logo
What is Sizewell C and what does it mean for Suffolk?

What is Sizewell C and what does it mean for Suffolk?

Yahoo10-06-2025

Plans for the Sizewell C nuclear power station have taken a step closer to the final go-ahead after the government announced significant funding. But what exactly is Sizewell C and what are the arguments for and against it?
French energy company EDF wants to build a new two-reactor nuclear power station on the east Suffolk coastline that could generate 3.2 gigawatts of electricity.
It claims Sizewell C could power the equivalent of about six million homes and will generate electricity for 60 years.
The power station will sit right next to Sizewell B that has been operating since 1995, just off Sizewell beach, close to the town of Leiston.
The decommissioned Sizewell A site, which first opened in 1967, can also be found here.
To generate nuclear power in non-military reactors, uranium atoms are bombarded by much smaller neutron particles.
This causes the atoms to break down in process called nuclear fission, which releases huge amounts of energy as heat.
The heat is used to boil water, producing steam, which drives turbines and generates electricity.
According to the International Atomic Energy Agency, the plants are among the "safest and most secure facilities in the world" and are subject to strict international safety standards.
In 2008, the then Labour prime minister, Gordon Brown, said the UK needed to increase its nuclear power capacity.
Two years later during the coalition government between the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats, Sizewell was identified as a site suitable for a new power station.
In November 2012, EDF launched its first public consultation to get the feedback of local people ahead of any formal planning application.
Three other public consultations were held, with the final one finishing in September 2019.
Sizewell C said more than 10,000 East Suffolk residents had been involved in the consultations.
In May 2020, EDF submitted an application for a development consent order to build the power station.
This is a legal document that grants permission for large-scale and nationally significant projects in England and Wales.
This was granted by the government in July 2022 despite the Examining Authority recommending it was not approved over water supply and nature concerns.
The site has also had its nuclear licence granted too in May 2024.
While both these have been given, there were still questions over how it would be funded.
The power station is expected to cost about £20bn.
EDF previously rejected claims the project would cost £40bn, but did accept its nuclear plant being built at Hinkley Point, in Somerset, would cost more than that figure.
The government confirmed a total of £3.6bn worth of investment had been put into the project so far.
This included some funding from a subsidy scheme called Devex.
The government said it would now be investing £14.2bn to build Sizewell C - this figure included £2.7bn announced in November last year, a spokesperson for the Department for Energy Security confirmed.
It means £17.8bn has been invested in the project in total.
However the government said a final decision on the funding model was due later this summer as the project was still in need of private investors.
Ministers and EDF previously said there had been plenty of potential investors coming forward and an agreement was close to being finalised.
No new nuclear power plant has opened in the UK since 1995 when Sizewell B began operating.
According to the government, all existing nuclear stations with the exception of Sizewell B, are likely to be phased out by the early 2030s.
The government has previously said it was on a "mission" to deliver clean power by 2030 and reach its net zero target.
Nuclear power stations do not produce greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide or methane while in operation and therefore it could be key to help with this goal.
The government also said this "clean, homegrown power" could play a part in building economic growth, improve its energy security and reduce the country's dependency on fossil fuels.
Another key argument around the project is the jobs it could create for the surrounding areas.
While in construction, the project could employ up to 10,000 people and once in operation there will be 900 people employed at Sizewell C.
There has been strong opposition against Sizewell C since it was announced.
Campaign groups Stop Sizewell C and Together Against Sizewell C both fear the plant could have negative effects across a range of different areas.
Both have significant worries over the environmental impact and the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds has similarly protested in the past over this fear.
Sizewell C has argued it has worked to protect the wildlife around the site by rehoming displaced animals in new nature reserves it has created.
The campaign groups also argue the project is "too slow" to combat climate change and is too expensive.
Alison Downes, director of Stop Sizewell C, said the government would come to "regret" its most recent investment announcement and felt the money could be spent elsewhere.
If the final investment decision on the funding model this summer goes ahead without issue, Sizewell C could be operational by the 2030s.
Sizewell C also recently announced plans to open a post-16 college in Leiston which it hoped would help train up its future workforce.
Follow Suffolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Sizewell C boss 'optimistic' it will get go-ahead
Latest legal challenge against Sizewell C launched
What does Leiston make of Sizewell C's plan for a college?
'Nothing prepared us for Sizewell C devastation'
EDF reject claims Sizewell C will cost £40bn
Five signs Sizewell C is gearing up for go-ahead
Sizewell C

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Police 'assessing' comments made by Kneecap and Bob Vylan at Glastonbury
Police 'assessing' comments made by Kneecap and Bob Vylan at Glastonbury

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Police 'assessing' comments made by Kneecap and Bob Vylan at Glastonbury

