logo
One of Hong Kong's last major pro-democracy parties disbands

One of Hong Kong's last major pro-democracy parties disbands

Yahoo12 hours ago

On the wall of the League of Social Democrats office, the Chinese characters for freedom are spelt out with court admission slips.
Members of the party take turns speaking into a microphone connected to a loudspeaker. They stand in front of a banner that reads "rather be ashes than dust", written in Chinese. Founded close to 20 years ago, the party is known as the last protest group in Hong Kong.
"The red lines are now everywhere," Chan Po Ying, the chair of the party, tells the BBC.
"Our decision to disband was because we were facing a lot of pressure."
She added that everything in Hong Kong has become politicised, and she was not in a position to go into more detail to elaborate the reasons.
The party is the third major opposition party to disband this year in Hong Kong. The group known for its street protests said it had made the decision after "careful deliberation" and to avoid "consequences" for its members.
The announcement to disband comes just days ahead of the fifth anniversary of the Beijing-imposed national security law. The party said it could not elaborate on the timing of its closure, but said it faced "intense pressure."
"Over these 19 years, we have endured hardships of internal disputes and the near-total imprisonment of our leadership, while witnessing the erosion of civil society, the fading of grassroots voices, the omnipresence of red lines, and the draconian suppression of dissent," it said in a statement.
The authorities said the national security law was needed in order to restore order after a year of often violent protests in 2019. But five years on, critics say it has been used to dismantle the political opposition.
In June, a Chinese official claimed hostile forces were still interfering in the city.
"We must clearly see that the anti-China and Hong Kong chaos elements are still ruthless and are renewing various forms of soft resistance," Xia Baolong said in a speech.
The national security law criminalises charges such as subversion. In 2024 Hong Kong passed a domestic national security law known as Article 23, criminalising crimes such as sedition and treason. Today the majority of Hong Kong's political opposition have either fled the territory or have been detained.
"I think it's no longer safe to actually run a political party. I think the political rights have almost totally gone in Hong Kong," vice-chairman Dickson Chau told the BBC.
On 12 June, three members were fined by a magistrates' court for hanging a banner at a street booth while collecting money from the public without permission.
Critics say opposition groups face political persecution. Chau says the party's bank accounts were closed in 2023. Over the last five years, six party members have been imprisoned.
"A place without any meaningful political party, then people sooner or later will forget how strong they are going to be if they can group together and voice out in a collective manner," said Chau.
"If I do nothing then why am I here in Hong Kong?".
He said even if he was not politically active, he feared he could still find himself a target of the police and be pressured to leave Hong Kong by the authorities.
"The future is very difficult as a citizen. If you want to exercise your right as a citizen it's very difficult. Not only for the politician or the activist, even the ordinary people need to think twice," said Chau.
"It's a dilemma I didn't expect to face in Hong Kong for just being an activist," he added.
HK security law is final nail in coffin, say critics
Silenced and erased, Hong Kong's decade of protest is now a defiant memory

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sportswear Brand Actively Black Reshores Operations to the U.S. as Juneteenth Launch Nears
Sportswear Brand Actively Black Reshores Operations to the U.S. as Juneteenth Launch Nears

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Sportswear Brand Actively Black Reshores Operations to the U.S. as Juneteenth Launch Nears

