Canada withdraws Digital Services Tax following suspension of trade talks by Trump
As per Al Jazeera, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney on Sunday announced that he and President Trump had reached an agreement to restart talks, targeting a July 21, deadline outlined at the recent G7 Leaders' Summit in Kananaskis.
The now-scrapped tax, which was set to take effect from Monday, would have imposed a 3 per cent levy on revenues earned by digital services companies from Canadian users above USD 20 million in a calendar year, retroactive to 2022, as per Al Jazeera.
It was intended to target online platforms, digital advertising, social media, and data monetisation, impacting major US tech firms such as Apple, Google (Alphabet), Amazon, and Meta.
President Trump denounced the tax on Friday, calling it 'a direct and blatant attack on our Country,' in defence of American tech giants, as reported by Al Jazeera.
Criticism followed the Canadian government's decision to withdraw the tax.
Tech analyst and journalist Paris Marx told Al Jazeera that the move signals Canada's vulnerability to US pressure, arguing that digital services taxes are crucial to ensuring large multinational tech firms contribute fairly to the countries in which they operate.
Marx pointed out that the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development's (OECD) efforts to establish a global framework for digital taxation have stalled largely due to US resistance under both the Biden and Trump administrations, leading many countries to adopt their own taxes.
'It has been continually delayed for years in the hope that a diplomatic process in the OECD would create an international framework to ensure those companies pay more tax in countries around the world. But the United States, under [former US President Joe] Biden and Trump, has ensured it's been unable to move forward... More countries are enacting digital services taxes for that very reason, and Canada is wrong to back down,' he stated as quoted by Al Jazeera.
Canada's Finance Ministry confirmed the suspension of tax collection and said Finance Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne will introduce legislation to repeal the Digital Services Tax (DST) Act.
The ministry reiterated that the DST was originally introduced in 2020 to address the low tax burden of large tech companies operating in Canada but emphasised Canada's preference for a multilateral solution, as reported by Al Jazeera.
As per Al Jazeera, citing the US Census Bureau, Canada is a major trading partner for the US, second only to Mexico, and purchased USD 349.4 billion worth of American goods last year, while exporting USD 412.7 billion to the US.
While Canada avoided sweeping US tariffs introduced in April, it still faces a 50 per cent duty on steel and aluminium exports to the US, Al Jazeera reported. (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
35 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Analysis shows Trump's tariffs would cost US employers $82.3 billion
WASHINGTON (AP) — An analysis finds that a critical group of U.S. employers would face a direct cost of $82.3 billion from President Donald Trump's current tariff plans, a sum that could be potentially managed through price hikes, layoffs, hiring freezes or lower profit margins. The analysis by the JPMorganChase Institute is among the first to measure the direct costs created by the import taxes on businesses with $10 million to $1 billion in annual revenue, a category that includes roughly a third of private-sector U.S. workers. These companies are more dependent than other businesses on imports from China, India and Thailand — and the retail and wholesale sectors would be especially vulnerable to the import taxes being levied by the Republican president. The findings show clear trade-offs from Trump's import taxes, contradicting his claims that foreign manufacturers would absorb the costs of the tariffs instead of U.S. companies that rely on imports. While the tariffs launched under Trump have yet to boost overall inflation, large companies such as Amazon, Costco, Walmart and Williams-Sonoma delayed the potential reckoning by building up their inventories before the taxes could be imposed. The analysis comes just ahead of the July 9 deadline by Trump to formally set the tariff rates on goods from dozens of countries. Trump imposed that deadline after the financial markets panicked in response to his April tariff announcements, prompting him to instead schedule a 90-day negotiating period when most imports faced a 10% baseline tariff. China, Mexico and Canada face higher rates, and there are separate 50% tariffs on steel and aluminum. Had the initial April 2 tariffs stayed in place, the companies in the JPMorganChase Institute analysis would have faced additional direct costs of $187.6 billion. Under the current rates, the $82.3 billion would be equivalent on average to $2,080 per employee, or 3.1% of the average annual payroll. Those averages include firms that don't import goods and those that do. Asked Tuesday how trade talks are faring, Trump said simply: 'Everything's going well.' The president has indicated that he will set tariff rates given the logistical challenge of negotiating with so many nations. As the 90-day period comes to a close, only the United Kingdom has signed a trade framework with the Trump administration. India and Vietnam have signaled that they're close to a trade framework. There is a growing body of evidence suggesting that more inflation could surface. The investment bank Goldman Sachs said in a report that it expects companies to pass along 60% of their tariff costs onto consumers. The Atlanta Federal Reserve has used its survey of businesses' inflation expectations to say that companies could on average pass along roughly half their costs from a 10% tariff or a 25% tariff without reducing consumer demand. The JPMorganChase Institute findings suggest that the tariffs could cause some domestic manufacturers to strengthen their roles as suppliers of goods. But it noted that companies need to plan for a range of possible outcomes and that wholesalers and retailers already operate on such low profit margins that they might need to spread the tariffs costs to their customers. The outlook for tariffs remains highly uncertain. Trump had stopped negotiations with Canada, only to restart them after the country dropped its plan to tax digital services. He similarly on Monday threatened more tariffs on Japan unless it buys more rice from the U.S. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in a Tuesday interview that the concessions from the trade talks have impressed career officials at the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative and other agencies. 'People who have been at Treasury, at Commerce, at USTR for 20 years are saying that these are deals like they've never seen before,' Bessent said on Fox News Channel's 'Fox & Friends.' The treasury secretary said the Trump administration plans to discuss the contours of trade deals next week, prioritizing the tax cuts package passed on Tuesday by the Republican majority in the Senate. Trump has set a Friday deadline for passage of the multitrillion-dollar package, the costs of which the president hopes to offset with tariff revenues. ___ Follow the AP's coverage of President Donald Trump at
Toronto Star
35 minutes ago
- Toronto Star
Hamas says it's open to a Gaza truce but stops short of accepting a Trump-backed proposal
CAIRO (AP) — Hamas suggested Wednesday that it was open to a ceasefire agreement with Israel, but stopped short of accepting a U.S.-backed proposal announced by President Donald Trump hours earlier, insisting on its longstanding position that any deal bring an end to the war in Gaza. Trump said Tuesday that Israel had agreed on terms for a 60-day ceasefire in Gaza and urged Hamas to accept the deal before conditions worsen. The U.S. leader has been increasing pressure on the Israeli government and Hamas to broker a ceasefire, and hostage agreement and bring about an end to the war.