Police are assessing videos of comments made by Bob Vylan and Kneecap at Glastonbury to decide whether any offences may have been committed. In a post on social media Avon and Somerset Police said: 'We are aware of the comments made by acts on the West Holts Stage at Glastonbury Festival this afternoon. 'Video evidence will be assessed by officers to determine whether any offences may have been committed that would require a criminal investigation.' Join the Manchester Evening News WhatsApp group HERE The videos being assessed are understood to include footage of punk duo Bob Vylan and Irish rap trio Kneecap. It comes as the Government said it 'strongly condemns' the comments made by Bob Vylan. The punk duo performed on the stage before Kneecap and led the crowd in chants of: 'Free, free Palestine' and: 'Death, death to the IDF'. During Kneecap's set, band member Naoise O Caireallain, who performs under the name Moglai Bap, said: 'The Prime Minister of your country, not mine, said he didn't want us to play, so f*** Keir Starmer.' The band also led crowds in chants of: 'Free Palestine'. A Government spokesperson said: 'We strongly condemn the threatening comments made by Bob Vylan at Glastonbury. 'The Culture Secretary has spoken to the BBC Director General to seek an urgent explanation about what due diligence it carried out ahead of the Bob Vylan performance, and welcomes the decision not to re-broadcast it on BBC iPlayer.' READ MORE: Glastonbury's Kneecap lead chants against Prime Minister Keir Starmer after BBC cut For the latest stories and breaking news visit Get the latest headlines, features and analysis that matter to you by signing up to our various Manchester Evening News newsletters here. You can also get all your favourite content from the Manchester Evening News on WhatsApp. Click here to stay up to date with the us on X @mennewsdesk for all the latest stories and updates on breaking incidents from across the region and beyond, as well as on our Facebook page you prefer reading our stories on your phone, consider downloading the Manchester Evening News app here, and our newsdesk will make sure every time an essential story breaks, you'll be the first to hear about it.

Two further terror arrests after vandalism of planes at RAF base
Two further terror arrests after vandalism of planes at RAF base

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Two further terror arrests after vandalism of planes at RAF base

Two more people have been arrested on suspicion of a terror offence after planes at an RAF base were vandalised in a move claimed by soon-to-be banned campaign group Palestine Action. Counter Terrorism Policing South East said two men aged 22 and 24, both from London, were taken into police custody after the incident at RAF Brize Norton on June 20. They are accused of the commission, preparation or instigation of acts of terrorism, contrary to Section 41 of the Terrorism Act 2000. On Friday, a woman, aged 29, of no fixed address, and two men, aged 36 and 24, from London, were also arrested accused of the same offence. A 41-year-old woman, of no fixed address, was also arrested on suspicion of assisting an offender, police said. Palestine Action previously posted footage online showing people inside the Oxfordshire base, with one person appearing to ride an electric scooter up to an Airbus Voyager air-to-air refuelling tanker, before spray-painting into its jet engine. The Home Secretary Yvette Cooper made the decision to proscribe Palestine Action following the incident, with the arrests coming just days before the proscription is set to come into force. Support for the group will become a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison when the ban comes into effect as soon as next Friday. Palestine Action has staged demonstrations that have included spraying the London offices of Allianz Insurance with red paint and vandalising US President Donald Trump's Turnberry golf course in South Ayrshire. As she announced plans for Palestine Action's proscription, Ms Cooper said the group's methods have become 'more aggressive', with its members showing 'willingness to use violence'. At the time of the incident, the group said it had 'directly intervened in the genocide and prevented crimes against the Palestinian people' by 'decommissioning two military planes'. Palestine Action said Thursday's arrests 'further demonstrates that proscription is not about enabling prosecutions under terrorism laws – it's about cracking down on non-violent protests which disrupt the flow of arms to Israel during its genocide in Palestine'.

Starmer's welfare cuts could leave thousands of disabled women trapped with abusers, campaigners warn
Starmer's welfare cuts could leave thousands of disabled women trapped with abusers, campaigners warn

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Starmer's welfare cuts could leave thousands of disabled women trapped with abusers, campaigners warn

