Boxes of Nazi Material Are Found After Decades in Basement of Argentina Court
The boxes had been stored there for more than eight decades, the court said, and were uncovered by accident because workers were going through archives for the creation of a Supreme Court Museum.
Upon opening the boxes, they found 'material intended to consolidate and propagate Adolf Hitler's ideology in Argentina, during the height of World War II,' according to a statement from the court in Spanish.
Last week, officials, researchers and members of the Argentine Jewish community held a ceremony to open more of the boxes. The court's president, Horacio Rosatti, ordered a full survey of the material given its historical significance and 'potentially crucial information it could contain to clarify events related to the Holocaust,' the court said in its statement on Monday.
Jonathan Karszenbaum, the executive director of the Holocaust Museum in Buenos Aires, participated in the formal opening on Friday. 'I was shocked because of the volume of this,' he said, adding that he had not seen the contents of all of the boxes.
The court has determined some details about the origin of the boxes. It said that the material had arrived in Argentina from the German Embassy in Tokyo on June 20, 1941, on the Japanese ship Nan-a-Maru, when Argentina was officially neutral in World War II, and Japan was allied with Hitler's Germany.
The German diplomatic mission in Argentina at the time had designated the boxes as personal effects, the court said, hoping they would easily pass customs. But the boxes were held up by Argentine customs authorities and flagged to the country's foreign minister, Enrique Ruiz Guiñazú, over concerns that admitting the contents could jeopardize Argentina's neutrality, the court said.
Argentine officials opened some of the boxes in August 1941, finding propaganda material and other items from the Nazi regime. They also included thousands of red notebooks stamped with swastikas and names and addresses that appeared to belong to members of the Nazi Party living outside Germany.
German diplomats asked that the packages be returned, the court said, but a federal judge in Argentina ordered the seizure of the materials and referred the matter to the country's Supreme Court.
That's where the documents seem to have languished, largely forgotten, until this month.
The full significance of the documents was still becoming clear, Mr. Karszenbaum said. Researchers were planning to comb through the red notebooks in the coming weeks.
While Argentina took in thousands of Nazis and Nazi war criminals after World War II, the boxes' journey reflects the country's efforts to discourage the spread of Nazi ideology and membership before and during the war.
In May 1939, Argentina's prosecuting attorney declared that the local Nazi party's activities in Argentina constituted an 'affront against Argentine sovereignty' and were 'completely illicit and contrary to the Argentine Constitution.' Members of the Nazi Party in Germany were not allowed to become naturalized Argentine citizens.
Mr. Karszenbaum said he hoped that the further investigation into the contents of the boxes would provide more information about Nazi activity in Argentina during the war, as well as the answer to another pressing question: 'Why this was hiding for so many years?'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Florida GOP, DeSantis may follow Texas's lead
Florida Republicans are increasingly pushing to redraw the state's congressional lines following a similar move by the Texas GOP. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) said Wednesday he is 'very seriously' looking at asking the state Legislature to redraw the state's congressional map, arguing the 2020 census is flawed. Rep. Jimmy Patronis (R-Fla.) came out in favor of redistricting in a post on social platform X, writing that 'Texas can do it, the Free State of Florida can do it 10X better.' Florida Republicans say they were already headed in this direction following a state Supreme Court decision that upheld a congressional map supported by DeSantis and state Republicans. But the plan is gaining even more traction in the wake of Texas Republicans' unveiling of a new congressional map. 'It's picking up steam,' Florida GOP Chair Evan Power told The Hill. 'We were probably heading there with the court decision, but Texas made it top news.' Florida has seen an uptick in population growth following the coronavirus pandemic in 2020. The state has also become solidly Republican over the past decade, with Republicans growing their representation in Congress and once-Democratic strongholds like Miami-Dade and Osceola counties flipping from blue to red. A number of Democratic-held congressional seats could be impacted if redistricting were to take place, including those held in south Florida by Reps. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Jared Moskowitz and Lois Frankel. Rep. Kathy Castor (D) in the Tampa area and Rep. Darren Soto (D) outside of Orlando have also been floated as possible targets. Florida Republicans already hold a 20 to 8 advantage over Democrats in the congressional delegation. Republicans were boosted last month when the state's Supreme Court ruled to uphold a congressional map that blocked a challenge to the elimination of a majority-Black congressional district in the north of the state that previously was represented by former Rep. Al Lawson (D). The area that comprised the former congressional district is now divided among three Republican lawmakers. But DeSantis is not stopping there. The governor has argued that Florida got a 'raw deal' in the 2020 census when the state only gained one congressional seat. The governor said last month he had relayed his concerns to Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick after he was sworn in earlier this year and that the Trump administration could be pursuing redoing the census. Additionally, the governor said he believes Florida's Fair District amendments, which a majority of voters approved of in 2010, could conflict with the U.S. Constitution. The amendments say that districts cannot be drawn in a way that hinders minorities voting for their choice of elected representatives. 'There's a lot of people who believe that the Fair District Amendments is unconstitutional, because what it does is, it mandates having race predominate,' DeSantis said this week. 'Whereas, neutrality should really be the constitutional standard.' Patronis also said in his X post that he believes the Fair District Amendments are unconstitutional 'because it violates freedom of speech AND elections are a states rights issue.' 