Historic vote: U. K. Parliament decriminalises abortions in England and Wales
Image: REUTERS/Caitlin Ochs
British lawmakers made a historic decision on Tuesday by voting to decriminalise the termination of pregnancies after 24 weeks in England and Wales.
This landmark amendment, which passed with a vote of 379 to 137, will prevent the criminal prosecution of individuals suspected of having unlawful abortions, marking a significant shift in abortion laws that have remained largely unchanged for decades.
Abortion in England and Wales is illegal under the 1861 Offences against the Person Act - a Victorian-era law that makes abortion a criminal offense that carries a maximum sentence of life imprisonment. That bill was written at a time when women could not vote, own property after marriage, or access higher education.
Tuesday's vote follows an increase in recent years in investigations and prosecutions of people suspected of having illegal abortions.
Many people, including residents, are surprised that abortion is technically illegal in England and Wales, given the widespread access to the procedure.The amended 1967 Abortion Act carved out exceptions, allowing abortions at up to 24 weeks if approved by two doctors. But outside of specific criteria, it is still a criminal offense.
Tuesday's vote will remove the criminal penalties for having an abortion, even outside of these parameters.
Tonia Antoniazzi, the Labour lawmaker who championed the amendment, said it was a 'once in a generation' opportunity and the 'right change at the right time.' Antoniazzi also insisted that the rules under the 1967 act for how abortion services are provided will not change.
Until recent years, prosecutions were almost unheard of. Campaigners report that approximately 100 women have been investigated for suspected unlawful abortions over the past decade.
Among them was Nicola Packer, 45, who was arrested in a hospital after taking abortion pills during the coronavirus lockdown. She denied knowing that she was 26 weeks pregnant. Four years later, after a trial in which intimate details of her personal life were examined, a jury found her not guilty. But the case sparked calls to update abortion laws.
'There must be no more Nicola Packers,' Antoniazzi told the House of Commons on Tuesday.
Louise McCudden, U.K. head of external affairs for MSI Reproductive Choices, one of Britain's biggest abortion providers, called the prosecutions 'a real anomaly in our law. Even in places like Texas, they don't tend to prosecute the woman herself.'
'The investigations themselves have been horrific,' McCudden said. 'In some cases, women have been separated from their children, their names made public, they've received death threats, they didn't take pills but had a stillbirth or a miscarriage.'
The rise of investigations coincided with a legal change that allowed access to abortion pills that can be taken at home at up to 10 weeks of pregnancy.
Surveys show that the overwhelming majority of Britons favor making abortion legal. But polls also show that most people don't support extending the legal time limit beyond 24 weeks' gestation.
Critics of the amendment argued that it would effectively legalize self-induced abortion at any point up until birth.
Rebecca Paul, a Conservative member of Parliament, told the House of Commons that the change would mean 'fully developed babies up to term could be aborted by a woman with no consequences.'
In interviews, abortion care doctors said that they will still be bound by the same rules as before – including the 24-week limit in most cases, mandatory legal forms, and the requirement of two signatures – and that they could face prosecution if they do not adhere to them.
Many European countries in recent years have expanded abortion rights. Denmark and Norway recently extended the legal limit from 12 to 18 weeks. Last year, France enshrined abortion as a 'guaranteed freedom' into its constitution, and Ireland liberalized its laws after a public referendum in 2018.
Other countries have maintained or tightened access. The current Polish government has failed to deliver on a pledge to liberalize the country's extremely restrictive laws. In 2022, Hungary made it mandatory for those seeking an abortion to listen to fetal vital signs.
Campaigners on both sides of the debate have said they have been energized by the rollback of abortion rights in the United States.
Stella Creasy, a Labour lawmaker who has been pushing for a more comprehensive reform of abortion law, told Parliament on Tuesday: 'Listen to our American counterparts who bitterly regret not having acted under Biden and Obama … and now find themselves with medics being prosecuted and dragged across state lines.'
