Inside the US Army's Pacific war prep, from unfamiliar aircraft landings to drone warfare
That includes flying and landing aircraft in unfamiliar locations in varying western Pacific weather.
Keeping troops alive in the environment and giving them the latest drones is also key.
Out in the islands of the western Pacific, the US Army and a strategic ally are landing aircraft in places they don't know, testing new drones and sensors, and trying to keep soldiers hidden in the electromagnetic spectrum.
The training is focused on adapting to the quickening pace of innovation on the battlefield, a general told Business Insider.
In the Philippines, soldiers from Hawaii's 25th Infantry Division are conducting their annual Joint Pacific Multinational Readiness Center- Exportable exercise. The division and its Philippine counterparts, about 2,000 personnel, are preparing for the possibility of a conflict in the Pacific.
The threat of a war with China is at the forefront of US military thinking about the region.
The environment poses the biggest challenge. This area is largely tropical, mostly water with islands scattered about. Maj. Gen. Marcus Evans, commander of the division, said temperatures are high and soldiers are grappling with the rain, wind, and humidity from monsoon season. These environmental factors are impacting how drones operate and how troops sustain themselves.
The exercise stretches across land, air, and sea, among other combat domains, and the operations are testing soldiers. "Each and every day, they are having to fly in varying terrain to different helicopter landing zones working around the different weather patterns," Evans said of the air operations. Some pilots are flying in temperatures and landing on terrain with which they are unfamiliar.
On the ground, troops are learning to drive infantry squad vehicles that can move over sand and through jungles. The vehicles carry everything soldiers will need when they're alone in the environment — more water, food, and power are priorities. At an exercise last year, troops were given bottled water. Now, they're working with a purification system that allows them to draw water from rivers and streams.
Among the weapons they're working with are emerging technologies like drones, which come with challenges. They're flying shorter distances and for less time due to the temperature and weather.
Soldiers are also working with counter-uncrewed aerial systems, reconnaissance and electronic warfare capabilities, and technology to help obscure or hide signatures from enemies. Much of it is a glimpse at what soldiers would need in the future war.
The exercise is a sort of stress-test, not just not on the vehicles, aircraft, weapons, and systems, but also the individual soldier. They're operating the drones across formations, using counter-UAS systems to defeat enemy drones, and looking at the electromagnetic spectrum to keep hidden.
It's also an opportunity for troops to innovate from the bottom up. Warfare technology is moving at breakneck speeds — urging, as Evans said, the need to be more agile in employing them but also knowing the threats and how to defend against them.
He told BI about one soldier who was flying a first-person view drone. They used a medium-range reconnaissance drone to "serve as a pathfinder," effectively navigating the FPV drone behind the reconnaissance one to have a better sense of the battlefield and get in a position to strike enemy targets.
"No one had talked to him about [that], trained him on [it], but he was innovating with the equipment that he was given," Evans said.
In Evans' view, having the soldiers out there working with and learning from the Philippine Army is crucial. "The longer we stay in the field, the more things that we can stress, the more things we test out and understand the true limitations in this kind of harsh environment," he said.