Thousands of disabled women could find themselves trapped with abusers as a result of the government's upcoming welfare cuts, campaigners have warned, despite Sir Keir Starmer offering significant concessions on the reforms late on Thursday. In the face of a growing rebellion, the prime minister announced adjustments to his welfare bill, including protecting Personal Independence Payments (PIP) for all existing claimants – a move which is expected to ensure the legislation passes its second reading on Tuesday. But domestic violence charity Refuge and the Women's Budget Group (WBG) have issued a stark warning over the reforms, saying that in the long term, the cuts to vital funding for daily living costs for disabled people – which will impact all new claimants – will make it difficult for those at risk to flee abusive relationships. Even with the concessions, the welfare cuts will be 'devastating for disabled women', WBG said, noting that disabled women are twice as likely to be victims of domestic abuse. For many, PIP is the only income they receive, they warned, so not having access to this source of individual support elevates the risk of coercive control and makes it harder to escape abusive situations. As a result, Refuge argues Sir Keir will struggle to reach his target of halving violence against women and girls. A scathing report, published jointly by the Women's Budget Group and Sisters of Frida, argues the cuts will deepen disabled women's 'economic insecurity, increase their vulnerability to violence and abuse, push them out of the labour market, and make parenting harder'. Their analysis - seen by The Independent - shows that women who are future claimants will be disproportionately affected by stricter eligibility rules to PIP. Currently, 52 per cent of female PIP claimants don't score 4 points in any one activity compared to 39 per cent of male claimants. This is likely due to the higher prevalence of musculoskeletal conditions and arthritis among women, conditions which are less likely to score 4 points in one indicator. Although current claimants will be protected, it indicates a broader gender imbalance which will leave women more significantly impacted by the cuts in the longer term. The government estimates that under the current rules, around 1,000 new people are signing on to PIP every day. Dr Sara Reis, WGB's deputy director, warned it would make women more vulnerable to abuse, while Refuge said the cuts would have 'devastating impacts on disabled survivors'. Gemma Sherrington, CEO of Refuge, told The Independent that the cuts present a 'truly terrifying prospect for disabled survivors', warning that they would 'severely undermine the government's commitment to halve violence against women and girls'. 'At Refuge, nearly one in three (29 per cent) of the survivors we support has a disability or mental health condition. For PIP claimants, this support is vital for covering essential living costs – and can mean the difference between fleeing to safety or remaining with an abusive partner', she said. 'Further restricting the financial resources of disabled survivors could leave thousands trapped with abusers – and that could have fatal consequences. 'If the government is serious about tackling VAWG, it cannot afford to neglect disabled survivors. We strongly echo the report's recommendation to scrap these cruel reforms and provide disabled survivors with the protection and support they deserve.' Dr Reis added: 'The proposed changes will be devastating for disabled women, cutting away income that grants many of them independence. 'The government already knows that it will push more people into poverty, but it also needs to be aware that these changes will make disabled women more vulnerable to abuse, make it harder for them to parent, and shut them out of jobs. 'We are glad to see the government reconsidering the reforms and to consult on changes to PIP – disabled people should be at the centre of designing any changes to the disability benefit system. 'However, as reforms stand they will bring more and more people into poverty as new claimants will not have access to the same support as exists now.' Responding to the report, Labour MP Rachael Maskell - who plans to vote against the bill on Tuesday - said she feels 'sick to the stomach' that ministers would press ahead with the reforms in light of WBG's report. She told The Independent: 'These cuts are gendered and dangerous, and blow a hole through the government's VAWG work too. Surely this evidence will cause government to realise that they have overreached and must withdraw this Bill. 'I feel sick to the stomach that they would press ahead after this evidence from Refuge and the Women's Budget Group. We already know that older women forced to work into later life experience greater ill health, and now this evidence highlights this.' It comes after the Joseph Rowntree Foundation urged MPs to oppose the welfare reforms, even with the concessions, warning that 'new disabled claimants from next year will continue to be pushed into deep hardship by these cuts'. Meanwhile, Amnesty said the concessions are 'nothing more than a superficial attempt to get MPs to vote through this cruel and harmful piece of legislation', warning it will 'deepen poverty, entrench discrimination, and create a two-tier welfare system that cannot be justified under any circumstances.' Some 126 Labour backbenchers had signed an amendment that would halt the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill in its tracks when it faces its first Commons hurdle on July 1. Rebels now believe the concessions on offer will be enough to win over a majority. The government's original package had restricted eligibility for PIP, the main disability payment in England, and cut the health-related element of Universal Credit, saying this would save around £5 billion a year by 2030. Now, the changes to PIP eligibility will be implemented in November 2026 and apply to new claimants only while all existing recipients of the health element of Universal Credit will have their incomes protected in real terms. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall confirmed the U-turn in a letter to MPs late on Thursday night, along with plans for a review of the PIP assessment to be led by disabilities minister Sir Stephen Timms and 'co-produced' with disabled people. A No 10 spokesperson said the current welfare system is 'failing people', arguing that it 'traps millions, tells them the only way to get help is to declare they'll never work again — and then abandons them.' 'No help, no opportunity, no dignity. We can't accept that and need to start fixing it', they said. The spokesperson added: 'The government has listened to MPs who support the principle of reform but are worried about the pace of change for those already supported by the social security system.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store