Rules for explicit books in Alberta schools on the way: education minister
The parameters would still leave room for independence, so schools and school divisions can manage their libraries in ways that work for them, Nicolaides told CBC News Thursday. But the goal is to ensure explicit content is inaccessible to elementary school students.
"There's consensus and understanding that some material, that we should be cautious of what age it's available," Nicolaides said.
"We do this in society in so many different ways that we have ratings for movies … based on sexual content, violence, all this other kind of stuff. So it's not an entirely foreign concept to how we govern our society."
The minister spoke with CBC News about two weeks after a public online survey about school library materials closed. It was offered by the provincial government.
The survey results, which were released Friday, suggest respondents were divided on multiple questions, including whether the government should set "consistent requirements" for school boards regarding how they select and manage school library materials.
Respondents who identified as educators, librarians and as an "interested Albertan" are firmly against, data suggests. Parents, either with or without school-aged children, were more divided.
Of the nearly 37,000 survey respondents identified as parents of K-12 students, almost half are cold to potential consistent requirements, data suggests. But 43 per cent are leaning in favour, and eight per cent are unsure.
"Decisions about what goes in libraries need to be made by trained librarians and educators," said Laura Winton, past president of the Library Association of Alberta, a non-profit that advocates for public and school libraries alike.
"There are already policies and practices in place in schools and school boards across Alberta to make sure that collections are age-appropriate, and there are also processes in place to allow parents to be involved," Winton said.
"If they are concerned about material, they can request that their school reconsider that material and a dialogue will be engaged with them about that."
Respondents were also divided about what age students should be able to access sexually explicit materials in school libraries, data suggests.
Parents of school-aged children said students should be able to access such content at school libraries at some point, particularly by middle school or high school, results suggest.
Yet, about two in five of the respondents with school-aged children feel students should never get to access it in school libraries.
"That's an overwhelming consensus from parents to keep it out of elementary schools," said Jeff Park, executive director of the Alberta Parents' Union, an advocacy group. "That's a strong basis to at least start there."
Nicolaides said last month that new rules would be coming, after parents raised concerns about four coming-of-age graphic novels, most of which show nudity and sexual 2SLGBTQ+ content, found in circulation in Edmonton and Calgary public schools.
The minister also said at the time that the government isn't looking to ban books from schools, noting that it doesn't have that authority. He reiterated that while speaking with CBC News Thursday.
"I don't think it's really helpful or beneficial for government to start saying, 'This book, this book, this book, this book,' just because of any particular commentary that an individual government official might find offensive to them personally," Nicolaides said.
"What one person finds offensive, another person might find enriching. But again, I think we can agree on some really high-level parameters, which are very simple: don't show graphic sexual material to underage children."
The Alberta government will use input from the survey, plus feedback from education partners, to develop the school library standards, according to a news release issued Friday afternoon.
The government published two sets of survey results: one raw, the other cleaned up. The raw version contains nearly 197,000 responses, but the clean dataset cuts it down to about 77,000 responses.
There were signs of possible abuse, Nicolaides said, such as bots or many responses coming from one IP address in a short period.
A CBC News analysis found that, of the many exclusions, only 1,000 of the respondents who identified as parents with school-aged children were cut. Most of the exclusions affected responses from alleged school administrators, teachers and librarians.
Division on restrictions, survey suggests
The survey suggests further division around questions like how libraries should handle such materials, and who the authority is that determines what content is age-appropriate.
About seven in 10 respondents with school-aged kids agree that parents and guardians should have a role in reporting or challenging the availability of sexually explicit material in school libraries, the results suggest.
Alberta government survey shows mixed support for policy on age-appropriate books
11 hours ago
Duration 2:12
New guidelines are on the way for what books are deemed age-appropriate in Alberta schools. As CBC's Sam Brooks reports, they will be based on the results of a public survey — but not everyone supports that plan.
Many respondents who identified as educators agreed as well. About half of school or public librarians agreed, data suggests.
But respondents were divided about who gets to decide what's age-appropriate, with the main responses being librarians, teachers and/or parents.
