The US should take heed – superpowers rarely fall overnight
unravelling of the Western world order, echoing the mistakes of past rulers whose unwise actions led to irreversible decline.
Advertisement
After World War II, the Western world order was built on globalisation and international law. But as global competition intensifies, the concepts that once enforced Western hegemony are being abandoned. Trump and his advisers are desperately trying to stay ahead of civilisational decline.
Trump's
tariffs , imposed even on America's
closest allies , have undermined the fundamentals of US and Western economic dominance. The safety of US bonds and currency – long considered unassailable – has been called into question,
shaking global confidence . The tariffs are expected to stoke inflation and may trigger a recession.
The Trump administration's
verbal attacks on Nato allies have turned the US from the Western world's greatest asset into its biggest liability. The transatlantic alliance, a cornerstone of Western security, is fraying. Favourable attitudes towards the US have plummeted across Europe. Trump's denial of facts,
embrace of nationalism and undermining of democratic norms have accelerated a loss of faith in the Western project.
Nato Secretary General Mark Rutte (left) speaks to the press as he meets US President Donald Trump at the White House in Washington, on March 13. Photo: AFP
History is replete with examples of empires undone by their leaders' hubris, short-sightedness or divisiveness. Diocletian's reforms were meant to stabilise the Roman empire but sowed the seeds of future turmoil. Administrative division created burdens and fragmentation, weakening central authority and hastening the empire's fall. Trump's policies of stoking internal division and focusing on perceived external threats mirror these fatal errors.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
6 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Why Asian exporters can't afford a passive approach to US politics
For all the continued dizzying headlines about global tariffs and strategic pauses, one thing remains true: the United States is deploying trade policy not just as economic leverage but as a tool of diplomacy and power. The August 1 deadline for countries, including several in Asia, to negotiate a trade deal or face steep tariffs is no exception. Markets throughout Asia – a region home to some of the most export-reliant economies in the world – are in the crosshairs of US President Donald Trump's 'America first' doctrine. The topic was top of mind at the Association of Southeast Asian Nations regional forum in Kuala Lumpur earlier this month. During the first Trump administration, China faced tariffs that affected a broad range of industries. These continued through the subsequent Biden administration and became embedded in business processes, pricing and distribution. Things are different this time, and the stakes – and the tariffs – are much higher. Trump's constant policy changes related to tariffs offer little relief, and his administration continues to stoke great uncertainty and frustration in global markets and in company boardrooms. For nations whose prosperity depends on steady access to global markets – especially in automobiles, agriculture, manufacturing, textiles and fisheries – tariffs have made conducting business persistently unpredictable. Notably, Trump's new slate of tariffs continues to rock the imported automobiles market , with such global powerhouses as Toyota, Honda and Hyundai feeling the sting. The stakes are no longer confined to profit margins or trade balances; they touch on national reputations, political alliances and long-term viability on the global stage. Yet too often Asian nations respond as if it's still business as usual, which it is not. The geopolitical terrain has shifted and will continue to do so under the current administration. Washington is more than just a diplomatic capital; it's an economic power centre where deals are shaped in the White House, amplified by media echo chambers and driven by electoral calculus. In this environment, silence is a potential vulnerability rather than an expression of neutrality.
The Standard
8 hours ago
- The Standard
Iran denies Trump claim it gave Hamas 'orders' in Gaza talks
Iranian flag flies in front of the UN office building, housing IAEA headquarters, in Vienna, Austria, May 24, 2021. REUTERS/Lisi Niesner
South China Morning Post
9 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Don't know how much your art is really worth? You're not alone
Depending on your perspective, the verdict delivered by art services and technology company Winston Artory Group was either very good or very bad. A print that had recently been appraised for US$1 million was, the company determined earlier this month, now worth just US$300,000 – a 70 per cent decline in possible value. These were happy tidings for the insurance company that requested the appraisal, and potentially devastating for the print's owner. 'The insurance company loved it,' says Winston Artory's co-executive chairman Elizabeth von Habsburg. 'The client, maybe not so much.' Art is not easy to value. Unlike soya beans or gold, whose prices might shift but whose inherent qualities are immutable (one soya bean is functionally the same as any other soya bean), every artwork is different, and therefore must be considered on its own merits. Making valuation even harder is the fact that a huge chunk of the art market's transactions are conducted privately, meaning that variations in price are often impossible to discern unless the world is explicitly told a sale has taken place. (Even then, the exact price is often suspect.) Mark Rothko's Untitled (Yellow and Blue) sold for HK$252.5 million (US$32.4 million) at Sotheby's Hong Kong in November 2024, making it the third most valuable work by a Western artist to be sold in Asia. Photo: courtesy of Sotheby's During a boom market, when auction results set records and art fair reports include hundreds of sales, information about price fluctuations is relatively accessible. But in recent years, as the market has deflated, publicly reported sales have thinned out and value – good or bad – has become increasingly difficult to determine. To find out more about the valuation process and the state of the art market today, we sat down with Habsburg and and her co-executive chairman, Nanne Dekking, founder of Artory, the art market data and technology company that recently merged with art appraiser and adviser Winston Art Group. We were joined by Winston Artory president Peter Loukas at the firm's Midtown headquarters in New York. Everyone says the market's down. Based on all your internal data, how bad is it really? Elizabeth von Habsburg: The market's tough, there's no question about it. You see it with the dealers that are going out of business or deciding not to continue. I'm seeing things that would've sold three years ago just not selling – even with a more reasonable reserve at auction. It's hard.