Read the original article on Business Insider
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
20 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Amazon rolls out a stricter performance review process — with culture as a key metric
Amazon is leaning harder on its "Leadership Principles" to rate employee performance, as CEO Andy Jassy continues to create a more disciplined workforce at the tech company. Starting this quarter's mid-year review cycle, Amazon managers will use a three-tiered system to evaluate how effectively corporate employees demonstrate the company's core values in their work, according to an internal document obtained by Business Insider. Although the Leadership Principles have long been central to Amazon's culture and considered in performance reviews, this is the first time they've been formally embedded into the evaluation process. Amazon relies on its 16 LPs, which stress things like customer focus and cost discipline, to guide nearly all business decisions. As part of this shift, Amazon is streamlining the rating scales for the other two evaluation criteria ("performance" and "potential"). Together with how employees use LPs, these factors determine an Overall Value (OV) score for each corporate employee, which influences future raises and whether they may be placed on a performance improvement plan. The internal guideline said the changes will "improve our ability to identify top talent and further strengthen our culture." It added that only 5% of the employees will be eligible for the top "role model" grade when measuring their LP behavior. "By making Leadership Principles a formal input to Overall Value ratings and increasing the granularity of the input rating combinations, the updated process helps us strengthen the connection between performance and culture," the guideline added. The move is part of a wider wave among tech giants to rethink how they manage performance and reward employees. Microsoft has a new 2-year rehire ban on ousted underperforming employees. Both Google and Meta have also made policy changes that better reward high performers this year. More discipline The initiative demonstrates Jassy's ongoing commitment to cultivating a more rigorous workforce and a more cohesive corporate culture. In the past year, Jassy has enforced a full return-to-office policy, reduced management layers, and updated its pay model to better reward top talent. Last year, he also shared a video series explaining each LP, and recently warned that AI will reduce Amazon's workforce because of efficiency gains. Amazon's spokesperson Sam Stephenson told BI that the company regularly reviews its performance review process to "ensure it best supports the growth and development of our employees." "Our unique culture, which is rooted in our Leadership Principles, drives the innovation we deliver for customers each day," Stephenson said. "These changes streamline the process for managers and help to ensure greater consistency." 'High-judgment' decision Amazon's performance review policy has long been controversial. Some employees have cited concerns over limited oversight and the potential for misuse, with one former employee describing the system as " predatory and opaque." Some people have also criticized Amazon's cutthroat "stack-ranking" culture, in which a fixed percentage of the workforce is replaced every year. Amazon managers group their employees in five broad buckets of performance tiers: Top Tier (TT), Highly Valued 3 (HV3), Highly Valued 2 (HV2), Highly Valued 1 (HV1), and Least Effective (LE). Teams with more than 50 employees should categorize 20% as TT, 15% as HV3, 25% as HV2, 35% as HV1, and 5% as LE, the internal guideline said. Amazon seems to recognize the nuanced nature of performance evaluations. The internal guideline urges managers to dedicate sufficient time to reviewing each employee to ensure accurate assessments. "Evaluating employees is a high-judgment decision," the guideline said. "You should invest sufficient time in gathering comprehensive and objective feedback to ensure accuracy and minimize unconscious bias."
Business Insider
6 hours ago
- Business Insider
We used ChatGPT as a stylist, and it generated custom lookbooks and color palettes. Human stylists had some thoughts.
Artificial intelligence may be coming for some jobs, but personal stylists can rest easy — for now. Users of OpenAI 's ChatGPT and others from competitors like Anthropic and Google are perpetually trying to find unique use cases to leverage its expansive knowledge in every aspect of their lives, from professional development to improving their dating game. However, for two reporters, there is still one subject they'd rather leave to humans: Fashion advice. Two Business Insider reporters uploaded their photos to ChatGPT and asked the bot to act as their virtual stylist, suggesting color palettes and a series of outfits to appear polished even in casual settings. One reporter asked ChatGPT to suggest outfits to take her from walking the dogs and running errands to going out and reporting in the field. The other requested outfit suggestions for a journalist living in Los Angeles that could take her from work events to dinner at a trendy restaurant. Three human stylists then reviewed the results. Man versus machine, fashion edition Human stylists were split about whether the bot was useful, with one calling it akin to a "StitchFix" box. That's not to say there was anything technically wrong with the outfits ChatGPT recommended; they were just, well, a bit boring for the reporters' tastes. "Let me start by saying I was pretty impressed by the overall results," Charline Zeroual, a sustainable wardrobe stylist, told Business Insider, adding that "the color palette seems to be right." Zeroual