Fetterman Hits Back at ‘Weird Smear' After Call to Step Aside Over Mental Health
The Democratic lawmaker appeared alongside his fellow Pennsylvania Senator David McCormick on Monday and rejected accusations that he is not engaged in his job.
'For me, it's very clear, it's just part of this weird, this weird smear,' Fetterman said.
The senator said he's been getting 'incoming' over his stance on Israel, the border, and not voting to shut the government down.
He pushed for the conversation to move during his appearance in Boston at 'The Senate Project', which aired on Fox Nation.
'I'm here. I'm doing my job. I'm defending on all those things, and all of those important votes, I've always been there,' Fetterman said.
'And for me, if I miss some of those votes, I mean some of those votes, I've made 90 percent of them, and we all know those votes that I've missed were on Monday. Those are travel days, and I have three young kids,' Fetterman continued.
He dismissed counts he had missed as 'throwaway procedural votes,' which were not important.
Fetterman's comments came after a scathing op-ed in The Philadelphia Inquirer on Sunday in which the paper's editorial board wrote he 'must take his position seriously.'
It noted the series of recent reports of erratic behavior, the senator missing and canceling meetings, and not showing up for more votes than nearly every other senator in the past two years.
'If Fetterman can't handle the attention or perform his job, then in the best interest of the country and the nearly 13 million residents of Pennsylvania he represents, he should step aside,' it wrote.
The editorial is the latest in an avalanche of Fetterman criticism since a bombshell New York Magazine report a month ago detailed former staffers raising alarms over the senator's mental state. Fettrman blasted it as a hit piece.
On Monday, Fetterman claimed Senator Bernie Sanders and Senator Patty Murray missed more votes than him.
'Why aren't the left media yelling and demanding them and claiming they're not doing their job?' Fetterman asked.
According to tracking by GovTrack.us, Fetterman missed 174 out of 961 roll call votes, or 18.1 percent of votes from February 2023 to May 2025 and more than 21 percent of the votes in the last Congress. It noted that it is much worse than the median of 2.9 percent of votes senators have missed.
Since taking office in 1993, Murray has missed 2.6 percent of votes, and 1.6 percent of votes in the last Congress. Sanders has missed 13.4 percent of votes since 1991, or 9.4 percent of votes in the last Congress.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
14 minutes ago
- New York Post
NYC moderates scramble to team up to beat Zohran Mamdani, but candidate grudges derail deal
Panicked moderates want to team up behind one candidate to stop Democratic nominee Zohran Mamdani from becoming Big Apple mayor – but incumbent Eric Adams scoffed at a possible deal between the remaining candidates. The mayor and ex-Gov. Andrew Cuomo, both set to appear on November ballots as independents, spent Monday bashing each other as former Gov. David Paterson argued the remaining candidates should make a deal so that only one of them actively runs against democratic socialist Mamdani in the general election. The candidate who continues to campaign would be determined by an independent poll closer to the election or by leaders across Big Apple institutions. 3 Paterson said other candidates should help back the strong one to face Mamdani. Matthew McDermott But Adams made clear that he had no interest in dropping out just as he started his campaign, claiming the energy, fundraising and support is all 'overwhelming.' Hizzoner is a Democrat but opted out of the party primary earlier this year. He said Cuomo — who lost the primary to Mamdani — should quit instead. Hizzoner brought up the ex-governor's 2021 resignation in the face of sexual harassment claims which he has strongly denied. 'The only reason we are in this situation is because Andrew stepped down from his office and did an embarrassing run for mayor. He knew when he ran on an independent line he was setting up this scenario,' a campaign spokesperson told The Post. 'He needs to put his selfish ambitions to the side and do what is best for the city,' the Adams camp added. 'Andrew stepped down for a reason, and the public hasn't forgotten. If he couldn't finish his last term, why should voters believe he can lead the city now? He'll step aside again — because New Yorkers want progress, not the politics of the past.' Cuomo essentially went head-to-head against Mamdani in a crowded Democratic primary, losing to the far-left Queens assemblyman by a whopping 12 percentage points after all ranked-choice voting was calculated. 3 Adams said his campaign is just getting started. William Farrington A rep for Cuomo insisted Adams was actually the candidate only looking out for himself – and had no shot at reelection. 'We do not see any path to victory for Mayor Adams,' campaign spokesperson Rich Azzopardi said in a statement. 'This is the time to put aside the usual political selfishness and agree to do what is truly best for all New Yorkers.' Still, Azzopardi stressed Cuomo's campaign is reviewing the proposal that would have candidates all be included in an impartial poll to determine who has the best shot in November. 'While this is unorthodox, these are unusual times,' the campaign said. 'We are at a dangerous moment for our city.' The polling proposal was first offered by another independent candidate, attorney Jim Walden, who said the four 'free-market' candidates, including GOP candidate Curtis Sliwa, could participate in a rank-choice poll in the fall and whomever came out on top would get support from the other three candidates. There are glaring caveats though. Sliwa, like Adams, doesn't appear willing to get on board with helping another candidate. 3 Cuomo lost in the primary to Mamdani. LP Media 'Andrew Cuomo couldn't beat Zohran Mamdani in a primary. Eric Adams is polling dead last with no support from either party,' the Guardian Angels founder tweeted Monday. 'I'm running on the issues and I will beat Mamdani on November 4th and bring this city back.' The other issue is the three candidates that suspend their campaign could possibly be forced to pay back the public funds received from the city's Campaign Finance Board, Walden admitted in a press release. Ex-Gov. Paterson, during Monday's press conference along with Gristedes owner John Catsimatidis and 770 AM personality Judge Richard Weinberg, said he would not say which candidate should step down. 'What we are really doing is calling on the candidates who are still in the race to find a way to unite behind one of them. Now, most candidates, you have to give them credit. They work hard. They're working 24/7. They're trying to get your vote,' said Paterson, who backed Cuomo in the primary. 