‘Beaten With Leather Whip': Members of Student Groups Allege Harrowing Torture in Detention by Delhi Police Special Cell
Atul Howale
The detained students and activists told The Wire that they were forcibly detained by police officials, who were in civil clothing, without following any legal procedure.
New Delhi: Members of the Delhi-based student organisation Bhagat Singh Chhatra Ekta Manch (BSCEM) and the Forum Against Corporatisation and Militarisation (FACAM) have alleged that at least six individuals associated with them, and one person working with Nazariya Magazine, were detained and assaulted by the Delhi Police's Special Cell without due process.
The individuals, aged between 19 and 26 years of age, have claimed they were subjected to extreme physical and mental torture between July 9 and July 21, under the guise of 'interrogation' by the special cell over the whereabouts of an IAS officer's daughter.
Timeline of detentions
The police allegedly detained Gurkirat (20), Gaurav (23) and Gaurang (24), who are associated with the BSCEM, on July 9 around 3:30 PM from Ber Sarai in Delhi. They told The Wire that they were forcibly detained by police officials in civil clothing, without following any legal procedure.
The Delhi Police's Special Cell had detained these students and activists from various locations in the capital.
Two days later, on July 11, Ethemam (26) and Lakshita (Badal) (21) of the FACAM were detained in Delhi around 1:00 PM.
Samrat, a professor and social activist, was detained the next day, on July 12, from his home in Haryana.
On July 19, Rudra, who is associated with Nazariya Magazine, was detained at the New Delhi railway station.
Speaking to The Wire about the detention, BSCEM member Gurkirat said, 'On July 9, Gaurav, Gaurang and I were in Ber Sarai, Delhi, collecting some books from Rudra's house. Around 3:30 PM, three to four men in civil clothing , who were police officers, came and questioned us. 'They said, 'You are terrorists, not students. You have to come with us to the office.' We countered and asked them to show a warrant and demanded their police ID cards. After this, one of the officers showed his ID card and said, 'Now you must come.''
When they resisted, one of the officers slapped both Gaurav and Gaurang five to six times, Gurkirat claimed. 'One of the policemen pushed me and threatened me, too. He said, 'I don't care that you're a girl.' After that, they called a woman constable and forced me into a police vehicle.'
Similarly, describing her detention, Lakshita, a member of the FACAM, said, "I reached Delhi from Ahmedabad around 11 AM on July 11. At 1 PM, some policemen came to my house and forcibly put me and my friend, Ehtemam, into a vehicle. They confiscated our phones, laptops, and iPads, and as soon as we were in the car, they put all the devices on airplane mode. They did not give us any information about where we were being taken."
She added, 'An FIR (First Information Report) has been filed against us, we have not been provided with a copy. When I received a notice (police served her an online notice, she mentioned) for interrogation, it mentioned an FIR number, but I was unaware of the specific allegations mentioned in the FIR against me.'
'Not taken to police station'
According to the detained activists, they were not taken to any official police station by the Delhi Police. Instead, the students who spoke to The Wire claimed they were held at an unknown location in Delhi's New Friends Colony.
All seven individuals, who were picked up from different locations on different days, were kept at this place.
Gurkirat and Lakshita claimed that the location was 'not a common police station' but a large 'bungalow', which they were told was an office of the Delhi Police's Special Cell.
Interrogation, physical torture, threats and harassment
Students and activists have alleged that the police interrogation after their detention was a process of harassment and physical and mental torture of them.
To intimidate Gurkirat, Gaurav and Gaurang were stripped naked in front of her and brutally beaten on the soles of their feet with a leather whip, the activists alleged.
Gurkirat said, "They took us to a room where we could see what was happening in the next room through a glass. There, the police officer called my friends Gaurav and Gaurang, stripped them, and made them lie down on a cold steel table. Then, using a leather belt with a wooden handle, the officers repeatedly whipped them on the soles of their feet. They would beat them and ask them to stand up, and when they couldn't, they would beat them again.'
'This wasn't for any interrogation process; it was done just to show me a 'demo' of what could happen to me. After that, they took me to the same room and beat me in the same way,' she said.
While Gurkirat was not stripped completely, the policewomen , also in civil clothing, tortured her and beat her on the foot with the leather whip. She also alleged that prior to that, the policemen slapped her and pulled her by the hair.