Tuesday's vote was a free one, allowing lawmakers to vote their conscience rather than in line with their party - as is customary with ethical issues such as abortion or assisted dying. The amendment is part of the Crime and Policing Bill, which is weaving its way through Parliament and is likely to become law later this year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
eNCA
8 hours ago
- eNCA
Former Arsenal player Partey granted bail on rape charges
Former Arsenal footballer Thomas Partey was granted conditional bail on Tuesday after appearing in a London court on rape and sexual assault charges. The 32-year-old Ghana international has been charged with five counts of rape against two women and one count of sexual assault against a third woman. The alleged offences took place between 2021 and 2022, when he was an Arsenal player. Partey was charged on July 4, four days after leaving the Gunners when his contract expired at the end of June. The midfielder stood with his arms behind his back in the dock at Westminster Magistrates' Court on Tuesday, wearing a black zip-neck jumper. The footballer showed no reaction as the charges were read out and was not asked to enter any pleas. Partey's lawyer Jenny Wiltshire previously said Partey "denies all the charges against him", adding he welcomed "the opportunity to finally clear his name". Under his bail conditions he cannot contact any of the three women and must notify police of any permanent changes of address or international travel. Reports in recent days have linked Partey with a move to La Liga club Villarreal. As bail conditions were discussed in court, chief magistrate Paul Goldspring said: "I understand he's no longer employed in this country and playing in Spain now." Partey is due to appear at London's Old Bailey court on September 2. A spokesperson for Arsenal Supporters Against Sexual Violence said the group was "profoundly disappointed" in the London club over their handling of the matter. Speaking outside court, Honor Barber told the PA news agency: "We never wanted to be in a situation where the club that we love and the club that has values that we believe in was playing, week-in, week-out, a player who is now facing court appearances on six counts of sexual violence. "We protested outside almost every home game last season because we wanted to disrupt the wall of silence that the club has put up around this issue." Barber said the group wanted the club to publish their sexual violence policies, "suspend anyone under investigation for sexual offences" and "properly support the survivors". British police said they first received reports of an allegation of rape in February 2022. Partey joined Arsenal for £45 million ($60 million) from Atletico Madrid in October 2020. He appeared 52 times for the Gunners last season, scoring four goals. Overall he played 167 games for the club, scoring nine times. Partey has also made 51 appearances for Ghana.
Daily Maverick
9 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
No easy solutions as Britain faces summer of social and economic discontent
Britain is in the grip of a deepening malaise. Over the past few months and years, a growing and unsettling consensus has emerged: the country is broken. What is less clear is what could be the route towards repair. Two interconnected crises lie at the heart of the discontent. First is a fraying of what could broadly be termed the social fabric, which leads citizens towards having some trust in each other, and more generally in the state itself. In the Daily Mail, Andrew Neil warns that 'Britain is on the edge of disaster… I'm scared for what's to come.' A recent Economist poll found that seven in 10 Brits believe race riots in the near future are likely. This apprehension is easy to understand. Over the past few weeks protests erupted in Epping, Essex and near Canary Wharf in London, where locals rallied against the government's decision to house young male asylum seekers in local hotels. Demands to 'send them home' and 'save our kids' soon proliferated online, drawing in agitators from both left and right. These social tensions, particularly over illegal immigration, have become national flashpoints. Meanwhile, Britain's politics is rapidly fracturing along both ethnic and ideological lines. Jeremy Corbyn recently launched a (yet unnamed) new left-wing party with former Labour MP Zarah Sultana that is likely to draw votes not just from the left but also from those who are furious about Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer's accommodating stance on Israel. This will further fragment the centre. And Nigel Farage, whose extreme right wing Reform UK party has been leading in the polls for months, has warned that 'civil disobedience on a vast scale' will break out unless migrants stop arriving in the UK from across the Channel in small boats. Why are the British in such a state of angst? And, more importantly, are they right to be so worried? Much of the anger can be traced to a second, more fundamental issue: the failure of the British economy. Business confidence has cratered. A July survey by business lobby The Institute of Directors (IoD) found that more than 80% of British executives were pessimistic about the economy; a gloom deeper than that felt even after Brexit, the Covid-19 pandemic, or Liz Truss' catastrophic mini-budget that almost bankrupted the country. The institute's economic confidence index has plunged to a record low of -72. What went wrong? But what has gone wrong? Essentially, Britain's economy is no longer able to deliver rising living standards, reasonable costs of living or acceptable levels of public services. The state has little fiscal room to ease budgetary trade-offs, while politicians have been either unable or unwilling to confront the difficult choices they entail, be they on welfare, taxation, spending or structural reform. Starmer's caution on welfare reform during the 2024 general election campaign is symptomatic of this broader political paralysis. Economic data underscores the scale of the problem. According to the 2025 Living Standards Review from the National Institute of Economic and Social Research, real disposable income per capita rose by a paltry 14% between 2007 and 2024, compared with 48% in the halcyon days between 1990 and 2007. Given the collapse in economic fortunes of Britons, it is no surprise disillusionment is rife. The International Monetary Fund similarly reports that annual trend growth in GDP per capita has declined from 2.5% between 1990 and 2007 to just 0.7% from 2008 to 2025, which is the steepest drop among the G7 plus Spain. Had pre-2008 trends continued, the UK's GDP per capita in 2025 would be a full 33% higher than it is now, representing the largest shortfall in this group. This drop is fundamentally a result of stagnant productivity. Between 2007 and 2023, output per hour in the UK rose by just 6%, among peers outperforming only Italy. In contrast, the