Major UK airport's plans for millions more passengers ahead of £1.1bn expansion – with new flights to Europe this year
London Stansted Airport is currently undergoing a major £1.1billion expansion.
2
And the airport is now seeking approval for an expansion that would allow up to 51million passengers a year by 2040.
The airport capacity currently allows around 47million passengers.
If given the go-ahead, it would make the airport the third busiest in the UK, behind London Heathrow and London Gatwick.
The expansion plans so not include an additional runway, unlike Heathrow and Gatwick, due to the lack of surrounding space.
And the current limit of 274,000 flights a year won't be increased either.
However, improvements made to the train services as well as road access would be improved.
The airport's Managing Director Gareth Powell said: "We have an exciting and ambitious vision for London Stansted and how we best serve our region.
'We have already kicked off our five-year £1.2 billion investment programme to transform the airport, and if this application is approved, we will be able to unlock even more local opportunities and improvements over the next 20 years."
Last year, Stansted handled nearly 30million passengers - a record for the airport.
The airport offers flights to more than 200 destinations including long-haul flights to Dubai and Barbados.
New routes this year including Ryanair's flights to Reggio Calabria as well as TUI's Enfidha this summer.
And Royal Air Maroc's new flights to Casablanca start this month.
London Stansted's £1.1billion expansion includes an extended main terminal, as well as a bigger security hall and gate rooms.
Works have already started and hope to be complete within three years.
All of London's airports have revealed huge expansion plans in the next decade.
London Heathrow is campaigning for a third runway, which would increase the current 80million passenger capacity to 140million a year.
to welcome larger passenger aircraft, increasing capacity from 55million to 75million.
Here are the 15 busiest airports in the UK by passenger numbers in 2023
London Heathrow - 79.2 million
London Gatwick - 40.9 million
Manchester - 28.1 million
London Stansted - 28.0 million
London Luton - 16.4 million
Edinburgh - 14.4 million
Birmingham - 11.5 million
Bristol - 9.9 million
Glasgow - 7.4 million
Belfast International - 6.0 million
Newcastle - 4.8 million
Liverpool - 4.2 million
Leeds Bradford - 4.0 million
East Midlands - 3.9 million
London City - 3.4 million
And London Luton has plans to increase capacity from 19million passengers to 32milllion passengers.
Here's everything you need to know about Manchester Airport's massive expansion as well.
2
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
10 minutes ago
- The Independent
Southern Water boss should refuse ‘outrageous' pay rise
The Environment Secretary has urged Southern Water's chief executive to turn down a pay rise worth hundreds of thousands of pounds, saying it was not 'merited'. Lawrence Gosden, who has led Southern Water since 2022, was awarded £691,000 as part of a long-term incentive plan this year on top of his fixed pay of £687,000, according to the company's annual report. It is understood that he has only received half of this payment this year, taking his total pay to more than £1 million. Asked on Sunday about Mr Gosden's pay, Environment Secretary Steve Reed told the BBC's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg it was 'outrageous' and implored Southern to 'think about how this looks to their customers'. He said: ' Trust between the customers and the water companies is at the lowest point probably ever, and by paying their senior executives rises of that kind, what message are they sending to their customers?' Asked whether Mr Gosden should turn down the pay rise, Mr Reed said: 'I think it would be right if he did.' He added: 'I don't think Southern Water has performed well enough for that kind of pay increase to be merited.' Southern Water was banned from paying bonuses last month over a so-called 'category 1' sewage spill in the New Forest, Hampshire, in August 2024. Under new rules, companies are banned from paying bonuses if they do not meet environmental, consumer or financial standards, or are convicted of a criminal offence. Southern Water has insisted the payment to Mr Gosden is not a bonus but part of a long-term incentive plan set up in 2023 and linked to a two-year effort to improve the company's performance. It is also paid directly by shareholders rather than out of consumers' bills. A Southern Water spokesperson said its chief executive's pay and benefits were decided by a remuneration committee 'following protocols and rules set out by Ofwat and in accordance with the law'. They added: 'Lawrence Gosden's 2025 package includes a relocation allowance, and long-term incentive plan paid by shareholders which marks improvements made during the delivery of our turnaround plan. Both of these payments represent common industry practice.' Mr Reed's criticism of Mr Gosden's pay package came before the publication of a landmark review of the water industry, which is expected to recommend sweeping reforms to how the sector is regulated, including the abolition of regulator Ofwat. The review follows widespread criticism of water companies for awarding executives large bonuses and paying significant dividends to shareholders while missing targets for investing in infrastructure and overseeing a rise in sewage pollution in England's rivers. Earlier this month, Southern Water itself was forced to ask its owner, Australian investment firm Macquarie, for an extra £2.1 billion to help boost its struggling finances. The company, which supplies 4.7 million people across the south and south-east of England, has amassed nearly £9 billion of debt – making it one of the most heavily indebted water firms in the UK behind Thames Water, previously also owned by Macquarie.