'Time to add more conservatives to Congress, so we can better deliver on President Trump's agenda, finally win the war against woke, cut government waste, and create an economy that moves our country into a new age of prosperity,' Patronis said. Republicans argue that DeSantis and the state's Republicans could be setting an example for other red states to follow. 'DeSantis here sees an opportunity to be a trailblazer for the Republican Party in this sense in that he could be setting up a pilot program that Texas and some of the other states can actually follow,' a Florida Republican strategist said. 'Let's not disillusion ourselves, if he pulls this off, he will be a fan favorite of one person who sits at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue,' the strategist added, referring to Trump. So far, Republicans in the Florida state Legislature have remained publicly quiet about the prospect of pursuing redistricting. This year's state legislative session was extended from 60 days to 105 days and saw tensions emerge between DeSantis and members of his own party. State Rep. Alex Andrade, a vocal Republican critic of DeSantis, said he has not spoken to his colleagues about redistricting. The state lawmaker noted he would support the effort only if the census was redone. 'I get the partisan argument,' Andrade told The Hill. 'I understand we could make hay right now and benefit Republicans but at some point do I care more about my party or the Constitution?' 'If the census were redone, I'd jump all over it,' he said. Florida Democrats warn that a move by DeSantis and the state's Republicans would set a negative precedent. 'It would mean that the governor and the state legislative branch would completely capitulate under Donald Trump,' state House Minority Leader Fentrice Driskell (D) said. 'It's not supposed to be that the president gets to act like a king and say 'do this on my behalf.'' In a Facebook video posted by Rep. Melanie Stansbury (D-N.M.), Soto accused Republicans of wanting to cheat in the election. 'They want to pick their voters rather than voters picking their representatives,' he said. 'You'll see us do whatever we can in the courts to make sure that the Fair Districts Amendments are enforced.' Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee spokesperson Madison Andrus dismissed the effort from Florida Republicans as 'a bold-faced attempt to save their flailing midterm performance by rigging the game.' The effort comes as the nationwide redistricting war heats up and both parties seek to gain seats ahead of next year's midterm elections. In addition to Republicans in Texas and potentially Florida taking a look at redistricting, Democrats in states like California and New Jersey are also exploring their options. 'There's an opportunity and if it better reflects the makeup of a state whether that's Texas or Florida, or to Gavin Newsom's point even California, then you should do it,' a national Republican strategist said. 'These redistricting efforts, if they comply with the law and meet all of the various federal thresholds to get mapped through, if you do that and do it quickly, you're going to increase the likelihood that the president and Republicans in Washington and going to be able to keep pushing things forward,' the strategist continued.
Epoch Times
4 hours ago
- Epoch Times
Trump Says Brazil's Lula Can Call Him ‘Anytime He Wants'
President Donald Trump said Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva is welcome to call him 'anytime,' as tensions rise between the two governments over new U.S. tariffs and sanctions on a Brazilian Supreme Court justice. 'He can talk to me anytime he wants,' Trump told reporters on Friday at the White House, speaking of his Brazilian counterpart.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
West Vancouver demolition order halted after appeal court finds judge had conflict
B.C.'s appeal court has overturned an earlier decision upholding a demolition order for a West Vancouver mansion. Homeowner Rosa Dona Este was successful in her bid to overturn the earlier court decision, after it was found the judge who allowed the order to go ahead had previously worked for a law firm representing the municipality and had consulted on the matter of Este's home. Este had argued against the judge's decision about the validity of the demolition order but also raised concerns over the judge's involvement in the case before being appointed to B.C.'s Supreme Court. 'According to Dr. Este, the judge also erred by failing to recuse herself based on a reasonable apprehension of bias,' said the appeal court's decision, handed down earlier this month. 'Este raised this issue prior to the hearing and advanced an application asking the judge to recuse herself on this basis. The judge dismissed the application, noting that almost seven years had elapsed since she had worked at the firm and stating she could not recall having ever been involved in the file or related matters.' While Judge Francesca Marzari had said previously that she did not recall working on the case involving Este's home, a lawyer for the West Vancouver district later filed an affidavit that said Marzari 'had sent an email to employees of the District advising them on matters related to the possible demolition of Dr. Este's home.' 'This information about the judge's prior involvement in the matter under appeal is clearly relevant to Dr. Este's allegation of apprehension of bias. For the reasons that follow, I conclude Dr. Este's applications must be granted,' wrote appeal court Justice Bruce Butler. Butler noted that if the appeal were refused, 'steps could be taken that could lead to irreparable harm to Dr. Este.' 'The balance of convenience, and particularly the overriding concern for maintaining judicial independence and impartiality, weighs in favour of granting a stay,' he wrote. The property in question is a 6,000-sq.-ft. waterfront home at 2668 Bellevue Ave. and was bought in 2003 by Este and her mother, Mina Esteghamat‑Ardakan. Este lived in the home until 2015 when a fire caused extensive damage. The home remained uninhabited and in a derelict state until 2020 when, following a number of neighbour complaints, the district ordered it demolished. Complications arose when the district found Este had rebuilt parts of the home without having sought proper permits or permission from her co-owner. Este's ex-husband, Mehran Taherkhani, also fought the demolition, arguing he had a stake in the matter because of divorce proceedings set for trial in 2026. Este and her mother had also previously been in court, battling over control of the property. sip@ Related Family battle over derelict West Vancouver house doesn't sway judge, who orders demolition to proceed