'The idea of pulling back and supporting someone else is very difficult for anyone to accept.' The candidates' names would all be on the November ballot even if they stopped campaigning. Paterson said leaders from the education, financial, business and political world could help sort out which candidate is best to run in November. He also suggested another good indicator would be which candidate has the most robust fundraising in the coming months. Paterson, in a statement released after the press conference, also said surveys and polls in the coming weeks could signal which candidates is strongest. He took a shot at Mamdani and said his policies would cripple Gotham. 'If [Mamdani's] the cure for what ails the [Democratic] Party, then cyanide is the cure for a headache,' Paterson argued. A poll released last week to bolster support for Adams fell flat for the mayor. It showed Mamdani with a comfortable 41% of the vote with Cuomo collecting 26% and Adams only taking home 16%. Sliwa cashed in with just under 10% of support. Cuomo has yet to commit to running for an actual campaign ahead of November while Adams is pressing the political scion to drop out. On CNBC, Adams said Monday Cuomo asked him in a conversation to drop out, but Adams rebuked that suggestion. 'I said, 'Andrew, are you that level of arrogance?' I'm the sitting mayor, the sitting mayor of the City of New York,' Adams claimed he told Cuomo.
New York Post
34 minutes ago
- New York Post
Republicans' righteous win on the ‘Big Beautiful Bill' saved the party's future
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act — a massive package of tax relief, more funding for immigration enforcement, and savings from entitlement changes — is now law, and it's a triumph not only for President Donald Trump but for the whole Republican Party. The GOP passed two make-or-break tests here: one of party discipline, the other of political principles. And the party saved its life by getting this bill enacted. Advertisement The stakes were so high because most of the OBBBA's tax cuts only continued the lower rates Trump shepherded through in his first term. But that relief was temporary, and if Congress hadn't made it permanent by passing the law, Americans would have seen their taxes go up. This wasn't just a vote about tax cuts — it was a vote against a tax hike. Advertisement Democrats wanted Republicans to commit suicide by letting taxes rise on their watch. What would happen to a tax-hiking Republican Congress in next year's midterms? Or to a Republican Congress that humiliated Trump by failing to deliver the legislation he promised? The answers are obvious: This was an existential trial for the party. Liberals played three cards to try to get Republicans to torpedo their own majority and president. Advertisement First, they used their media leverage to make the bill as unpopular as possible, though most people polled had no idea what the bill's details were — or that their taxes were guaranteed to spike if it didn't pass. As always, Democrats tried to demonize spending reductions as attacks on the poor, though any voter who looks at what the bill actually says will find common-sense reforms, such as requiring that able-bodied recipients of Medicaid support work at least 80 hours a month to qualify for benefits. Is working ten days a month too much to ask of able-bodied beneficiaries between the ages of 18 and 64? And the law exempts parents who are raising children. Democrats will scour the country for woeful anecdotes to promote ahead of next year's midterms, but if Republicans campaign on the clear merits of the law they've passed, voters will reward them. Advertisement The other cards the bill's opponents played came from dissident factions on the right, and put Republican principles to the test. Ironically, these arguments against the OBBBA came from utterly opposed rival camps: the libertarians and the New New Dealers. The libertarians had a champion in Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie, one of only two House Republicans to vote against the bill in the end. 'I voted No on final passage because it will significantly increase US budget deficits in the near term,' he wrote on X. But why would higher deficits be worse than higher taxes? The more libertarian policy is actually to let Americans keep more of their own money, no matter what. Even if someone like Massie disputes that, the practical upshot of defeating the OBBBA wouldn't be to keep deficits down anyway, since the bill's failure would hasten the return of Democrats to power. Advertisement The result would be higher taxes and more spending, the dead opposite of what libertarians want. Antithetical to Massie, yet also opposed to the OBBBA, are those conservatives with high-profile media perches who want to conserve the New Deal. These New New Dealers consider the welfare state as sacred as Democrats do — they prefer bigger government and imagine it can be used for socially conservative ends. They don't want tax cuts for all Americans, only for families, in the form of more expansive child tax credits. Advertisement Yet the OBBBA helps families tremendously, not only by lowering their taxes along with everyone else's but also by creating 'Trump accounts,' allowing parents and their employers to make tax-advantaged contributions for a newborn's future needs, like college or buying a home. Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters The Trump accounts even start every American baby off with a $1,000 contribution from the federal government. Yet Trump accounts aren't the specific policy the New New Dealers want, and they find the OBBBA's spending cuts and taxpayers-first philosophy abhorrent. Advertisement They looked to Vice President JD Vance as their champion, but he strongly supported the bill, in keeping with the ethic of self-responsibility (not welfarism) laid out in his memoir-manifesto 'Hillbilly Elegy.' Democrats have spent a decade praying Donald Trump would shatter the Republican coalition. Instead he's strengthened it, clarifying the party's aims and defying its fringes. He listened to libertarians and family-policy engineers, but he wouldn't allow narrow concerns to veto a bill that protects the border and lowers taxes for essentially everyone. Advertisement With a single-digit majority in the House, if Republicans had any serious divisions they would have lost this fight. Instead, they're as unified behind low taxes as they were in Ronald Reagan's day, even as they've added new priorities as well. Daniel McCarthy is the editor of Modern Age: A Conservative Review and editor-at-large of The American Conservative.
