapon funded by Big Tech and wrapped in secrecy. Altman denies the betrayal and OpenAI has countersued. The legal drama is thick and both sides have subpoenaed internal documents. Meanwhile, Musk's xAI is developing its own ChatGPT rival and launching it on X (formerly Twitter). This is a very public and very expensive fight over who gets to define ethical AI. Stakes: Both want to build AGI, or Artificial General Intelligence, a system smarter than humans. Musk wants to do it his way with radical transparency and no corporate strings. Altman wants to do it with Microsoft money, oversight, and a mission-first approach. The future of AI safety and perhaps civilization is the prize. They were supposed to be on the same team. Microsoft has invested over $13 billion in OpenAI and uses ChatGPT to power Bing, Copilot, and Azure. But now the two companies are increasingly at odds and headed for a potential breach. Microsoft has quietly built its own internal AI team called MAI, which is developing foundation models independent of OpenAI. The company wants more control, fewer surprises, and possibly a total replacement. Altman, meanwhile, has turned OpenAI into a hybrid nonprofit-corporate juggernaut. He's building custom chips, launching an AI app store, and moving fast into hardware and enterprise services. Microsoft sees this as direct competition. It's a fraying marriage held together by mutual benefit, but barely. Stakes: A real split could upend the entire enterprise AI ecosystem and open the door for rivals like Google, Meta, or Anthropic to swoop in. This relationship could end with another courtroom clash. It's the quietest war but maybe the most cutthroat. Meta has made AI its top priority for 2025 and Zuckerberg is going straight for Altman's team. In recent months, Meta has offered $100 million and more in signing bonuses to OpenAI researchers in a bid to poach top talent, Altman says. So far, most have stayed loyal to Altman. But the scale of the offers has shocked the Valley. In a podcast with his brother, Altman didn't mince words: 'They started making these, like, giant offers to a lot of people on our team, you know, like $100 million signing bonuses,' Altman said, adding:'It is crazy.' He accused Meta of 'just trying to copy OpenAI, down to the UI mistakes.' Zuckerberg's strategy is familiar. Outspend, out-recruit, outlast. Meta's AI tools are still basic compared to ChatGPT, but with enough hires and acquisitions (like rumored talks with voice-AI startup PlayAI), Meta hopes to leapfrog the field. Stakes: Zuckerberg is fighting not just for dominance in AI, but for relevance. If Meta fails to catch up, it could be left behind in a world where AI, not social media, is the next major computing platform. New episode of Uncapped with @sama. Enjoy 🤗 — Jack Altman (@jaltma) June 17, 2025The AI race has become a war of personalities. Altman, the techno-missionary. Musk, the chaos capitalist. Zuckerberg, the empire builder. Each believes they are the only one who can lead humanity into the next era of intelligence. What's unfolding is a battle for the infrastructure of the 21st century: who owns the models, who trains the machines, and who gets to decide what AI thinks. And if the lawsuits, subpoenas, and poaching wars are any indication, they're willing to burn billions to win.
Engadget
3 hours ago
- Engadget
Tesla shows off its first fully autonomous delivery to convince us its self-driving cars work
Tesla's robotaxi service may have had some early hitches, but the company said it just successfully delivered a car autonomously. Using the same robotaxi technology, Tesla showed the delivery process of a Model Y from its Gigafactory Texas in Austin to a customer with a roughly 30-minute journey as seen in a video posted on X. Unlike the robotaxi service launch last week, the automated delivery had no safety monitor, nor anyone behind the wheel. Tesla's CEO, Elon Musk, also posted on X that the delivery didn't have any "remote operators in control at any point." World's first autonomous delivery of a car! This Tesla drove itself from Gigafactory Texas to its new owner's home ~30min away — crossing parking lots, highways & the city to reach its new owner — Tesla (@Tesla) June 28, 2025 The trip covers navigating through everything from the Gigafactory Texas' parking lot to city streets, even managing to handle the highway without any incidents. This delivery comes just after Tesla's rollout of its robotaxi service in Austin, with Musk promising that the "first Tesla that drives itself from factory end of line all the way to a customer house is June 28." While impressive, it's not the first time that a fully autonomous car has used the highway, since Waymo started allowing its employees access to self-driving rides on Los Angeles freeways earlier this year. Tesla's competing robotaxi service hasn't been without its hiccups. As seen in a 10-mile trip posted on X, the Model Y using the robotaxi software struggled to make a left turn and corrected its course by entering the other side of the road briefly. In another launch day video, the robotaxi was seen braking hard twice after encountering police cars with their lights on, even though none of the emergency vehicles were on the road. The robotaxi pilot program has caught the attention of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, which said that it reached out to Tesla for more information about these incidents. On top of the robotaxi concerns, recent demonstrations showed Tesla's Full Self-Driving software failing to stop for a school bus' flashing lights and stop signs, as well as for kid-sized mannequins who dart into the road.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Doge employee ‘Big Balls' has resigned, says White House official
Edward Coristine, whose nickname 'Big Balls' made him one of the most publicized members of Elon Musk's so-called 'department of government efficiency' (Doge), resigned from the US government this week. The 19-year-old technologist had worked at multiple agencies, most recently the Social Security Administration. Coristine's youth and lack of professional experience were emblematic of a class of Doge staffers tasked with dismantling the federal government under orders from Musk, their de facto leader. The White House official gave no further details on the move and Coristine did not immediately return an email seeking comment. The future of Doge and employees like Coristine has been an open question since Musk left the White House last month. Musk's very public online feud with Donald Trump, which has now settled into an apparent detente, intensified uncertainty over whether controversial Doge staffers would remain part of the administration. Coristine became a source of public fascination and mockery earlier this year after Wired identified him as one of Doge's young engineers and revealed he had gone by the online handle 'Big Balls'. Musk and his supporters embraced Coristine, with the Tesla CEO bringing him on Fox News last month and promoting 'Big Balls' memes on X. Related: The chaos Elon Musk and Doge are leaving behind in Washington Despite only briefly working at Musk's brain implant company Neuralink before joining Doge, Coristine parachuted into major government agencies. Last month, Reuters reported that Coristine was one of two Doge associates promoting the use of AI across the federal bureaucracy. Coristine, like other Doge members, was followed by a shady online history. Media outlets, including Wired which first reported his departure, revealed that Coristine had been active in a chatroom popular with hackers and previously had been fired from a job following an alleged data leak. In March, Reuters reported that Coristine had provided tech support to a cybercrime gang that had bragged about trafficking in stolen data and harassing an FBI agent. Coristine was also fired from a previous internship at a cybersecurity firm for leaking secrets, Bloomberg reported. Among the agencies that Coristine worked at were Health and Human Services, the General Services Administration, the Social Security Administration, and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Agency. Doge's cuts during this time gutted public services and targeted tens of thousands of government workers with terminations. Although the exact reasons behind Coristine's departure are unclear, several other Doge staffers have also left since Musk stepped away from his government role. One of Musk's top lieutenants, Steve Davis, left Doge last month after running its day to day operations. Investor Brad Smith, who oversaw cuts at Health and Human Services, also departed. A large number of Doge staffers remain spread throughout various agencies, however, and are continuing to implement cuts. Russell Vought, a top White House budget official and key player in the far-right Project 2025 policy manifesto, has taken on an increased role pushing for Doge's mission since Musk contributed reporting
