
‘It's going a bit too far': locals criticise Wimbledon expansion plans before judicial review
To ensure Wimbledon maintains its pre-eminence on the tennis circuit, the AELTC has plans to develop a further 39 courts, including an 8,000-seat show court, on the grounds of the old Wimbledon Park golf club. Local opposition, however, has long questioned why the 'industrial-scale development' is needed.
A judicial review will start this week while the 138th edition of the tournament is under way, as a local campaign group challenges the planning permissions approved in September 2024. Residents have argued against the loss of green space as well as 10 years of disruption to the local area and have questioned its legality.
Gary Forde, 58, who has been part of the Save Wimbledon Park campaign for years, said: 'It's not just a local issue, it is a national issue, because it would set an unhealthy precedent for other areas that are subject to development threat.'
The proposed expansion straddling the boroughs of Merton and Wandsworth would be on metropolitan open land, which has the same protected status as green belt. Aside from the judicial review, a separate court action brought by the AELTC will determine whether the land is for public recreation or protected by a statutory trust.
The dispute goes back to 1993 when the AELTC bought the golf course land from Merton council for £5.2m. It signed a covenant agreeing it would not use the land other than for leisure, recreational purposes or as open space. The campaign group, which has raised £200,000 ahead of the review, believes the proposals have violated that pledge.
The AELTC's counterargument is that what was once a private golf course will be converted into land that will offer access to the public, including a 23-acre park, with further green space open through the year outside the championships. The scaling up of facilities is necessary for players and to maintain the prestige of the grand slam tournament, it contends.
It also hopes 10,000 fans would come to the qualifying tournament, currently held nearby at the Bank of England club in Roehampton with a 2,000 capacity. Other grand slam tournaments – the Australian, French and US Opens – hold qualifying matches on site. But campaigners say people will continue to attend the only lawn tennis grand slam regardless.
The tournament director, Jamie Baker, said on Friday that the expansion plans would enable more people to experience the championships and would open up a new public park for the local community.
'We're constantly listening to people, we are constantly open to being completely transparent with everything that we're doing and ultimately we just want the best result for the local area, for Wimbledon, for the country,' he said.
The expansion includes plans to plant 1,500 trees and spend £6m on silting the Wimbledon Park lake. Such moves have been welcomed by the local heritage group, which backs the scheme. A report said the proposal would bring in £336m of annual benefits, 40 annual jobs and 256 championship jobs.
'It genuinely does make lots of people a winner out of the plan, and so we're not going to stray away from that and we won't tire from it,' Baker said.
Forde has lived for years on the tournament's main artery, Wimbledon Park Road, which gets tens of thousands of visitors passing along it each year. Should the plans go ahead, the years-long construction would 'frankly be hell', he said.
It is just one of the many facets of life that residents have argued will be affected by the development, including the loss of 300 trees, and the strain on the nearby Southfields tube station. More broadly, the plans could set a worrying precedent for 50 other development sites across the UK that Forde said were similarly protected and under threat.
Matt, who has lived in the area for six years, said: 'I'm a tennis coach, so I like seeing expansion. We were never allowed on the golf course.' As he walked his son and dog through the park on Friday morning, he said that before moving to Wimbledon he had sometimes been among the thousands queueing to get into the grounds each day of the tournament.
'I think some people are probably worried about the value of their house, but once the building's done, I'd like to think it would settle down,' he said. 'And the environment, I mean, it's so tough, you do have to look after your planet, but then there's the economy.'
Linda Tomes, who has lived in Wimbledon for 40 years, said she had not taken part in the local campaigning but she criticised the size of the expansion plans.
'The last time they built No 1 stadium, a lot of people down here got bronchitis from all the dust and everything that went past on these great big lorries,' she said, standing outside her house on Friday morning as attenders poured past towards the tennis grounds. 'The dust and everything, it was awful. I had terrible bronchitis with it.'
Was she concerned about the environmental loss? 'Well, yes and no,' she said. 'I mean, you've got to have improvement all the time, but I do think that it's going a bit too far with the amount that they're doing.'
