More than 500 people crossed Channel on Friday
On Tuesday, the tally passed 20,000, the earliest point in the calendar year the figure has been reached since data was first collected in 2018, as ministers struggle with their pledge to 'smash the gangs' of people-smugglers who facilitate the journeys.
It comes after reports on Friday that French police officers had used knives to puncture a boat off the French coast.
The Government has repeatedly pushed for French authorities to do more to prevent boats leaving the shore, including changing existing rules to allow police officers to intervene when dinghies are in the water.
Those changes have not yet come into effect, but reports on Friday suggested tougher action was already being taken.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper pledged to crack down on the gangs (Stefan Rousseau/PA)
Meanwhile, the Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has announced a 'crackdown' on immigration enforcement targeting illegal working in the gig economy.
Officers will carry out checks in hotspots across the country where they suspect asylum seekers are working as delivery riders without permission.
It comes after Deliveroo, Uber Eats and Just Eat said they would ramp up facial verification and fraud checks over the coming months after conversations with ministers.
Ms Cooper said: 'Illegal working undermines honest business and undercuts local wages. The British public will not stand for it, and neither will this Government.
'Often those travelling to the UK illegally are sold a lie by the people-smuggling gangs that they will be able to live and work freely in this country, when in reality they end up facing squalid living conditions, minimal pay and inhumane working hours.
'We are surging enforcement action against this pull factor, on top of returning 30,000 people with no right to be here and tightening the law through our plan for change.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Glasgow Times
22 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
King Charles sends unity message on 7/7 attacks anniversary
The head of state said comfort can be taken from the 'spirit of unity' across the UK, which has allowed the nation to heal. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer also said that 'those who tried to divide us failed," adding: 'We stood together then, and we stand together now'. King Charles issues message of national unity for 7/7 attacks anniversary The King has called on the country to continue its spirit of unity (Image: PA/Aaron Chown) The King said: 'Today, as we mark 20 years since the tragic events of 7th July 2005, my heartfelt thoughts and special prayers remain with all those whose lives were forever changed on that terrible summer's day. 'We remember with profound sadness the 52 innocent people who were killed in senseless acts of evil – and the enduring grief of their loved ones. 'We recall, too, the hundreds more who carry physical and psychological scars, and pray that their suffering may ease as the years pass. 'In doing so, we should also remember the countless stories of extraordinary courage and compassion that emerged from the darkness of that day. 'The selfless bravery of our emergency services, transport workers, and fellow citizens who rushed towards danger to help strangers reminds us of the very best of humanity in the face of the very worst.' Other members of the Royal Family are taking part in memorials today, including The Duke and Duchess of Edinburgh, who will appear at the National Service of Commemoration at St Paul's Cathedral from 11.30am on Monday. Sir Keir Starmer said that 'those who tried to divide us failed' (Image: PA) The King also stressed the importance of communities coming together in times of adversity. He said: 'While the horrors will never be forgotten, we may take comfort from the way such events rally communities together in solidarity, solace and determination. 'It is this spirit of unity that has helped London, and our nation, to heal. 'As we remember those we lost, let us therefore use this 20th anniversary to reaffirm our commitment to building a society where people of all faiths and backgrounds can live together with mutual respect and understanding, always standing firm against those who would seek to divide us.' The Duke and Duchess of Edinburgh are to attend a memorial today (Image: PA) What were the 7/7 attacks in London? The 7/7 attacks were a series of attacks across London's transport network on July 7, 2005. The attacks saw bombs detonated on three underground trains and a double-decker bus. This caused severe casualties during rush hour, seeing 52 people killed and more than 700 injured. These were carried out by Islamist terrorists using improvised explosive devices made from concentrated hydrogen peroxide and pepper, packed into backpacks.
Telegraph
26 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Migrant can stay in UK after ‘far-fetched' claim he was shot by lover's father
An Iraqi asylum seeker has been allowed to remain in the UK after 'far-fetched' claims that he was shot by his married lover's father in an attempted honour killing. The unnamed migrant claimed that he was gunned down and left in hospital by his girlfriend's family following a secret affair. The Iraqi, in his late 20s, said he was outside his home in Iraq when his lover's disapproving father and brother shot him in the shoulder. He claimed the woman's father was a 'powerful' and 'influential' man who had connections with the Iraqi government. After arriving in Britain, he is now trying to claim asylum on humanitarian grounds by arguing that he cannot be deported because he is at risk of becoming an honour killing victim. A previous ruling at an asylum court dismissed his case, finding that he was not 'credible' and casting doubt on his 'far-fetched' story. However, the man has won an appeal after a new ruling said the original judge made legal mistakes. The case, disclosed in court papers, is the latest example uncovered by The Telegraph in which illegal migrants or convicted foreign criminals have been able to remain in the UK or halt their removal from the UK. Ministers are proposing to raise the threshold to make it harder for judges to grant the right to remain based on Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which protects the right to a family life, and Article 3, which protects against torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. The Iraqi man, of mixed Arabic and Kurdish ethnicity, lodged his asylum claim in September 2020, having arrived in the country. On his way to Britain, he spent time in France and had an asylum bid rejected in Denmark. 'The basis of the [Iraqi's] claim is that he cannot return to Iraq as he fears he is at risk of an honour killing from the family of a woman with whom he had an extra-marital relationship,' the tribunal said. 'He claims that [her] father is a powerful person with connections to the Iraqi government.' The Iraqi said he was in a 'secretive' relationship with the unnamed woman and was not aware of her father's 'rank, power and influence' before he began the relationship, only finding out later from her and a friend. The woman was married and 'forced to return to her family home', according to the man. He said he never met the woman's family but was able to recognise them after seeing photos at her home. He alleges that her father and brother shot him outside his own home and that he had to be treated in hospital for a gunshot wound to his shoulder. Account 'not credible' When the Home Office tried to deport him, he appealed against the decision. However, a lower-tier tribunal ruled that his account was 'not credible' and that 'he does not face a real risk of suffering serious harm in Iraq'. The judge at the time cast doubt over whether he was able to recognise the father and brother during the shooting, saying it was 'far-fetched' that he recognised them during the 'moment of heightened anxiety'. The judge also said the Iraqi gave 'confusing' and 'varying' accounts of who had shot him while in hospital. There was also no direct evidence of the injury, with his medical notes merely stating that he had a 'historic shoulder injury'. However, after a further appeal to an upper immigration tribunal, a judge has ruled the lower tribunal made mistakes in law that meant it could not be said the Iraqi's account about being shot was not credible. The panel concluded that the legal mistakes 'cast sufficient doubt on the overall approach to the credibility assessment'. The case will be reheard at the first-tier tribunal.