The students and activists, while speaking to The Wire, claimed that in the end, they were forced to sign 'several blank sheets of the paper and false confessions' without even being allowed to read them.
Gaurav, a student at the Delhi School of Journalism, who has now returned to his native, Nawada in Bihar, spoke to The Wire about his eight-day-long ordeal. He said, 'Gurkirat, Gaurang and I were picked up from Ber Sarai on July 9. In the first three days, the police tortured us a lot. They would wake us up at 1:30 or 2:00 am and take us to the interrogation room. There, they would strip us completely naked, make us lie on the floor, and beat us with belts and sticks.'
'On the day of release on July 17, they asked us to sign several documents. Some of them were blank papers. We were being threatened that if we did not sign, they would not release us," he added.
When asked what the police asked them during the interrogation, four of them (Lakshita, Gaurav, Gurkirat and Ehtamam) said that the initial and most persistent question was about IAS officer Archana Verma's daughter Valika.
The police were constantly asking, 'Where is Valika?'.They kept asking questions like, 'Why did she leave home?', and whether anyone had helped her 'escape'.
Lakshita and Gurkirat claimed that of the seven detainees, Ehtemam faced the most severe and inhuman torture.
Throughout the entire detention, Ehtemam, a lawyer-activist with FACAM who studied at Jamia Millia Islamia, was deliberately and more brutally targeted because of his 'Muslim identity', they alleged.
He was constantly beaten while being subjected to Islamophobic slurs like " Mulla" and " Katwa", they said. Lakshita claimed that the police also tried to falsely cast her and Ehtemam's relationship in a "love jihad" angle – a conspiracy theory used by the right-wing groups that falsely accuses Muslim men of duping Hindu (non-Muslim) women with promises of love and marriage to religiously convert them.
What's the IAS officer and her daughter's connection with the detentions?
Lakshita and Gurkirat claimed that primary reason they were subjected to sustained torture is a 'personal dispute' between a senior bureaucrat IAS officer Archana Verma and her daughter, Valika Verma.
According to some of the detainees, Valika, a 24-year-old law graduate from Jindal University, Haryana, and the editorial member of the Nazariya Magazine, had left her home due to the ideological differences with her mother and was living independently in Delhi's Ber Sarai.
Gurkirat said, "We do not know where Valika is. She had ideological differences with her mother and left the house. But the police have been after us and have brutally tortured us. During our questioning, they repeatedly asked us where Valika was.'
Lakshita also said that they have still not been provided with a copy of the FIR, whose number was mentioned on the notice she received. She is unaware of the specific allegations mentioned against them.
She said, "An FIR has been filed. I too received an online notice, I have that notice, the one summoning me for an investigation under that FIR. But the police are not giving us the FIR, they are not giving us anything. The police were constantly telling us, 'If you come to Delhi, we will arrest you.''
She added that the notice that she received from the police was sent online to her parents' mobile on July 20.
Parents summoned
Throughout this entire issue, the parents of the detained students have also faced harassment. Both Lakshita and Gurkirat stated that their parents were summoned to Delhi and were forced to sign documents so that their children were released.
Lakshita said, "They made our parents write, and sign it, that if they send us back to Delhi, then police will arrest us. Due to this fear, my parents are not allowing me to speak with anyone and are pressuring me to remain at home.'
The parents of the other students also took their children back home and kept them away from any form of legal or public response.
Ehtemam is currently living in Lucknow with his family after the harrowing detention. Speaking to The Wire, he said: "The police physically and mentally harassed me. They kept asking me during the interrogation where Valika was, which I did not know. They called me 'Mulla' and said they would create a 'love jihad' angle with my friend Lakshita. They threatened to plant weapons at my house and said they will arrest my parents for arms trafficking.'
He claimed that when the police released him, they did not return his belongings.
He added, "The police took my phone, my wallet, my Bar Association ID card, my Aadhaar card, my PAN card and most importantly, they did not return my flat keys, which they had initially taken from me.'
Amongst the seven detainees, Rudra was the youngest, and only 19 years old. A student at Delhi University's Zakir Husain College, he was working with Valika for the Nazariya Magazine.
Rudra was the last person to be detained by the police, on July 19, at the New Delhi railway station, and was taken after some of the initially detained individuals had already been released.