said the suggestions were missing "soul." No patterns or prints, no standout accessories, and the outfit suggestions didn't take the weather or typical professional norms into account — a lawyer is expected to dress differently than a writer, for example. ChatGPT didn't seem to make the distinction. "Your style is 80% basics and good foundation, but 20% you need some essence," Zeroual said. "You need the signature. You need something specific to you that is going to make your style personal." Amanda Massi, a luxury personal stylist based in Los Angeles and Las Vegas, and St. Louis-based stylist Dacy Gillespie, both agreed. "It's too generic," Massi told Business Insider. "Even when you upload a photo, like you did yourself, you're going to get pretty Pinterest-y, cookie-cutter results that aren't really speaking to your true lifestyle or your authentic message." "I'm not worried for my job," Gillespie said. ChatGPT was able to create custom style lookbooks and recommend color palettes based on photos we uploaded of ourselves, both of which could be useful if someone has no idea where to start when it comes to building a wardrobe or developing personal style. However, despite our attempts to describe our style in detail, the lookbook was nowhere close to matching it. When given feedback and asked to try again, ChatGPT's lookbook did improve, but it was still way too basic to inspire any new looks. ChatGPT as a personal shopper We also tried using ChatGPT as a personal shopper by telling it a specific item we were looking for, and it fared decently, but not great. With one prompt, we described a specific style of brown moto boots we were looking for, and we were pleasantly surprised to see that its very first recommendation was pretty decent. But it was also the exact same top result that we got on Google with a shorter search term than the prompt we had to give ChatGPT — and the other Google results were actually more in line with our description than the others the AI recommended. Other recommendations made by ChatGPT sent us to broken links, or pages that contained entirely different articles of clothing than the bot was trying to offer up. In one instance, a link provided by ChatGPT that was supposed to take you to a site to purchase a pair of olive green utility trousers instead presented the page of a pink bikini. Massi took a look at the recommendations ChatGPT gave and said she also wasn't impressed with where it was sourcing its picks, noting that it didn't source any higher-quality or independent labels that a human stylist would find for you. While, in theory, you could communicate your preferences and refine its results repeatedly with ChatGPT, she said, getting it to really know your style could be a challenge. "Everyone's creative language is so different, and it's something that sometimes can't be tangible. You can't really grasp it," she said. "To communicate your creative language to a computer program, I think it's very difficult to do accurately." Massi said in her work, the first thing she does is physically visit a client's closet, so she can get a full and in-depth sense of what they already like to wear and already own. It also allows her to pick up on nonverbal cues that signal who the client is, what they're comfortable, and what they won't be comfortable in. Though the stylists who spoke to Business Insider do not think AI is there quite yet, they agreed it's a promising start and could be helpful for someone just beginning to think seriously about their personal style. Massi said she is excited about the future possibilities. One interesting use case could be maintaining a digital closet where all the items of your wardrobe are stored. Then, generative AI can be used to put together new outfits with items you already have. But she said there's still a ways to go before we get a "Clueless"-level smart closet. "I found it's helpful for putting something in and then just seeing it spit something back at you to get your own brain started," Gillespie said. "It's not necessarily that you're going to do what ChatGPT does, but it can act as a starting point."
Business Insider
20 hours ago
- Business Insider
The gray area at the center of Microsoft's battle with OpenAI
The future of the most important partnership in technology depends on Microsoft 's access to the artificial intelligence powering ChatGPT. When OpenAI first demoed a breakthrough feature in May 2024, allowing users to talk to its AI just like a person, it looked as if the company did so in lock-step with its partner and investor, Microsoft. Soon after OpenAI demoed this voice capability for its new GPT-4o model, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella included it in a keynote speech at the company's Build developer conference. Behind the scenes, Microsoft had little knowledge of the feature until days before the demo, people involved in the matter told Business Insider. While the agreement between the two companies gives Microsoft access to OpenAI's technology, exactly what OpenAI has to share — and when — is sometimes a gray area. In this case, Microsoft had access to frequent updates of the core model at the time, but not the voice technology OpenAI built on top of it. Microsoft found out about the demo, and pressured OpenAI executives, including then-technology boss Mira Murati, to get access to the code so Microsoft could do its own announcement, the people said. The company did not want to appear flat-footed to investors, to whom the company has to justify its $13 billion investment in OpenAI, they said. The example illustrates the ongoing complexity of Microsoft's relationship with OpenAI, and why access to the AI startup's technology is a core issue as the companies renegotiate their agreement. OpenAI