Many felt there should be some kind of restrictions for explicit content, data suggests. But nearly an equal proportion of parents with school-aged children said they want access granted based on age or grade level (35 per cent), as those who said the materials shouldn't be on the shelves at all (36 per cent).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Post
42 minutes ago
- National Post
Jesse Kline: Carney's futile attempt to will a Palestinian state into existence
French President Emmanuel Macron's announcement last week that his country intends to recognize Palestine as an independent state in September was quickly followed by similar pronouncements from British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and, as of Wednesday, Prime Minister Mark Carney. The three G7 powers are thus set to join a growing list of countries taking a performative step that does little but signal their enmity towards the only democracy in the region — Israel. Article content Article content Carney's announcement following a cabinet meeting on Wednesday shouldn't come as much of a surprise, as Ottawa has shown no interest in supporting its former allies in Jerusalem since Israel was brutally attacked on Oct. 7, 2023. But for Macron, it represents a radical about-face. Article content Article content Less than a month after the October 7 massacre, Macron visited Israel (something former prime minister Justin Trudeau refused to do) and suggested that the 86-member coalition that fought against the Islamic State 'should also fight against Hamas.' Article content Had anyone listened to him at the time, we might be living in a much different world today. A coalition of countries willing to put boots on the ground in Gaza would have shown Israel that the international community was united against terrorism. Israel's allies would have had more say over how the war was conducted and how aid would be distributed. Article content More importantly, a broad international coalition that included other Arab countries could have established a transitional government in Gaza capable of maintaining law and order, providing essential services and ensuring that Hamas wasn't able to reassert control when Israeli forces pulled out. Article content Article content But the rest of the world wasn't willing to lift a finger to eliminate the terrorist threat posed by Hamas and further the cause of peace in the Middle East. Article content Article content Thus here we are, nearly 22 months later. Israel is still at war. The humanitarian situation in Gaza is dire. Mideast peace is as elusive as ever. And world powers seem to think that gathering a bunch of politicians together for a drab UN confab will somehow bring about a solution for peace that has eluded everyone for nearly a century. Article content That conference, which was organized by France and Saudi Arabia and held earlier this week in New York, was billed as a means of finding a path towards a two-state solution. This is a policy that has long been favoured by Canada and many of its allies. But it has some major obstacles to overcome, including the fact that none of the parties involved seem particularly interested in it. Article content A recent Pew poll found that only 21 per cent of Israelis support a two-state solution, the lowest number since the survey began in 2013, with 75 per cent citing a lack of trust as a 'major obstacle' to peace — and who can blame them, after the October 7 massacre? Israel's government, which rests on the support of ultra-nationalists intent on annexing the territories, is also firmly against Palestinian statehood, arguing that it would be akin to a reward for terrorism. Article content In the West Bank, a Gallup poll released last fall found that support for a two-state solution was also near historic lows, with only 28 per cent support. The Palestinian Authority (PA), which controls the West Bank, has rejected numerous offers for statehood over the years and is unlikely to get a better deal this time around. And Hamas, which maintains a grip on power in Gaza, is resolutely committed to the total destruction of the Jewish state. Article content How do you force two nations with a long list of grievances and a history of mistrust into a peace that neither side particularly wants? Foreign Minister Anita Anand was right when she said on Monday that, 'Peace is not only about borders and agreements. It is also about shared stories and understanding that humanize all sides and foster trust.' Article content But building that kind of trust is a decades-long project that will require serious reform of the hate-laden Palestinian education system and cannot be achieved so long as some Palestinians are intent on massacring their Israeli neighbours. Article content Article content So, it would seem, a growing list of countries are attempting to will a two-state solution into existence by unilaterally recognizing a Palestinian state that simply does not exist. Article content While there is no single definition of what constitutes a state, they are generally believed to includes four key elements: a population, a clearly defined territory, an established government and sovereignty. 