logo
RFK Jr sacks US vaccine committee

RFK Jr sacks US vaccine committee

Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has fired all 17 members of a US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention panel of vaccine experts and is in the process of replacing them, his department said, drawing protest from many vaccine scientists.
The move is the most far-reaching in a series of actions by Kennedy, a long-time vaccine sceptic, to reshape US regulation of vaccines, food and medicine. Scientists and experts said the changes to the vaccine panel, which recommends how vaccines are used and by whom, would undermine public confidence in health agencies.
Kennedy promised the move would raise public confidence.
"Today we are prioritising the restoration of public trust above any specific pro- or anti-vaccine agenda," Kennedy said in a statement from the Department of Health and Human Services.
Kennedy has for years sown doubt about the safety and efficacy of vaccines, but he pledged to maintain the country's existing vaccine standards to secure his appointment in President Donald Trump's administration.
The Food and Drug Administration, which is overseen by Kennedy's department, has approved a number of vaccines during his tenure despite concerns over his stances. Even so, at least one senior Republican member of Congress expressed doubts about the changes in the panel.
Kennedy said the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices is rife with conflicts and has never turned down a vaccine, even though the decision to approve vaccines rests with the US Food and Drug Administration. The CDC panel provides guidance to the CDC on which groups of people would most benefit from an already-approved vaccine.
"That's a tragedy," said former FDA Chief Scientist Jesse Goodman. "This is a highly professional group of scientists and physicians and others... It's the kind of political meddling that will reduce confidence rather than increase confidence."
The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America called Kennedy's action concerning for public health.
"Upending the ACIP membership increases uncertainty and vaccine skepticism, undermining the health gains achieved through vaccination," the industry body said in a statement.
Shares of vaccine makers Moderna and US-listed shares of BioNTech fell more than 1%, while Pfizer was down marginally in extended trading on Monday.
Kennedy said most panel members received funding from drugmakers although members were required to declare any potential or perceived conflicts of interest that arise in the course of their tenure and any relevant business interests, positions of authority or other connections with organisations relevant to the committee's work.
Kennedy and HHS provided no specific evidence of industry conflicts of interest among departing ACIP members. The CDC's web page for conflicts of interest, last updated in March, showed that one current member had recused herself from votes on a handful of vaccines because she had worked on clinical trials for their manufacturers.
BIDEN APPOINTEES
All 17 ACIP members were appointed under former president Joe Biden's administration, including 13 in 2024, HHS said. Without their removal, Trump's administration would not have been able to choose a majority of the committee until 2028.
"This is not a political committee, it's never been partisan," said Dorit Reiss, a vaccine law expert at UC Law San Francisco. "It's an expert committee. Presidents have never been involved in ACIP membership."
The decision drew criticism from Democrats in Congress, and one key Republican expressed concern.
"Of course, now the fear is that the ACIP will be filled up with people who know nothing about vaccines except suspicion," said Republican US Senator Bill Cassidy in a post on X. "I've just spoken with Secretary Kennedy, and I'll continue to talk with him to ensure this is not the case."
Cassidy, a doctor from Louisiana who had expressed wariness about Kennedy's anti-vaccine views before clearing the path for him to become the nation's top health official, said at the time he had received assurances Kennedy would protect existing vaccination programmes.
The CDC panel will convene its next meeting June 25-27 at CDC headquarters in Atlanta, the department said.
Vetting new panel members typically takes months, said one expert with close ties to the committee, who expressed doubts the newly appointed panel would be able to meet on time unless Kennedy and his team "have been working in the shadows" to onboard them months ahead of the announcement.
Kennedy has drawn condemnation from health officials for his vaccine policies, including what they say is a weak endorsement of the measles shots during an outbreak that has infected more than 1000 mostly unvaccinated people and killed three.
He announced last month the government was dropping its recommendation that healthy children and pregnant women should receive Covid shots, sidestepping the typical process.
Traditionally, once the FDA approves vaccines for sale to the public, ACIP's role is to review data in a public meeting and vote on vaccine recommendations, which are then sent to the CDC director to sign off.
The Affordable Care Act generally requires insurers to cover vaccines that are listed on the CDC vaccine schedules for adults and children. The recommendations also determine which vaccines the CDC's Vaccines for Children program will provide free of charge to those without insurance.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Taxpayer Funded Satellite Likely "Irrecoverable" After Losing Contact With The Ground
Taxpayer Funded Satellite Likely "Irrecoverable" After Losing Contact With The Ground