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
Can Buying the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF Make You a Millionaire?
Buying an exchange-traded fund (ETF) that tracks an index like the S&P 500 can be a great way to build long-term wealth, and this strategy is endorsed by some of the world's top investors, including Warren Buffett. The Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (NYSEMKT: VOO) is one of the most popular funds on the market because of its super low cost, and it could certainly make you a millionaire with regular contributions and the right time horizon. Below, I'll break down the components of the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF and run through some possible pathways to the million-dollar club for regular investors. A diversified index with healthy exposure to high-growth trends The S&P 500 might be the best American stock market index for building long-term wealth. It's home to 500 companies from 11 different sectors of the economy, and it has a strict entry criteria to ensure that only the highest-quality names make the cut. For example, companies need to have a market capitalization of at least $20.5 billion to qualify for inclusion, and the sum of their earnings (profits) must be positive over the most recent 12-month period. By comparison, the Dow Jones Industrial Average holds a narrow portfolio of just 30 stocks, and the Nasdaq Composite is dominated by stocks in the tech and tech-adjacent industries. The Vanguard S&P 500 ETF tracks the performance of the S&P 500 by holding the same stocks and maintaining similar weightings. Below is a breakdown of the 11 sectors in the ETF, including their weightings (the percentage of the fund's value which they represent) and some of the most notable stocks within them: Data source: Vanguard. Sector weightings are accurate as of May 31, 2025, and are subject to change. The reason the information technology sector has such a dominant weighting is because Nvidia, Microsoft, and Apple are the three largest companies in the world, with a combined market capitalization of $10.5 trillion. The S&P 500 (and by extension, the Vanguard ETF) is weighted by market cap, which means the largest companies in the index have a higher influence over its performance than the smallest. Artificial intelligence (AI) has been a big driver of value for companies in the information technology sector over the last couple of years, but a growing number of companies in non-technology industries are also rapidly adopting it. They include Amazon, Tesla, Alphabet, Meta, Netflix, and Uber, which are using AI to supercharge their legacy businesses. Simply put, the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF offers investors a high amount of exposure to the booming AI revolution, but with a very healthy splash of diversification thanks to sectors like financials, healthcare, industrials, and consumer staples, where companies are far less reliant on the technology. Can the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF make you a millionaire? The S&P 500 has delivered a compound annual return of 10.4% since it was established in 1957 (assuming all dividends were reinvested). It's important for investors to buy an S&P 500 ETF with low fees in order to unlock as much of that return as possible. The Vanguard S&P 500 ETF has an incredibly low expense ratio of 0.03%, meaning an investment of $10,000 would incur an annual fee of just $3. Vanguard says the average fee charged by comparable funds in the industry is a whopping 25 times higher at 0.75%, which can dent investors' returns over the long run. Based on a compound annual return of 10.4%, here's how long it would take investors to achieve millionaire status from three different starting positions (assuming no additional contributions): Starting Balance Time to Reach $1 Million $50,000 31 years $100,000 24 years $250,000 15 years Data source: Calculations by author. But don't worry, investors who aren't sitting on a large pile of idle cash can still reach the millionaire's club with small but consistent contributions (these calculations assume a starting balance of zero): Monthly Contribution Time to Reach $1 Million $300 33 years $500 28 years $1,000 22 years Data source: Calculations by author. It's important to remember that past performance isn't a good indicator of future results. However, a track record spanning almost seven decades inspires a lot of confidence, which is why S&P 500 index funds are so popular among regular investors and professionals alike. Plus, the S&P 500 is rebalanced once per quarter (four times per year), meaning a special committee removes companies that no longer fit its criteria and replaces them with more suitable candidates. Maintaining exposure only to the highest-quality companies is a big reason the S&P 500 has maintained such strong returns over the long run. Moreover, as I highlighted earlier, the index has a high degree of exposure to high-growth segments of the economy like AI, which could supercharge its future returns. Therefore, yes, buying the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF can make you a millionaire if you take a disciplined approach to investing and remain focused on the long term. Should you invest $1,000 in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF right now? Before you buy stock in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $722,181!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $968,402!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is1,069% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to177%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 30, 2025 John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. JPMorgan Chase is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Randi Zuckerberg, a former director of market development and spokeswoman for Facebook and sister to Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Anthony Di Pizio has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends AbbVie, Alphabet, Amazon, American Tower, Apple, Berkshire Hathaway, Chevron, Constellation Energy, Costco Wholesale, Equinix, JPMorgan Chase, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, Netflix, NextEra Energy, Nike, Nvidia, Simon Property Group, Tesla, Uber Technologies, Vanguard S&P 500 ETF, Visa, and Walmart. The Motley Fool recommends Dominion Energy, Johnson & Johnson, and Sherwin-Williams and recommends the following options: long January 2026 $180 calls on American Tower, long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft, short January 2026 $185 calls on American Tower, and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