'Palestine' currently lacks most of those things. Article content The two Palestinian territories are noncontiguous and the borders of the West Bank are yet to be defined under international law. They are controlled by different governments, one of which is a genocidal terrorist organization that lacks international legitimacy. And neither one has full security control, and thus full sovereignty, over their respective territories. Article content Carney has conditioned his recognition of a Palestinian state on the PA enacting significant reforms, including a pledge to hold elections next year (something its dictatorial leader hasn't done since 2006), and promised to send $10 million to Ramallah over the next year to help it make those changes. Article content Article content There's little doubt that the notoriously corrupt Palestinian Authority government is in serious need of reform, not only if it wants Canada's recognition, but if it has any hope of regaining legitimacy in the eyes of its people and convincing Israel it is capable of reasserting control over Gaza. Article content But if foreign handouts alone could bring about the 'legitimate, democratic governance' that Anand said Canada is seeking, the Palestinian territories would be pinnacles of democracy, rather than failed pseudo-states run by a tinpot dictator and a messianic death cult. Article content If Canada and the rest of the world truly hopes to bring stability, if not a lasting peace, to the Middle East, they should follow the Macron of 2023, who was willing to send troops into Gaza, not the Macron of 2025, who's intent on playing political games that are purely for show. Article content Article content
National Post
42 minutes ago
- National Post
Jamie Sarkonak: It shouldn't take 16 years to deport a foreign criminal
Article content He also feared that India wouldn't issue him a passport to allow him to see his children. Finally, he made the thin suggestion that he might face harassment in India for claiming asylum abroad — there was no 'assurance' that he would not be persecuted there, he claimed. Article content Try as he did, none of his concerns met the legal test to halt his imminent deportation, and Judge Phuong Ngo — who came to Canada as a legitimate refugee when she was a child — ordered him deported. Whether he's actually in India, we don't know. The CBSA won't comment on individual cases. Article content It's possible that he's still here: aside from uncooperative foreign countries and individuals, the CBSA told the Post that other 'impediments to removal' exist, such as 'the inability to use commercial airlines due to their lack of flights to certain destinations, their limits on the number of deportees per flight or refusal to transport foreign nationals with criminality.' Article content Uncooperative foreign governments are a recurring problem. Right now, probably still locked up in a CBSA detention facility is Somali national Lahi Abdi, who came to Canada in 2003 and has committed many serious crimes here since, including assault with a weapon, robbery, gun offences, drug offences and, of course, court-order breaches. Deportation proceedings finally commenced in 2017, and he was ordered deported in 2020. He wasn't removed from the country, however, and went on to commit more gun crimes in 2021. He was finally jailed by the CBSA in 2022. Article content Article content Abdi tried to have the Federal Court release him in 2024, but was denied. The decision rejecting his bid notes that CBSA officials have tried since 2023 to have Somali officials provide the appropriate travel documents, to no avail. Thus, his care was left to Canadian taxpayers. Article content Ankit Kundu, a work- and study-permit holder from India, got here in 2016 and, by 2019, was convicted of sexual interference against an underage girl. He was ordered deported that year, but he continued to live in Canada, using administrative levers to stall his removal. 'Between 2021 and 2023, the CBSA was unable to remove the applicant due to a lack of proper travel documentation,' notes a Federal Court decision that green-lit his scheduled January 2024 deportation. It's not clear whether Kundu was the uncooperative party in this case, or India. Article content This is the Canadian system working on autopilot. An endless series of processes set out by careless legislators allows convicted criminals repeated kicks at the can, and when foreign countries refuse to co-operate with our border officials, we sit back and let it happen. Article content Article content It doesn't have to be this way. If countries refuse to co-operate when we exercise our sovereign rights, they should face consequences. If, say, Pakistan is causing problems in this regard, Canada should refuse to issue visas to its travellers until it can cough up the travel documents we need. Public statements should be made by the public safety minister (hopefully a future, competent one who hasn't tried to help an admitted terrorist immigrate to Canada). Article content We could use some transparency, too: the CBSA should have an outstanding-travel-document dashboard on its website for all to see. It should also be obligated to confirm whether a particular deportee has actually been sent home. Article content The CBSA could be staffed to the brim with the greatest officers in the country, but it wouldn't change the high-level issue here: the agency is constrained by the meekness of its minister, and by Parliament via Canadian immigration laws — laws that support endless 'due process' for foreign criminals at the expense of public safety. Article content
National Post
42 minutes ago
- National Post
Opinion: Review of F-35 fighter jet purchase should heed lessons from the past