The Guardian
10 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Environment secretary ‘furious' about England and Wales water bills
The environment secretary, Steve Reed, has said he is 'furious' about an average 36% rise in water bills in England and Wales but was unable to rule out further above-inflation increases in future to fix the broken water sector. Reed said he hoped that 'root and branch' reform of the industry would lead to billions of pounds more in investment, which would mean companies would 'never again' have to increase bills in the way they did last year. However, asked by the BBC's Laura Kuenssberg whether he would allow water companies to increase bills even further, as many have already askedsaid the decision would be up to regulators. 'I'm furious about the bill rises that we saw last year,' he said. 'They happened because of 14 years of failure under the previous government. They could have intervened and made sure that that investment to fix the broken sewage pipes was going in. They didn't. 'The point is you can learn from the past to improve the future. If you see a crack in the wall of your home and you leave it for 10 years, it gets much more expensive to fix. That's what happened with our water pipes. Bill payers were made to pay the price of failure. 'I'm furious about that. By changing the whole system, root and branch reform, I can make sure enough money is going in every year that we will never again see that kind of massive bill hike that customers had to pay last year.' Ministers will this week announce a consultation into creating a new water regulator, with a government-commissioned review expected to confirm on Monday that Ofwat, the watchdog that polices how much water companies can charge for services, will be abolished. 'A key part of that will be you make the water companies upgrade the pipes so they don't collapse to the extent that you need huge bill rise to put them back into a decent state,' Reed said. 'If we can get that right, we will get that right, you have a much more level for how bills will go up, no more massive bill shocks, like we had at the end of last year.' Critics have said Ofwat has presided over a culture of underinvestment in water infrastructure and financial mismanagement by water companies since its creation in 1989. Thames Water, the most troubling case for the government and the UK's largest water company, is loaded with £20bn in debt and struggling to stave off financial collapse. Earlier, Reed told Sky News' Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips programme that households expected 'a small, steady increase' in water bills rather than massive hikes. 'Bills need to be as low as possible,' he said. There needed to be 'appropriate bill rises' to secure 'appropriate levels of investment', he said, adding: 'A small, steady increase in bills is what people expect. That's what happens in most bills that I pay this year.' Industry leaders have also long complained about a lack of coherence in water regulation, with different regulators and agencies doubling up on areas of investigation. This has made it hard to have timely decisions, allowing investigations to drag on rather than prevent or address environmental harm and pollution. Reed said that it was 'outrageous' that Southern Water's chief executive, Lawrence Gosden, was given a pay rise that almost doubled his income, adding that he should have turned it down. 'Trust between the customers and the water companies is at the lowest point probably ever, and by paying their senior executives rises of that kind, what message are they sending to their customers?' he added. 'I really would urge them to think about this very, very, very carefully.' He said he would resign as environment secretary if the government failed to halve sewage pollution in rivers by 2030. 'Politicians come and say we're going to do things. Of course our job should be on the line if we don't.' Nigel Farage told the BBC the water industry was in a 'hell of a mess' before adding that the government should not bail out investors if water companies go bust, even though Reform's policy is to bring 50% of the sector under state control. Ofwat estimated it would cost £99bn to nationalise the sector, but Farage said it would cost 'a lot less' than £50bn if the right deal was struck. 'It's public-sector thinking, we need private-sector innovation,' he added, although the industry is run by the private sector currently. Ed Davey, the Liberal Democrat leader, called for a public benefit corporation model to restructure the water industry, with a new regulator to replace Ofwat. He told the BBC that the private capital model brought in by the Conservatives had failed but that nationalisation also would not work. Kevin Hollinrake, the shadow communities secretary, said he was not opposed to new regulation of the water industry but was concerned it 'might just be shuffling the deckchairs on the Titanic'.
Daily Mail
10 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Could Bitcoin help Rachel Reeves fill the black hole in UK finances? Chancellor ‘could profit from £5bn sale' of seized criminal crypto cash
could use bitcoin worth more than £5billion confiscated from criminal gangs to help fund Labour's spending plans, it has been suggested. The Home Office and police forces are said to be working on a major seven-figure sale of crypto-currency seized from organised crime figures, with the Treasury hoping to benefit. There are also plans to develop a storage system that would allow the regular sale of confiscated crypto-currencies. It comes as the Chancellor is facing pressure not to raise taxes in her autumn budget, after Labour backbenchers nixed efforts to cut the cost of the welfare bill and watered down plans to means-test the winter fuel payment. The price of bitcoin hit an all-time high last week of £123,000 (92,0000), with the Telegraph reporting this would value a single stash of 61,000 taken from a Chinese Ponzi scheme by officials in 2018 at more than £5.4billion - far above its value at the time. Aidan Larkin, the chief executive of Asset Reality, said: 'There is oil under our feet in terms of digital assets, from an illicit perspective, that could have hundreds of millions of pounds coming back into the UK each year.' Ministers are increasingly seeing crypto-currency as a possible income stream. Earlier this month ministers revealed they plan to crack down on speculators who evade tax on their profits. Under new rules, holders of currencies such as Bitcoin, Ethereum or Dogecoin will face fines of £300 if they fail to provide personal details to crypto service providers they use to make sure they are paying the right amounts to HMRC. The Government expects the new rules, which are known as the Cryptoasset Reporting Framework and take effect from January, to raise up to £315 million by April 2030. Any service provider which fails to provide accurate details about transactions and tax reference numbers will also face fines. Reform UK has recently pledged to cut taxes on cryptocurrencies and set up a 'Bitcoin reserve' if elected. Party chairman Zia Yusuf told reporters in may that a Reform government would reduce capital gains tax on assets such as Bitcoin to 10 per cent as part of a raft of reforms to how cryptocurrencies are governed. Mr Yusuf, who does not own cryptocurrency, suggested the cut could generate up to £1 billion for the Treasury over a decade, saying it would encourage more use of such currency and encourage people to move their assets to the UK. Cryptocurrencies currently incur capital gains tax of either 18 per cent or 24 per cent, depending on the rate of income tax paid by the person selling the assets. Mr Yusuf also announced that Reform would allow people to pay tax in Bitcoin and establish a 'Bitcoin reserve fund' to 'diversify' the UK's reserve holdings.