Scoop

time6 hours ago

  • Scoop

Taxpayer Funded Satellite Likely "Irrecoverable" After Losing Contact With The Ground

, Climate Change Correspondent Space Minister Judith Collins has declined to answer questions about the loss of a taxpayer-funded satellite. The New Zealand government put $29 million towards MethaneSAT, which has been lost in space after going off course. The government invested in MethaneSAT in the hopes of growing the space industry. The mission's goal was to name and shame oil and gas producers that are allowing planet-heating methane to escape into the atmosphere. RNZ has been asking about problems with the satellite since September and was previously told its issues were "teething problems". Asked if the public had been kept adequately informed, Minister Collins said she had nothing to add and questions should go to the New Zealand Space Agency, which is part of the Ministry for Business, Innovation and Employment. The Space Agency released a statement saying the owners of the MethaneSAT satellite had advised contact with the satellite was lost on 20 June and attempts to restore communication have been unsuccessful. "Clearly this is a disappointing development. As those who work in the space sector know, space is inherently challenging, and every attempt, successful or not, pushes the boundaries of what we know and what we're capable of." "New Zealand has been a partner in the MethaneSAT mission since 2019, which is a collaboration with the US-based Environmental Defense Fund. "While the mission's primary focus has been detecting and measuring global oil and gas emissions, New Zealand's involvement extended the focus to a science programme to investigate the detection of methane emissions from agriculture and other sources." It said New Zealand's involvement had "strengthened our expertise and space capability as a country" and generated 97 measurements over agricultural land including 13 measurements over New Zealand, which scientists at Earth Sciences New Zealand, formerly NIWA, would work with as part of their $6 million project using the satellite. The satellite's owners released a statement overnight saying the taxpayer-funded climate satellite had lost contact with the ground and "is likely not recoverable." "While this is difficult news, it is not the end of the overall MethaneSAT effort, or of our work to slash methane emissions," said a statement released by the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF), the US group behind the satellite. The mission has been plagued by delays, first to its launch date and then to the arrival of its promised data about global methane emissions. The University of Auckland has been waiting to take over the mission control at its new, partly taxpayer-funded Te Pūnaha Ātea Space Institute. The announcement of the satellite's demise came just two days after the latest deadline for handing control over to university staff and students. In May, the mission's chief scientist said more intense solar activity because of a peak in the sun's magnetic cycle had been causing MethaneSAT to go into safe mode. The satellite had to be carefully restarted every time. There had also been a problem with one of the satellite's three thrusters, which maintain its altitude and steer the spacecraft. MethaneSAT had said it could operate fully on two thrusters. The new information helps explain why control of the satellite had to be handed back to its manufacturers in Colorado in March instead of going straight from Rocket Lab to the University of Auckland as planned. The university had said it would still operate the mission control from a delayed start date of June, and staff had been involved in day-to-day tasks ahead of the full hand over. The ability to learn from operating the satellite was a major rationale for the government's investment, after early hopes that it would reveal new information about New Zealand's methane emissions proved incorrect. New Zealand scientists had raised questions about what they saw as a lack of transparency with the New Zealand public about delays to the satellite's data. EDF, the environmental non-profit behind the satellite mission, told RNZ in October that the spacecraft was performing as expected and there were no "notable or particular complications outside the realm of what would be anticipated". But just a few months later, after more questions from RNZ, MethaneSAT announced that control of the satellite had been transferred back to its maker Blue Canyon Technologies so it could fix "challenges." When RNZ previously asked EDF if its response in October had been true it said the issues were "teething problems" and nothing beyond what was expected. "MethaneSAT experienced the sort of teething problems that one would encounter with any new mission using a new platform (bus), but nothing outside the bounds of what was to be expected. The expectation was that developing an efficient, well-honed set of operating procedures takes time," it said. MethaneSAT acknowledged in October the process was taking longer than expected, particularly commissioning the thrusters. However it did not disclose the issue with the satellite having to be brought out of safe mode until RNZ asked a list of specific questions. In March, Collins was asked about the mission's problems - but told Parliament she could not say because of confidentiality. In February, the government's Space Agency also cited the need for confidentiality when it declined to answer questions from RNZ about what was wrong. University of Auckland astrophysicist Richard Easther was among the critics of the mission's lack of communication about its problems. On Wednesday, he said New Zealand needed a "no blame" review to understand "how New Zealand blew past so many red flags about MethaneSAT's operation." "This is a tragedy for the people here who worked hard on it, and for New Zealand science." He said the mission "kept pumping out upbeat comms even after it became apparent that the spacecraft had major problems which in many cases appear to have been present since launch." Full statement from EDF: "On Friday, June 20, the MethaneSAT mission operations lost contact with MethaneSAT. "After pursuing all options to restore communications, we learned this morning that the satellite has lost power, and that it is likely not recoverable. "While this is difficult news, it is not the end of the overall MethaneSAT effort, or of our work to slash methane emissions. "Launched in March 2024, MethaneSAT had been collecting methane emissions data over the past year. It was one of the most advanced methane tracking satellites in space, measuring methane emissions in oil and gas producing regions across the world. "The mission has been a remarkable success in terms of scientific and technological accomplishment, and for its lasting influence on both industry and regulators worldwide. "The engineering team is conducting a thorough investigation into the loss of communication. This is expected to take time. We will share what we learn. "Thanks to MethaneSAT, we have gained critical insight about the distribution and volume of methane being released from oil and gas production areas. "We have also developed an unprecedented capability to interpret the measurements from space and translate them into volumes of methane released. "This capacity will be valuable to other missions. "EDF and MethaneSAT remain firmly committed to our core purpose of turning data into action to protect the climate including reducing methane emissions from the global oil and gas industry. "The advanced spectrometers developed specifically for MethaneSAT met or exceeded all expectations throughout the mission. In combination with the mission algorithms and software, we showed that the highly sensitive instrument could see total methane emissions, even at low levels, over wide areas, including both large sources (super emitters) and the smaller ones that account for a large share of total methane emissions, which were not visible from space until MethaneSAT. "EDF and MethaneSAT remain firmly committed to our core purpose of turning data into action to protect the climate, including reducing methane emissions from the global oil and gas industry. "We will be working with partners around the world to leverage the algorithms and associated software as well as the now-proven high precision technology that was developed as part of the MethaneSAT mission so the world has access to high quality actionable greenhouse gas emissions data on a global basis. "We will continue to process data that we have retrieved from the satellite and will be releasing additional scenes of global oil and gas production region-scale emissions over the coming months. "To solve the climate challenge requires bold action and risk-taking and this satellite was at the leading edge of science, technology and advocacy. "We also will continue to work closely with our partners to reduce methane emissions and implement the goals of the Global Methane Pledge, The Oil and Gas Decarbonization Charter, Oil and Gas Methane Partnership 2.0, the United Nations Environment Programme's International Emissions Observatory and Climate and Clean Air Coalition, and so many other efforts this mission was designed to support."

Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' passes Senate with JD Vance's tie-break
Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' passes Senate with JD Vance's tie-break

1News

time11 hours ago

  • 1News

Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' passes Senate with JD Vance's tie-break

Senate Republicans hauled US President Donald Trump's big tax breaks and spending cuts bill to passage on Wednesday on the narrowest of margins, pushing past opposition from Democrats and their own GOP ranks after a turbulent overnight session. The sudden outcome capped an unusually tense weekend of work at the Capitol, the president's signature legislative priority teetering on the edge of approval or collapse. In the end, that tally was 50-50, with Vice President JD Vance casting the tie-breaking vote. Three Republican senators — Thom Tillis of North Carolina, Susan Collins of Maine and Rand Paul of Kentucky — joined all Democrats in voting against it. "In the end, we got the job done," Senate Majority Leader John Thune of South Dakota said afterward. What exactly is in the bill? - Find out here ADVERTISEMENT The difficulty for Republicans, who have the majority hold in Congress, to wrestle the bill to this point is not expected to let up. The package now goes back to the House, where Speaker Mike Johnson had warned senators not to overhaul what his chamber had already approved. But the Senate did make changes, particularly to Medicaid, risking more problems ahead. House GOP leaders vowed to put it on Trump's desk by his Fourth of July deadline. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of N.Y., speaks during a news conference after passage of the budget reconciliation package of President Donald Trump's signature bill . (Source: Associated Press) It's a pivotal moment for the president and his party, as they have been consumed by the 940-page "One Big Beautiful Bill Act", as it was formally titled before Democrats filed an amendment to strip out the name, and invested their political capital in delivering on the GOP's sweep of power in Washington. Trump acknowledged it's "very complicated stuff", as he departed the White House for Florida. "I don't want to go too crazy with cuts," he said. "I don't like cuts." ADVERTISEMENT What started as a routine but laborious day of amendment voting, in a process called vote-a-rama, spiralled into a round-the-clock slog as Republican leaders were buying time to shore up support. The morning's headlines in 90 seconds, including Australia's weather bomb, the surprising costs of getting one more dog, and BTS are back. (Source: 1News) The droning roll calls in the chamber belied the frenzied action to steady the bill. Grim-faced scenes played out on and off the Senate floor, amid exhaustion. Thune worked around the clock desperately reaching for last-minute agreements between those in his party worried the bill's reductions to Medicaid will leave millions more people without care and his most conservative flank, which wants even steeper cuts to hold down deficits ballooning with the tax cuts. The GOP leaders had no room to spare, with narrow majorities. Thune could lose no more than three Republican senators, and two — Tillis, who warned that millions of people will lose access to Medicaid health care, and Paul, who opposed raising the debt limit by $5 trillion — had already indicated opposition. Attention quickly turned to two other key senators, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Collins, who also raised concerns about health care cuts, as well as a loose coalition of four conservative GOP senators pushing for even steeper reductions. Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, walks from the chamber. (Source: Associated Press) ADVERTISEMENT Murkowski in particular became the subject of the GOP leadership's attention, as they sat beside her for talks. She was huddled intensely for more than an hour in the back of the chamber with others, scribbling notes on papers. Then all eyes were on Paul after he returned from a visit to Thune's office with a stunning offer that could win his vote. He had suggested substantially lowering the bill's increase in the debt ceiling, according to two people familiar with the private meeting and granted anonymity to discuss it. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer of New York said "Republicans are in shambles because they know the bill is so unpopular." An analysis from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office found 11.8 million more Americans would become uninsured by 2034 if the bill became law. The CBO said the package would increase the deficit by nearly US$3.3 trillion (NZ$5.4 trillion) over the decade. Pressure built from all sides. Billionaire Elon Musk said those who voted for the package should "hang their head in shame" and warned he would campaign against them. But Trump had also lashed out against the GOP holdouts including Tillis, who abruptly announced his own decision over the weekend not to seek reelection. (Source: Associated Press) Senators insist on changes ADVERTISEMENT Few Republicans appeared fully satisfied as the final package emerged, in either the House or the Senate. Collins fought to include US$50 billion (NZ$82 billion) for a new rural hospital fund, among the GOP senators worried that the bill's Medicaid provider cuts would be devastating and force them to close. While her amendment for the fund was rejected, the provision was inserted into the final bill. Still she voted no. The Maine senator said she's happy the bolstered funding was added, "but my difficulties with the bill go far beyond that". And Murkowski called the decision-making process "agonising". She secured provisions to spare Alaska and other states from some food stamp cuts, but her efforts to bolster Medicaid reimbursements fell short. She voted yes. What's in the big bill ADVERTISEMENT All told, the Senate bill includes US$4.5 trillion (NZ$7.3 trillion) in tax cuts, according to the latest CBO analysis, making permanent Trump's 2017 rates, which would expire at the end of the year if Congress fails to act, while adding the new ones he campaigned on, including no taxes on tips. The Senate package would roll back billions of dollars in green energy tax credits, which Democrats warn will wipe out wind and solar investments nationwide. It would impose US$1.2 trillion (NZ$1.9 trillion) in cuts, largely to Medicaid and food stamps, by imposing work requirements on able-bodied people, including some parents and older Americans, making sign-up eligibility more stringent and changing federal reimbursements to states. Additionally, the bill would provide a US$350 billion (NZ$574.6 billion) infusion for border and national security, including for deportations, some of it paid for with new fees charged to immigrants. "The big not so beautiful bill has passed," said Paul. Democrats fighting all day and night Unable to stop the march toward passage, the Democrats tried to drag out the process, including with a weekend reading of the full bill. A few of the Democratic amendments won support from a few Republicans, though almost none passed. More were considered in one of the longer such sessions in modern times. Senator Patty Murray of Washington, the ranking Democrat on the Appropriations Committee, raised particular concern about the accounting method being used by the Republicans, which says the tax breaks from Trump's first term are now 'current policy' and the cost of extending them should not be counted toward deficits. She said that kind of "magic math" won't fly with Americans trying to balance their own household books.