By Tom Lawson and Gaëlle Rivard Piché Article content As the Liberal government proceeds with its review of the F-35 acquisition, it finds itself trying to balance two competing impulses: the strategic necessity to replace the aging CF-18 fleet with the most capable fighter available — Lockheed Martin's F-35 — versus a reluctance to purchase yet another product from the U.S. defence industry. Before making a final decision, it would be wise for the government to reflect on a previous Royal Canadian Air Force (RCAF) procurement — one that offers a cautionary tale about what can happen when political discomfort trumps operational need. Article content Article content Article content In 1992, the Progressive Conservative government signed a $4.8-billion contract with a European consortium to replace the aging Sea King helicopters deployed aboard Royal Canadian Navy (RCN) ships. For purely political reasons, when the Liberals came to power the following year, they cancelled the deal — incurring $500 million in termination penalties — and set out to find a more politically acceptable solution. That search dragged on for over a decade, culminating in a 2004 contract with Sikorsky to procure 28 CH-148 Cyclone helicopters. Article content Article content What the government failed to realize — or chose to overlook — was that Sikorsky was not offering a ready-made military platform. Instead, it proposed to adapt its civilian S-92 model into a maritime helicopter fit for military use, with the hope of replicating the global success of its venerable Sea King. Article content But developmental issues plagued the project from the outset. The original delivery schedule of 2009 slipped repeatedly, prompting then-minister of national defence Peter MacKay to call the procurement 'the worst in the history of Canada.' By 2014, the program was on the brink of cancellation. Only a tense meeting between senior ministers and Sikorsky's president salvaged the deal, leading to a revised agreement that saw the Cyclone finally enter operational service in 2018. Article content Article content Yet the challenges did not end there. The Cyclone has consistently posted poor serviceability rates. A crash that cost the lives of six Canadian Armed Forces members in early 2020 was linked to inadequate documentation and flawed software. More recently, the fleet has again been largely grounded — this time due to a shortage of spare parts. The Commander of the RCN has voiced public frustration over the shortage of deployable helicopters, even threatening to replace them with drones if necessary. Article content Article content To be fair, Sikorsky is not solely to blame. It offered an attractive idea: a modern fly-by-wire maritime helicopter based on a successful civilian platform. The government accepted, underestimating the complexity of the transformation. The key lesson here — one that directly applies to the current fighter jet debate — is that there is enormous risk in buying aircraft, like the Cyclone, that exist in limited numbers worldwide. Article content The best path forward with the Cyclone may now be to phase out the fleet and absorb the sunk costs. A more reliable option could be the MH-60 Seahawk, also made by Sikorsky. Unlike the Cyclone, the Seahawk is a proven design, with nearly 1,000 units in active service with the U.S., Australian and some NATO navies. While it would be politically awkward to cancel a Sikorsky platform only to purchase another from the same manufacturer, pragmatism must prevail. Perhaps a deal could be struck to return the Cyclones for parts, recouping some value through the civilian S-92 supply chain. Article content This brings us back to the F-35. If the government decides to alter or abandon the current plan to acquire 88 of these jets, a series of negative consequences will quickly follow: Article content First, Canadian companies involved in the F-35 global supply chain — currently contributing over $2 million in parts for every jet produced — will lose contracts. Those roles will go to suppliers in member nations that remain committed to the program. Article content Second, the RCAF will be saddled with a purchase of inferior, older-generation fighters flown by a limited number of air forces. Article content While there are already 1,200 F-35s in service with NATO allies and other close partners, that number is expected to exceed 2,500 within a decade and double that number over the full life of the fleet. Such a global user base ensures plentiful parts, broad interoperability and shared development. By contrast, only around 300 Swedish Gripens have been produced since 1987. Their operators include countries like Brazil, South Africa and Hungary — not exactly paragons of long-term defence collaboration. The French Rafale has similar production numbers and is used by nations such as Egypt and India, with whom interoperability is not required. While both the Gripen and Rafale are reasonably capable platforms, the crucial point is this: there is safety in numbers. Article content Article content To its credit, the government is taking a broader view of procurement — aiming to distribute defence dollars more globally and support Canadian industry. But fighter procurement is not the place to make that stand. The F-35 is not only the fighter of today — it is the fighter of the next 50 years. It will serve Canada and its allies reliably, effectively, and in sync with the evolving demands of modern warfare. Article content The Cyclone saga offers a painful reminder of what happens when procurement decisions prioritize optics over operational outcomes. Let's not repeat that mistake. The F-35 path is not only well charted — it's the right one. Article content