Actively Black is shifting part of its manufacturing to the U.S. and out of China, aligning with broader national efforts to bring production stateside. On Thursday, the sportswear brand, owned by former Sacramento Kings player Lanny Smith, will debut a new collection designed by an all-Black creative team. Unlike previous drops, every piece in the collection—which includes graphic T-shirts, shorts and hoodies—will be made from 100 percent certified Black-grown cotton and produced entirely in the U.S. through a fully Black-owned supply chain. More from Sourcing Journal Can Tech Plug the Gaps Between Immigration Policies and Reshoring Aspirations? Veteran's Carbon Holdings Pledges $1.1 Billion to US Farmers for Carbon Soil Program Trump Says US Should Produce Tech and Tanks, Not T-Shirts and Sneakers This venture kicked into high gear earlier this year after Donald Trump's global trade war gave Smith the push he needed to pivot. 'The idea of working with a fully Black-owned, U.S.-based supply chain [first crossed my mind] last year, but it didn't really accelerate until all the tariff talk began. That's when we had to start looking at some pivots just for operational survival,' Smith told Sourcing Journal. 'But overall, so many industries in America were built off profits made from slavery and cotton. Our people unwillingly participated in the wealth generation that created the U.S. economy, but we never got to enjoy the fruits of that labor or share in the upside of that wealth creation. There are scars, there's trauma… but I see this venture as reclamation.' To onshore its operations, Actively Black partnered with Bridgeforth Farms, a fifth-generation Black-owned and operated cotton farm and manufacturer. Based in Tanner, Alabama, the farm was established almost immediately after the Civil War, when former slave George Bridgeforth began purchasing land in North Alabama to build a legacy. Together with his wife, Jennie, he laid the foundation for what would become one of the oldest Black-owned farms in the country. Fast-forward to today, the farm is now run by Carlton and Kyle Bridgeforth—along with a few other family members—who were 'vital assets' in bringing the collection to life. 'The Bridgeforth family has been an amazing partner. Their capability to produce the products we're releasing is incredible, and the fact that they've kept this going for 150 years is just remarkable,' Smith said. 'We're also working with another company, Comoco Cotton, which is aggregating Black farmers in North Carolina. By working with both, we see an opportunity to hopefully scale [our operations] into an ecosystem.' This collection was intentionally timed to drop on Juneteenth, the annual June 19th holiday that commemorates the end of slavery in the United States. 'I think of Juneteenth and what it means for our people and the continued fight for freedom and equality…that's part of what this [collection] represents,' Smith said. 'We're not asking for a handout or for anyone to give us anything. We're building our own supply chain so we can generate wealth and power ourselves.'

Trump says he found a TikTok buyer
Trump says he found a TikTok buyer

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

Trump says he found a TikTok buyer

President Trump said in a Sunday interview that he has found a buyer for TikTok, the popular video-sharing app that Congress voted to ban if China-based parent company, ByteDance, did not divest from the platform. 'We have a buyer for TikTok, by the way,' Trump said in an interview on Fox News's 'Sunday Morning Futures' with Maria Bartiromo. 'I think I'll need probably China approval, and I think President Xi will probably do it,' he added. Asked who the buyer is, Trump said, 'I'll tell you in about two weeks.' The president added that the buyers are 'very, very wealthy people.' 'It's a group of very wealthy people.' The law requiring ByteDance to divest from the platform or face a ban on U.S. networks and app stores was signed by former President Biden last year. Trump signed an executive order earlier this month extending the divestiture deadline by 90 days. The new deadline is set for Sept. 17. The order instructed the Department of Justice not to enforce the law or impose penalties related to it, and it marked Trump's third extension since taking office in January. The Supreme Court upheld the divest-or-ban law in early January, prompting the measure to take effect January 19, the day before Trump was sworn in for his second term. The platform was brought back online hours later after Trump vowed to sign an executive order once back in office to give the company an extension. Trump made good on that promise, and his first order gave ByteDance 75 days beyond the January deadline to divest from the platform amid national security concerns. A deal was finalized by the White House in early April but was never completed amid Trump's tariff fight with China. The president then signed another executive order in April, extending the deadline by another 75 days, which was set to expire June 19, when he issued the most recent extension.

AI Export Shakeup: Strategic Imperatives For The C-Suite
AI Export Shakeup: Strategic Imperatives For The C-Suite

