Some parents 'undermining' school staff 'by excusing poor behaviour', report says
The report, which was published by Estyn, the schools inspectorate for Wales, said engagement with parents was "key to sustaining positive behaviour".
From the 24 secondary and all-age schools Estyn visited during the last year, nearly all of them noted a "degree of difficulty" in engaging with some parents.
The Welsh government said it was "committed" to addressing "declining behaviour" in schools and colleges.
In the inspectorate's national survey, many staff described a few parents as "unsupportive" and sometimes "undermining staff by excusing poor behaviour".
The main issues identified by staff were low-level disruption, defiance and truancy, and poor behaviours outside of lessons included vaping, use of mobile phones and damage to school property.
In March, a Senedd committee rejected calls for a mobile phone ban
When presented with concerns about their child's behaviour, a few parents "displayed aggressive behaviour" towards school leaders and staff, the report said.
One school leader said support from parents was "not as it was" and poor behaviour at home was "not being addressed".
Another told the survey that parents' "reluctance to address challenging behaviour supports defiant attitudes".
'National campaign'
Most school leaders who responded to Estyn's national survey said the "overall support" from the Welsh government and other agencies in dealing with challenging behaviour was "inadequate".
They said schools were often having to use a "limited budget" to provide their own behavioural support provisions.
Estyn has recommended "an update to national behaviour guidance" and has called on the Welsh government to launch a "national campaign on positive behaviour to support schools and pupils alike".
Chief inspector Owen Evans said: "Our report shows that schools that prioritise well-being, establish high expectations, and build trusting relationships with families are more likely to succeed in creating safe and supportive learning environments."
The Welsh Conservatives' shadow education secretary Natasha Asghar said the situation in Welsh schools was "deeply concerning with record levels of physical assaults on teachers".
The Welsh government said it was "committed to ensuring everything possible is done to address declining behaviour in schools and colleges".
"We welcome this important report from Estyn which both highlights the issues our secondary schools are facing and, importantly, the steps that can be taken to address them," a spokesperson added.
"We will be discussing these points further at our behaviour summit later this month."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
China-backed centres at UK universities under threat from new free speech laws
Confucius Institutes at universities across England are under threat from new free speech rules, setting off urgent talks between ministers, vice-chancellors and regulators over the fate of the China-backed language and culture centres. Universities fear that the new regulations imposed by the Office for Students (OfS) this month will cause legal headaches with their Chinese partners, including the government in Beijing, and could lead to some being closed. University leaders claim they have been left in the dark by England's regulator over whether or not they are breaking the new rules, which bar foreign governments from vetting staff employed at the institutes. The 20 Confucius Institutes operating in England – including at the universities of Manchester, Coventry and Liverpool – are partnerships between each university, a Chinese university, and an arm of the Chinese state that provides funding. They offer Mandarin classes and promote cultural events but critics allege they also act as a Trojan horse within the education system. The Department for Education (DfE) said it 'welcomed a range of international partnerships with UK higher education' but that they had to comply with UK laws and regulations. 'It is for individual higher education providers to assess whether the criteria of existing arrangements would have the effect of restricting free speech and take steps to address that,' the DfE said. Jacqui Smith, the skills minister, said the government wanted to ensure that universities were 'places of rigorous debate' for all views. Smith said: 'Any attempt by a foreign state to intimidate, harass or harm individuals in the UK will not be tolerated. The government has robust measures in place to prevent this activity, including updated powers and offences through the National Security Act. 'We are also working directly with the Office for Students to support universities in safeguarding free speech and tackling any form of harassment on campus.' China's embassy in London did not respond to a request for comment. The new guidance is likely to force the universities to rewrite agreements with the institutes or face sanctions for breaching the OfS's free speech regulations in England, particularly new rules that punish universities involved with 'a foreign-funded institute [that] imposes an ideological test' as a condition of employment. One critical group, UK-China Transparency, says Chinese staff applying to work in the institutes have been asked to provide references to their 'political attitude' and be vetted by a committee of China's ruling Communist party. A spokesperson for the OfS said: 'Where universities or colleges enter into agreements with any country, they must ensure that they continue to uphold freedom of speech within the law and academic freedom. Where they cannot do this, they should immediately take all necessary steps to amend or terminate the agreement. 'Our guidance is clear, for example, that the imposition of any kind of ideological test as a condition of employment would be unacceptable.' Several universities contacted by the Guardian declined to comment publicly. But university leaders said they have asked the OfS for more time to investigate and negotiate with their partners. A spokesperson for the OfS said: 'Any institution not meeting their free speech obligations should take urgent action.' A spokesperson for Lancaster University said: 'Lancaster University is fully committed to upholding the right to freedom of speech for all staff and students. Along with our sector colleagues, we are carefully considering if there are any potential implications in the new guidance for our Confucius Institute, which plays an important role in our internationally diverse academic community.' One university said that the situation was complicated by the OfS refusing to indicate which arrangements would be allowed under the new regulations. A spokesperson for Universities UK, which represents vice-chancellors, said: 'UK universities are committed to upholding free speech and academic freedom. They work hard to protect these fundamental freedoms and meet significant legal duties in this area set out by the Office for Students. 'This commitment extends to the partnerships universities have with institutions around the world, which bring important economic and social benefits to the UK.'