needs Microsoft's blessing for a corporate restructuring. To get that, OpenAI may need to convince Microsoft to change or give up some pretty sweet terms: Microsoft has access to much of OpenAI's technology, exclusive rights to sell it on Azure, first right of refusal to provide computing resources, and a revenue-sharing agreement worth billions of dollars. Lots of thorny details about points of contention in the negotiations have made recent headlines — a looming, existential clause OpenAI could activate to cut off Microsoft's access, a "nuclear option" reportedly considered by OpenAI executives to accuse Microsoft of anticompetitive behavior, and a report that Microsoft was prepared to walk away from the renegotiations. In response to those reports, Microsoft and OpenAI released a joint statement saying, "Talks are ongoing and we are optimistic we will continue to build together for years to come." People close to Microsoft's side of the negotiating talks tell BI the software giant is unlikely to walk away because it is deeply reliant on OpenAI's intellectual property, and the negotiations are an opportunity to improve and expand its access to this technology. It's all about IP Microsoft has significantly benefited from its arrangement to access the rights to OpenAI's intellectual property, both by selling it to customers through the Azure OpenAI service and creating its own products using OpenAI's technology, like its AI assistant Copilot. There are limits, however, to what the companies consider "IP." For example, Microsoft gets access to important aspects of OpenAI's models, like model weights that help determine AI outputs and inference codes that instruct the models on how to use data, the people said. Some things are excluded from what the companies consider IP, like product and user interface information, they said, and the point at which OpenAI must share any technology is up to interpretation. One person with knowledge of OpenAI's operations said the company doesn't have to share what it's developing until it's finished, which can be subjective. "You can make sure you share something with Microsoft as late as possible, so they can still simultaneously announce, but make it really difficult to build the same product on top of it," the person said. Plus, having access to the IP isn't the same as knowing how to use it. This has been harder than expected, several people told BI. OpenAI has grown frustrated with Microsoft's request to spell out the technology to its employees, people with knowledge of both companies said. Sometimes, Microsoft doesn't know what questions to ask of OpenAI. Microsoft formed a new AI organization two years ago and hired Mustafa Suleyman, the former Inflection CEO who cofounded the AI pioneer DeepMind, to run it. The hiring was meant as a hedge against OpenAI, after Nadella received pressure from Microsoft's board to diversify following instability at its partner startup and CEO Sam Altman's ouster. However, little has come of that in terms of replacing Microsoft's need for its partnership with OpenAI, the people said. Suleyman has completely rebuilt Microsoft's Copilot app. That effort has yet to achieve much growth for Copilot. His team is focused on building smaller models and has seen success with post-training existing models for new purposes, one of the people said. Overall, Microsoft isn't trying to build frontier models like those that would compete with GPT, and is instead putting resources toward OpenAI, they said. Microsoft is less worried about AGI, antitrust, Windsurf, or SoftBank Other points of contention that have made recent headlines are of less concern to Microsoft, the people with knowledge of Microsoft's position said. Included in the agreement is a clause that would allow OpenAI to declare what's called artificial general intelligence or "AGI," and cut off Microsoft's access to OpenAI's IP and profits. OpenAI defines AGI as "a highly autonomous system that outperforms humans at most economically valuable works." While OpenAI could declare AGI, the concept is so open to interpretation that Microsoft could sue and easily tie the company up in a legal battle for years, the people said. There's another version of the clause, "sufficient AGI," that OpenAI could declare when it builds a technology capable of achieving a certain level of profits, but Microsoft has to sign off on that. Another apparent sticking point in the negotiations has centered on OpenAI's desire to acquire AI coding assistant startup Windsurf. Under the current agreement, that would give Microsoft access to Windsurf's technology. Microsoft has said it would agree to the acquisition, but Windsurf's CEO doesn't want the company's technology to be shared with Microsoft, one of the people said. While GitHub Copilot faces increasing competition from other AI coding assistants, access to Windsurf's technology is not a big desire for Microsoft, and the company might consider a carve-out of Windsurf IP in a new deal, the person said. OpenAI executives have reportedly considered accusing Microsoft of anticompetitive behavior. Microsoft is largely unconcerned about this, two of the people said. The existing deal was investigated by antitrust regulators, including the European Union and the United Kingdom's Competition and Markets Authority. OpenAI's desire to restructure is in part motivated by a deadline from investor SoftBank that risks a percentage of funding if OpenAI can't close such a deal by the end of the year. OpenAI has said it struggled to fundraise due to its peculiar structure. SoftBank has a reputation for taking risks with its funding, and its CEO is keen on OpenAI, so some observers doubt SoftBank will follow through on its deadline to revoke funding if a new deal isn't reached.