In final results Mamdani won by 12%, but faces growing opposition for November's election
In final results Mamdani won by 12%, but faces growing opposition for November's election

NZ Herald

time14 hours ago

  • NZ Herald

In final results Mamdani won by 12%, but faces growing opposition for November's election

The 33-year-old candidate, a democratic socialist who is backed by Senator Bernie Sanders (Independent-Vermont) and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (Democrat-New York), overtook Cuomo's famed Democratic political dynasty backed by prominent figures from the party's old guard. Cuomo had sought a political resurrection less than four years after leaving the governorship in disgrace amid allegations of sexual harassment. However, in the week since Mamdani's upset, powerful donors, lobbyists, and political consultants in both the Democratic and Republican parties have scrambled to amass a unified opposition to his candidacy - based largely on his support for liberal economic policies and avowed anti-Zionism. Cuomo promised he would run in the general election as an independent even if he lost. But his well-funded campaign, which benefitted from the biggest super PAC in the city's history, was knocked on its heels by Mamdani's youth-powered volunteer army and voters' reservations about Cuomo's past. Cuomo is contacting donors and other groups to gauge their support in the general election, according to three people who have fielded those calls. So far, those donors have been mainly unenthusiastic about his candidacy, according to a dozen political operatives and donors active in city politics, all of whom spoke on the condition of anonymity. Mamdani's campaign, in a statement released after the results were announced, said he had received the most votes in a Democratic mayoral primary in 36 years, and is 'excited to expand this coalition even further as we defeat Eric Adams and win a city government that puts working people first'. Mamdani prevailed in the primary election by focusing on the affordability crisis faced by many New York residents. He pledged to ease the cost of living by providing free childcare, freezing rent among the city's one million rent-stabilised apartments, opening a collection of city-run grocery stores to provide lower-cost produce and staples, and making city buses free. In a city with the largest population of billionaires in the world, he has proposed to fund his ideas by raising taxes on the ultra-wealthy. And in his effort to become the first Muslim mayor of New York, which has the largest population of Jews outside of Israel, he has run unapologetically as a critic of Israel, saying he would arrest Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu if he came to the city. Many Democratic voters said those ideas energised them, but they have drawn an array of opponents. Members of his own party in his own state attacked him. Republicans have demonised him with Islamophobic and racist attacks - while also highlighting his progressivism. Many political donors in New York have scrambled to find a way to combat him. In addition to Cuomo's potential independent candidacy, Mamdani will also face Adams, a registered Democrat, who elected not to run in the crowded primary and instead is running as an independent in November. Curtis Sliwa, the Republican primary candidate, could be the fourth candidate on the ballot. Donors and Republican officials launched a national effort to persuade Sliwa to step aside and endorse Adams. Stephen Bannon, a former Trump Administration official and far-right podcast host, appeared on former Representative Matt Gaetz's show on One America News last week and described the effort to get Sliwa to step down so that anti-Mamdani forces could coalesce around a single candidate. Adams also met donors and floated the idea that Sliwa, a longtime fixture in New York and the former leader of the vigilante group the Guardian Angels, could accept a job in the Trump Administration as an incentive to leave the race. But Sliwa loudly resisted those calls. 'The only job I'm focused on is earning your support to be the next Mayor of #NYC,' he wrote on X last week. Adams won the race for mayor in 2021 as a Democrat but has been increasingly distanced from his party following his indictment on corruption charges in September 2024. Those charges were dropped in April, 2½ months after Adams visited President Donald Trump at one of his Florida golf courses. Both Adams and Cuomo are unpopular with voters and face an uphill battle to overcome their respective scandals. And both represent a fundamentally different style of campaigning - with institutional endorsements and big-money donations - to the small-dollar campaign that propelled Mamdani to victory in the primary. 'The outpouring of support that has come to Mayor Adams has been overwhelming and humbling, and we believe that energy is going to translate as an election for Mayor Adams as the leader of New York City,' said Frank Carone, Adams' former chief of staff and a key member of his re-election campaign. Cuomo's campaign said Mamdani's large showing with voters aged under-30 was hard to predict. Cuomo did not commit to campaigning in the general election but reiterated that he was 'continuing conversations with people from all across the city while determining next steps'. Hedge fund managers Dan Loeb and Bill Ackman have both thrown their support behind Adams, as have a variety of the city's business and industry groups. Jewish groups such as the New York Solidarity Network, a pro-Israel non-profit that represents centre-left Jewish New Yorkers concerned about growing anti-Semitism, have held discussions about backing either Cuomo or Adams, according to three people familiar with the various calls and conversations such groups have had. Many are waiting to put their money towards a candidate in the northern autumn until they can see how the race plays out in the coming weeks and months, these people said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store