The Independent
5 hours ago
- The Independent
Police pay rise: Officers' salary to increase 4.2% in England and Wales
Police officers are set to get a 4.2 per cent pay rise for police officers in England and Wales. The increased salary, which has been approved by the government, will apply to all ranks up to and including chief superintendent. It will also be backed by £120 million of extra funding from the Home Office. The Police Federation said the pay award 'barely treads water' with the current rate of inflation and equates to 'a Big Mac per shift'. The pay rise puts the starting salary for a police constable at £31,163, typically going up to £50,257 after six years, while the average salary for a chief superintendent will be £98,500. Allowances for on-call, away from home and hardship will increase by £10 and London weighting will go up by 4.2 per cent. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said: 'Our brave police officers work day and night, often making enormous sacrifices, to keep us safe. 'This government is proud to back them in doing so and today's pay award is a clear signal of our gratitude, and our determination to ensure they are properly rewarded for their service.' Brian Booth, deputy national chairman of the Police Federation, said: 'Today's pay award of 4.2% barely treads water, with inflation currently at 4.1%. 'We note that chief constables argued for a pay rise of just 3.8%. We welcome the government's decision to reject that position and instead listen to the strong case we have been making on behalf of police officers across the country. 'However, after more than a decade of real terms pay cuts, this award does little to reverse the long-term decline in officers' living standards or address the crisis policing faces. 'A pay rise worth the price of a Big Mac per shift won't stop record levels of resignations, record mental health absences, or the record number of assaults on officers.' The federation, which represents more than 145,000 officers, will now ask its members whether they want to accept or reject the award. The National Police Chiefs' Council's lead for pay and conditions, Philip Wells, said: 'We are pleased that the pay review body recognised the evidence that was presented by chief constables and the pay award that has been announced today is what we believe our officers deserve and reflects the nature of the work they are required to undertake to keep our streets safe. 'Today the Home Secretary also announced an extra £120 million towards funding the pay award. 'With more than 85% of police spend being on pay costs, it is vitally important that additional costs for pay are fully funded if we are to maintain services and be able to continue to invest in areas such as neighbourhood policing and technology.'
The Independent
5 hours ago
- The Independent
Miscarriage of justice watchdog investigates cases of 175 people handed abolished indefinite jail terms
The country's miscarriage of justice watchdog is investigating at least 175 cases which saw offenders, including children and young people, handed abolished indefinite jail terms. The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) has announced it has launched a major project to review applications from prisoners languishing on Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) jail terms. The open-ended sentences, which were scrapped in 2012 and have been described as 'psychological torture' by the UN, have left thousands trapped in jail for up to 22 times longer than their original tariff. This includes many who were children at the time of their offence and handed a type of IPP sentence for under-18s called a Detention for Public Protection (DPP) jail term. Now scores of cases are set to be reviewed by the watchdog after a string of IPP and DPP sentences were overturned by the Court of Appeal. Eight of 12 cases referred to the appeal judges for review have resulted in the sentences being quashed, reduced or substituted. This includes father-of-three Leighton Williams, who was wrongly handed an IPP sentence with a 30-month tariff for a drunken fight aged 19. He served almost 16 years under the sentence – mostly in custody – before it was quashed and replaced with a five-year determinate sentence in the Court of Appeal last year. If he had served half of that time in custody, he would have been out of prison by the time he was 22. Three appeal judges finally set him free on 9 May last year, aged 36, after finding the original sentencing judge had wrongly counted a previous offence, committed when he was 17, against him. After he was released, he told The Independent the jail term had robbed him of 16 years, adding: 'I have missed out on growing up with my friends. Going out. Getting a trade, being able to work. Just living a normal life. 'I deserved to go to jail – I understand that. There is no doubt about that. But for the length of time – I don't think you can justify that.' In a similar ruling in October, Darren Hilling's IPP sentence was quashed and substituted because the sentencing judge had failed to attach the necessary importance to his age and maturity when he committed his crime aged 21. Other victims of the scandal, whose tragic cases have been highlighted by The Independent, include: Leroy Douglas, who has served almost 20 years for robbing a mobile phone; Thomas White, 42, who set himself alight in his cell and has served 13 years for stealing a phone; and Abdullahi Suleman, 41, who is still inside 19 years after he was jailed for a laptop robbery. At total of 2,486 IPP prisoners were still languishing in overcrowded prisons without a release date at end of June. Almost 700 of them have served at least ten years longer than their original tariff. At least 94 IPP prisoners have taken their own lives in prison as they lose hope of getting out, according to campaigners. The CCRC project will see the body – tasked with independently reviewing alleged miscarriages of justice – consider up to eight current applications from people serving IPP and DPP sentences, before systematically re-reviewing a backlog of 175 historic applications to see if they should be referred to the Court of Appeal in light of the recent judgments. 'This starts with young people principally because that's where the chink of light is from the Court of Appeal,' CCRC chair Dame Vera Baird told The Independent. Reviews will start with those who were handed indefinite jail terms as children, before looking at those aged 18 to 25, followed by those over 25. This is because sentencing judges may have considered previous convictions as children when they handed out the jail terms to adults. However there is no timeline for the wide-ranging review and Dame Vera warned the CCRC has been allocated no additional resources for the project. The news has been welcomed by campaigners, including the Howard League for Penal Reform, which this summer called for a special CCRC process for IPP prisoners in a major report on the jail term. Other recommendations put forward in the report, including seeing all remaining prisoners given a release date to work towards at their next Parole Review, are being considered by the government. Their director of campaigns Andrew Neilson said he was thrilled to see the CCRC take this 'hugely positive' step, adding: 'Justice is long overdue to the thousands of people serving IPP sentences in prisons and in the community, and we hope that this will be one of many similar policies that will finally end the suffering of this abolished sentence for good.'