Forbes

time2 hours ago

  • Forbes

AI Export Shakeup: Strategic Imperatives For The C-Suite

Claudio Saes is a partner and telecom practice leader at Bell Labs Consulting, a group of the award-winning Nokia Bell Labs. In today's ever-changing technology landscape, regulatory shifts can alter competitive dynamics nearly overnight. On May 13, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce rescinded the Biden-era rule for AI diffusion. This export-control policy was designed to impose tiered restrictions on advanced AI chip exports. This policy reversal is set to reshape global AI markets, diplomatic relations and security strategies. As a result, corporate leaders will need to reassess their strategic priorities and risk profiles in real time. From Tiered Control To Targeted Agreements In early January, former President Biden introduced a framework for AI diffusion, classifying countries into three tiers: Tier 1 was most permissive for countries such as Japan, South Korea and Canada; Tier 2 imposed moderate restriction on countries such as Mexico, Brazil and India; and Tier 3 was most restrictive on countries such as China, Russia and Iran. The goal was "to keep advanced computing power in the United States and among its allies while finding more ways to block China's access," per Reuters. The Trump administration is moving away from a broad embargo and appears to be exploring customized bilateral agreements. The New York Times reported that the administration seems to be "interested in using A.I. chips to secure strategic bonds" in the Middle East. If this comes to fruition, this shift could signal a transition to a more streamlined, deal-oriented approach. While it could reduce bureaucratic complications and speed up market entry timelines for hardware vendors, it also introduces some uncertainty. Corporate executives will need to monitor diplomatic negotiations closely, as export privileges may depend on changing agreements between countries rather than fixed, published rules. Revenue Upside And Market Access Chipmakers like Nvidia and AMD now benefit from renewed access to restricted markets. Previous regulations limited exports to Tier 2 and Tier 3 countries, which some said risked the diversion of buyers to non-U.S. suppliers. With these controls rescinded, U.S. firms can gain market share in rapidly digitizing regions like Latin America and Southeast Asia, as well as access the largest AI markets in China and India. Stock markets responded swiftly: Nvidia's share price climbed by 3% on the day of the announcement, reflecting investor confidence in broader global sales prospects. For C-level leaders at technology companies, the challenge now is to recalibrate sales forecasts, re-engage international channels and scale production—while remaining vigilant to potential licensing requirements that might arise under the new bilateral framework. Accelerating Innovation Without Overheating By removing the specter of near-term export limits, we may see a fresh wave of research and development (R&D) investment and product development. Without the looming compliance deadlines and complexity of the tiered structure, engineering teams can focus on performance, integration and customer customization rather than regulatory paperwork. With fewer regulations in place, I believe the speed of AI advancement could surpass companies' ability to properly evaluate and secure their deployments. Corporate strategists need to consider the benefits of innovation against the risks of "overheating" in both market demand and technological development. It is essential to ensure that the rapid rollout of AI technology does not outstrip workforce readiness, graphics or tensor processing units and chipset availability. Diplomatic Ripples And Alliance Management The original tiered system received some pushback from U.S. partners who were assigned to more restrictive categories. By reversing these downgrades, the administration may reduce some political tensions and strengthen certain economic ties; however, not all allies may agree. It's possible that some could push for stricter controls and demand additional safeguards or specific clauses in bilateral agreements. Top executives should keep communication open with government affairs teams to anticipate objections from allies that could result in export vetoes or similar regulations. National Security And Supply Chain Vigilance The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace warned that lifting broad export caps without any type of replacement could result in offshoring AI development in countries that "offer generous subsidies, flexible regulations, and lower wages—but that do not share U.S. interests or values." This could, in turn, allow adversarial states to transform "intelligence and surveillance capabilities," develop "strategically significant weapons" and create "new cyber threats." As a result, corporate risk officers need to intensify supply chain diligence. It's crucial to screen partners and distributors for compliance with temporary licensing regimes, use AI analytics to identify unusual procurement patterns and strengthen internal controls to prevent unauthorized re-exports. Embracing Regulatory Uncertainty The policy reversal has created uncertainty regarding the replacement system. Companies now face a dilemma: Invest in capacity expansion, risking retroactive constraints or wait and potentially lose a first-mover advantage. To address this uncertainty, boards should form cross-functional teams of leaders from legal, finance, sales and R&D to explore different scenarios and develop contingency plans. Flexible contracts with suppliers, tiered hiring strategies and modular manufacturing can help businesses quickly adapt as new regulations emerge. Strategic Imperatives For The C-Suite 1. Reassess go-to-market plans. Update international sales and marketing road maps to capitalize on reopened markets while mapping out potential restrictions under forthcoming bilateral agreements. 2. Strengthen government engagement. Forge closer ties with trade negotiators and regulatory bodies to influence and anticipate the shape of replacement rules. 3. Elevate security posture. Boost supply-chain transparency and compliance monitoring, and consider using AI tools to flag suspicious orders or partner behaviors. 4. Build adaptive operations. Design production and hiring plans with elasticity, so capacity can ramp up or down in response to regulatory fluctuations. Looking Ahead The rescission of the AI diffusion rules marks a crucial shift in U.S. technology policy. The Trump administration said this move was intended to boost American innovation and global competitiveness, but this also raises national security questions and regulatory uncertainty. Executives need to act quickly to seize market opportunities while implementing careful risk management and adaptable strategies for future policy changes. Companies that achieve this balance can thrive in the rapidly evolving landscape of competitive AI innovation. Forbes Business Council is the foremost growth and networking organization for business owners and leaders. Do I qualify?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store