From the time the student activists were detained on July 9 until July 18, Nazariya Magazine has been posting calls for their release on their social media handles on Facebook, X, Instagram, as well as on its website. However, the last post on their Facebook page was on July 18.
Following Rudra's detention on July 19, there have been no further posts on any of the platforms.
The detained students were released in stages between July 16 and July 21. After eight days of detention, Gurkirat was the first to be released on the night of July 16. Only after her release did the outside world receive concrete information about the case and the detention of the other students.
The following day, on July 17, Lakshita, Gaurav and Gaurang were released. Ehtemam, who had faced the most severe physical and mental torture, was released on July 18. Samrat, who was arrested in Haryana, was released on July 19. Finally, Rudra, who had been detained last, was released on July 21.
This is not the first time that the students of the BSCEM had been detained.
In May last year, during the Lok Sabha elections, BSCEM had made wall paintings in Delhi, calling for an election boycott. Two female students of the organisation, Lakshita and Uttara, were detained by the police while leaving their college after an exam.
A few months ago, the students associated with BSCEM alleged that after a wall painting in JNU depicting atrocities in Bastar, four members – Gaurav, Gaurang, Kiran and Rahul – were illegally detained for 15 hours at the Vasant Vihar police station, Delhi, where they were also allegedly beaten.
The Wire reached out to Delhi Police for a comment, but was not able to connect over telephone. We sent the email to the pro@delhipolice.gov.in, Delhi Police. This story will be updated if a response is received.
The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
8 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
NDPS case: Panchkula court junks anticipatory bail plea of 3 pharmacists
A local court has dismissed the anticipatory bail pleas of three Panchkula pharmacists who were caught selling psychotropic tablets to an unauthorised purchaser in February this year. The court of additional sessions judge Himanshu Singh junked the plea after the NCB stated that their custodial interrogation was required. (Shutterstock) The accused are Ashish Gupta, 33, the proprietor of M/s Hare Krishna Pharma, Jatinder Verma, 51, of M/s Verma Medico Distributors and Amit Chopra, 45, of M/s UR Enterprises The case dates back to February 28 when a team, acting on CBI intelligence, inspected Pinjore-based M/s Deep Medicos, and found psychotropic tablets being sold without permit. The matter was handed over to Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB), Chandigarh, which seized 948 tablets/capsules and registered a case against proprietor Randeep Singh based on his voluntary, self-incriminatory statement. In his statement, Randeep named wholesale dealers Ashish Gupta, Jatinder Verma and Amit Chopra. Based on this, the NCB registered a case against them for violating their licence conditions by selling psychotropic substances to an unauthorised purchaser, M/s Deep Medicos. The court of additional sessions judge Himanshu Singh junked the plea after the NCB stated that their custodial interrogation was required. Last week, the court had dismissed the bail plea of other pharmacists involved in the case: Sanjay Kumar, 61, of M/s SS Bharti, Naresh Kumar Sardana, 54, of M/s Mediking, and Deepak Sharma, 55, of Sharma Enterprises.

The Hindu
8 minutes ago
- The Hindu
When caste pride slays young love
The quiet hamlet of Arumugamangalam near the banks of the Tamirabharani in southern Tamil Nadu's Thoothukudi district has just about 300 families. Since Sunday last (July 27), however, the residents have lost sleep, with senior Ministers, politicians, top police officers, and leaders of caste outfits visiting this otherwise nondescript village. The visits followed a cold blooded murder that stemmed from a love affair, involving a boy from the Scheduled Castes and a girl of an intermediate caste. For some, it was a crime that deserved punishment. Chandrasekar, father of the victim, C. Kavin Selvaganesh, lives at Arumugamangalam, 25 km from the district headquarters of Thoothukudi, to take care of his farmland. His family of three — wife Tamilselvi, a teacher at Ananthamadan Pacheri near Thoothukudi, and sons Kavin and Praveen — had moved to Thoothukudi. After completing his SSLC at a school in Chidambara Nagar in Thoothukudi, Kavin moved to a higher secondary school on Meelavittaan Road on the outskirts of the town. It was here he met his classmate Subhashini, daughter of two Sub-Inspectors of police. 