Los Angeles Times
43 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Six months after L.A. fires, Newsom calls for federal aid while criticizing Trump's ‘polluted heart'
Gov. Gavin Newsom on Monday marked the six-month anniversary of the Eaton and Palisades fires with a call for billions in federal funding to support the state's wildfire recovery, and offered a blistering critique of the Trump administration's most recent immigration raids in MacArthur Park. Newsom said the immigration raids were proof of President Trump's 'polluted heart,' a shift from the weeks after the fires when he tried to strike a more conciliatory tone as he pushed for more federal aid from Congress and the White House. The comments, made after a news conference to mark the six-month anniversary of the fires, left Newsom once again in the conflicting position of criticizing Republicans while asking them for disaster aid. So far, the GOP-led U.S. House of Representatives has made no progress on a request from Newsom, made in late February, for $40 billion in additional wildfire funding that would go toward rebuilding schools, churches, homes and hospitals. Newsom said Monday that fire funding is a nonpartisan issue, and that all U.S. states are 'in this together.' He said that other states have outstanding requests for federal aid after their own natural disasters, and that the Republican-controlled House will 'absolutely' come through. He urged federal lawmakers to do the same for Texas after last week's deadly floods. 'South Carolina, I think they should get every penny that they need,' Newsom said. 'North Carolina, they should get every penny that they need. ... I expect that we will figure out a path, a bipartisan path, to support the people of the United States of America, and those include the 40 million Americans residing in California.' Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass had been scheduled to appear at the event, held at Pasadena City College, but did not attend after heavily armed federal immigration agents on horseback descended on MacArthur Park. The federal government's work in Los Angeles County has included a record-breaking debris removal program run by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Newsom said Monday that 9,195 of the 9,873 properties enrolled in the federal government's debris removal program have been cleared. That figure doesn't include commercial buildings, which were not included in the Army Corps program, or the nearly 2,000 property owners who chose to hire their own private contractors for debris removal. Newsom said the clearance was the fastest in California history, surpassing the cleanups that followed the 2018 Camp and Woolsey fires. The federal government has reimbursed the state and local governments for direct response costs and paid for their own debris cleanup, said Brian Ferguson, a spokesperson for the governor. The federal government has also provided more than $3 billion in individual assistance to homeowners and small-business loans, he said. Long-term recovery funding, which the federal government typically provides states after disasters, is expected to be determined by Congress after lawmakers return to work in September, Ferguson said. Reps. Judy Chu (D-Monterey Park) and Brad Sherman (D-Sherman Oaks), who represent Altadena and Pacific Palisades in Congress, said they were continuing to push for the supplemental aid package in Congress with 'no strings.' Some Republicans have suggested linking aid to policy decisions in California, including changes to water policy or voter identification laws. Sherman said California's $40-billion request could get through the House 'as a supplemental that also includes the Texas disaster and other disasters.' Newsom and Trump appeared to put aside their political differences in January when the commander in chief traveled to Los Angeles to survey wildfire damage. After embracing on the tarmac at Los Angeles International Airport, the two sparring partners pledged to work together to rebuild the fire-ravaged communities. Hours before the in-person meeting, the president had threatened to condition any wildfire funding on California agreeing to adopt more stringent voter identification laws. Trump has continued to point the finger at Newsom since the meeting, calling the governor and local officials 'incompetent.' In his final days in the White House, President Biden pledged that the federal government would cover 100% of disaster assistance costs to California for 180 days, and the Trump administration has 'honored that commitment,' Newsom said Monday. But Newsom hasn't held back sharp critiques of the president's leadership on other major topics, including immigration, tariffs, and healthcare funding. After discussing the state's response to the wildfires, Newsom condemned the federal immigration raids on Monday in MacArthur Park in Los Angeles as 'a disgrace.' The timing isn't a coincidence, Newsom said. He said that an estimated 41% of the state's construction workforce is working without legal status, and that immigration raids could shake a sector that is 'foundational' to the state's recovery. 'They know what they're doing,' he said. 'And then again, they have no idea what they're doing. Their ignorance is legendary. And the impacts of this will be felt in the recovery — and that's on them. Donald Trump owns that. He owns the cruelty, he owns the arrogance.'