US posted a 22% increase, while the Eurozone averaged 10% (an important consideration given the reality of Brexit). The UK's torpid productivity is of grave socioeconomic concern. When economies cease to grow, everything becomes zero-sum; more for one group of people means less for others. The problem is exacerbated if demographic change increases the number of older beneficiaries of fiscal transfers relative to that of younger, productive taxpayers. The overwhelming questions in politics become less about growing the pie, but rather a race to contain collective frustration. Arresting this decline first requires being honest about past failures. There needs to be an acknowledgement that the economic model born of the Thatcher neoliberal revolution has not delivered long-term gains. Much of the post-1980s performance was a mirage created by a global credit boom to which the UK was more exposed than any other developed economy. The act of economic suicide that was Brexit has not helped either. The Centre for European Reform estimates that by mid-2022, the UK's GDP was 5.5% lower than it would have been had it remained in the EU. Structural weaknesses These structural weaknesses have become apparent by the increasingly precarious state of public finances. The Office for Budget Responsibility has flagged the UK's perilous position; the country now has the sixth-highest debt, fifth-highest deficit and third-highest borrowing costs among developed economies. June 2025 saw the second-highest government borrowing on record, surpassed only by June 2020 at the height of the Covid-19 pandemic. Bond markets have traditionally given more leeway to Britain because of its reputation for seriousness, political stability and fiscal prudence. But Liz Truss' disastrous spell as PM seems to have blown that premium for good, while Starmer's Labour looks more like a teetering administration on its last legs than a barely one year old government with a huge majority in the House of Commons. Nigel Farage looks on eagerly from the wings. Last month, the government failed to pass modest welfare reforms that would have raised a measly £6.5-billion (R156-billion), a fraction of the £1.3-trillion (R31-trillion) annual public spend. Embattled Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves has instead raised taxes on labour and targeted non-domiciled residents, risking the flight of high earners who contribute disproportionately to both tax revenues and general economic activity, particularly in the all-important regional powerhouse of London. While an outright crisis — whether a debt blow out or social unrest — is still on balance unlikely, the long-term trajectory looks bleak. The UK faces challenges not unlike those confronting other post-industrial democracies. But without access to the EU single market, burdened with a dysfunctional political class and bound by stagnant economic productivity, Britain appears locked in a slow and grinding descent. The post-1980s era of growth is over. What lies ahead for Britain may not necessarily be an immediate crisis, but it is likely to be a drawn-out period of socioeconomic pain and inexorable decline. DM
eNCA
10 hours ago
- eNCA
UK-France migrant returns deal takes effect
A "one-in, one-out" deal in which Britain can return some migrants who cross the Channel in small boats back to France came into force on Tuesday, the UK government announced. The interior ministry said that British authorities were "operationally ready" and that migrant detentions were expected to begin "within days" following ratification of the agreement. "Today we send a clear message -- if you come here illegally on a small boat you will face being sent back to France," Prime Minister Keir Starmer said in a statement after striking the deal with French President Emmanuel Macron last month. The agreement seeks to curb record levels of irregular Channel crossings that are causing discontent in Britain and helping fuel the rise of the hard-right Reform UK party. Under the arrangement -- for now a pilot scheme set to run until June 2026 -- irregular migrants arriving on UK shores could be detained and returned to France if they are deemed ineligible for asylum. In exchange, the UK will accept an equal number of migrants from France who can apply for asylum via an online platform, giving priority to nationalities most vulnerable to smugglers and to people with ties in Britain. The two governments signed the final text last week, with the EU Commission giving its "green light on this innovative approach", Britain's Home Office said in a statement late Monday. "The unscrupulous business model of smugglers must be broken," the European Union's migration commissioner Magnus Brunner wrote on X Tuesday. But refugee charities have criticised the deal, urging the British government to provide more safe and legal routes for asylum seekers instead. The number of migrants making the dangerous journey in flimsy dinghies this year crossed 25,000 at the end of July, the highest tally ever at this point in the year. The rise, which the government has partly attributed to extended periods of good weather, means Labour leader Starmer is struggling to fulfil one of his main pledge's before winning last year's general election. - Social media ads - In recent weeks, anti-immigration protesters and counter-protesters have clashed outside hotels housing asylum seekers in Britain, with some demonstrations turning violent. Starmer has tried to portray the deal as a diplomatic victory after years of faltering cooperation between France and the UK on the politically sensitive issue. "This is the product of months of grown-up diplomacy delivering real results for British people as we broker deals no government has been able to achieve," he said. While the agreement has also met with criticism in northern France, where some officials say the scheme is too favourable to the UK, Nigel Farage's anti-immigrant Reform UK party says it does not go far enough to secure Britain's borders. Interior minister Yvette Cooper said Tuesday that she would not put a number on how many migrants would be deported under the deal. "Of course, it will start with lower numbers and then build, but we want to be able to expand it," she told BBC radio. The Home Office this week pledged £100 million ($132 million) for law enforcement, including additional staff and technology, to "tackle" gangs who organise the crossings. Starmer's government also said it would make it an offence to promote on social media dangerous immigration routes into the UK, including via the Channel. Under the new provision, which will be part of a border security bill making its way through parliament, those found advertising such crossings could be fined and face up to five years in prison. According to a Home Office analysis, 80 percent of migrants arriving via small boats told officials they used social media during the process. By Akshata Kapoor And Peter Hutchison