'They were good friends since their schooldays, and caste was not so important to them,' says Praveen. Maturing into love After Class XII, Kavin joined the B.E. Civil Engineering (2017-21) course at a private engineering college in Nalattinpudur near Kovilpatti in Thoothukudi district. Meanwhile, Subhashini realised her dream of becoming a siddha doctor by studying in a Coimbatore-based private siddha medical college. The couple remained in touch during their college days. After completing his Civil Engineering degree with a gold medal, Kavin joined a construction firm in Coimbatore. Then, he switched to Information Technology, securing a job in a Chennai-based multinational company with an enviable salary package. Subhashini, whose parents had by then moved from Thoothukudi to the neighbouring Tirunelveli, started practising siddha medicine at a private hospital at KTC Nagar in Palayamkottai. By this time, their friendship had evolved into love. When Kavin's mother came to know about this, she cautioned him against continuing the affair as Subhashini is from a Most Backward Caste and they belong to the Scheduled Castes, a union no one from the girl's side would approve of. However, Kavin ignored the warning and continued his relationship. The police said that Subhashini's younger brother Surjith, a graduate and athlete, had come to know about the relationship on May 30 and informed his parents Saravanan and Krishnakumari. The girl, the police added, denied that they were in a relationship when her parents questioned her. One reason she hid her love was that Kavin had requested her to wait for six more months because he wanted to move further up in his career. Kavin had shared his mother's anxiety with Subhashini and she had spoken to Tamilselvi on the phone to allay her fears. Yet, the mother's worst fear came true around 3 p.m. on July 27. That day, Tamilselvi's father Muthumalai had suffered an injury on the head. Kavin had taken him to the hospital where Subhashini works. Tamilselvi and his younger brother accompanied them to the hospital, where Subhashini explained to them about the line of treatment to be followed. Meanwhile, as Kavin stepped outside, Surjith was waiting for him. Both left the place on Surjith's bike, Kavin on the pillion. Only when the conversation between Subhashini and Tamilselvi ended, did they realise that Kavin was not there. Their repeated attempts to contact him failed as he did not attend the calls. Subhashini asked them to have lunch and assured them that she would send Kavin back home when he returned. However, he never returned. Attacked with machete The police said Surjith had stopped the bike and hacked him with a machete. The victim's relatives say Surjith, after sprinkling chilli powder on Kavin's face, hacked him. With four sharp cuts landing on the neck and the head, Kavin died on the spot. Passers-by and residents alerted the Palayamkottai police, who nabbed Surjith immediately. Besides Surjith, the First Information Report named Sub-Inspectors Saravanan and Krishnakumari as the second and third accused. Saravanan was arrested on the night of July 30. 'Krishnakumari is yet to be arrested. We have demanded the transfer of this case to the CBI,' says advocate S.R. Ramachandran of Thoothukudi, who is working with the family of the deceased. While theories were floated that Kavin and Subhashini were just friends, a few photos have surfaced on social media exhibiting the bond between them. In a bid to put the speculation to rest, the girl released a video in which she unequivocally admitted that she was in love with Kavin. In the same breath, she said her parents were innocent and they were not aware of Surjith's plan to murder Kavin. Leaders of caste outfits and caste-based political parties are staging protests in support of the bereaved family and demanding 'Justice for Kavin'. 'This barbaric crime continues as there is no draconian law to crush this evil. Since 'caste killing' is a national issue, the Union government, in line with the Supreme Court guidelines, should enact a law with stringent provisions to eradicate murders of Scheduled Caste members by those of other communities in the name of caste,' says Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi leader and MP Thol. Thirumavalavan, who met the family on July 31 at Arumugamangalam. He also demanded the constitution of a separate government agency to stamp out caste killings. The youth wing leader of Puthiya Thamizhagam, K. Shyam, the son of party founder K. Krishnasamy, also bats for a law with more stringent provisions to uproot caste killings. He urges the State government not to post members of a particular most backward community, especially as Collectors, Superintendents of Police, Deputy Superintendents of Police, and revenue officials. 'Since the Scheduled Castes are always at the receiving end of the aggression of this particular community, the government should not post officials of this caste in the already communally sensitive southern Tamil Nadu, where several caste clashes had occurred in the past,' he says. A. Kathir, executive director, Evidence, a Madurai-based NGO, says the recent caste killing is another example of how Tamil society has been embroiled in the system of graded inequality. While other caste killings were staged by people with a conservative mindset, this one was committed by a youngster raised in an urban surrounding, he adds. Pointing to the complexity in such killings, he says these incidents happen even within the same castes. 