Telegraph
33 minutes ago
- Telegraph
‘Should I pay my final salary pension into a Sipp to drop a tax band?'
However, when the lifetime allowance was abolished, anyone who already had fixed protection before March 15 2023 (the date of the Budget announcement) could resume paying into or getting pension contributions and keep their protections. So, although one part of the rules relaxing means you might be able to start paying in again, the tax relief rules might still get in the way of you achieving your goal of minimising your higher-rate tax, or mitigating it completely. Tax relief and earnings You can claim tax relief on the greater of 100pc of your UK earnings, or £3,600 in any tax year. For most personal pensions, including Sipps, contributions are typically taken from pay after tax and topped up by basic-rate (20pc) tax relief returned from the Government, which is paid directly into the pension. If an individual paid in £4,000, this would be topped up by £1,000 basic-rate relief, meaning £5,000 goes into their Sipp. A UK resident with no earnings can pay in up to £2,880 a year, which is topped up by pension tax relief to £3,600. You've mentioned that you receive income from a final salary pension scheme. Although pension income is taxed under income tax in the same way as salary or bonuses earned in your working life, it is not classed as earnings when calculating how much you can pay into a pension for tax relief. The same goes for investment income like dividends, savings income or property rental income, even if you are paying higher rates of tax on these sources. I'm afraid that unless you have earnings from another source, your ability to make pension contributions for tax relief is going to be very limited, meaning your strategy is unlikely to work. The full list of what counts as relevant UK earnings can be found in the Government's pension tax manual. Your question does raise some important points about how pension tax relief works, and the interaction with the personal savings allowance, so I've taken the chance to explain this below and it should help if you do have some earnings after all. The second lever the Government uses to limit the value of tax relief is the annual allowance. This allowance is £60,000 per tax year for most people, and applies to the total gross pension contributions made by or for you across all your pension schemes. So your own payments, the automatic government top-up and any employer contributions. The allowance is lower for people with very high incomes (usually £200,000 plus), or those who have already accessed a pension using a flexible income option, like pension drawdown. How pension tax relief works I've mentioned that schemes like Sipps automatically top up money you pay in personally by 20pc tax relief. So, for every £800 you save, £1,000 in total ends up in the pension pot. But people who pay more than 20pc tax on their earnings can claim more relief by contacting HMRC directly. This includes Scottish taxpayers paying intermediate tax (21pc) and above, and higher-rate (40pc) and additional-rate (45pc) taxpayers in the rest of the UK. The amount of extra tax relief on offer will depend on someone's earnings, and how much falls into those higher rates of tax. As you've pointed out, making a pension contribution and claiming that extra tax relief has the effect of expanding the basic-rate band, bringing all or some earnings out of higher rates of tax. For people earning between £100,000 and £125,140, the tax-free personal allowance is gradually removed, resulting in an effective tax rate of 60pc – or up to 67.5pc in Scotland. It's possible to use pension contributions to reduce taxable income, claw back personal allowance and boost retirement savings, if someone's UK earnings allow. Personal savings allowance You also mentioned the personal savings allowance. If someone can move out of a higher tax band thanks to pension contributions, it can help them get more of their savings interest tax-free. This is because the amount of personal savings allowance someone has depends on your tax rate. Basic-rate taxpayers get a £1,000 allowance, but the allowance is halved to £500 for higher-rate taxpayers and lost completely for those paying additional-rate income tax. How to claim extra tax relief The Government has recently introduced an online service to help claim extra tax relief, which makes things much easier for those who don't usually have to complete a tax return and avoids getting stuck on the telephone to the taxman. People who already complete a tax return will need to include their total gross (personal) pension contributions on the pension pages of their return to claim relief. Most of the above on pension contributions also applies to charity donations made under gift aid, except that pension income received does count as income on which gift aid can be claimed. So, if you don't have UK earnings and still want to reduce your marginal rate of tax, you could consider your favourite charity. I hope this has helped to answer your question, even though it might not be the tax outcome you were hoping for. With best wishes, – Charlene