The AELTC has been approached for comment.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
22 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Djokovic brought up as BBC star picks sides after Norrie's Wimbledon ‘scrap'
Cameron Norrie was involved in a heated exchange with Nicolas Jarry after their Wimbledon showdown - but the tennis sensation saw his on-court actions defended by BBC commentator Pat Cash Pat Cash has leapt to Cameron Norrie's defence following a fiery row with Nicolas Jarry at Wimbledon, using Novak Djokovic as an example. The star found himself embroiled in controversy during his thrilling five-set victory over Jarry in Sunday's fourth-round clash. The Chilean became increasingly frustrated with Norrie's serving routine, moaning to umpire Eva Asderaki-Moore before the third set about the 29-year-old's lengthy second serve time. Jarry was particularly wound up by Norrie's habit of bouncing the ball repeatedly, then stopping to bounce it again - a pattern he claimed was throwing off his own concentration. Jarry admitted he didn't know the rules and was heard telling the official: "What is the rule there? The problem is, is it normal to do that when it affects the other player? You have to intervene there or I have to suck it. That's the real issue, it doesn't matter the reason. "It is the same as hitting the ball anywhere. It's not intentional but you have to apply the code as well. How is it now? He perfectly can stop doing it, it's not a nervous tick. "It's something that he can control. It's not a nervous tick. You think there's nothing I can do so I just have to suck it up, because he does it always. That's a reason for me to have to play with something that affects me. It can be changed, it's not something that cannot be changed," reports the Express. Asderaki-Moore responded: "I am going to step in if I think there is a reason to step in," before Jarry added: "I don't want to force you into anything. I just want to do what the rules say. And if there is not a rule then tell me and I cannot do anything about it." The match continued, with Norrie eventually clinching victory 6-3 7-6 6-7 6-7 6-3. However, the tension didn't dissipate as the pair exchanged frosty words during their post-match handshake. During his on-court interview, Norrie shed some light on what might have irked Jarry. He explained: "He said I was a little bit vocal and I think that's my energy. "I was pulling [energy] from my team and then I just said, 'Man, you competed so well and hung in there so well and it was an amazing, competitive match.' I love it, I loved the Chilean fans too, and you guys definitely pulled me through the match there at the end." Norrie's ball-bouncing habit seemed to unsettle Jarry on Court One, but BBC commentator Cash defended the player's actions. Using 24-time Grand Slam winner Djokovic as an example, the 1987 Wimbledon champion said: "You can bounce the ball 35 times if you want between first and second serve. "That is the anomaly. There are a few weird things in tennis. If you are late coming in for a first serve, you have been running all over the place, and you are tired, all you have to do is get to the line and throw the ball and catch it, and then you can bounce the ball 20 or 30 times. "But I don't think Cam does it that extreme. Novak used to bounce the ball 20 or 30 times. He is regrouping himself and that's the anomaly of the rule. I don't agree with quite a few of the silly rules of tennis that they have. But Norrie is within his rights to do so. "You can go for a toilet break. I went for two toilet breaks in my whole career over five sets, but they go every set. So as he (Jarry) said, I don't mind you as a player, but that's a bit extreme. He has got a bit of a point there, I suppose. I have not seen Cam bounce the ball that much, I have to be honest. So maybe this is something that he has decided. "I am a bit tired, I just need extra breathing space between points. I have never seen him bounce the ball that much, so maybe that is just something he has done today." Following his victory, Norrie is set to take on reigning champ Carlos Alcaraz in the quarter-finals on Tuesday, eyeing his maiden Grand Slam trophy. The ATP No. 61 has previously made waves at Wimbledon, reaching the semi-finals in 2022 where he was eventually defeated by Djokovic on the iconic Centre Court.