'When a person of the Scheduled Caste or the Scheduled Tribe is the victim, the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act could be invoked, but what can be done when the victim is from the Backward Class or the Most Backward Class, or the victim and the accused are both from the Scheduled Castes,' he asks. He says that about 51 murders related to caste violence have been registered between 2017 and 2025, and the conviction rate is less than 1%. 'Exclusive law needed' Stressing the need for an exclusive Act to deal with honour killings, related to caste or gender or class, he says that after a yearlong study and research, a group of activists came up with a draft for a special Act, titled The Freedom of Marriage and Association and Prohibition of Crimes in the Name of Honour Act, 2022. The framework was arrived at after the modus operandi and social structure and practices in every State were analysed. This draft should be tabled in Parliament for discussion, he pointed out. 'Chief Minister M.K. Stalin, when in the Opposition, promised that his government would pass an Act to prevent honour crimes, but it has not been done so far,' he adds. In the meantime, if the guidelines laid down by the Supreme Court in Shakti Vahini vs Union of India were followed rigorously, these crimes could be prevented in the caste-ridden Tamil society, Mr. Kathir says. In Kavin's murder, the Inspector who registered the case was from the same community as the accused. 'Though I do not want to blame the entire police department, for better policing and law and order, police officials posted in a region should not be of the predominant caste there,' he adds. Henri Tiphagne, human rights activist and executive director of People's Watch, alleges that police personnel are among the accused in this case; hence, their arrest is being delayed. 'Anyone involved must be arrested immediately, and the case should be expedited to ensure swift punishment,' he adds.


Time of India
13 minutes ago
- Time of India
Rohan Jaitley demands apology from Rahul Gandhi over remarks on Arun Jaitley
New Delhi: Rohan Jaitley , son of former Finance Minister Arun Jaitley and chief of the Delhi & District Cricket Association (DDCA), on Saturday demanded a public apology from Congress leader Rahul Gandhi for his remarks claiming that Arun Jaitley had threatened him over the farm laws. Calling the allegations "highly condemnable," Rohan Jaitley earlier pointed out that the farm laws were introduced in 2020—13 months after his father's death in August 2019—making it impossible for Arun Jaitley to have been involved. "Threatening people was not in Arun Jaitley's nature. He was a staunch democrat and a consensus builder. To say he threatened anyone over the Farmer's Bill, which came after his death, is unacceptable," Rohan Jaitley told ANI. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Project Management Artificial Intelligence Data Science Degree Technology Data Analytics Public Policy Operations Management Management Healthcare others CXO Product Management Digital Marketing PGDM MBA MCA Cybersecurity Leadership Data Science healthcare Finance Design Thinking Others Skills you'll gain: Project Planning & Governance Agile Software Development Practices Project Management Tools & Software Techniques Scrum Framework Duration: 12 Weeks Indian School of Business Certificate Programme in IT Project Management Starts on Jun 20, 2024 Get Details Skills you'll gain: Portfolio Management Project Planning & Risk Analysis Strategic Project/Portfolio Selection Adaptive & Agile Project Management Duration: 6 Months IIT Delhi Certificate Programme in Project Management Starts on May 30, 2024 Get Details He urged Rahul Gandhi to "let the departed rest in peace" and discharge his duties "with responsibility." In a post on X, Rohan also reminded Gandhi of his earlier controversial remarks about the late Manohar Parrikar, saying such statements were in "equally poor taste." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like The Business Sneaker Loved by CEOs and NFL Stars Wolf & Shepherd Shop Now Undo BJP leaders Amit Malviya and Anurag Thakur also came out strongly against Rahul Gandhi. Malviya termed Gandhi's statement "factually incorrect and misleading," clarifying that the farm bills were drafted and enacted in 2020, well after Arun Jaitley's demise. Thakur accused Gandhi of spreading "a new lie every day" and demanded he apologise to Jaitley's family and the BJP. "Rahul Gandhi should apologise to Arun Jaitley's family, the BJP, and the entire country," Thakur said, pointing out that the farm laws were passed in Parliament over a year after Jaitley's death. Live Events Rahul Gandhi had earlier alleged that Arun Jaitley was sent by the Modi government to "threaten" him for opposing the farm laws, sparking a sharp backlash from the BJP and Jaitley's family.