The Guardian
28 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Minister won't rule out support cuts for children with EHCPs amid Send overhaul – UK politics live
Update: Date: 2025-07-07T08:34:23.000Z Title: Richard Adams Content: Good morning. Less than a week after the government had to abandon the main pillar of its welfare reform plans 90 minutes before a vote it was otherwise likely to lose, the government is now facing another revolt over plans to scale back support available to disabled people. But this row affects children, not adults – specifically pupils with special educational needs who have education, health and care plans (EHCPs) that guarantee them extra help in schools. As and Kiran Stacey report, although the plans have not been announced yet, campaigners are alarmed by reports that access to EHCPs is set to be restricted. The Times has splashed on the same issue. The Times quotes an unnamed senior Labour MP saying: 'If they thought taking money away from disabled adults was bad, watch what happens when they try the same with disabled kids.' Stephen Morgan, the early education minister, was giving interviews this morning. He was supposed to be talking about the government's Giving Every Child the Best Start in Life strategy being announced today, but instead he mostly took questions on EHCPs. On Times Radio, asked if he could guarantee that every child who currently has an EHCP would continue to keep the same provisions, Morgan would not confirm that. Instead he replied: We absolutely want to make sure that we deliver better support for vulnerable children and their parents and we're committed to absolutely getting that right. So it's a real priority for us. When it was put to him that he was not saying yes, he replied: Well of course we want to make sure that every child gets the support that they need. That's why we're doing the wider reform and we're publishing the white paper later this year. Here is the agenda for the day. Morning: Nigel Farage attends a meeting of Kent county council where his party, Reform UK, is in power. 11.30am: Downing Street holds a lobby briefing. 11.30am: Keir Starmer and other leaders attend a memorial service at St Paul's Cathedral in London to commemorate the 20th anniversary of the 7/7 attacks. 2.30pm: Yvette Cooper, the home secretary, takes questions in the Commons. If you want to contact me, please post a message below the line when comments are open (normally between 10am and 3pm at the moment), or message me on social media. I can't read all the messages BTL, but if you put 'Andrew' in a message aimed at me, I am more likely to see it because I search for posts containing that word. If you want to flag something up urgently, it is best to use social media. You can reach me on Bluesky at @ The Guardian has given up posting from its official accounts on X, but individual Guardian journalists are there, I still have my account, and if you message me there at @AndrewSparrow, I will see it and respond if necessary. I find it very helpful when readers point out mistakes, even minor typos. No error is too small to correct. And I find your questions very interesting too. I can't promise to reply to them all, but I will try to reply to as many as I can, either BTL or sometimes in the blog.


BBC News
32 minutes ago
- BBC News
Who should foot the bill for tennis players' pay rise?
As players continue to ask the Grand Slams for more prize money, the chair of the All England Club has suggested those questions would be better directed to the regular tour of top 10 players met officials at Wimbledon last week to discuss increasing prize money and having a greater say in the running of the Grand Professional Tennis Players' Association, meanwhile, has begun legal action against the ATP Tour, the WTA Tour, the International Tennis Federation and the International Tennis Integrity claims prize money is artificially restricted and the 11-month season is "unsustainable".Players have frequently pointed to the vast revenues generated by the Grand Slams, and feel they deserve a significantly larger return."For a lot of players, it's playing for Slams that provides the income for [financing a year on] the whole tour - so the sport needs to look at itself," Debbie Jevans, chair of the All England Club, told BBC Sport."Something like golf, where they earn the majority of money on the tour and less at the majors, is flipped over in tennis."As much as we're asked to look at ourselves, I do think the tour events need to look at themselves as well." ATP Tour figures for 2023 show players earned 30% of their income from the Grand Slams. A total of $241.6m (£176.7m) - including prize money, performance bonuses and retirement contributions - was provided by the ATP, with an additional $104.5m (£76.5m) in Grand Slam men's prize year's PGA Tour in golf will offer more than $400m (£292.9m) in prize money - and it stages several events with bigger prize funds than any of the four prize money has doubled over the past 10 years to £53.5m, but players wonder why they do not make more from the £406.5m of revenue recorded in the All England Club's most recent financial everyone in the sport agrees the season is too long, and the ATP is understood to be hoping to reduce it by two weeks from 2028. This would require the tour to buy back some events from their owners - but, if successful, it could create a seven-week break for players."If you hear what the players have been saying about their brutal schedule, burnout, injuries - the sport needs to provide the players with a decent off season at the end of the year," Jevans added."Let's look at that schedule and give the players their off season."I'm very hopeful that over the coming years we can collectively make that happen."